I salted the beef 4 hours before starting. The 3 lb piece of beef went into
a Ziplock bag; the air was sucked out thoroughly, and it was placed in a
warm water bath at 140F, first in the microwave on "thaw", and then in the
oven at a low temp, 150F by oven thermometer. The water bath, as far as I
could tell never went above 140F. By plan, I was going to sear the meat
afterwards, rather than before cooking. This can be done either way, the
recipes say.
After three hours, I took the meat out, expecting to sear it. I had a beef
"rock", dry as a bone, and tasteless.
I think one must do this with a very careful attention to an ongoing
temperature just over your final meat temperature. I wanted the meat to cook
to 130F at the center. I couldn't even get my thermometer in to measure it;
it was so hard searing would have been a joke.
In retrospect, I would
1. Sear first at a high temp.
2 Find a way to not ever exceed the planned temperature. Cook at 1
degree over the final temp for many hours, and hold the meat at that temp.
For a final meat temp of 130F, the water temp should have been 131F. That's
far beyond kitchen technology for most of us, for me at least.
As I posted previously, searing an eye of round, and roasting in the oven at
a very low temp, 150F and turning the oven off when the meat temp hit 120F
resulted in excellent results. The meat was moist, with au jus on the plate,
and very tasty, a real poor man's standing rib. I've done this twice with
excellent results. Slice it very thinly.
If any want to try this, here's a very good scientific article on the
subject with recipes. http://amath.colorado.edu/~baldwind/sous-vide.html
Ed
.
Creamed chipped beef on toast as a salvage effort perhaps?
You know, anytime I've ever seen one of the cheftestants on Top Chef
attempt to cook a piece of meat that way it's always been a disaster
too. Maybe it's just not a good way to cook a piece of meat.
Or I was thinking, crock pot.
--
Peace! Om
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
It's about learning to dance in the rain.
-- Anon.
recfood...@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: recfoodrecip...@yahoogroups.com
Ed
Sous vide might be okay for a tough cut of meat, but not eye round.
It's one thing to roast it at a low temp (dry heat) and quite another to
stew it in its own juices at low temp. This is another fad that will
pass.
Cindy
--
C.J. Fuller
Delete the obvious to email me
> People talk about "sous vide" cooking in a crockpot. You'd have to use the
> low temp setting.
>
> Ed
The whole thing sounds like a try at the Darwin Award. When training for a
culinary career, one is taught that food spending time between 38� and 140�
is a shortcut to food poisoning and lawsuits. I frankly think this needs to
be left to the pros for a while yet, because they obviously know more about
this than the resrt of us. You describe deliberately leaving a piece of
meat in that temp range for hours. I think your shoe leather may have saved
your butt this time.
Ed
Ed
Especially an eye of round which isn't much good for anything, IMO.
Well, maybe hash.
N.
What I was thinking.
Eye of round (as well as sirloin) are lean enough to make good steak
tartar. Served raw, it's not tough. It only gets tough when you cook
it, unless it's long slow cooked to tenderize.
Eye of round makes excellent pot roast for instance.
Last time I ruined a hunk of beef tho', pressure cooking it into a stew
salvaged it nicely.
> Apparently high brow steak houses do this routinely, over a 12-24 hour
> period. The steak is then seared at 1700F with an infrared burner, and then
> to the table, as here. http://www.ruthschris.com/Menu/Steaks Hubert Keller,
> of French Laundry fame has just published a cookbook about sous vide.
Minor correction: it's THOMAS Keller of French Laundry fame. The book is
"Under Pressure: Cooking Sous Vide."
Thomas and Hubert are not related.
Now, as to your claim that Ruths Chris does sous vide before grilling,
having eaten there it didn't sound right, I just called our local RC and
no, they do not sous vide a steak before grilling. It was "Huh? Sue
what?" So, I explained the process. Nope. Season and sizzle is about it.
BTW, it's 1800F degrees and not 1700F. But hey, what's 100F between
friends. ;-)
Bob has dabbled a bit with sous vide, but we have been less than
impressed with the results. It does lend itself better to smaller, more
delicate cuts of meat. I would never do eye of round that way.
--Lin
But, but, but, .... it doesn't have any flavor because of the lack of
fat.
N.
> > --
> Apparently high brow steak houses do this routinely, over a 12-24 hour
> period. The steak is then seared at 1700F with an infrared burner, and then
> to the table, as here. http://www.ruthschris.com/Menu/Steaks Hubert Keller,
> of French Laundry fame has just published a cookbook about sous vide.
>
> Ed
It's Thomas Keller. Just because "highbrow steak houses do it" doesn't
mean that the method translates well to a home kitchen. It's a very
rare household that has a 1700� infrared burner. And, as the OP found
out, it can be damn hard to keep the temp of the sous vide at 140�.
Depends on whether or not you know how to cook. <g>
--
Peace! Om
"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."
--Steve Rothstein
recfood...@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: recfoodrecip...@yahoogroups.com
> Sous vide might be okay for a tough cut of meat, but not eye round.
> It's one thing to roast it at a low temp (dry heat) and quite another to
> stew it in its own juices at low temp. This is another fad that will
> pass.
I've found eye of round to be a tough cut of meat. Perhaps I just got a
couple of bad ones. I roasted it to a medium rare, like I would tri
tip. It was *very* chewy. And isn't "stewed in its own juices" just
about like pot roast? That will make the toughest meat tender.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
da...@sonic.net