Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:46:00 -0600, cshenk wrote:
>
> > You need to read the ARTICLE. Sorgham sugar is sold in many names.
> > One of them is sorghum molasses. It is not the same nor was it
> > said to be the same as the regular beet or cane type.
>
> That is exactly what Julie was implying: that since it has "molasses"
> in it's name, it must just be regular sugarcane molasses "That should
> be available at any regular grocery store.".
>
> > Please bother to read the actual post first next time ok?
>
> I did read and UNDERSTAND the post. You go back and read it you
> psycho bitch.
>
> -sw
You did not read the link she added that stated it comes also under the
name of Sorghum Molasses. " This indicates that it is the same thing
as sorghum molasses." Note she is specific to *sorghum* molasses. Not
generic Molasses.
YOU are the only one to claim that which she did NOT say and
specifically her quoted link also is specific that it isnt the same.
Names you can call all you want, you are wrong this time. Julie gets
plenty of flak for being wrong (which she is often). Lets not make it
worse when she is *right* because you mis-read it.
The last refuge when you are flat out wrong apparently is to call me a
psycho bitch eh? Whatever.
--