cooking rice in the fridge?

[sarto...@my-deja.com]

I seem to remember that rice packets used to say that you could cook
rice by putting it in a container with the required amount of water and
leaving it in the fridge overnight. Has anyone tried it and does it
work?

Frank

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

[Goomba]

sarto...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> I seem to remember that rice packets used to say that you could cook
> rice by putting it in a container with the required amount of water and
> leaving it in the fridge overnight. Has anyone tried it and does it
> work?

Any kinda rice that would "cook" that way ain't worth eating in my
estimation. You wouldn't be thinking "minute rice" or something equally
ghastly, would you?
Goomba

[Liz Nyman]

AFAIK, in Australia they have a brand of rice which has on the front
"cook in the fridge". Yes, amazingly, it does work. You pour the boiling
water in, and cover it with cling wrap, and several hours later or the
next day, you have nice fluffy rice.

Liz

sarto...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> I seem to remember that rice packets used to say that you could cook
> rice by putting it in a container with the required amount of water and
> leaving it in the fridge overnight. Has anyone tried it and does it
> work?
>

[Proctor X]

go for it and let the rest of us know.

sarto...@my-deja.com wrote in message <876jn4$bam$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

[Fiona Campbell]

I've never had any success but then I may well be doing something wrong. My
mother said she had cooked rice that way, though never in my living memory.
That doesn't make her a liar, I just don't remember her having done it.

Do you start with cold, warm or hot water?

Foneda

>sarto...@my-deja.com wrote in message <876jn4$bam$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

>>I seem to remember . . . does it work?

[Robb Dabbs]

In article <QNUl4.188$iH5....@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>,
fon...@primus.com.au says...

First off, I've never tried it. What I've read is to pour boiling
water over the rice in a 2:1 ratio. Cover tightly and cool to room
temperature. Then, refrigerate over night.

--
Robb Dabbs

If I lived here, I'd be home now!

[Kate Connally]

That sounds basically the same as Minute Rice.
Kate

Kate Connally
" If I were as old as I feel, I 'd be dead already."
"Liz Nyman" <amemil...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:38971749...@mindspring.com...

> AFAIK, in Australia they have a brand of rice which has on the front
> "cook in the fridge". Yes, amazingly, it does work. You pour the boiling
> water in, and cover it with cling wrap, and several hours later or the
> next day, you have nice fluffy rice.
>
> Liz
>
> sarto...@my-deja.com wrote:
> >

> > I seem to remember that rice packets used to say that you could cook
> > rice by putting it in a container with the required amount of water and

> > leaving it in the fridge overnight. Has anyone tried it and does it

[jenn...@gmail.com]

Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container that will take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.

Jenniw853

[Julie Bove]

<jenn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8c0a05d9-b98a-42f8...@googlegroups.com...

> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container that will
> take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>
> Jenniw853

That makes no sense.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:1pybsmjvd2cis$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:31:14 -0700 (PDT), jenn...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container
>> that will take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>

> This is a refreshing change from the newbie Googlers answering 20
> years old posts out of context. Maybe she's answering a FUTURE post,
> when they invent a GMO rice that cooks in cold water.

That's funny!

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:o61cs44krlh9$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:13:42 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> <jenn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:8c0a05d9-b98a-42f8...@googlegroups.com...
>>> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container that
>>> will
>>> take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>>

>> That makes no sense.
>
> At least she did it in only two sentences rather than 4 or 5
> long-winded rambling paragraphs.
>
> Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
> you're divorced. Now that you don't have to share a bed (and
> bedroom?) with that prick you're finally getting to sleep at a
> reasonable hour?

Who I share my bed with is none of your business! I will say that there will
be three of us later on. I'll just leave you wondering about that.

[Janet]

In article <o61cs44krlh9$.d...@sqwertz.com>, swe...@cluemail.compost
says...

>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:13:42 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>

> > <jenn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:8c0a05d9-b98a-42f8...@googlegroups.com...
> >> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container that will
> >> take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
> >

> > That makes no sense.
>
> At least she did it in only two sentences rather than 4 or 5
> long-winded rambling paragraphs.
>
> Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
> you're divorced. Now that you don't have to share a bed (and
> bedroom?) with that prick

She didn't.

Julie and Angela shared a bedroom.

Janet UK

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[Janet]

In article <pb4inc$hc9$1...@dont-email.me>, juli...@frontier.com says...

I was just checking out future-google to follow Miss Julie's
passionate courtship of Kuthe. Sheldon caters the wedding reception,
Gary is best man, Bruce is a bridesmaid, Wayne is godfather to the
triplets.

No more spoilers but here's a tip; you'll need a proper newsreader to
see the sexy bits.

[Gary]

Julie Bove wrote:
>
> Who I share my bed with is none of your business! I will say that there will
> be three of us later on. I'll just leave you wondering about that.

Eh-oh! You probably shouldn't have said that here, Julie!
Easy guess is that gardener and friend will be moving
in from back house to main house soon.

If you're happy though, so be it. :)

[Gary]

Janet wrote:

>
> swertz wrote:
> > Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
> > you're divorced. Now that you don't have to share a bed (and
> > bedroom?) with that prick
>
> She didn't.
> Julie and Angela shared a bedroom.

I remember that. Husband had his own separate bedroom.
He also sounded like a worthless tyrant too so seems to me
Julie is much better off without him.

Divorce is never fun but sometimes some end up in a better
situation. Julie seems to be handling all this quite fine. Bet
the husband will never find some other woman that will wait on
him hand and foot like Julie did.

[jmcquown]

The husband may not find someone but her gardener sure did!

Jill

[col...@gmail.com]

Cooking it in the fridge may remove the arsenic that most rice eaters want.

[Gary]

col...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Cooking it in the fridge may remove the arsenic that most rice eaters want.

That wouldn't eliminate arsenic.

[Default User]

Sqwertz wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:31:14 -0700 (PDT), jenn...@gmail.com wrote:
>

> > Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container
> > that will take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>

> This is a refreshing change from the newbie Googlers answering 20
> years old posts out of context. Maybe she's answering a FUTURE post,
> when they invent a GMO rice that cooks in cold water.

They were talking about this on alt.usage.english. I think someone said
it had to do with a Google Groups app that doesn't quote by default.
Regular GG through a web browser does.

But the old thread thing is weird, and suddenly happening a lot. It was
always a bit of a problem. I don't know if the app is finding
"relevant" threads or something and presenting them to the users or
what.


Brian

[dsi1]

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 8:56:39 AM UTC-10, Default User wrote:
>
> They were talking about this on alt.usage.english. I think someone said
> it had to do with a Google Groups app that doesn't quote by default.
> Regular GG through a web browser does.
>
> But the old thread thing is weird, and suddenly happening a lot. It was
> always a bit of a problem. I don't know if the app is finding
> "relevant" threads or something and presenting them to the users or
> what.
>
>
> Brian

It's not possible to auto quote in Google Groups mobile interface. That's a serious problem and makes posting from a mobile device impractical. I don't see the connection myself.

Mostly, people on newgroups just get upset whenever they see a post not in the format they expect. I suspect it's a personality defect and these folks simply have a hard time living in this new age.

Why these really old post appear is kind of a mystery. Your best bet is to study the folks that post them. Typically, they'll make a single post on a topic and disappear. My assumption is that it's some kind of research project on how people react to this situation. Perhaps these things are being posted by the Russians or Chinese i.e., the commies.

[Nellie]

Thanks for this explanation. I wondered why Google groups is to blame. I use GG and never see old threads.

Nellie

[Nellie]

It's not possible to auto quote in Google Groups mobile interface. That's a serious problem and makes posting from a mobile device impractical. I don't see the connection myself.

Mostly, people on newgroups just get upset whenever they see a post not in the format they expect. I suspect it's a personality defect and these folks simply have a hard time living in this new age.

Why these really old post appear is kind of a mystery. Your best bet is to study the folks that post them. Typically, they'll make a single post on a topic and disappear. My assumption is that it's some kind of research project on how people react to this situation. Perhaps these things are being posted by the Russians or Chinese i.e., the commies.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Very true. I don't use my laptop much anymore, maybe once a week. I like my laptop a lot, but I like my phone more.

When I want to post something here, I copy and paste what I am answering. It's not that hard to do, but as dsi1 said, it makes it impractical if you want to do a lot of posting.

Nellie

[Default User]

dsi1 wrote:

> It's not possible to auto quote in Google Groups mobile interface.
> That's a serious problem and makes posting from a mobile device
> impractical. I don't see the connection myself.

I haven't tried it, but something along those lines is happening.

> Mostly, people on newgroups just get upset whenever they see a post
> not in the format they expect. I suspect it's a personality defect
> and these folks simply have a hard time living in this new age.

Well, I disagree with that. Most of the conventions are there for a
good reason, not just tradition. Things like this make it difficult to
figure out what the person is trying to say.

> Why these really old post appear is kind of a mystery. Your best bet
> is to study the folks that post them. Typically, they'll make a
> single post on a topic and disappear. My assumption is that it's some
> kind of research project on how people react to this situation.
> Perhaps these things are being posted by the Russians or Chinese
> i.e., the commies.

People on AUE claim it's people using GG and with Gmail addresses.
Possibly some service for people logged into Google. I have such an
account, and used Google Groups occasionally over the past few years
when I wasn't really reading usenet. I don't recall seeing anything.



Brian

[Bruce]

dsi1 doesn't understand the basics of Usenet.

[Wayne Boatwright]

On Tue 17 Apr 2018 06:13:43a, Janet told us...

LOL

--

~~ If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. ~~

~~ A mind is a terrible thing to lose. ~~

**********************************************************

Wayne Boatwright

[Default User]

Nellie wrote:

> They were talking about this on alt.usage.english. I think someone
> said it had to do with a Google Groups app that doesn't quote by
> default. Regular GG through a web browser does.

> Thanks for this explanation. I wondered why Google groups is to
> blame. I use GG and never see old threads.

Are you using the app? I notice that while you did include quoted
material, it doesn't have quote indicators (> or the like) or an
attribution line. Did you copy/paste that?

Not complaining at you, just trying to work out the nuances.



Brian

[Default User]

Nellie wrote:

> When I want to post something here, I copy and paste what I am
> answering. It's not that hard to do, but as dsi1 said, it makes it
> impractical if you want to do a lot of posting.

That answers the question I posting in reply elsewhere. Can't you use a
web browser and the regular GG interface? That would make your posts
look better.



Brian

[Bruce]

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:13:43 +0100, Janet <nob...@home.com> wrote:

>In article <pb4inc$hc9$1...@dont-email.me>, juli...@frontier.com says...
>>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:1pybsmjvd2cis$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>> > On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:31:14 -0700 (PDT), jenn...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container
>> >> that will take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>> >
>> > This is a refreshing change from the newbie Googlers answering 20
>> > years old posts out of context. Maybe she's answering a FUTURE post,
>> > when they invent a GMO rice that cooks in cold water.
>>
>> That's funny!
>
> I was just checking out future-google to follow Miss Julie's
>passionate courtship of Kuthe. Sheldon caters the wedding reception,
>Gary is best man, Bruce is a bridesmaid, Wayne is godfather to the
>triplets.

I hope I don't catch the flowers by mistake.

[Bruce]

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:37:50 -0700, "Julie Bove"
<juli...@frontier.com> wrote:

>
>"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>news:o61cs44krlh9$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>

>> Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
>> you're divorced. Now that you don't have to share a bed (and
>> bedroom?) with that prick you're finally getting to sleep at a
>> reasonable hour?
>
>Who I share my bed with is none of your business! I will say that there will
>be three of us later on. I'll just leave you wondering about that.

Good one. The bully sharks will have a feeding frenzy with that
tidbit.

[Bruce]

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:04:50 -0700 (PDT), col...@gmail.com wrote:

>Cooking it in the fridge may remove the arsenic that most rice eaters want.

Why would rice eaters want arsenic?

[Bruce]

Also: how do you cook rice in the fridge? It sounds
counter-productive.

[dsi1]

This is the age of the mobile device. Usenet and everything else will change to accommodate that reality. This group will change too but it will go like some Chinese guy on a United airlines flight i.e., kicking and screaming.

The gmail accounts are being created solely for the purpose of posting old threads in a very limited way. Google Groups are being used for these type of posts because of its post retention goes way, way, back. I'm using Google Groups and can see the entire thread. It's kind of interesting to see these old posts.

[dsi1]

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 11:00:03 AM UTC-10, Default User wrote:
>
> That answers the question I posting in reply elsewhere. Can't you use a
> web browser and the regular GG interface? That would make your posts
> look better.
>
>
>
> Brian

When I see a post like that, it doesn't cause me to fret because I know what kind of interface they're using and what kind of device they're using to post. Knowledge is power. Where people can only see a problem, I see the why and how. Understanding is calming.

[Julie Bove]

"Gary" <g.ma...@att.net> wrote in message news:5AD5F986...@att.net...

Meow!

[Julie Bove]

"Gary" <g.ma...@att.net> wrote in message news:5AD5FA59...@att.net...

He is trying but I'll bet she will be back here soon enough.

[Default User]

dsi1 wrote:

> The gmail accounts are being created solely for the purpose of
> posting old threads in a very limited way. Google Groups are being
> used for these type of posts because of its post retention goes way,
> way, back. I'm using Google Groups and can see the entire thread.
> It's kind of interesting to see these old posts.

Sure, you can see them, but you have to find them first. If you just
access the group through the main GG interface, it's going to show
threads in update order. Normally you need to search to find an old.

But you can find really old stuff. I have located in the past my first
message. Properly, to alt.test, of course.



Brian

[dsi1]

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:35:28 PM UTC-10, Default User wrote:
>
> Sure, you can see them, but you have to find them first. If you just
> access the group through the main GG interface, it's going to show
> threads in update order. Normally you need to search to find an old.
>
> But you can find really old stuff. I have located in the past my first
> message. Properly, to alt.test, of course.
>
>
>
> Brian

I don't typically go looking for old posts although they are easy enough to find. Just enter keywords and sort by date. However, I'm talking about random responses to really old posts. I can see the whole thread. I think that's pretty special...

[Bruce]

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:58:47 -0500, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost>
wrote:

>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:37:50 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:o61cs44krlh9$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:13:42 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>
>>> At least she did it in only two sentences rather than 4 or 5
>>> long-winded rambling paragraphs.

>>>
>>> Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
>>> you're divorced. Now that you don't have to share a bed (and

>>> bedroom?) with that prick you're finally getting to sleep at a
>>> reasonable hour?
>>

>> Who I share my bed with is none of your business! I will say that there will
>> be three of us later on. I'll just leave you wondering about that.
>

>Always instigating the gossip, you whore.

I wonder how this punk copes on Facebook.

[Sqwertz]

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:30:14 -0000 (UTC), Default User wrote:

> dsi1 wrote:
>

>> Why these really old post appear is kind of a mystery. Your best bet
>> is to study the folks that post them. Typically, they'll make a
>> single post on a topic and disappear. My assumption is that it's some
>> kind of research project on how people react to this situation.
>> Perhaps these things are being posted by the Russians or Chinese
>> i.e., the commies.
>
> People on AUE claim it's people using GG and with Gmail addresses.
> Possibly some service for people logged into Google. I have such an
> account, and used Google Groups occasionally over the past few years
> when I wasn't really reading usenet. I don't recall seeing anything.

Theres a simple answer for this. Google Groups posts show up in
regular Google search results. They click on that and they are taken
to the Google Groups web interface. If they are logged into Google at
the time it gives a Reply: box to type in their hare-brained comments.
Google makes it easy to be an idiot.

Type "cooking rice in the fridge" into google and see what you get -
first hit is the OP in this thread.

This is also why they don't revisit the thread or group. It's just a
drive-by posting.

-sw

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:1d3b48o5...@sqwertz.com...

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:37:50 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:o61cs44krlh9$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:13:42 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>

>>>> <jenn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:8c0a05d9-b98a-42f8...@googlegroups.com...

>>>>> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container that
>>>>> will
>>>>> take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>>>>

>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>
>>> At least she did it in only two sentences rather than 4 or 5
>>> long-winded rambling paragraphs.
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
>>> you're divorced. Now that you don't have to share a bed (and
>>> bedroom?) with that prick you're finally getting to sleep at a
>>> reasonable hour?
>>
>> Who I share my bed with is none of your business! I will say that there
>> will
>> be three of us later on. I'll just leave you wondering about that.
>

> Always instigating the gossip, you whore. You're sleeping with the
> gardener and his wife who won't pay you any rent even after they move
> in. Boy, they sure you pegged as a gullible, hare-brained sucker.

You just wish, squirty! Try one small mammal with black fur and a slightly
larger white Tortie. Meow! I'll have to ask the gardener about this wife of
which you speak. As of yesterday he wasn't married.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:rkx9or76...@sqwertz.com...
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:01:56 +0100, Janet wrote:
>
>> In article <o61cs44krlh9$.d...@sqwertz.com>, swe...@cluemail.compost
>> says...

>>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:13:42 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>>> <jenn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:8c0a05d9-b98a-42f8...@googlegroups.com...
>>>>> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container that
>>>>> will
>>>>> take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>>>>
>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>
>>> At least she did it in only two sentences rather than 4 or 5
>>> long-winded rambling paragraphs.
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
>>> you're divorced. Now that you don't have to share a bed (and
>>> bedroom?) with that prick
>>

>> She didn't.
>>
>> Julie and Angela shared a bedroom.
>>

>> Janet UK
>
> I totally expected that she didn't share a bedroom with her husband.
> Their third bedroom must be reserved for the indoor grow operation of
> the wacky weed that she smokes to help keep her supposedly "normal".

Nopies. Wacky weed is legal here but the only kind I am familiar with
growing is the sativa and that doesn't do so well indoors.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:4dewo8i6vo14$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:54:58 -0400, jmcquown wrote:

>
>> On 4/17/2018 9:44 AM, Gary wrote:
>>
>>> Divorce is never fun but sometimes some end up in a better
>>> situation. Julie seems to be handling all this quite fine. Bet
>>> the husband will never find some other woman that will wait on
>>> him hand and foot like Julie did.
>>>

>> The husband may not find someone but her gardener sure did!
>
> I really can't see Julie actively having or desiring sex. This is the
> same woman who can't cut watermelon because it makes a mess.
> Everything about her says she does not have sex or masturbate.

That's funny! Keep dreaming Stevie!

[Julie Bove]

"Bruce" <Br...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:rbhddd5tro9gut05f...@4ax.com...

Dunno. I do quite well on there myself.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:118tx8gi...@sqwertz.com...
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:13:43 +0100, Janet wrote:
>
>> In article <pb4inc$hc9$1...@dont-email.me>, juli...@frontier.com says...

>>>
>>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

>>> news:1pybsmjvd2cis$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:31:14 -0700 (PDT), jenn...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container
>>>>> that will take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>>>>

>>>> This is a refreshing change from the newbie Googlers answering 20
>>>> years old posts out of context. Maybe she's answering a FUTURE post,
>>>> when they invent a GMO rice that cooks in cold water.
>>>
>>> That's funny!
>>
>> I was just checking out future-google to follow Miss Julie's
>> passionate courtship of Kuthe. Sheldon caters the wedding reception,
>> Gary is best man, Bruce is a bridesmaid, Wayne is godfather to the
>> triplets.
>

> I see it. It's no surprise that the menu was kasha varnishkes with
> vodka and diet 7-up. Look a week past that at the wedding
> announcements - Sheldon married her gardener. The wedding was held in
> Sheldon's barn and they drove off in Sheldon's tractor (to spend their
> honeymoon at his house).

Heavens no. My gardener doesn't swing that way.

[jmcquown]

On 4/18/2018 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:54:58 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/2018 9:44 AM, Gary wrote:
>>
>>> Divorce is never fun but sometimes some end up in a better
>>> situation. Julie seems to be handling all this quite fine. Bet
>>> the husband will never find some other woman that will wait on
>>> him hand and foot like Julie did.
>>>
>> The husband may not find someone but her gardener sure did!
>
> I really can't see Julie actively having or desiring sex.

> (snipped)
> -sw
>

Who said anything about sex? I was referring to Gary's comment about
her ex-husband not finding someone who will wait on him hand and foot.

Jill

[tert in seattle]

Steve seems to be practicing his creative writing here again

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:xdnfu6a1up2z$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:02:03 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

>> news:1d3b48o5...@sqwertz.com...

>>>
>>> Always instigating the gossip, you whore. You're sleeping with the
>>> gardener and his wife who won't pay you any rent even after they move
>>> in. Boy, they sure you pegged as a gullible, hare-brained sucker.
>>
>> You just wish, squirty! Try one small mammal with black fur and a
>> slightly
>> larger white Tortie. Meow! I'll have to ask the gardener about this wife
>> of
>> which you speak. As of yesterday he wasn't married.
>

> So there you go again - you instigated their divorce, too. Nice
> going, whore.

Hahaha. You are soooo funny! The only one of my gardeners that was married
is Carlos. AFAIK he's still married. Just no longer my gardener.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:fyyy9jup...@sqwertz.com...

> When you said, ".... but her gardener sure did" you're implying that
> he's her new husband and in the context that he is presumably moving
> in with her (he's already living in the back yard). Is it really that
> hard to extrapolate what I said from all this context? Sheesh - you
> and terd.

Dear Lard! The tales you tell. I have birds, squirrels and at least one
raccoon living in the backyard as well as smaller things like bugs, worms
and slugs. I have no husband and don't ever plan on having another. Making
someone's dinner is hardly waiting on them hand and foot. Sheesh.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:53xt3613i1x8$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:04:01 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:rkx9or76...@sqwertz.com...
>>

>>> I totally expected that she didn't share a bedroom with her husband.
>>> Their third bedroom must be reserved for the indoor grow operation of
>>> the wacky weed that she smokes to help keep her supposedly "normal".
>>
>> Nopies. Wacky weed is legal here but the only kind I am familiar with
>> growing is the sativa and that doesn't do so well indoors.
>

> It still a lot cheaper to grow your own. And the cannabis sativa
> strains do best when grown indoors ion most climates. It's no
> surprise it didn't work well for you.

I never tried growing it. I did look it up. I think Indica grows best here.
I do know people who use that. I'm not going to grow it though. We have a
very nice weed shop near here. Best in the area.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:8r30lfc9q77j$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:09:43 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:118tx8gi...@sqwertz.com...
>>

>>> I see it. It's no surprise that the menu was kasha varnishkes with
>>> vodka and diet 7-up. Look a week past that at the wedding
>>> announcements - Sheldon married her gardener. The wedding was held in
>>> Sheldon's barn and they drove off in Sheldon's tractor (to spend their
>>> honeymoon at his house).
>>
>> Heavens no. My gardener doesn't swing that way.
>

> <sigh> I guess ironic humor is way over your head, eh?
>
> So you have that intimate knowledge of him, eh? We can read the
> writing on the wall, Julie. he doesn't have to beat around your bush.

You're assuming that I have a bush. And you know what happens when you
assume!

[jmcquown]

On 4/17/2018 6:37 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

> news:o61cs44krlh9$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:13:42 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>

>>> <jenn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8c0a05d9-b98a-42f8...@googlegroups.com...

>>>> Have done this myself regularly. It works. Better in a container
>>>> that will
>>>> take boiling water and also has a lid for best results.
>>>

>>> That makes no sense.
>>
>> At least she did it in only two sentences rather than 4 or 5
>> long-winded rambling paragraphs.
>>
>> Speaking of which, we don't get your usual does of 5:AM posts now that
>> you're divorced.  Now that you don't have to share a bed (and
>> bedroom?) with that prick you're finally getting to sleep at a
>> reasonable hour?
>
> Who I share my bed with is none of your business! I will say that there
> will be three of us later on. I'll just leave you wondering about that.

Even I could guess you were talking about cats. I do hope you've
repaired the window screen so a raccoon can't break in and take one of them.

Jill

[Julie Bove]

"jmcquown" <j_mc...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:St2CC.2524$mD....@fx31.iad...

Mr. Handyman took care of that years ago.

[Hank Rogers]

If you cover that thing up, or maybe spray it with some febreeze, it
might not attract them coons and possums. They have a keen sense of smell.

[Bruce]

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 23:51:31 -0500, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost>
wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 01:31:20 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:8r30lfc9q77j$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:09:43 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>>> Heavens no. My gardener doesn't swing that way.
>>>
>>> <sigh> I guess ironic humor is way over your head, eh?
>>>
>>> So you have that intimate knowledge of him, eh? We can read the
>>> writing on the wall, Julie. he doesn't have to beat around your bush.
>>
>> You're assuming that I have a bush. And you know what happens when you
>> assume!
>

>Wow, this is getting *really* lame. You've gotta be the most boring
>person to converse with in any situation.

In that case, why don't you stop and eat something? There's always
room for more.

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:1je8xii6potoq$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 01:31:20 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:8r30lfc9q77j$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:09:43 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>>>> news:118tx8gi...@sqwertz.com...
>>>>
>>>>> I see it. It's no surprise that the menu was kasha varnishkes with
>>>>> vodka and diet 7-up. Look a week past that at the wedding
>>>>> announcements - Sheldon married her gardener. The wedding was held in
>>>>> Sheldon's barn and they drove off in Sheldon's tractor (to spend their
>>>>> honeymoon at his house).
>>>>
>>>> Heavens no. My gardener doesn't swing that way.
>>>
>>> <sigh> I guess ironic humor is way over your head, eh?
>>>
>>> So you have that intimate knowledge of him, eh? We can read the
>>> writing on the wall, Julie. he doesn't have to beat around your bush.
>>
>> You're assuming that I have a bush. And you know what happens when you
>> assume!
>

> Wow, this is getting *really* lame. You've gotta be the most boring
> person to converse with in any situation.

Aw... Poor Steve.

*Offers Steve celery rib stuffed with hummus*

Look! Beans! What could be better!

[Julie Bove]

"Bruce" <Br...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message

news:41vidd9r90j7jrn5k...@4ax.com...

I just gave him a celery rib with hummus. Would you like one too? I didn't
make the hummus. It's Kirkland, Organic.

[Julie Bove]

"Hank Rogers" <nos...@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:pbbdlq$fe8$1...@gioia.aioe.org...

Cover *what* thing up?

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:16ud6xjcky3pl$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 01:29:38 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

>> news:53xt3613i1x8$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

>>
>>> It still a lot cheaper to grow your own. And the cannabis sativa
>>> strains do best when grown indoors ion most climates. It's no
>>> surprise it didn't work well for you.
>>
>> I never tried growing it. I did look it up. I think Indica grows best
>> here.
>> I do know people who use that. I'm not going to grow it though. We have a
>> very nice weed shop near here. Best in the area.
>

> Julie the pothead. That explains a lot.

The last time I had any was late 70's or maybe early 80's. That stuff never
did a thing for me except to give me the munchies. That's the last thing I
need.

[Bruce]

I like hummus. I use it as butter and we make our own on a good day.

[Dave Smith]

I don't know why anyone would buy hummus. It is cheap and easy to make,
and it always tastes better than the commercial stuff.

[Gary]

Dave Smith wrote:
>
> I don't know why anyone would buy hummus. It is cheap and easy to make,
> and it always tastes better than the commercial stuff.

I tried commercial hummus once. From Trader Joe's. It was highly
recommended from someone here. Nasty stuff and a waste of money.

Also recommended here once was their "Triple ginger snaps" with
the tiny dollup of candied ginger on top. Good enough but still
not all that and overpriced. I still use that old container for
my cookie jar now though.

Been to Trader Joe's twice and 2 strikes. Probably won't ever go
again.
Never been to Whole Foods either but I won't comment until I do
try it.

[Cheri]

"Gary" <g.ma...@att.net> wrote in message news:5ADA2B43...@att.net...

> Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>> I don't know why anyone would buy hummus. It is cheap and easy to make,
>> and it always tastes better than the commercial stuff.
>
> I tried commercial hummus once. From Trader Joe's. It was highly
> recommended from someone here. Nasty stuff and a waste of money.

I've never found a commerical hummus that tasted good, and as pointed out,
very easy to make.

Cheri

[Bruce]

I prefer home made too, but I'm a very busy man :)

[Dave Smith]

On 2018-04-20 2:57 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "Gary" <g.ma...@att.net> wrote in message

>> I tried commercial hummus once. From Trader Joe's. It was highly
>> recommended from someone here. Nasty stuff and a waste of money.
>
>
> I've never found a commerical hummus that tasted good, and as pointed
> out, very easy to make.

I have had a couple commercially made hummus products recently that
weren't too bad, but more often they were horrible. I remember once
being offered a sample in the grocery store and it was so horrible that
I had to wonder why they would be letting people know how bad it was
because I could not imagine people buy it after having eaten a sample.

I discovered good hummus in a middle eastern restaurant that my son took
me to. After see how good it could be I decided to try making it. It was
so easy, and it was so good.

[Dave Smith]

In the time you took to read that and post a reply you could have
made a batch.

[Bruce]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:22:19 -0400, Dave Smith

You must read and type extremely slowly.

[Dave Smith]

No. I just assumed that you do.
>

[Bruce]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:09:12 -0400, Dave Smith

I think it would take me 10 minutes to make hummus. And then 5 to
clean up. It's very doable, but I still don't always get around to it.

[cshenk]

I bought a small container and liked it, so learned to make it.

[cshenk]

I went to TJ's twice. Second trip was 2 too many.

Whole foods is a yes for me though. It's due to only 2 main things
that has me driver there.

1) unique flours for bread making at the least expensive price
2) fancy ends of various cheeses you don't see elsewhere, cut to small
affordable taste tests.

If i am there for those things, I will also get some of the fresh
veggies and fruits

[Bruce]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:31:21 -0500, "cshenk" <csh...@cox.net> wrote:

>Gary wrote:
>
>> Dave Smith wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't know why anyone would buy hummus. It is cheap and easy to
>> > make, and it always tastes better than the commercial stuff.
>>
>> I tried commercial hummus once. From Trader Joe's. It was highly
>> recommended from someone here. Nasty stuff and a waste of money.
>>
>> Also recommended here once was their "Triple ginger snaps" with
>> the tiny dollup of candied ginger on top. Good enough but still
>> not all that and overpriced. I still use that old container for
>> my cookie jar now though.
>>
>> Been to Trader Joe's twice and 2 strikes. Probably won't ever go
>> again.
>> Never been to Whole Foods either but I won't comment until I do
>> try it.
>
>I went to TJ's twice. Second trip was 2 too many.

lol

[Dave Smith]

On 2018-04-20 7:27 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> I don't know why anyone would buy hummus. It is cheap and easy to
>> make, and it always tastes better than the commercial stuff.
>
> I bought a small container and liked it, so learned to make it.

You probably saved a bundle, and ended up with much better hummus.

[Wayne Boatwright]

On Fri 20 Apr 2018 02:59:24p, Dave Smith told us...

It's so easy to make from scratch at home, why buy iit?

--

~~ If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it. ~~

~~ A mind is a terrible thing to lose. ~~

**********************************************************

Wayne Boatwright

[Doris Night]

And it's so cheap to make it yourself.

There's a little "gourmet" place near me that sells a home-made type
hummus in 250 ml (1 cup) tubs. I say home-made because the lid has a
label that looks like it was done up on someone's home printer.

Anyway, it's all natural, vegan, organic, etc, justifying the $5 they
want for it.

Doris

[Hank Rogers]

But are you sure the beans were free range vegetables?
And were they certified non gmo?
Did the farm hands that harvest them smoke? That's a real killer for
special foods.
Did the various gods bless the humus after packaging?

[Julie Bove]

"Bruce" <Br...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message

news:7p7jdd5ukl3r8go6l...@4ax.com...

Nice.

[Julie Bove]

"Dave Smith" <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:jvmCC.7692$w94....@fx43.iad...

For me, it's something I eat when I need something quick and/or grab and go.
I get the little cups.

My mom made some once. Not sure what she did wrong but it was inedible.

[Julie Bove]

"Gary" <g.ma...@att.net> wrote in message news:5ADA2B43...@att.net...

I made TJ's polenta for dinner tonight. It tasted fine but seemed oddly more
filling than the kind I usually buy.

[Julie Bove]

"Cheri" <che...@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:pbdd6...@news2.newsguy.com...

If you have the ingredients perhaps. Tahini is pretty expensive and I don't
want to store it. I don't eat hummus often so when I want it, I buy it. Just
not the Sabra. That's disgusting.
>

[Julie Bove]

"Bruce" <Br...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message

news:moqkdddn43qbssus2...@4ax.com...

Yeah. Takes me awhile to find all of the ingredients!

[Julie Bove]

"Dave Smith" <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message

news:bUuCC.4496$1a5....@fx09.iad...

Like hummus is expensive!

[Julie Bove]

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

news:1qjbtfc6kcx86$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:55:37 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:16ud6xjcky3pl$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 01:29:38 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>>>> news:53xt3613i1x8$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>>>
>>>>> It still a lot cheaper to grow your own. And the cannabis sativa
>>>>> strains do best when grown indoors ion most climates. It's no
>>>>> surprise it didn't work well for you.
>>>>
>>>> I never tried growing it. I did look it up. I think Indica grows best
>>>> here.
>>>> I do know people who use that. I'm not going to grow it though. We have
>>>> a
>>>> very nice weed shop near here. Best in the area.
>>>
>>> Julie the pothead. That explains a lot.
>>
>> The last time I had any was late 70's or maybe early 80's. That stuff
>> never
>> did a thing for me except to give me the munchies. That's the last thing
>> I
>> need.
>

> There you go again - implying something to get somebody to respond,
> and then denying it. That's just one of your pathetic MO's that
> you've used a half dozen times in this thread already.

I'm denying what you said, yeah. I'd say that most adults smoked it at least
once during the time frame that I mentioned. Smoking it a few times doesn't
make you a pothead.

[Bruze]

It's not and I've never bought bad hummus yet. I prefer to make my
own, but sometimes life gets in the way. I might not have time to make
it, because I have to reply to Cshenkie or Dave Smith, for instance.

[Cindy Hamilton]

Because I have better things to do.

We have a large Middle Eastern population hereabouts, and some of the
commercial hummus is quite good.

Cindy Hamilton

[cshenk]

Yes, but first i just wanted to try it when all the buzz started.

Now I make all sorts of variations that suit us well. Some may not
technically be Hummus? Can lentils be hummus? If so then that's what
I have making up right now. Out a lb on to simmer with tandoori
seasoning (suits us).

Go a bit more to the fancier side and it would be Dal.

[cshenk]

Morfed again just to avoid the holes you've dug for yourself eh?

[cshenk]

Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Fri 20 Apr 2018 02:59:24p, Dave Smith told us...
>
> > On 2018-04-20 2:57 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >> "Gary" <g.ma...@att.net> wrote in message
> >
> >>> I tried commercial hummus once. From Trader Joe's. It was highly
> >>> recommended from someone here. Nasty stuff and a waste of money.
> >>
> >>
> >> I've never found a commerical hummus that tasted good, and as
> >> pointed out, very easy to make.
> >
> > I have had a couple commercially made hummus products recently
> > that weren't too bad, but more often they were horrible. I
> > remember once being offered a sample in the grocery store and it
> > was so horrible that I had to wonder why they would be letting
> > people know how bad it was because I could not imagine people buy
> > it after having eaten a sample.
> >
> > I discovered good hummus in a middle eastern restaurant that my
> > son took me to. After see how good it could be I decided to try
> > making it. It was so easy, and it was so good.
> >
> >
>
> It's so easy to make from scratch at home, why buy iit?

Well in my case, I got a small tub to see if I would like it. I did
then I looked up recipes and started making it. That was probably 5
years ago and have a fair number of variations now that we like.

Since we make beans from dried all the time here, it's a natural leap
to sift out some and toss in the old blender to pulse lightly.

[cshenk]

Tahini is just roasted sesame seeds and olive oil, tossed in the
blender then you add the beans. Not all hummus types use tahini.

[Cindy Hamilton]

On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 12:59:31 PM UTC-4, cshenk wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
> > On 2018-04-20 7:27 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > > > I don't know why anyone would buy hummus. It is cheap and easy to
> > > > make, and it always tastes better than the commercial stuff.
> > >
> > > I bought a small container and liked it, so learned to make it.
> >
> >
> > You probably saved a bundle, and ended up with much better hummus.
>
> Yes, but first i just wanted to try it when all the buzz started.
>
> Now I make all sorts of variations that suit us well. Some may not
> technically be Hummus? Can lentils be hummus?

Technically, no, because "hummus" is the word for "chickpeas". The
full name of the dish is "hummus bi tahini". Chickpeas with tahini.

> If so then that's what
> I have making up right now. Out a lb on to simmer with tandoori
> seasoning (suits us).
>
> Go a bit more to the fancier side and it would be Dal.

Sound like dal to me.

Cindy Hamilton

[Cheri]

"cshenk" <csh...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:QvCdnd-8W_rQ80bH...@giganews.com...

Troll behavior.

Cheri

[Gary]

Sqwertz wrote:

> You imply, and then you deny. Just like you imply you're fucking your
> gardener with those innuendoes, then deny it.
>
> Anyway, I'm done here. You can masturbate yourself from now on.
>
> -sw

What would RFC Facebook say about this?
Steve is wasting valuable mirror time
by insulting every one here.
Serious insecurity issues I suspect.

[Bruze]

On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 10:38:23 -0700, "Cheri" <che...@newsguy.com>
wrote:

When people killfile me and then bitch about me, I'll change my name
so I can say something back. Otherwise I'll stay Bruce.

[Gary]

Sqwertz wrote:

>
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:44:41 -0400, Gary wrote:
> > What would RFC Facebook say about this?
> > Steve is wasting valuable mirror time
> > by insulting every one here.
> > Serious insecurity issues I suspect.
>

> I don't know, what would they say? Why don't you go over and ask
> them, you trolling pussy.

All operator's standing by, eh? :)

[cshenk]

Yes, and I'm tired of the sexual harassment. He just tried to define
it as a term of 'endearment' as if that makes it ok after I have told
him to cease for many months. It's not 'endearing' at all. It is
sexual harassment at this stage.

He's killfile material because neither I, nor anyone else has to put up
with that in their lives. It's just wrong.

[Brouce]

Lol, you wish! I wouldn't sexually harass you if you begged me to.

>He's killfile material because neither I, nor anyone else has to put up
>with that in their lives. It's just wrong.

And do people have to put up with "Now begone you pestulant bit of
pus"? Or is that "just wrong"?

[Dave Smith]

On 2018-04-21 2:53 PM, Bruze wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 10:38:23 -0700, "Cheri" <che...@newsguy.com>

>>> Morfed again just to avoid the holes you've dug for yourself eh?
>>
>>
>> Troll behavior.
>
> When people killfile me and then bitch about me, I'll change my name
> so I can say something back. Otherwise I'll stay Bruce.

Heaven forbid you change the behaviour that makes people filter you. I
have said before and will say again that changing your user name to get
past filters is a matter of throwing in the towel and admitting that you
are an asshole.

[Brouce]

On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:07:36 -0400, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2018-04-21 2:53 PM, Bruze wrote:

>> When people killfile me and then bitch about me, I'll change my name
>> so I can say something back. Otherwise I'll stay Bruce.
>
>Heaven forbid you change the behaviour that makes people filter you.

The ones who filter me are pompous people who take themselves too
seriously. They should change their behaviour, not me :)

>I
>have said before and will say again that changing your user name to get
>past filters is a matter of throwing in the towel and admitting that you
>are an asshole.

People who call other people names, should also change their
behaviour.

[Dave Smith]

On 2018-04-21 7:28 PM, Brouce wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:07:36 -0400, Dave Smith
> <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-04-21 2:53 PM, Bruze wrote:
>
>>> When people killfile me and then bitch about me, I'll change my name
>>> so I can say something back. Otherwise I'll stay Bruce.
>>
>> Heaven forbid you change the behaviour that makes people filter you.
>
> The ones who filter me are pompous people who take themselves too
> seriously. They should change their behaviour, not me :)

It would appear otherwise, and you are the one who insists on being heard.

>
>> I
>> have said before and will say again that changing your user name to get
>> past filters is a matter of throwing in the towel and admitting that you
>> are an asshole.
>
> People who call other people names, should also change their
> behaviour.

Did someone call you a name? Oh.... you saw yourself in that descriptor?

[Bruce]

On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 20:11:25 -0400, Dave Smith

<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2018-04-21 7:28 PM, Brouce wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:07:36 -0400, Dave Smith
>> <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-04-21 2:53 PM, Bruze wrote:
>>
>>>> When people killfile me and then bitch about me, I'll change my name
>>>> so I can say something back. Otherwise I'll stay Bruce.
>>>
>>> Heaven forbid you change the behaviour that makes people filter you.
>>
>> The ones who filter me are pompous people who take themselves too
>> seriously. They should change their behaviour, not me :)
>
>
>It would appear otherwise, and you are the one who insists on being heard.

Only when they bitch about me. Otherwise, I accept that they felt the
need to killfile me :)

>>> have said before and will say again that changing your user name to get
>>> past filters is a matter of throwing in the towel and admitting that you
>>> are an asshole.
>>
>> People who call other people names, should also change their
>> behaviour.
>
>
>Did someone call you a name? Oh.... you saw yourself in that descriptor?

Of course, since that's what you meant. lol @ descriptor

[Julie Bove]

"cshenk" <csh...@cox.net> wrote in message

news:DoudnasKaIew70bH...@giganews.com...

I never have sesame seeds.