Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Rachael Ray's wardrobe?
2,025 views
Skip to first unread message
Bryan
Aug 4, 2002, 2:24:21 PM8/4/02
to
I admit it. I watch "$40 A Day" and can even deal with "30 Minute
Meals" (with the sound off) 'cuz Rachael's a cutie. Actually, I'd
probably watch $40 anyway even without her.
Meals" (with the sound off) 'cuz Rachael's a cutie. Actually, I'd
probably watch $40 anyway even without her.
But what is the deal with her wardrobe? She wears either black or
dark brown clothes on practically every episode. I just watched an
episode of $40 when she went to Vancouver and they titled who does her
wardrobe. Dude, you need a new career!
Having a wardrobe consisting of nothing but black and brown, no wonder
Rachael's single. She'd make a great goth girl, though.
Jack Schidt
Aug 4, 2002, 2:55:43 PM8/4/02
to
"Bryan" <bry...@anote.c-m> wrote in message
news:sorqkus8kedr7dpl0...@4ax.com...
umm, if'n ya got a couple extra loaves in the breadbasket, dark colors
create a good illusion to help hide them. Also, vertical, not horizontal
stripes. Well enough fashion stuff, how bout that new corvette?
Jack LaLanne
Bryan
Aug 9, 2002, 11:37:20 PM8/9/02
to
On 09 Aug 2002 23:45:06 GMT, sport...@aol.com (SportKite1) wrote:
Funny, the 30 minute meals that was broadcast today showed Rachael
wearing brown slacks and a long brown shirt...with a 2nd shirt being
covered. And except for the Las Vegas show, Rachael wears either
black or brown for ever $40 per day episode, too. Then again, for $40
maybe that's all she can afford ro wear?
Emeril wears a chefs uniform so I forgive his wardrobe. On his
Essence show where he cooks at home he has much more fashionable
clothes. And I'm too young to comment on Julia Child, although I
would have watched her for the cooking content whereas Rachael's
"cooking" or more to the point, "eating" skills don't interest me in
the least. (She eats better than she cooks). I'd say something about
Martha Stewart but she's in enough trouble.
As for Rachael's "nice booty, small waist" and other stuff, maybe if
she'd wear something other than dark brown or black for a change I
could see for myself.
>She wore a light sage green blouse on today's episode of 30 minute meals.
>Curious though, did you become annoyed with Julia child's ever present white
>blouse and pearls, or are you annoyed with Emeril's chef garb? Another thought
>on the subject, if I were her stylist I would probably wardrobe her similarly
>to what she wears on both her shows for one very good reason. It doesn't
>detract from the lively colors of the kitchen where she works nor does her
>wardrobe conflict with the many different types of restaurant styles her $40. a
>Day show takes place in.
>
>It's not like she's some 20 year old hosting a Reality TV show. Sheesh!
>
>Her wardrobe doesn't bother me in the slightest and I think she's got a great
>figure - she's got a nice booty, a small waist, and she seems perfectly in
>proportion to me, if not a bone rack.
>
>Turn the channel if you don't like her shows...there are plenty others you can
>watch. Try Iron Chef - maybe the wardrobes there will be more pleasing to you.
>
>Ellen
>
Scott
Aug 11, 2002, 10:00:36 AM8/11/02
to
"Bryan" <bry...@anote.c-m> wrote in message
> On 09 Aug 2002 23:45:06 GMT, sport...@aol.com (SportKite1) wrote:
>
> Funny, the 30 minute meals that was broadcast today showed Rachael
> wearing brown slacks and a long brown shirt...with a 2nd shirt being
> covered. And except for the Las Vegas show, Rachael wears either
> black or brown for ever $40 per day episode, too. Then again, for $40
> maybe that's all she can afford ro wear?
>
> Emeril wears a chefs uniform so I forgive his wardrobe. On his
> Essence show where he cooks at home he has much more fashionable
> clothes. And I'm too young to comment on Julia Child, although I
> would have watched her for the cooking content whereas Rachael's
> "cooking" or more to the point, "eating" skills don't interest me in
> the least. (She eats better than she cooks). I'd say something about
> Martha Stewart but she's in enough trouble.
>
> As for Rachael's "nice booty, small waist" and other stuff, maybe if
> she'd wear something other than dark brown or black for a change I
> could see for myself.
>
See that smallish black thing with all the buttons on your coffee table?
It's called a remote control. There are probably two buttons with arrows
pointing up and down ( or possibly a + and - sign ) to change the channel
with. If you are so annoyed by the Rachel Ray show, simply press either of
the two buttons and you will be magically tranported to a different TV show.
No kidding!!
Bryan
Aug 11, 2002, 11:25:26 AM8/11/02
to
>See that smallish black thing with all the buttons on your coffee table?
>It's called a remote control. There are probably two buttons with arrows
>pointing up and down ( or possibly a + and - sign ) to change the channel
>with. If you are so annoyed by the Rachel Ray show, simply press either of
>the two buttons and you will be magically tranported to a different TV show.
>No kidding!!
>
>
See that dirty white thing in front of your fingers? It's called a>It's called a remote control. There are probably two buttons with arrows
>pointing up and down ( or possibly a + and - sign ) to change the channel
>with. If you are so annoyed by the Rachel Ray show, simply press either of
>the two buttons and you will be magically tranported to a different TV show.
>No kidding!!
>
>
"keyboard". There are probably 105 buttons with pretty little letters
and arrows that some people communicate with. If you are so annoyed
by my comments about Rachael's poor clothing selection, simply press
the button called "Delete" and you will magically be transported to a
different message. No kidding!!
Nancy Young
Aug 11, 2002, 11:43:03 AM8/11/02
to
Bryan wrote:
> But what is the deal with her wardrobe? She wears either black or
> dark brown clothes on practically every episode. I just watched an
> episode of $40 when she went to Vancouver and they titled who does her
> wardrobe. Dude, you need a new career!
It's funny to me that you said that, I mentioned it last week or
so. She always wears the same thing, a shirt with no style
whatsoever and black stretchy pants. I guess she wants to cover
up or something, her business, but does that mean her clothing
has to be so drab?
I saw that, too ... someone actually admitted to providing her
wardrobe, or parts of it. You're right, it had better be her
underwear because no one designed her outer clothing. I still
like to watch her (not for the same reasons you do!) but her
clothing and her set are butt ugly.
I was half listening to one of her $40 shows when I could swear
I heard her say she was going shopping to buy something for her
daughter. I probably misheard.
nancy
jen
Aug 11, 2002, 1:16:01 PM8/11/02
to
shes far too happy and smiley to be a goth. :p
"Bryan" <bry...@anote.c-m> wrote in message
news:sorqkus8kedr7dpl0...@4ax.com...
PENMART01
Aug 11, 2002, 1:49:23 PM8/11/02
to
>"Scott" lupis49 says:
>
>"Bryan" <bry...@anote.c-m> wrote in message
>news:6t19lu4dh55mom18u...@4ax.com...
>> On 09 Aug 2002 23:45:06 GMT, sport...@aol.com (SportKite1) wrote:
>>
>> Funny, the 30 minute meals that was broadcast today showed Rachael
>> wearing brown slacks and a long brown shirt...with a 2nd shirt being
>> covered. And except for the Las Vegas show, Rachael wears either
>> black or brown for ever $40 per day episode, too. Then again, for $40
>> maybe that's all she can afford ro wear?
>>
>> Emeril wears a chefs uniform so I forgive his wardrobe. On his
>> Essence show where he cooks at home he has much more fashionable
>> clothes. And I'm too young to comment on Julia Child, although I
>> would have watched her for the cooking content whereas Rachael's
>> "cooking" or more to the point, "eating" skills don't interest me in
>> the least. (She eats better than she cooks). I'd say something about
>> Martha Stewart but she's in enough trouble.
>>
>> As for Rachael's "nice booty, small waist" and other stuff, maybe if
>> she'd wear something other than dark brown or black for a change I
>> could see for myself.
>
>
>"Bryan" <bry...@anote.c-m> wrote in message
>news:6t19lu4dh55mom18u...@4ax.com...
>> On 09 Aug 2002 23:45:06 GMT, sport...@aol.com (SportKite1) wrote:
>>
>> Funny, the 30 minute meals that was broadcast today showed Rachael
>> wearing brown slacks and a long brown shirt...with a 2nd shirt being
>> covered. And except for the Las Vegas show, Rachael wears either
>> black or brown for ever $40 per day episode, too. Then again, for $40
>> maybe that's all she can afford ro wear?
>>
>> Emeril wears a chefs uniform so I forgive his wardrobe. On his
>> Essence show where he cooks at home he has much more fashionable
>> clothes. And I'm too young to comment on Julia Child, although I
>> would have watched her for the cooking content whereas Rachael's
>> "cooking" or more to the point, "eating" skills don't interest me in
>> the least. (She eats better than she cooks). I'd say something about
>> Martha Stewart but she's in enough trouble.
>>
>> As for Rachael's "nice booty, small waist" and other stuff, maybe if
>> she'd wear something other than dark brown or black for a change I
>> could see for myself.
>
change the channel
>with. If you are so annoyed by the Rachel Ray show
>with. If you are so annoyed by the Rachel Ray show
Yeah, but... then how will I fixate on her full red pouty lips... she has real
nice bedroom eyes too. And under her pubescent Gurl Scout garb I can make out
a delightful pair of sweet little perkies... so why should I change the channel
when Rachel Ray gives me such an appetite.
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
MH
Aug 12, 2002, 10:11:04 AM8/12/02
to
"jen" <mist...@fatlittlegirl.org> wrote in message
news:lZw59.66135$7n5.10389@sccrnsc01...
news:lZw59.66135$7n5.10389@sccrnsc01...
Indeed. Plus, she doesn't wear enough make-up and has too much color to her
skin. I don't think she likes clove cigarettes either.
Martha H.
>
eadick...@gmail.com
May 16, 2019, 6:17:39 PM5/16/19
to
Seriously, the clothes she wears are not attractive and do nothing for her shape. And her shoes are equally bad. She should take advise from some of the guest stylists.
Nancy2
May 16, 2019, 10:48:24 PM5/16/19
to
Really, she doesn't have all that great a shape, IMO. Her arms are too short, and look
almost plump, her waist is too thick and she is noticeably high-waisted. There is
nothing wrong with that; it's just that I guess I can't see what you-all are seeing. I think
she wears blacks and Browns to make herself look thinner. There is nothing wrong with
that, either, really...it is what I would do without a second thought.
(And, BTW, she has never referred to herself as a "chef." She even makes a point of
emphasizing, "I am not a chef; I am a cook."). And as a personable cook, she has many,
many loyal fans.
N.
N.
almost plump, her waist is too thick and she is noticeably high-waisted. There is
nothing wrong with that; it's just that I guess I can't see what you-all are seeing. I think
she wears blacks and Browns to make herself look thinner. There is nothing wrong with
that, either, really...it is what I would do without a second thought.
(And, BTW, she has never referred to herself as a "chef." She even makes a point of
emphasizing, "I am not a chef; I am a cook."). And as a personable cook, she has many,
many loyal fans.
N.
N.
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 16, 2019, 11:06:30 PM5/16/19
to
On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 9:48:24 PM UTC-5, Nancy2 wrote:
>
> Really, she doesn't have all that great a shape, IMO. Her arms are too short, and look
> almost plump, her waist is too thick and she is noticeably high-waisted. There is
> nothing wrong with that; it's just that I guess I can't see what you-all are seeing. I think
> she wears blacks and Browns to make herself look thinner.
>
Seventeen year old post. Another Gmail dummy dug it up originally. It's
>
> Really, she doesn't have all that great a shape, IMO. Her arms are too short, and look
> almost plump, her waist is too thick and she is noticeably high-waisted. There is
> nothing wrong with that; it's just that I guess I can't see what you-all are seeing. I think
> she wears blacks and Browns to make herself look thinner.
>
always a Gmail user that replies to ancient posts.
Ed Pawlowski
May 16, 2019, 11:15:24 PM5/16/19
to
dresses
Terry Coombs
May 16, 2019, 11:28:28 PM5/16/19
to
--
Snag
Yes , I'm old
and crochety - and armed .
Get outta my woods !
Bruce
May 16, 2019, 11:54:09 PM5/16/19
to
liked her. I probably still do. I don't care if her waist is high or
her breasts are low or whatever. She's less fake than many other
American TV heads :)
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 17, 2019, 12:24:53 AM5/17/19
to
On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 10:54:09 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>
> She was one of the first American Food Network chefs I ever saw. I
> liked her. I probably still do. I don't care if her waist is high or
> her breasts are low or whatever. She's less fake than many other
> American TV heads :)
>
I'll take Ina and sometimes Martha over Wretched Ray.
>
> She was one of the first American Food Network chefs I ever saw. I
> liked her. I probably still do. I don't care if her waist is high or
> her breasts are low or whatever. She's less fake than many other
> American TV heads :)
>
Bruce
May 17, 2019, 12:38:44 AM5/17/19
to
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 17, 2019, 12:45:08 AM5/17/19
to
Julie Bove
May 17, 2019, 1:58:45 AM5/17/19
to
<eadick...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fa0a01eb-b552-4ed2...@googlegroups.com...
> Seriously, the clothes she wears are not attractive and do nothing for her
> shape. And her shoes are equally bad. She should take advise from some
> of the guest stylists.
What does this have to do with food?
> shape. And her shoes are equally bad. She should take advise from some
> of the guest stylists.
dsi1
May 17, 2019, 2:09:56 AM5/17/19
to
Julie Bove
May 17, 2019, 5:36:33 AM5/17/19
to
"dsi1" <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote in message
news:b51d30dc-92fc-435b...@googlegroups.com...
Dave Smith
May 17, 2019, 8:48:38 AM5/17/19
to
Ed Pawlowski
May 17, 2019, 9:44:53 AM5/17/19
to
penm...@aol.com
May 17, 2019, 10:49:30 AM5/17/19
to
http://www.bodymeasurements.org/rachael-ray/
Nigella Lawson is Eye Candy:
http://www.bodymeasurements.org/nigella-lawson/
http://crush-of-the-day.blogspot.com/2012/07/nigella-lawson-hot-cleavage-n-ass-show.html?zx=7289108aed585537
jmcquown
May 18, 2019, 2:33:08 PM5/18/19
to
On 5/16/2019 6:17 PM, eadick...@gmail.com wrote:
> Seriously, the clothes she wears are not attractive and do nothing for her shape. And her shoes are equally bad. She should take advise from some of the guest stylists.
>
Seriously? LOL
> Seriously, the clothes she wears are not attractive and do nothing for her shape. And her shoes are equally bad. She should take advise from some of the guest stylists.
>
Jill
jmcquown
May 18, 2019, 2:40:11 PM5/18/19
to
when they stumble across rec.food.cooking. The majority of these folks
are fly-by-nighters who don't come back.
I don't actually care about what Rachel Ray wears, do you?
Jill
Julie Bove
May 19, 2019, 5:34:52 AM5/19/19
to
<penm...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:edhtde5cta88s7010...@4ax.com...
https://www.google.com/search?q=rachael+ray&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwikqKiHpafiAhVGHDQIHW5yA8cQ_AUIDygC&biw=1024&bih=653#imgrc=-0V4L1H7pqF1MM:
Julie Bove
May 19, 2019, 5:37:06 AM5/19/19
to
Terry Coombs
May 19, 2019, 11:08:57 AM5/19/19
to
teats .
Dave Smith
May 19, 2019, 12:52:30 PM5/19/19
to
jmcquown
May 19, 2019, 1:11:06 PM5/19/19
to
On 5/16/2019 11:06 PM, itsjoan...@webtv.net wrote:
> Seventeen year old post. Another Gmail dummy dug it up originally. It's
> always a Gmail user that replies to ancient posts.
Yep! It's the google groupers who somehow stumble upon RFC. They're
> always a Gmail user that replies to ancient posts.
fly-by-night posters. I sort of remember when this discussion came up
all those years ago. I didn't care then and I don't care now so no
specific recollections.
The only thing I remember about watching Rachel Ray's cooking shows (my
mother liked them) was the amount of food she cooked always like a lot.
She'd say it was for four people. More like 8 people in my book.
Jill
Bruce
May 19, 2019, 3:01:50 PM5/19/19
to
times? You've been saying this since the dawn of time.
penm...@aol.com
May 19, 2019, 5:29:23 PM5/19/19
to
On Sun, 19 May 2019 13:10:59 -0400, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:
I see nothing bad about cooking enough for left overs, I always do...
cooking every day gets boring and cleaning pots and pans every day is
gross, People who can't tolerate left overs need to think about take
out and likely they do.
wrote:
cooking every day gets boring and cleaning pots and pans every day is
gross, People who can't tolerate left overs need to think about take
out and likely they do.
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 19, 2019, 5:57:02 PM5/19/19
to
On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 11:52:30 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>
> Bigger? I would not say that they are bigger. The ride exceptional high.
>
You noticed that too?? The first time I ever saw her on TV my immediate
>
> Bigger? I would not say that they are bigger. The ride exceptional high.
>
thought was "damn, that girl has those boobs right under her chin!" And
a scant A cup at that.
graham
May 19, 2019, 6:24:38 PM5/19/19
to
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 19, 2019, 6:34:04 PM5/19/19
to
Dave Smith
May 19, 2019, 8:05:00 PM5/19/19
to
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 19, 2019, 8:11:29 PM5/19/19
to
On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 7:05:00 PM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>
> One more face lift and she'll be sporting a Van Dyke.
>
*GUFFAW*
>
> One more face lift and she'll be sporting a Van Dyke.
>
John Kuthe
May 19, 2019, 10:48:28 PM5/19/19
to
YUM! :-)
John Kuthe...
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 19, 2019, 10:53:25 PM5/19/19
to
On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 9:48:28 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
>
> Nigella Lawson is a cooking Goddess! She was in STL once, and oh how I wish I would have had some of my Chocolate Covered Cherries to GIVE HER! Closest I would ever get to her delicious MOUTH! And in the nicest way possible too! Vicariously, with the best Chocolate Covered Cherries she probably ever had!
>
> YUM! :-)
>
> John Kuthe…
>
> Nigella Lawson is a cooking Goddess! She was in STL once, and oh how I wish I would have had some of my Chocolate Covered Cherries to GIVE HER! Closest I would ever get to her delicious MOUTH! And in the nicest way possible too! Vicariously, with the best Chocolate Covered Cherries she probably ever had!
>
> YUM! :-)
>
>
It's rare celebrities accept food from crazed fans. Yeah, she would have
probably accepted it and when your back was turned, right into the trash.
Bruce
May 20, 2019, 12:43:59 AM5/20/19
to
jmcquown
May 20, 2019, 8:16:35 AM5/20/19
to
are never as large as the ones RR prepares.
Jill
John Kuthe
May 20, 2019, 9:21:28 AM5/20/19
to
And I decided *I* could do better! So I do! I use REAL FRESH Bing cherries, pit them, soak then in Majic Juice (yes, wine proof liquor is involved!), drain them then wrap each cherry in almond/vanilla flavored powdered sugar YUM, then dip each in REAL Dark Chocolate!
:-)
KutheChocolates.com (seasonal)
John Kuthe...
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 20, 2019, 9:47:00 AM5/20/19
to
On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 8:21:28 AM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 9:53:25 PM UTC-5, itsjoan...@webtv.net wrote:
> >
> > It's rare celebrities accept food from crazed fans. Yeah, she would have
> > probably accepted it and when your back was turned, right into the trash.
>
> Possibly! But I would have told her the story of why I invented my own recipe to make Chocolate Covered Cherries because every chocolate covered cherry I ever ate up until mine were flawed for one reason! Because the thing inside was only called a "cherry" because at one time IT USED TO BE! :-(
>
> John Kuthe...
>
> On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 9:53:25 PM UTC-5, itsjoan...@webtv.net wrote:
> >
> > It's rare celebrities accept food from crazed fans. Yeah, she would have
> > probably accepted it and when your back was turned, right into the trash.
>
> Possibly! But I would have told her the story of why I invented my own recipe to make Chocolate Covered Cherries because every chocolate covered cherry I ever ate up until mine were flawed for one reason! Because the thing inside was only called a "cherry" because at one time IT USED TO BE! :-(
>
>
Like she has time to listen to every fan babble about their kitchen experiences.
When she's on tour I'm willing to bet every minute is mapped out of where and
when she'll be somewhere and for how long.
U.S. Janet B.
May 20, 2019, 9:53:01 AM5/20/19
to
On Mon, 20 May 2019 08:16:29 -0400, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
I've thought that too.. I gather she cooks for Italian family so
maybe that is the way they eat.
Janet US
maybe that is the way they eat.
Janet US
Cindy Hamilton
May 20, 2019, 10:17:15 AM5/20/19
to
On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 9:21:28 AM UTC-4, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 9:53:25 PM UTC-5, itsjoan...@webtv.net wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 9:48:28 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
> > >
> > > Nigella Lawson is a cooking Goddess! She was in STL once, and oh how I wish I would have had some of my Chocolate Covered Cherries to GIVE HER! Closest I would ever get to her delicious MOUTH! And in the nicest way possible too! Vicariously, with the best Chocolate Covered Cherries she probably ever had!
> > >
> > > YUM! :-)
> > >
> > > John Kuthe…
> > >
> > It's rare celebrities accept food from crazed fans. Yeah, she would have
> > probably accepted it and when your back was turned, right into the trash.
>
> Possibly! But I would have told her the story of why I invented my own recipe to make Chocolate Covered Cherries because every chocolate covered cherry I ever ate up until mine were flawed for one reason! Because the thing inside was only called a "cherry" because at one time IT USED TO BE! :-(
You didn't invent the use of invertase in making chocolate-
> On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 9:53:25 PM UTC-5, itsjoan...@webtv.net wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 9:48:28 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
> > >
> > > Nigella Lawson is a cooking Goddess! She was in STL once, and oh how I wish I would have had some of my Chocolate Covered Cherries to GIVE HER! Closest I would ever get to her delicious MOUTH! And in the nicest way possible too! Vicariously, with the best Chocolate Covered Cherries she probably ever had!
> > >
> > > YUM! :-)
> > >
> > > John Kuthe…
> > >
> > It's rare celebrities accept food from crazed fans. Yeah, she would have
> > probably accepted it and when your back was turned, right into the trash.
>
> Possibly! But I would have told her the story of why I invented my own recipe to make Chocolate Covered Cherries because every chocolate covered cherry I ever ate up until mine were flawed for one reason! Because the thing inside was only called a "cherry" because at one time IT USED TO BE! :-(
covered cherries. There's nothing magic about it.
> And I decided *I* could do better! So I do! I use REAL FRESH Bing cherries, pit them, soak then in Majic Juice (yes, wine proof liquor is involved!), drain them then wrap each cherry in almond/vanilla flavored powdered sugar YUM, then dip each in REAL Dark Chocolate!
jmcquown
May 20, 2019, 10:17:32 AM5/20/19
to
scheduler and an entire entourage. If he got close enough to hand her a
box of his chocolates it would have been handed off to someone else as
she said "Thank you!" and moved on. I sincerely doubt she'd have
stopped, tasted a chocolate covered cherry and waxed rhapsodic about
what a sublime experience it was.
He's a legend in his own mind. :)
Jill
jmcquown
May 20, 2019, 10:29:22 AM5/20/19
to
eat half of what she's plated, that's it.
I'm certainly not adverse to eating leftovers. That's one reason I have
a separate freezer. I make homemade freezer dinners using leftovers all
the time. My portions are much smaller. :)
Jill
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 20, 2019, 10:34:52 AM5/20/19
to
On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 9:17:32 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>
> I'm sure she's surrounded by security as well as her assistant and
> scheduler and an entire entourage. If he got close enough to hand her a
> box of his chocolates it would have been handed off to someone else as
> she said "Thank you!" and moved on. I sincerely doubt she'd have
> stopped, tasted a chocolate covered cherry and waxed rhapsodic about
> what a sublime experience it was.
>
> He's a legend in his own mind. :)
>
> Jill
>
You nailed it!
>
> I'm sure she's surrounded by security as well as her assistant and
> scheduler and an entire entourage. If he got close enough to hand her a
> box of his chocolates it would have been handed off to someone else as
> she said "Thank you!" and moved on. I sincerely doubt she'd have
> stopped, tasted a chocolate covered cherry and waxed rhapsodic about
> what a sublime experience it was.
>
> He's a legend in his own mind. :)
>
> Jill
>
Nancy2
May 20, 2019, 11:42:07 AM5/20/19
to
I doubt there is a celebrity of any kind who would accept and taste something an unknown
fan handed out...I certainly wouldn't. It could have anything in it.
N.
fan handed out...I certainly wouldn't. It could have anything in it.
N.
U.S. Janet B.
May 20, 2019, 12:06:23 PM5/20/19
to
On Mon, 20 May 2019 10:29:15 -0400, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
Janet US
wrote:
>On 5/20/2019 9:52 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 May 2019 08:16:29 -0400, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
snip
>On 5/20/2019 9:52 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 May 2019 08:16:29 -0400, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>> I have no problem cooking enough for leftovers but my "serving sizes"
>>> are never as large as the ones RR prepares.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I've thought that too.. I gather she cooks for Italian family so
>> maybe that is the way they eat.
>> Janet US
>>
>Perhaps that's it, JanetB. The portions appear large. I could maybe
>eat half of what she's plated, that's it.
>
>I'm certainly not adverse to eating leftovers. That's one reason I have
>a separate freezer. I make homemade freezer dinners using leftovers all
>the time. My portions are much smaller. :)
>
>Jill
If she has leftover steak at her house I would love to have that, I
>>> I have no problem cooking enough for leftovers but my "serving sizes"
>>> are never as large as the ones RR prepares.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I've thought that too.. I gather she cooks for Italian family so
>> maybe that is the way they eat.
>> Janet US
>>
>Perhaps that's it, JanetB. The portions appear large. I could maybe
>eat half of what she's plated, that's it.
>
>I'm certainly not adverse to eating leftovers. That's one reason I have
>a separate freezer. I make homemade freezer dinners using leftovers all
>the time. My portions are much smaller. :)
>
>Jill
adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
Janet US
itsjoan...@webtv.net
May 20, 2019, 1:18:48 PM5/20/19
to
On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 11:06:23 AM UTC-5, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>
> If she has leftover steak at her house I would love to have that, I
> adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
> onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
> Janet US
>
What's leftover steak?? The only kind of 'leftover steak' at my house is if
>
> If she has leftover steak at her house I would love to have that, I
> adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
> onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
> Janet US
>
I have a T-bone and the bone is the only thing left.
Dave Smith
May 20, 2019, 1:33:25 PM5/20/19
to
On 2019-05-20 12:06 p.m., U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019 10:29:15 -0400, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
> On Mon, 20 May 2019 10:29:15 -0400, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>> I'm certainly not adverse to eating leftovers. That's one reason I have
>> a separate freezer. I make homemade freezer dinners using leftovers all
>> the time. My portions are much smaller. :)
>>
>> Jill
>
> If she has leftover steak at her house I would love to have that, I
> adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
> onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
What? No tomato or cheese? My wife eats a lot more meat than I do. It is
>> a separate freezer. I make homemade freezer dinners using leftovers all
>> the time. My portions are much smaller. :)
>>
>> Jill
>
> If she has leftover steak at her house I would love to have that, I
> adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
> onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
rare that she cannot finish a steak, but if I leave some she is likely
to have steak and eggs for breakfast.
Dave Smith
May 20, 2019, 1:47:08 PM5/20/19
to
both the size that she will eat. Any time I cook steaks I have to watch
the cooking time because hers will be the bigger one and she likes it
cooked more than I do for myself. My preferred steak is a tenderloin,
and a 5 oz one is enough for me.
jmcquown
May 20, 2019, 2:23:33 PM5/20/19
to
In article <sKBEE.72159$8z4....@fx03.iad>, adavid...@sympatico.ca
says...
Fasinating, no really.
Jill
says...
Jill
Cindy Hamilton
May 20, 2019, 2:36:52 PM5/20/19
to
Sometimes I forget that and cook two of them.
I generally have my leftover steak on a salad with a dressing made
of 1 teaspoon balsamic vinegar, 1 teaspoon soy sauce, and 1 tablespoon
extra-virgin olive oil.
If I have some sort of bun in the house, sometimes I have it with
sauteed onions, a slice of provolone, and a little "hoagie spread".
<https://www.amazon.com/HADDON-HOUSE-Spread-Hoagie-Pack/dp/B07693KZN8>
Original Ypsilanti cheesesteak.
Cindy Hamilton
Ed Pawlowski
May 20, 2019, 4:48:03 PM5/20/19
to
On 5/20/2019 1:49 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>
> It is something that happens here when my wife buys two steaks that are
> both the size that she will eat. Any time I cook steaks I have to watch
> the cooking time because hers will be the bigger one and she likes it
> cooked more than I do for myself. My preferred steak is a tenderloin,
> and a 5 oz one is enough for me.
>
Usually the man gets the huge portion. Fact is, 5 oz is plenty for any
>
> It is something that happens here when my wife buys two steaks that are
> both the size that she will eat. Any time I cook steaks I have to watch
> the cooking time because hers will be the bigger one and she likes it
> cooked more than I do for myself. My preferred steak is a tenderloin,
> and a 5 oz one is enough for me.
>
of us but I usually have at least 8 oz. In my younger days even more.
Dave Smith
May 20, 2019, 6:14:40 PM5/20/19
to
than women. Maybe it is a matter or heredity or perhaps it is the way we
were raised. Neither of my parents had large portions of meat. My mother
would do a roast at least once a week and we would have one or two more
dinners with the leftovers. My wife's family are all carnivores. My
mother would cook a turkey for 15 people and have leftovers. MiL would
cook the same size turkey for 10 and the bird was devoured.
penm...@aol.com
May 20, 2019, 8:12:46 PM5/20/19
to
I've not seen a 5 oz steaks displayed, even the typical pork chop is
over 8 ounces but typically ssold in pairs or more, I usually buy
thick cut loin pork chops, about 1 pound each, however there's a bone
and fat to discard. I'd typically cook a 2 1/2 pound London broil and
we'd get two meals plus some for the cats. One pan to clean and we
like cold London broil, thinly sliced makes great sandwiches. I
prefer top round for London broil, it's lean and well marinated it's
very flavorful. Just don't cook past medium and it's very succulent,
we like it more than expensive fatty steak.... top round is more
flavorful than ribeye... but then chuck is more flavorful than ribeye.
Beef rib is really for people who neglect their teeth and are
afflicted with chronic TIAD... rib is tender but is the least
flavorful beef cut. For grilling my steak of choice is a 1 1/2" thk 7
bone chuck steak. It annoys me that chuck steak used to be the least
expensive cut, nowadays it's priced like filet mignon.. another steak
for those with bad teeth and chronic TIAD.
Julie Bove
May 20, 2019, 10:10:54 PM5/20/19
to
"Nancy2" <ellor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3031983f-1505-43ba...@googlegroups.com...
Gary
May 21, 2019, 9:23:08 AM5/21/19
to
"U.S. Janet B." wrote:
>
> If she has leftover steak at her house I would love to have that, I
> adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
> onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
> Janet US
That sounds very good, JanetUS. I've not gone that far with it
>
> If she has leftover steak at her house I would love to have that, I
> adore leftover steak sandwiches. White bread, butter, steak, s&p,
> onions and maybe horseradish. Yum
> Janet US
though. Whenever I cook a steak I always save at least 1/3 for
the next day leftovers.
My way is to butter hot toast, fold one slice in half, then fill
with cold, thin sliced and salted steak. Good eats, for sure.
I'll also add leftover mushrooms and onions if available.
jemsb...@gmail.com
Dec 4, 2019, 2:18:55 PM12/4/19
to
Does she wear a slip under the skirts which snug between her legs?
How about trying to dress in appropriate clothing for her body shape?
How about trying to dress in appropriate clothing for her body shape?
Ed Pawlowski
Dec 4, 2019, 4:00:50 PM12/4/19
to
On 12/4/2019 2:18 PM, jemsb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does she wear a slip under the skirts which snug between her legs?
> How about trying to dress in appropriate clothing for her body shape?
>
I've not seen her for ages. She used to dress appropriately, well, for
> Does she wear a slip under the skirts which snug between her legs?
> How about trying to dress in appropriate clothing for her body shape?
>
men. You could always get some peeks at her boobs as she cooked.
lsouz...@gmail.com
Dec 27, 2019, 3:37:55 PM12/27/19
to
And it's always a webtv jerk who.responds to them?
Patrick Dennis
Dec 27, 2019, 4:45:07 PM12/27/19
to
After serious thinking lsouz...@gmail.com wrote :
> And it's always a webtv jerk who.responds to them?
>
Mostly google group posting tards, these days.
>
jmcquown
Dec 27, 2019, 6:59:53 PM12/27/19
to
On 12/27/2019 3:37 PM, lsouz...@gmail.com wrote:
> And it's always a webtv jerk who.responds to them?
>
If you knew anything about this ng (do you even know what an ng is?)
> And it's always a webtv jerk who.responds to them?
>
you'd know better. It's always the Google Grouper who is late to the
game. You're replying to a post from May in December. At least you're
replying in the current year.
Jill
0 new messages