You can't generalize. It depends on what you're cooking and the processes
involved, and how you like to work.
>>
>>> Go to Amazon and read the specs on digital scales. You're
>>> not going to find one where you can set the timing and you're not
>>> going to find many that will stay on much/any longer than 3 minutes.
>>
>> Well, that is ridiculous. Why should it be necessary to set the
>> timing? Just stay on until I turn it off. Is that so hard? I have to
>> turn my heater off. I have to turn my lights off. I have to turn the
>> oven off. I'm more than happy to turn my scale off when I'm done
>> with it, and not before.
>
> Sounds like digital isn't for you.
Digital means a digital read-out, and that is certainly what I want.
> Your problem will be solved if you
> can find a $30 digital scale with a cord instead of batteries or one
> you could buy of these
A battery is far more convenient than a cord. I can move it anywhere, I don't
need to find a power point (I have none spare) and the cord would just get in
the way.
> <
http://www.amazon.com/Detecto-Mechanical-Bakers-Dough-Capacity/dp/B002LVAVGE>
>
>> Why should my scale
>> decide when to turn off, and lose the weight of the container on it
>> in the process?
>
> It's had to understand what your problem is. You don't need to know
> total weight while you're measuring. What is so hard about hitting
> tare when you turn it back on again for the next measurement?
Example:
To make a chocolate biscuit cake I would like to put the mixing bowl on the
scale and press tare. Then add all the ingredients - melted copha, icing sugar
(previously weighed out), cocoa, egg, vanilla - and mix them. Then if I put the
bowl back on the scale it will give me the weight of the mixture alone, which I
would divide by 5 to give me the amount of mixture per layer. I can't do all
that in one minute before the scale turns itself off.
> Or you
> could just add whatever it is to the weight without hitting tare and
> mentally subtract the weight of the bowl from each measurement after
> you add the new ingredient.
Why should that be necessary? If it only didn't turn itself there'd be no need
for that.
>>
>> This is undoubtedly meant to be a design "feature" to save battery
>> life.
>
> Bingo.
Scales use very little power and batteries are cheap, and like other electrical
devices people will typically turn them on when they use them and then turn them
off. There's just no need for scales to have this "feature" that is really a
fault.
>> The
>> manufacturer had to write additional software to note the last
>> change in weight, check the clock and see if it's reached the time
>> limit since that chang e - whatever time they think is long enough -
>> and then turn itself off if it has. Have the manufacturers ever
>> cooked anything? Do they know that the cook might be busy for a few
>> minutes before getting back to the scale? They think it's desirable
>> that it operate this way. It's not, and any cook knows that. Why
>> don't they know that? It would actually cost them less to do it
>> right.
>
> Listen to yourself.
>>
>>> This is what I have.
>>>
>> <
http://www.amazon.com/Primo-Digital-Kitchen-Scale-Chrome/dp/B0007GAWRS/ref=sr_
>> 1_2/178-1937262-3241424?s=hpc&ie=UTF8&qid=1413262885&sr=1-2&keywords=escali+sca
>> les>
>
> It's obvious you didn't bother to look at that link.
I didn't look at it because you had already told me that it turns itself off. I
do appreciate your assistance, but as I said in the OP I am looking for one that
stays on until I turn it off.
> According to the
> comments on Amazon, the one I have turns off at 4 minutes. If you
> can't do whatever you need to do in 4 minutes, you have a serious
> problem that a kitchen scale can't help you with.
I'm pretty sure it takes me more than four minutes to make that chocolate
biscuit cake mixture I described above.