info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Me Vs. HEB
67 views
Skip to first unread message
Sqwertz
Feb 20, 2024, 2:54:39 AMFeb 20
to
Since I believe all records should be made public and I'm a big
fan of H-E-B....
February 19, 2024
VIA EMAIL: sqwe...@gmail.com
Mr. Steven Wertz
Austin, Texas
Re: Complaint against H-E-B
Dear Mr. Wertz:
Please be advised that we have been retained to represent the
interests of H-E-B, LP, and its partners, in connection with an
alleged incident involving the H-E-B Pharmacy. Please consider
this a notice of representation and forward all future
communications to my office accordingly. Thank you for your
immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
F ARMER, H OUSE , OSUNA & OLVERA
---------------
Which complaint is this regarding? The original complaint for
which there was a supposed private settlement. Or the lawsuit I
filed in Travis County justice court against H-E-B and Netspend
regarding the monies from that settlement having been stolen
while in their possession?
J3-CV-24-000232 STEVEN ALAN WERTZ vs. NETSPEND CORPORATION, H-E-B
Prepaid, LLC.
The way I see it the resolution of the first incident depends on
the second and are now related.
Netspend has 3 days to respond. I think they're chicken.
I can't tell if H-E-B has been served that lawsuit yet as the
courts are closed today. But I suspect you have seen what has
already been filed and the evidence. I will probably be modifying
that suit now that I, too, have seen the evidence (which was not
privy to me when I first filed).
Shall I expect a response on that from you - is that what you're
saying?
Sincerely,
Steven Wertz
fan of H-E-B....
February 19, 2024
VIA EMAIL: sqwe...@gmail.com
Mr. Steven Wertz
Austin, Texas
Re: Complaint against H-E-B
Dear Mr. Wertz:
Please be advised that we have been retained to represent the
interests of H-E-B, LP, and its partners, in connection with an
alleged incident involving the H-E-B Pharmacy. Please consider
this a notice of representation and forward all future
communications to my office accordingly. Thank you for your
immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
F ARMER, H OUSE , OSUNA & OLVERA
---------------
Which complaint is this regarding? The original complaint for
which there was a supposed private settlement. Or the lawsuit I
filed in Travis County justice court against H-E-B and Netspend
regarding the monies from that settlement having been stolen
while in their possession?
J3-CV-24-000232 STEVEN ALAN WERTZ vs. NETSPEND CORPORATION, H-E-B
Prepaid, LLC.
The way I see it the resolution of the first incident depends on
the second and are now related.
Netspend has 3 days to respond. I think they're chicken.
I can't tell if H-E-B has been served that lawsuit yet as the
courts are closed today. But I suspect you have seen what has
already been filed and the evidence. I will probably be modifying
that suit now that I, too, have seen the evidence (which was not
privy to me when I first filed).
Shall I expect a response on that from you - is that what you're
saying?
Sincerely,
Steven Wertz
Sqwertz
Feb 20, 2024, 5:23:15 AMFeb 20
to
They didn't tell you about that part. Eh?
Churn it over with Netspend that the $520 claim is $783 to drop
it. The court fees and settlement will cost about $885 and more
(when I can't lose).
If not resolved by the end of the week, I'll double that in court
for just being obnoxious pricks (Netspend, mostly - HEB for
turning blind eye).
And if I were to miraculously lose, brings up the pharmacy
incident (have you seen my hospital and ambulance bills since
then?)
Oops, Times up. $803.13 resolves current claim with both parties
which resolves pharmacy claim [again]. Just give me my money
back, dammit@!@! You see the evidence! (assuming they sent it to
you, oops!).
End of week is the 'Point of no Return' (for you).
If you're not representing H-E-B on the below referenced case and
just the "pharmacy incident", then I guess we now may have a
conflict since I just assumed....
Oops. My bad <shrug>. I didn't hear from you.
-sw
Churn it over with Netspend that the $520 claim is $783 to drop
it. The court fees and settlement will cost about $885 and more
(when I can't lose).
If not resolved by the end of the week, I'll double that in court
for just being obnoxious pricks (Netspend, mostly - HEB for
turning blind eye).
And if I were to miraculously lose, brings up the pharmacy
incident (have you seen my hospital and ambulance bills since
then?)
Oops, Times up. $803.13 resolves current claim with both parties
which resolves pharmacy claim [again]. Just give me my money
back, dammit@!@! You see the evidence! (assuming they sent it to
you, oops!).
End of week is the 'Point of no Return' (for you).
If you're not representing H-E-B on the below referenced case and
just the "pharmacy incident", then I guess we now may have a
conflict since I just assumed....
Oops. My bad <shrug>. I didn't hear from you.
-sw
Sqwertz
Feb 20, 2024, 5:26:46 AMFeb 20
to
I'm still gonna get you your two cases of Del Primo Salsa, Bryan!
And you kinda know by now I probably will, too, eh? I'm fighting
for you!
-sw
And you kinda know by now I probably will, too, eh? I'm fighting
for you!
-sw
Sqwertz
Feb 20, 2024, 2:08:52 PMFeb 20
to
Me to the Court:
I just received defendants answer. I would like to modify the
monetary value of the claim since evidence has come to light after
I filed the original petition. Can I do that in open
court/hearing or do I need to submit a revised petition? How
informal is this?
The defendant did not indicate I could communicate with them
electronically, unlike I graciously indicated upon myself. Do I
have to formally service them again on any revisions to the
petition (if the above is not generally considered?)
If I can petition for modification of damages in open court, lets
put it on the calendar. No other motions or discovery needed.
They must have bumped their widdle heads. And I'm sorry to have to
take the court's time on this.
Sincerely, and Thank You,
Steven Wertz
I just received defendants answer. I would like to modify the
monetary value of the claim since evidence has come to light after
I filed the original petition. Can I do that in open
court/hearing or do I need to submit a revised petition? How
informal is this?
The defendant did not indicate I could communicate with them
electronically, unlike I graciously indicated upon myself. Do I
have to formally service them again on any revisions to the
petition (if the above is not generally considered?)
If I can petition for modification of damages in open court, lets
put it on the calendar. No other motions or discovery needed.
They must have bumped their widdle heads. And I'm sorry to have to
take the court's time on this.
Sincerely, and Thank You,
Steven Wertz
Sqwertz
Feb 20, 2024, 4:54:18 PMFeb 20
to
Making money at your keyboard is actually very hard work,, however
you do it.
To Lawfirm:
-----
Your usage of 'partners' as in "...we have been retained to
represent the interests of H-E-B, LP, and its partners" will have
a different meaning when argued in the courts.
I assumed you meant H-E-B as well as all the H-E-B imprints. And I
gave you privileged information on that case based on that
assumption, and on your demand letter. You solicited information
from myself that you should not have been privy to.
We now have an issue here. Can you folks not stop fucking up?
Call Netspend. Tell them to give me the $803.13 and I will drop
the cases against both of you resolving you of court costs.
Otherwise we'll both jack those costs up. END OF WEEK! The court
costs alone are already up to $925 (including original demand)
It's so simple. Don't make it hard. You should have my number.
-sw
On 2/20/2024 11:03 AM, Alexis Adams wrote:
> H-E-B refers to their employees as partners. I am not making any
> other representations. I do not believe H-E-B has been served
> with your lawsuit at this time and I do not have authority to
> accept service.
>
> Alexis A. Adams
> Associate Attorney
>
>
>
> 411 Heimer Road
> San Antonio, Texas 78232
> (210) 377-1990 - Main
> aad...@satx.law
>
you do it.
To Lawfirm:
-----
Your usage of 'partners' as in "...we have been retained to
represent the interests of H-E-B, LP, and its partners" will have
a different meaning when argued in the courts.
I assumed you meant H-E-B as well as all the H-E-B imprints. And I
gave you privileged information on that case based on that
assumption, and on your demand letter. You solicited information
from myself that you should not have been privy to.
We now have an issue here. Can you folks not stop fucking up?
Call Netspend. Tell them to give me the $803.13 and I will drop
the cases against both of you resolving you of court costs.
Otherwise we'll both jack those costs up. END OF WEEK! The court
costs alone are already up to $925 (including original demand)
It's so simple. Don't make it hard. You should have my number.
-sw
On 2/20/2024 11:03 AM, Alexis Adams wrote:
> H-E-B refers to their employees as partners. I am not making any
> other representations. I do not believe H-E-B has been served
> with your lawsuit at this time and I do not have authority to
> accept service.
>
> Alexis A. Adams
> Associate Attorney
>
>
>
> 411 Heimer Road
> San Antonio, Texas 78232
> (210) 377-1990 - Main
> aad...@satx.law
>
GM
Feb 20, 2024, 6:08:22 PMFeb 20
to
--
GM
Laguna Material
Feb 20, 2024, 6:43:27 PMFeb 20
to
jmcquown
Feb 20, 2024, 7:00:32 PMFeb 20
to
Jill
Hank Rogers
Feb 20, 2024, 7:30:42 PMFeb 20
to
0 new messages