On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:27:23 -0400, songbird <
song...@anthive.com>
wrote:
>Jeßus wrote:
>> On Sun, 02 Aug 2020 07:24:56 -0400, Gary <
g.ma...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Jeßus" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 01 Aug 2020 09:30:01 -0400, Gary <
g.ma...@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Look at this pic. Is that correct?
>>>> >
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jc2ZAw5kem4/TDlvpMbxB4I/AAAAAAAAEgA/qlXU8-370_0/s1600/how+to+hold+chopsticks+1.jpg
>>>>
>>>> There is no 'correct'. Just find the way that works best for you. And
>>>> wooden chopsticks are easier to use that plastic ones IME (the wood
>>>> grips the food better).
>>>
>>>The one thing that the picture mentioned was that the bottom
>>>chopstick was stationary and only the top one was moved to
>>>grasp the food. That made sense to me.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>My only remaining pair of chopsticks are lacquered ones and
>>>very slippery. The cheap unfinished wooden ones are much
>>>better. They give you those with Chinese takeout food.
>>>
>>>I still don't use them but have always wondered about the
>>>proper way to hold them.
>>
>> I learned over time to not over think it... in my earlier days, the
>> more I analyzed the issue, the worse I was with chopsticks :) Stopped
>> thinking and worrying about it and had much greater success.
>
> sometimes i just poke chunks of things with one and
>that gets the job done.
That can work :) Thai noodles can be dangerous with chopsticks. Twice
I've flicked spicy noodles in my eye using chopsticks. not good, maybe
I should wear protective glasses in future.
> if you want to practice use raw soybeans and rice...
I've developed the skills need for cooked rice, dunno about raw
rice...
> for bonus points try to snag the flies out of the air.
>i have actually done that once.
Really? Quite an achievement.
> no reason to try again
>since then...
Indeed. You can now rest on your laurels... not that I even know what
a 'laurel' in this context means.