Woop, Woop, photo accepted on foodgawker.com
koko
I am so excited.
I just had this photo
http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
accepted on
www.foodgawker.com
Woop, Woop.
Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
so much.
koko
--
There is no love more sincere than the love of food
George Bernard Shaw
www.kokoscornerblog.com
updated 04/23/10
Sky
>
> I am so excited.
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
>
> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
> so much.
Many Kudos and oh so sweet, eh?!!! Keep up the fantastic work because
you do a fantastic job ;)
Sky
--
Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer!
Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice!!
PeterL2
4ax.com:
>
> I am so excited.
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
>
> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
> so much.
>
Good job K4 :-)
How does one go about having ones pics accepted by foodgawker?
And who is "starkoch"? Another ID for you??
Peter
in Brisbane
Australia
Ophelia
"koko" <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in message
news:grcnt5dpjpt2r0njk...@4ax.com...
>
> I am so excited.
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
Oh MY!!!! Well done you:)) Congratulations:)))))
Well deserved!!!!!! That is a great photo and mouthwatering food:)
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
brooklyn1
>
>I am so excited.
>
>I just had this photo
>http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
>accepted on
>www.foodgawker.com
They must've been hard up for contributions... compared with all the
others on that page those eggs are losers; lousy presentation
(actually non existant presentation), and blurry/smeary camera work
(invest in a tripod or stop drugging/boozing. Your dish looks like a
"Nice" emesis basin filled to the max.
>Woop, Woop.
Shouldn't that be WOP, WOP?
Or did you mean Whoop, Whoop?
koko
wrote:
>koko wrote:
>>
>> I am so excited.
>>
>> I just had this photo
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>> accepted on
>> www.foodgawker.com
>>
>> Woop, Woop.
>>
>> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
>> so much.
>
>Many Kudos and oh so sweet, eh?!!! Keep up the fantastic work because
>you do a fantastic job ;)
>
>Sky
Thanks Sky, I appreciate the encouragement you've been giving me.
koko
wrote:
>koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in news:grcnt5dpjpt2r0njkaui9h33v9ij81ppvp@
>4ax.com:
>
>>
>> I am so excited.
>>
>> I just had this photo
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>> accepted on
>> www.foodgawker.com
>>
>> Woop, Woop.
>>
>> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
>> so much.
>>
>
>
>
>Good job K4 :-)
Thank you so much, I'm thrilled.
>
>How does one go about having ones pics accepted by foodgawker?
The photos posted on foodgawker are from food bloggers. It must be a
photo that has been published on your blog already. They ask for the
link to the post the photo was in.
>
>And who is "starkoch"? Another ID for you??
Yes, but I use koko on my blog, here and abf.
>
>Peter
>in Brisbane
>Australia
koko
--
There is no love more sincere than the love of food
George Bernard Shaw
www.kokoscornerblog.com
updated 04/30/10
koko
wrote:
>
>
>"koko" <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in message
>news:grcnt5dpjpt2r0njk...@4ax.com...
>>
>> I am so excited.
>>
>> I just had this photo
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>> accepted on
>> www.foodgawker.com
>>
>> Woop, Woop.
>
>
>Oh MY!!!! Well done you:)) Congratulations:)))))
>
>Well deserved!!!!!! That is a great photo and mouthwatering food:)
>--
Thank you Ophelia, I appreciate that so much.
This makes me want to work harder at improving my photography.
koko
--
There is no love more sincere than the love of food
George Bernard Shaw
www.kokoscornerblog.com
updated 04/30/10
blake murphy
> I am so excited.
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
>
> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
> so much.
>
> koko
your thumb ring will become famous!
your pal,
blake
blake murphy
> koko wrote:
>>
>>I am so excited.
>>
>>I just had this photo
>>http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>>accepted on
>>www.foodgawker.com
>
> They must've been hard up for contributions... compared with all the
> others on that page those eggs are losers; lousy presentation
> (actually non existant presentation), and blurry/smeary camera work
> (invest in a tripod or stop drugging/boozing. Your dish looks like a
> "Nice" emesis basin filled to the max.
cram it, farm-boy.
or better yet, submit a photo of your clove-studded virginia spam. they'll
delete all the other pics for sure!
blake
Ophelia
"koko" <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in message
news:gmgot59rutkh4du0s...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 1 May 2010 07:43:36 +0100, "Ophelia" <Oph...@Elsinore.me.uk>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"koko" <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in message
>>news:grcnt5dpjpt2r0njk...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> I am so excited.
>>>
>>> I just had this photo
>>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>>
>>> accepted on
>>> www.foodgawker.com
>>>
>>> Woop, Woop.
>>
>>
>>Oh MY!!!! Well done you:)) Congratulations:)))))
>>
>>Well deserved!!!!!! That is a great photo and mouthwatering food:)
>>--
> Thank you Ophelia, I appreciate that so much.
> This makes me want to work harder at improving my photography.
I shall look forward to the next ones:)
Chemo the Clown
I just don't get it....why the fascination with having a pic of your
food. Next, people will be posting pics of their dirty socks.
brooklyn1
>brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>> They must've been hard up for contributions... compared with all the
>> others on that page those eggs are losers; lousy presentation
>> (actually non existant presentation), and blurry/smeary camera work
>> (invest in a tripod or stop drugging/boozing. Your dish looks like a
>> "Nice" emesis basin filled to the max.
>
>cram it, farm-boy.
>
>or better yet, submit a photo of your clove-studded virginia spam. they'll
>delete all the other pics for sure!
There ya go, my food pics are memorable, even for a low IQ mick who
misplaced his legs. LOL No one wants to remember a fercocktah spoiled
Western Omelet turned to hash.
brooklyn1
My socks are more attractive, and sweeter smelling, than her abortion
omelet: http://i42.tinypic.com/k1xgs4.jpg
Cheryl
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
>
> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
> so much.
>
Awesome. Congrats!
Dimitri
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
>
> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
> so much.
>
> koko
Good job....
Next the peppers you do.
:-)
Dimitri
Brawny
> accepted onwww.foodgawker.com
>
Very Nice!! Congrats!
Roy
==
What in hell is it? Is it edible?
==
brooklyn1
wrote:
>On Apr 30, 10:52�pm, koko <k...@letscook.com> wrote:
>> I am so excited.
>>
>> I just had this photohttp://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>> accepted onwww.foodgawker.com
>>
>> Woop, Woop.
>>
>> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
>> so much.
>What in hell is it? Is it edible?
Vomit can't be too bad if eaten while still fresh. Many creatures
regurgitate to feed their young. The gourmet canned cat foods look
more appetizing than that eggo hash... this looks and smells pretty
good: http://www.whiskas.com/meal_time/pouch_food/pftc_v12.aspx
projectile vomit chick
>
> I just don't get it....why the fascination with having a pic of your
> food. Next, people will be posting pics of their dirty socks.
Or Bret Michaels biographies......
projectile vomit chick
lmao
Terry Pulliam Burd
>
>I am so excited.
>
>I just had this photo
>http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
>accepted on
>www.foodgawker.com
<clap!><clap!><clap!>
It looks as if you placed everything, including each grain of pepper,
with a tweezer. If I produced something that pretty, I wouldn't allow
anyone to eat it! Just admire it!
Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
--
"If the soup had been as warm as the wine,
if the wine had been as old as the turkey,
and if the turkey had had a breast like the maid,
it would have been a swell dinner." Duncan Hines
To reply, remove "spambot" and replace it with "cox"
koko
wrote:
Thank you Cheryl.
koko
--
There is no love more sincere than the love of food
George Bernard Shaw
www.kokoscornerblog.com
updated 04/30/10
koko
wrote:
>
>"koko" <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in message
>news:grcnt5dpjpt2r0njk...@4ax.com...
>>
>> I am so excited.
>>
>> I just had this photo
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>> accepted on
>> www.foodgawker.com
>>
>> Woop, Woop.
>>
>> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
>> so much.
>>
>> koko
>
>Good job....
>
Thank you Dimitri.
>Next the peppers you do.
Dang, I forgot about them and I do them all the time. Thanks for the
idea.
>:-)
>
>Dimitri
koko
--
There is no love more sincere than the love of food
George Bernard Shaw
www.kokoscornerblog.com
updated 04/30/10
koko
wrote:
>http://whstoneman.blogspot.com/
Thanks Brawny, I appreciate that.
koko
--
There is no love more sincere than the love of food
George Bernard Shaw
www.kokoscornerblog.com
updated 04/30/10
Omelet
koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote:
>
> I am so excited.
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
>
> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
> so much.
>
> koko
Very cool. Congrats! :-)
--
Peace! Om
Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. --Alex Levine
Bob Terwilliger
> I am so excited.
>
> I just had this photo
> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>
> accepted on
> www.foodgawker.com
>
> Woop, Woop.
>
> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
> so much.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what do YOU get out of it? I've never heard
of foodgawker.com before; is it well-known and prestigious?
Bob
Christine Dabney
<virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:
>Please forgive my ignorance, but what do YOU get out of it? I've never heard
>of foodgawker.com before; is it well-known and prestigious?
>
>Bob
Among other things, you get exposure for your blog. One can click on
the picture and be taken straight to your blog, and the recipe
featured....
Also, clicking through that, and Tastespotting, can give one some
great ideas...
Try it sometime. ;)
Christine
koko
<ntpu...@spambot.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:52:13 -0700, koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>I am so excited.
>>
>>I just had this photo
>>http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>>accepted on
>>www.foodgawker.com
>
><clap!><clap!><clap!>
>
>It looks as if you placed everything, including each grain of pepper,
>with a tweezer. If I produced something that pretty, I wouldn't allow
>anyone to eat it! Just admire it!
>
>Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
Thank you, Squeaks, high praise indeed. I really appreciate it.
koko
wrote:
>In article <grcnt5dpjpt2r0njk...@4ax.com>,
> koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am so excited.
>>
>> I just had this photo
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>> accepted on
>> www.foodgawker.com
>>
>> Woop, Woop.
>>
>> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate it
>> so much.
>>
>> koko
>
>Very cool. Congrats! :-)
Thanks Om. :-)
koko
<virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:
No problem Bob.
I'm new to foodgawker having recently heard about it on other food
blogs and food forums.
It's not easy to have a photo published on the site. What do I get out
of it? I get the satisfaction of having one of my photos published on
a well known and respected site.
Here's the quote from their "about" page.
"foodgawker is a gallery where food bloggers can showcase their food
and photography skills. It's a place for you to discover new sites,
dishes, recipes and ingredients to inspire your own cooking."
The photos are clickable and will take you to the blog if you are
interested in the recipe.
Bob Terwilliger
>> Please forgive my ignorance, but what do YOU get out of it? I've never
>> heard of foodgawker.com before; is it well-known and prestigious?
>
> Among other things, you get exposure for your blog. One can click on
> the picture and be taken straight to your blog, and the recipe
> featured....
I'm sorry to say that that doesn't really clarify things for me. Is it a
*good* thing to receive exposure for your blog? If so, why?
> Also, clicking through that, and Tastespotting, can give one some
> great ideas...
OK, but that doesn't benefit *koko*, it benefits the *readers*.
Bob
Christine Dabney
<virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:
>Christine wrote:
>
>>> Please forgive my ignorance, but what do YOU get out of it? I've never
>>> heard of foodgawker.com before; is it well-known and prestigious?
>>
>> Among other things, you get exposure for your blog. One can click on
>> the picture and be taken straight to your blog, and the recipe
>> featured....
>
>I'm sorry to say that that doesn't really clarify things for me. Is it a
>*good* thing to receive exposure for your blog? If so, why?
'Yes..it is. Why do a blog, unless you want someone to read it, even
if it is just family? If you want more exposure, then yes..it can
really draw folks in.
I have seen some marvelous things on some of these sites....some truly
spectacular food. People are creative...
>
>
>> Also, clicking through that, and Tastespotting, can give one some
>> great ideas...
>
>OK, but that doesn't benefit *koko*, it benefits the *readers*.
It can also benefit Koko, if she is a regular on Foodgawker. Again,
it can trigger the imagination sometimes... NO, getting a picture
posted might not benefit Koko in that way, but just getting a picture
accepted by those sites, can really help with the confidence boosting
thing. It is notoriously hard to get a picture accepted, from what I
have heard.
Plus, it is just fun... ;)
Christine
Bob Terwilliger
>> Is it a *good* thing to receive exposure for your blog? If so, why?
>
> 'Yes..it is. Why do a blog, unless you want someone to read it, even
> if it is just family? If you want more exposure, then yes..it can
> really draw folks in.
There's a difference between writing a blog for family, writing a blog for
commercial reasons, and writing a blog to satisfy vanity.
If I wrote a blog for family, then I'd be letting my family know about the
blog by e-mail; there would be no benefit from having photos on
foodgawker.com, and I'd have no interest at all in reaching out to a wider
audience.
If it's a blog where the blogger is remunerated for hits on his or her site,
then the benefit is obvious, but I'm not sure how many bloggers are so
popular that they can make appreciable sums that way.
If it's just a "LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!" blog, then I can see where the
blogger would be thrilled at the greater exposure, but koko doesn't strike
me as that kind of conceited twit.
> I have seen some marvelous things on some of these sites....some truly
> spectacular food. People are creative...
Yes, but again, you are failing to distinguish between the benefits of
*writing* a blog and the benefits of *reading* a blog.
> It can also benefit Koko, if she is a regular on Foodgawker. Again,
> it can trigger the imagination sometimes... NO, getting a picture
> posted might not benefit Koko in that way, but just getting a picture
> accepted by those sites, can really help with the confidence boosting
> thing. It is notoriously hard to get a picture accepted, from what I
> have heard.
Hm. I suppose if someone LACKS confidence, they could derive some
psychological benefit. But what if the blogger is already well-balanced and
secure?
> Plus, it is just fun... ;)
That's the only thing which makes sense to me: It's fun to see your photos
on foodgawker.com. But if it were me I don't think I'd be excited about it
the way koko appears to be. "Satisfied" would probably be a better
description.
Bob
brooklyn1
>koko wrote: contains
>
>> I'm new to foodgawker having recently heard about it on other food
>> blogs and food forums.
>
>> It's not easy to have a photo published on the site.
>
>foodgawker; and the pictures on view don't suggest fg seeks
>professional quality in either the cookery or the photography.
>
> Janet
There are no submission requirements except to register, pretty much
submit ones email addy and create a password is all, and submit your
photo with a brief description. There is obviously an administrative
body that peruses all entries for tastefulness, pardon the pun. But
yes, there are no requirements.
From perusing quite a few entries it's obvious that most are amature
photographers but most of the presentations are quite artistic and
well thought out, Koko's is possibly the worst, there is no
presentation and no thought/effort whatsoever, just a big blob of what
appears to be a hacked up Denver omelet dumped willy nilly onto a too
small plate... that I'd be embarrassed to serve guests let alone
submit for public display... I call that awful wreck of a hacked up
failure of an egg dish critter chow... at best it's Spot's treat... I
don't have a dog and my cats wouldn't eat an eggy dish so the backyard
crows would get that abortion. Its only redeeming value is as a good
lesson of what not to do with perfectly good ingredients. To be
perfectly honest my first impression was that I thought it was a joke,
a parody on a worst Denver omelet. Even the worst greasy spoon
wouldn't dare serve that hog slop... it wouldn't even qualify for
white trash trailer trash cookery.
I don't see what all the oohing and ahhing over Koko's creations is
about... it's obviously totally disingenuous/dishonest, like how folks
fall all over themselves to praise the severely learning disabled to
their face in public but behind their backs in private they think
they're creepy... those compliments are obviously pity... otherwise
Koko must be giving a lot of rfc'ers free head.
blake murphy
if your idea of a good meal includes spam i'm sure cat food looks good as
well.
blake
blake murphy
koko must be some kind of communist.
your pal,
blake
Serene Vannoy
> I am so excited.
>
Oh, excellent! Congrats.
Serene
--
"I tend to come down on the side of autonomy. Once people are grown up,
I believe they have the right to go to hell in the handbasket of their
choosing." -- Pat Kight, on alt.polyamory
brooklyn1
<janet.a...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
>The message <bhart5hr4kn1ipo5v...@4ax.com>
>from brooklyn1 <grave...@verizon.net> contains these words:
>
> my cats wouldn't eat an eggy dish
>
> I've never had a cat or dog that didn't love raw beaten egg (at room
>temp, not fridge).
> When we kept hens , the dogs always had an egg mixed into their feed.
>It's something that even sick animals will happily eat and can digest.
>
All my cats have different food preferences but none will eat eggs...
two won't eat fish but they love poultry. I suppose if they were
hungry they'd eat even eggs but my cats have never experienced hunger,
and as long as I'm around they never will.
koko
<ser...@serenepages.org> wrote:
>koko wrote:
>> I am so excited.
>>
>> I just had this photo
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>
>> accepted on
>> www.foodgawker.com
>
>Oh, excellent! Congrats.
>
>Serene
Thank you Serene.
Terry Pulliam Burd
<arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>Also, clicking through that, and Tastespotting, can give one some
>great ideas...
>
>Try it sometime. ;)
I just bookmarked both of 'em for future reference, Christine. I'd
not heard of either one of 'em, so thank you.
Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd...behind the curve as usual
Omelet
brooklyn1 <grave...@verizon.net> wrote:
I've never starved my cats either, but they all love egg!
PeterL(aptop)
news:Xns9D6C16538...@61.9.191.5:
> koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in
> news:okgot5lfkg6tjkcpe...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 01 May 2010 06:14:23 GMT, PeterL2 <Pet...@home.on.laptop>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in
>>>news:grcnt5dpjpt2r0njkaui9h33v9ij81ppvp@ 4ax.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am so excited.
>>>>
>>>> I just had this photo
>>>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>>>
>>>> accepted on
>>>> www.foodgawker.com
>>>>
>>>> Woop, Woop.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate
it
>>>> so much.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Good job K4 :-)
>> Thank you so much, I'm thrilled.
Crack the bubbly woman!! ;-)
>>>
>>>How does one go about having ones pics accepted by foodgawker?
>> The photos posted on foodgawker are from food bloggers. It must be a
>> photo that has been published on your blog already. They ask for the
>> link to the post the photo was in.
I've thought about a blog......... often.
But I just don't have enough hours in the day to keep it updated.
As it is, I spend *way* too much time reading the damn things!!
Between yours, the Pioneer Woman, Gene from abf, and old Ma
Schaller's......... you'all take up too much damn time!! ;-P
Maybe when I retire..... again.
BTW, do you have a doo-dad on your blog where you can sign up for
updates?
>>>
>>>And who is "starkoch"? Another ID for you??
>> Yes, but I use koko on my blog, here and abf.
Thought that may be the case..... just wondered when I saw it earmarked
on the pic.
>>
>> www.kokoscornerblog.com
Saw the 'Croc' purchase.
I agree with the tile/wooden floor thing........ I just couldn't come at
wearing plastic shoes.
--
_________
Peter
in Brisbane
Australia
Serene Vannoy
> On Sat, 1 May 2010 19:57:22 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> <virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:
>
>> Christine wrote:
>>
>>>> Please forgive my ignorance, but what do YOU get out of it? I've never
>>>> heard of foodgawker.com before; is it well-known and prestigious?
>>> Among other things, you get exposure for your blog. One can click on
>>> the picture and be taken straight to your blog, and the recipe
>>> featured....
>> I'm sorry to say that that doesn't really clarify things for me. Is it a
>> *good* thing to receive exposure for your blog? If so, why?
> 'Yes..it is. Why do a blog, unless you want someone to read it, even
> if it is just family? If you want more exposure, then yes..it can
> really draw folks in.
Also, I know two people personally who have gotten book deals based on
their blogs, and several more who have been published in other ways as
direct results of blogging.
koko
<Pet...@home.on.laptop> wrote:
>"PeterL(aptop)" <Pet...@home.on.laptop> wrote in
>news:Xns9D6C16538...@61.9.191.5:
>
>> koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in
>> news:okgot5lfkg6tjkcpe...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 01 May 2010 06:14:23 GMT, PeterL2 <Pet...@home.on.laptop>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>koko <ko...@letscook.com> wrote in
>>>>news:grcnt5dpjpt2r0njkaui9h33v9ij81ppvp@ 4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am so excited.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just had this photo
>>>>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ju8xvs.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> accepted on
>>>>> www.foodgawker.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Woop, Woop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks guys for all your encouragement and feedback, I appreciate
>it
>>>>> so much.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Good job K4 :-)
>>> Thank you so much, I'm thrilled.
>
>
> Crack the bubbly woman!! ;-)
That'll have to be a gin and tonic ;-)
>
>
>>>>
>>>>How does one go about having ones pics accepted by foodgawker?
>>> The photos posted on foodgawker are from food bloggers. It must be a
>>> photo that has been published on your blog already. They ask for the
>>> link to the post the photo was in.
>
>
> I've thought about a blog......... often.
>
> But I just don't have enough hours in the day to keep it updated.
>
> As it is, I spend *way* too much time reading the damn things!!
>
>
> Between yours, the Pioneer Woman, Gene from abf, and old Ma
> Schaller's......... you'all take up too much damn time!! ;-P
>
>
> Maybe when I retire..... again.
>
It's up to you how much time you put into one. It's blog crusing that
cuts into my time. ;-)
>
> BTW, do you have a doo-dad on your blog where you can sign up for
> updates?
I don't think I do, I'll look into it.
>
>>>>
>>>>And who is "starkoch"? Another ID for you??
>>> Yes, but I use koko on my blog, here and abf.
>
>
> Thought that may be the case..... just wondered when I saw it earmarked
> on the pic.
>>> www.kokoscornerblog.com
>
>
>Saw the 'Croc' purchase.
>
>I agree with the tile/wooden floor thing........ I just couldn't come at
>wearing plastic shoes.
>
Love my Crocs, I warn you then, don't try on a pair you'll love your
"plastic shoes."
koko
--
There is no love more sincere than the love of food
George Bernard Shaw
www.kokoscornerblog.com
updated 05/01/10
PeterL(aptop)
news:m2ist51urt12okov9...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 03 May 2010 03:17:26 GMT, "PeterL(aptop)"
> <Pet...@home.on.laptop> wrote:
>
>>
>> Crack the bubbly woman!! ;-)
> That'll have to be a gin and tonic ;-)
I can handle that :-)
I still have a couple bottles of Bombay Sapphire, and some Beefeaters
left :-)
>>
>>
>> Maybe when I retire..... again.
>>
> It's up to you how much time you put into one. It's blog crusing that
> cuts into my time. ;-)
I know what you mean!!
>>
>> BTW, do you have a doo-dad on your blog where you can sign up for
>> updates?
> I don't think I do, I'll look into it.
Call it the lazy man's way of checking for updates ;-P
>>
> Love my Crocs, I warn you then, don't try on a pair you'll love your
> "plastic shoes."
>
I can honestly assure you that will never happen.
Ophelia
"blake murphy" <blakepm...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:zxlphtm0o1s9$.dnzc3104rin9$.dlg@40tude.net...
koko is enjoying working on her photos and having them accepted on some
cooking site.
That sounds pretty damned good to me!
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
Ophelia
"Serene Vannoy" <ser...@serenepages.org> wrote in message
news:846vqh...@mid.individual.net...
> Christine Dabney wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 May 2010 19:57:22 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
>> <virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:
>>
>>> Christine wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Please forgive my ignorance, but what do YOU get out of it? I've never
>>>>> heard of foodgawker.com before; is it well-known and prestigious?
>>>> Among other things, you get exposure for your blog. One can click on
>>>> the picture and be taken straight to your blog, and the recipe
>>>> featured....
>>> I'm sorry to say that that doesn't really clarify things for me. Is it a
>>> *good* thing to receive exposure for your blog? If so, why?
>> 'Yes..it is. Why do a blog, unless you want someone to read it, even
>> if it is just family? If you want more exposure, then yes..it can
>> really draw folks in.
>
> Also, I know two people personally who have gotten book deals based on
> their blogs, and several more who have been published in other ways as
> direct results of blogging.
Excellent:)) So there is the answer and enjoyment too:))
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
J. Clarke
If you haven't seen "Julie and Julia" you might find it interesting.
While it has much food content and Meryl Streep portraying Julia Child,
it's really the story of a blog.
Ophelia
"J. Clarke" <jclarke...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:hrrtl...@news2.newsguy.com...
I have not! If I get the chance to see it, I will, thank you:)
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
Bob Terwilliger
> I don't see what all the oohing and ahhing over Koko's creations is
> about...
Did anybody else see green text in the newbie's post?
Bob