On 2019-03-30 1:40 p.m., Gary wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>> My point is: I'd much rather people stop trying find better ways to
>> kill each other. Is that okay with you?
>
> In my opinion, I think the USA, China, and even Russia should all
> chip in and arm to the hilt every middle east country then sit
> back and let them kill each other off. Then we can roll in and
> divy up all the land for ourselves. Every single one of them are
> just a pain in the ass to the world in general.
I thought that is what they were doing. One of the great ironies of the
Gulf War was the story about how Saddam had to be disarmed because he
had a vast supply of WMDs including gas and that they had used gas
against the Kurds. They certainly had no objection to Iraq using gas
against the Iranians. They even provided them with satellite
intelligence about Iranian troop positions to help them to target them.
One of the reasons that the conflict has been going on for so long is
that the US and western powers are backing one site while Russia and
Iran are backing other factions. It is a proxy war where they are
backing one side or another without getting totally sucked into the
fighting.
There is no reason to send your own troops in to fight if you can arm
someone else to do it. Look at how the situation turned out in
Afghanistan. The US was pissed that the Soviet Union had marched into
Afghanistan to prop up a communist regime. The US backed the
Mujahideen, "freedom fighters", who were basically a bunch of Islamists
under the control of various war lords. That was their way to fight the
expansion of communism and to get back at them for having armed the
insurgency in Vietnam. Once the Soviets pulled out the US stopped
funding them and they went back to their old games, and then the Taliban
moved in with the promise of law and order. That worked out really well.