Re: Rape is over rated

[dsi1]

On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 8:48:34 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rape Is Over-Rated
>
>
>
> A rollicking torrent of fist-driven thunder
> Rained down on the old wino's face
> His lips were in shreds, his eyes torn asunder
> But the madman proferred him no grace
>
> Quite some distance away at a seperate scene
> A young girl was involved in a scrape
> Her attacker was large and incredibly mean
> But she calmed him by yielding to rape
>
> Not so lucky a route could our wino friend take
> From the punchin’ and beggin’ and wheezin’
> With no pussy to sell - no deal could he make
> He was stomped for no rhyme and no reason
>
> So for women who scorn their 'subservient' role
> This proposal I offer instead
> "Are you willing to barter your rape-ravaged hole
> In exchange for that old wino's head?”

Sounds like you've never been raped. Me neither.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0Cmu-_bA48&t=186s

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> I'm kind of old so chances are good that I'll never have to worry about getting screwed in the ass by a lust-crazed jailhouse negro. OTOH, chances are good that I'll have an electric self-driving car and ride in an electric airplane. How amazing is that? Really fucking amazing.


Self driving cars - I still don't get it and probably never will. I see the day coming
when such computerized cars are hijacked and used to plow large quantities of
explosives into crowded events such as the concert you mentioned earlier. A lot
of negatives around the corner with these new and improved pieces of crap. I
guess that's just par for the course. I am no more amazed by jets being propelled
by electricity than by gas. To me the shower is still an amazing invention. And the
toilet. The wheel wasn't bad either.

[Thomas Joseph]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 10:26:54 PM UTC-4, Mike Duffy wrote:

> On 2022-05-24, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>
> > chances are good that I'll have an electric self-driving
> > car and ride in an electric airplane. How amazing is that?

> They've been predicting that 'real soon' for about 100 years.


I am viewed by many as negative but agree it's going to be some time
before these fabulous new and improved versions of whatever we've
already got swing into action. I expect to see a lot of unexpected
malfunctions and other horrors with lots of this new shit that seems
to be rather rushed at times, and am hoping to see a lot of conflict
and problems with it. That's the price of progress - you gotta go through
me to get there. Come on New-timer, try me. Try my fucking hand!

[André Malraux]

Self-driving cars only have to drive better than the average person.
And since they don't drink, don't use drugs, don't drop cigarettes,
don't use mobile phones etc etc, I can see it happen soonish. They
don't have to drive better than the infallible super hero Thomas
Joseph.

--
André Malraux
<https://cdn.britannica.com/20/109120-050-C8214147/Andre-Malraux.jpg>

[dsi1]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 4:26:54 PM UTC-10, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On 2022-05-24, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>
> > chances are good that I'll have an electric self-driving
> > car and ride in an electric airplane. How amazing is that?
> They've been predicting that 'real soon' for about 100 years.
>

> More likely you'll catch some of that Putin monkey pox.

I like people like you saying "it'll never fly Orville." Shortsighted people are tons of fun. Please keep it up!

[dsi1]

My brother has a self-driving truck although he has to keep his eyes on the road or the system disengages. That sort of takes away from the self-driving feature but I don't have any problems with taking baby steps.

[André Malraux]

Yes, it's probably a good idea to insist on human supervision for now.

[Mike Duffy]

On 2022-05-24, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>
> My brother has a self-driving truck although he has

> keep his eyes on the road or the system disengages.

Does it bring the vehicle to a full stop first?

That might be handy if someone has a heart attack.

[dsi1]

I don't know a thing about the system. Being able to stop would be a nice feature.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCG_3Wr_ViU

[Thomas Joseph]

André Malraux wrote:

> Self-driving cars only have to drive better than the average person.
> And since they don't drink, don't use drugs, don't drop cigarettes,
> don't use mobile phones etc etc, I can see it happen soonish. They
> don't have to drive better than the infallible super hero Thomas
> Joseph.

I won't argue it, especially since you are so convinced these new and
improved versions of stuff already around are going to take off big time
any day now. It's going to be a while and there are going to be plenty of
roadblocks. In time there will be separate roads for self driving vehicles
and ones piloted by people, with the self driving vehicles getting the new
and improved roads. That's the way I see it.

I won't argue it because in time your expectations will come to pass
even if they are not exactly as you imagined. So at that time we will
see who's right. Even then if the self driving cars get into a lot of
trouble I'm sure those who support them and all new things simply
because they're new will have excuses at the ready. "Well, it's only
been a short while, let's give the new self driving cars a little more
time before we start criticizing them", and so forth.

Also, number one with me - these constant claims of self driving cars
being more safe - how can such claims be made on the basis of a few
experiments with actual humans in the car? Besides, safety is not the
main issue even if some people want to pretend that's what they care
about. I think there should be some danger to driving. Just as bad
brakes make a careful driver, so too does danger of all sorts do the
same thing. You want a world where everyone goes perfectly round
and round, buy yourself an electric train set.

[Mike Duffy]

On 2022-05-24, Thomas Joseph <jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
>
> And the toilet.

There is still some room for improvement. Every few weeks I experience an
'incomplete operation', whereby I am left with the need to go and get the
toilet obstruction displacement kit from the basement and apply successive
escalation of levels of shit-disturbing operations.

Usually I start with a pail of lukewarm water from the shower, followed by
a half hour wait repeated a few times. Of course, if in a hurry, I go
directly to plan B, which looks like a concertina with a wooden handle on
one end and a 5" hole on the other.

The thing is, I would be willing to put in an industrial-sized toilet.
You know, the ones with no tank, but you've got a 200 PSI pump in the
basement and people on the Internet take pix of flushing pit balls, &c

My wife says that would look inelegant, but I figure I can always
exercise my male prerogative for a stand-up urinal and then pretend to
concede to the one-piece toilet. Is that a plan or what?

The worse part is that I usually end up cleaning the whole bathroom
because there is always some (clean) water from the pail that ends
up on the floor, so I'm already at the point of mopping the floor.

[Thomas Joseph]

Mike Duffy wrote:

> Does it bring the vehicle to a full stop first?


> That might be handy if someone has a heart attack.

Yes, in another way it could prove deadly, like the car suddenly
coming to a stop without the driver wanting it to happen. That'
would be quite the shock. Lawsuits are going to fly soon.

There are intangibles to driving as with most things. In a moment requiring
a split second decision I'll take the most ordinary human brain over a machine
any day.

Those cars that are programmed to stop when the system senses
something in front of them. O think it's stupid rely on such things, to take
yourself out of the picture completely, which seems to be what most people
want these days, to be removed from all responsibility, making things as distant
and impersonal as possible.

The self driving car is programmed to stop under certain conditions where
a human brain might be able to see that hitting the gas pedal is a better option
than coming to a quick stop. Yeah I know - people are stupid, right? Well, I don't
care how stupid they may be, I'll take the most ordinary human brain over a
machine in a life and death split second decision. For now anyway.

[Thomas Joseph]

Mike Duffy wrote:

> My wife says that would look inelegant, but I figure I can always
> exercise my male prerogative for a stand-up urinal and then pretend to
> concede to the one-piece toilet. Is that a plan or what?
>
> The worse part is that I usually end up cleaning the whole bathroom
> because there is always some (clean) water from the pail that ends
> up on the floor, so I'm already at the point of mopping the floor.

Pretty wild plan. Reminds me of when I was a kid and I stole $20 out of
my grandmother's purse and decided to lessen the guilt by handing it to
her and telling her I found under the cushion of her favorite chair knowing
she'd give me a $10 reward for my "honesty."

I have had a problem with incomplete bowel movements for about 8 years.
Went to 3 different doctors and got paraded through their machines which
are nothing but giant cash registers. Procedures, nothing more. No detective
work. No questions and answers. Anyway, because I have to dig the turds out
I got into the habit of using paper towels instead of toilet paper. Stronger,
less apt to tear.

They say don't flush paper towels down the toilet. I don't care. I use the
really cheap flimsy ones for that purpose alone. I have gotten into using
baby wipes. I flush those too. If anybody ever bitches about it I'll tell
them to talk to my doctors. Lately, after 8 years the problem seems to
be getting better on its own.

You gotta admit, lots of old inventions are taken for granted, as maybe
they should be. But for me, stepping into a shower and turning the faucet
and water comes pouring out instantly at just the right temperature, to me
that is a luxury. Sometimes I'll be taking a shower or a shit and will stop to
think about these amazing inventions which seem to have taken a backseat
to "new and improved" electronic bullshit that has it's place and can be exciting
as well but has not yet stood the test of time the way the shower and toilet have.

This is the ultimatum. You have a computer and a toilet but can only
keep one. Which would you throw away? I was going to say I'd toss the
computer because I love the toilet so much. But I know that's not true. I know
I'd let go of the toilet easily in favor of squatting over a spread out newspaper to
let the turds fly. I'll keep the computer. But a shower might be a different story.
Lots of modern inventions, or modifications to older ones, are ok with me,
especially when they work. But to rant and rave about some new shit just
because it's new and is nowhere near being proved as workable, man that is
sick and disheartening to see and I am sincerely hoping to see a lot of accidents
and other negative shit happen with some of this stuff starting with self driving
cars.

[Thomas Joseph]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 10:52:56 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:

> I like people like you saying "it'll never fly Orville." Shortsighted people are tons of fun. Please keep it up!

That is a very narrow minded and unfair example you just tossed my way.
I've heard it used before. It must make you feel really progressive and ahead
of the times to tell other people how archaic they are simply because they have
some doubts about some new things. Not all new things are good just because
they are new. I'm sure at some point in time you have had doubts about
something new and unproved on the horizon. Isn't it fun when you express your
doubts and are met with the "It'll never fly, Orville" routine? That's easy to say
because you were born into a world where flight already existed. At one time you
may even have believed the earth to be flat had you not learned otherwise in school.
I won't hesitate to admit that had I not learned otherwise in school I would probably
think it's flat. And you know what? It is flat. It is flat to me because I don't look beyond
the horizon even though I am an extremely open minded person capable of venturing
deeper into the future and the past and the inner folds of abstract thought than you or
anyone I've encountered on this group or in the general population period.

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> My brother has a self-driving truck although he has to keep his eyes on the road or the system disengages. That sort of takes away from the self-driving feature but I don't have any problems with taking baby steps.

Yes indeed, baby steps. But you would also need some kind of magic elixir to turn
yourself into a baby, or at least a lot younger than you are now, in order to live long
enough to see those baby steps get anywhere. Just because the self driving car
represents the future to some people doesn't mean it's going to happen any time
soon. As I said, it could happen, but only if the self driving vehicles and those
driven by humans are on separate roads. At that time people will be clamoring to
the old school style of driving, doing it by one's self - and at that time they will find
themselves viewed as second class citizens, knowing deep in their heart that they
deserve it because they put their faith into a bunch of unproven techno bullshit.

[Thomas Joseph]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 10:58:48 PM UTC-4, André Malraux wrote:

> Yes, it's probably a good idea to insist on human supervision for now.

Yes, until the thing you're touting as ready for action has proven itself.

"And it shall come to pass that I will be asked to prove myself and will
find myself unable to do so."

Gandhi, 2022

[Thomas Joseph]

I feel unsafe around people who rely on security for everything. Just because
something is touted as the future doesn't mean it's going to happen just because
Orville and his brother did so. Some advancements don't surprise me at all. For
instance, a plane that in the beginning goes only 40 miles an hour, if that - it's
obvious once the first step has been made that it won't be long before its going
much faster.

Escalation is alien to nothing. Records are made to be broken. But to
say that some unproven form of newness is going to be a success just because
Orville and Wilbur had success, that could be a problem as I'm sure the past was
full of promises that never came to pass. But we don't hear about those.. To call
someone narrow minded simply because they are skeptical of something new
(and unproved), is very unfair. Very very unfair.

[dsi1]

You've completely missed how technology has changed society in the last 20 years. You forgot how things were back in the recent past. You somehow believe that things will stay frozen in the year 2022. You also haven't been keeping abreast of what's going on in the world. That's fine. You like to brag about how you reject the modern world anyway. So what else is new in rfc-land? Nuttin honey. :)

[André Malraux]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 1:48:34 AM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rape Is Over-Rated
>
>
>
> A rollicking torrent of fist-driven thunder
> Rained down on the old wino's face
> His lips were in shreds, his eyes torn asunder
> But the madman proferred him no grace
>
> Quite some distance away at a seperate scene
> A young girl was involved in a scrape
> Her attacker was large and incredibly mean
> But she calmed him by yielding to rape
>
> Not so lucky a route could our wino friend take
> From the punchin’ and beggin’ and wheezin’
> With no pussy to sell - no deal could he make
> He was stomped for no rhyme and no reason
>
> So for women who scorn their 'subservient' role
> This proposal I offer instead
> "Are you willing to barter your rape-ravaged hole
> In exchange for that old wino's head?”

Sources have told The Telegraph that an internationally advertised gay party in Spain is also being investigated as the
root cause of the global monkeypox cases.

In the UK, a link was first drawn between gay men and monkeypox earlier in the week, with the UK Health Security
Agency (UKHSA) urging men who have sex with men to be alert to any new rashes or lesions on their body, including their genitalia.

[Mike Duffy]

On 2022-05-24, Thomas Joseph <jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> I have had a problem with incomplete bowel movements for about 8 years.
> Went to 3 different doctors and got paraded through their machines which
> are nothing but giant cash registers. Procedures, nothing more. No detective
> work. No questions and answers. Anyway, because I have to dig the turds out
> I got into the habit of using paper towels instead of toilet paper.

Gosh. And I felt I was revealing too much info when I admitted how often
my ample below-the-belt endowment ends up blocking the toilet.

[André Malraux]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 1:48:34 AM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rape Is Over-Rated
>
>
>
> A rollicking torrent of fist-driven thunder
> Rained down on the old wino's face
> His lips were in shreds, his eyes torn asunder
> But the madman proferred him no grace
>
> Quite some distance away at a seperate scene
> A young girl was involved in a scrape
> Her attacker was large and incredibly mean
> But she calmed him by yielding to rape
>
> Not so lucky a route could our wino friend take
> From the punchin’ and beggin’ and wheezin’
> With no pussy to sell - no deal could he make
> He was stomped for no rhyme and no reason
>
> So for women who scorn their 'subservient' role
> This proposal I offer instead
> "Are you willing to barter your rape-ravaged hole
> In exchange for that old wino's head?”

Money quote from Bill Maher:

"I don’t understand parents who won’t let their nine-year-old walk to the corner without a helmet,
an EpiPen, and a GPS tracker, and God forbid their lips touch dairy, but hormone blockers and
genital surgery?

Fine.

Talk about a nut allergy."

[cshenk]

dsi1 wrote:

> On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 4:10:34 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> > dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds like you've never been raped. Me neither.
> > >

> > I was "semi-raped' a few times. Got screwed up the ass twice for
> > money. Not only did I agree to it, I sought it out. Well, I wasn't
> > looking for an ass reaming, but I needed the cash and that's what
> > the guy was looking for.
> >
> > He was a big jailhouse Negro. I knew right away it was a mistake.
> > He did not rape me, but he wouldn't let me go when I wanted to. I
> > had a rough time getting away from him. He was looking for a
> > full-time sex slave. Later I talked to a few other poolroom guys
> > who played the streets for money who said they ran into the same
> > guy and did get raped. I do not doubt it. As I said, I saw the guy
> > as a predator right from the start. But I had put myself in a
> > position of needing money pronto, so I took the chance. And from
> > that chance I got an evening of unsurpassed anal agony as well as a
> > story that will live with me forever. As I have always said (for
> > example), a good story about losing money is worth more than the
> > money lost. So while I certainly did not enjoy that evening in my
> > life I am aware that I am alive today and in some odd way a better
> > man for it thanks in part to the lust-crazed jailhouse Negro.

>
> I'm kind of old so chances are good that I'll never have to worry
> about getting screwed in the ass by a lust-crazed jailhouse negro.

> OTOH, chances are good that I'll have an electric self-driving car
> and ride in an electric airplane. How amazing is that? Really fucking
> amazing.

dsi1, use at least some discretion when quoting obvious spammers ok?
Please?

[dsi1]

I'l try but I can make no guarantees.

[Mike Duffy]

On 2022-05-25, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:

> On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 2:53:51 PM UTC-10, cshenk wrote:

>> dsi1 wrote:

>> > On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 4:10:34 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com

>> > > [...] I am alive today and in some odd way a better man

>> > > for it thanks in part to the lust-crazed jailhouse Negro.
>> >

>> > I'm kind of old so [...] How amazing is that?

>> dsi1, use at least some discretion when quoting obvious spammers ok?

> I'll try but I can make no guarantees.

Just because he has reams of meretricious piffle to spew about everything
does not make TJ a spammer. He's not trying to 'sell' anything.

Like most of use here, he is just another soul on the tramway to Hell
pumping the hand-cart like a jackhammer even though we're all so far
over the hill that pumping it does not make it go any faster.

[Hank Rogers]

She's not THAT damn stupid. She knows he's not a spammer. She just
prefers to read kuth's batshit crazy stuff instead. Anything else
irritates her.

[dsi1]

Direct your comments at the poster that used the word "spammer."

[Bryan Simmons]

And Mike just criticized me for not trimming sigs.

--Bryan

[Mike Duffy]

On 2022-05-25, Bryan Simmons <bryang...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 11:39:44 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:

>> On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 4:49:40 PM UTC-10, Mike Duffy wrote:

>> > On 2022-05-25, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:

>> > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 2:53:51 PM UTC-10, cshenk wrote:
>> >
>> > >> dsi1 wrote:
>> >
>> > >> > On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 4:10:34 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com
>> > >> > > [...] I am alive today and in some odd way a better man
>> > >> > > for it thanks in part to the lust-crazed jailhouse Negro.

>> > >> > I'm kind of old so [...] How amazing is that?

>> > >> dsi1, use at least some discretion when quoting obvious spammers ok?
>> > > I'll try but I can make no guarantees.

>> > Just because he has reams of meretricious piffle to spew about everything
>> > does not make TJ a spammer. He's not trying to 'sell' anything.

>> Direct your comments at the poster that used the word "spammer."

> And Mike just criticized me for not trimming sigs.

Really? Bryan, you're the one always saying to count the '>'s.

I left them in to clearly direct my comments at Carol.

Now I have proof that the Hawaiian and the least insane poster
from St. Louis are in a conspiracy to besmirch my logic.

[GM]

"The Hawaiian" gets the blame by default...

--
GM

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> You've completely missed how technology has changed society in the last 20 years. You forgot how things were back in the recent past. You somehow believe that things will stay frozen in the year 2022. You also haven't been keeping abreast of what's going on in the world. That's fine. You like to brag about how you reject the modern world anyway. So what else is new in rfc-land? Nuttin honey. :)

No, I haven't missed anything, you have. You always do. Maybe I'm just
not very good at conveying my thoughts. Or maybe you're not good at
interpreting them. I don't know, but your comments about me rejecting
all modern advancements is bogus. I never gave the future wholesale
rejections, only parts of it that at the moment are purely speculative. You
seem to be the absolute opposite of what you suspect me to be. You
suspect me of rejecting the future and recent advancements in total, and
we both know that's not true. I don't like a lot of the forced security aspects
of a lot of this new shit, and it's going to get worse. But there are plenty of
modern things I appreciate and use. There is also a lot of modern stuff
that is considered new and improved but is really neither. I know all about
how technology has changed the world. I'm an observant person. But I'm
not ready to hop on board with every new unproved trend that comes down
the pike just because no one's ever seen it before.

"When you are ahead of the times - like me - you can afford to ridicule
the future, because you're already ahead of it." - Gandhi, 2022

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

cshenk wrote:


> > dsi1, use at least some discretion when quoting obvious spammers ok?
> > Please?

> I'l try but I can make no guarantees.

I have no idea what the first guy is talking about. Spammers? Is he
talking about me? Hey, Cshenk, are you talking about me?

[Thomas Joseph]

Mike Duffy wrote:

> Just because he has reams of meretricious piffle to spew about everything
> does not make TJ a spammer. He's not trying to 'sell' anything.
>
> Like most of use here, he is just another soul on the tramway to Hell
> pumping the hand-cart like a jackhammer even though we're all so far
> over the hill that pumping it does not make it go any faster.

Thanks for the kind words. But let's back up a bit and see about
getting rid of the words "meretricious piffle" (which I have not yet
looked up but will). You are correct, I am not trying to sell anything.

In fact, only a moment ago I was responding to someone about
something and was outwardly expressing to my disgust to myself
about how I write all this shit and get nothing but ultra short responses,
if that. I was screaming at the machine, "Why can't these people GIVE?
Like me?" Sure, some of the stuff, maybe most of it, sucks. But a lot
of it is flat-out true. I have some pretty entertaining stories from my
life that would sell big time if they were found in the basement or
attic of John Lennon or some other dead celebrity. It's nothing great
but no one is forced to read it. Again, thanks for chiming in. I know
it's generalizing but I am beginning to think people who use their
own names in this group, even if it's just a monicker, I am beginning
to see them as more honest and open even if I happen to disagree with
some of them big time sometimes. Maybe this Cshenk person was
talking about somebody else, but I kind of doubt it.

[Thomas Joseph]

Hank Rogers wrote:

Mike Duffy wrote:

> > Like most of use here, he is just another soul on the tramway to Hell
> > pumping the hand-cart like a jackhammer even though we're all so far
> > over the hill that pumping it does not make it go any faster.

> She's not THAT damn stupid. She knows he's not a spammer. She just
> prefers to read kuth's batshit crazy stuff instead. Anything else
> irritates her.

She? She? I swear to God I knew it. Well, I didn't know it, I just felt it,
but the feeling was strong. The look of the name Cshenk has a masculine
vibe to it. Hard core. Yet for some reason when I read that person's very
hateful and spiteful words I immediately saw a woman's hand behind it.
I have great intuition. Not the women's type, stronger and better with a
higher batting percentage of being right. Although I can be wrong - at times.

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:
Mike Duffy wrote:

dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:

cshenk wrote:
> >
dsi1 wrote:

jazee...@gmail.com

> > Like most of use here, TJ is just another soul on the tramway to Hell

> > pumping the hand-cart like a jackhammer even though we're all so far
> > over the hill that pumping it does not make it go any faster.

> Direct your comments at the poster that used the word "spammer."

Yo, dis1 - what's your actual name anyway? - at first I wondered, "Is he
talking to me, I don't think I ever once called anybody a spammer in any
group at any time. I had to look. So you were talking to Mike Duffy. In
his defense, not that he needs it, the name "Cshneck" does appear
above his post although it's a bit jumbled up up there.

I am serious though. I never asked your name. I asked someone else,
a few people, at different times. I thought I saw someone call you Dave.
When I called you that someone said "His name is not Dave", without
revealing your real name. It's like some kind of secret agent bullshit,
CIA type stuff, or what? Just the dog tags, rank and whatever - no name.
So what's your name if you don't mind? Mine is Thomas Joseph and
it's immediate derivatives Tom, Tommy, or TJ. Or "Hey you." That's ok too.

"My Name is Nobody." (I liked that movie in parts)

[André Malraux]

On Wed, 25 May 2022 22:02:14 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Joseph
<jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>dsi1 wrote:
>Mike Duffy wrote:
>
>dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>
>cshenk wrote:
>> >
>dsi1 wrote:
>
>jazee...@gmail.com
>
>> > Like most of use here, TJ is just another soul on the tramway to Hell
>> > pumping the hand-cart like a jackhammer even though we're all so far
>> > over the hill that pumping it does not make it go any faster.
>
>> Direct your comments at the poster that used the word "spammer."
>
>
>Yo, dis1 - what's your actual name anyway?

His real name's Mr. Aloha.

--
André Malraux
<https://cdn.britannica.com/20/109120-050-C8214147/Andre-Malraux.jpg>

[Thomas Joseph]

Mike Duffy wrote:

Bryan Simmons wrote:
>
dsi1 wrote:
>
Mike Duffy wrote:
>
dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>
cshenk wrote:
>
dsi1 wrote:

> > And Mike just criticized me for not trimming sigs.

> Really? Bryan, you're the one always saying to count the '>'s.

> I left them in to clearly direct my comments at Carol.

> Now I have proof that the Hawaiian and the least insane poster
> from St. Louis are in a conspiracy to besmirch my logic.

Pretty funny. There is a conspiracy vibe to it for sure. Be careful
when entering St. Louis. You don't want to meet up with the
"Arch Sniper."

Carol, huh? Funny. Now I know her name. I'm a decent typist,
but Cshenk gives me pause. I don't like pause. I like to roll daddy roll.

[Thomas Joseph]

André Malraux wrote:
Thomas Joseph

> Yo, dis1 - what's your actual name anyway?


> His real name's Mr. Aloha.

Can we do Aloha without the Mister? As for you, what the fuck
is your name anyway? I got you pegged as Greg Sorrow. Your short
response style posts are better than your political screeds which are
too predictable and sermonesque for me. But even those can be a
relief at times, kind of like a coffin confined corpse being visited by
someone he didn't get along with above ground but who now
suddenly is his best friend because they are the only one visiting.

"When you see me coming, call me Mr. Hello.
When you see me walk away, call me Mr. Goodbye." - Gandhi, 2022

[Thomas Joseph]

UTC-4, GM wrote:


> "The Hawaiian" gets the blame by default...

..............lol. "No man is an island" - only peninsulas and
inlets. Like the penis and the vagina, the yin and the yang
of love, they reach out across the raging seas to shake hands
across the long bridge of human love-man-ship.

[André Malraux]

On Wed, 25 May 2022 22:13:24 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Joseph
<jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Can we do Aloha without the Mister?

Doc Aloha would be ok too.

>As for you, what the fuck
>is your name anyway? I got you pegged as Greg Sorrow.

Greg Sorrow is my forger. I'm the real he, the real Bruce. Now going
through life as forging victim André Malraux.

> Your short
>response style posts are better than your political screeds which are
>too predictable and sermonesque for me.

Those posts are Greg Sorrow's.

>But even those can be a
>relief at times, kind of like a coffin confined corpse being visited by
>someone he didn't get along with above ground but who now
>suddenly is his best friend because they are the only one visiting.
>

If it works for you, enjoy!

[dsi1]

Sounds like your'e in full confusion mode. :)

[dsi1]

No, I wasn't talking to you. I've never called you a spammer, nor would I ever call you a spammer - even if you were a spammer. I don't call people names. Someone else called you a spammer. Why did she do that? I do not know. Take it up with her. I reckon she won't respond to you because she thinks you're an "obvious spammer."
I wasn't talking to Mike Duffy either. He doesn't think you're a spammer but he thinks that I think you're a spammer. Why does he think that? I do not know. I don't know why anybody thinks anything in this nutty group.

Here's what I had for breakfast: crispy edge pancakes AKA, "pancakes." My wife had French toast. Gosh it was good! It was the best French toast I've ever tasted.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/kheMMXJnvjCgbTVn7
https://photos.app.goo.gl/LGHwRMZUyb5LHoTB7

[Thomas Joseph]

André Malraux wrote:
Thomas Joseph

> > Your short response style posts are better than your political screeds which are too predictable and sermonesque for me.
>

> But even those can be a relief at times, kind of like a
coffin confined corpse being visited by someone he didn't get
along with above ground but who now suddenly is his best friend

because he's the the only one visiting.

> Greg Sorrow is my forger. I'm the real he, the real Bruce. Now going
> through life as forging victim André Malraux.

> Those posts are Greg Sorrow's.

> If it works for you, enjoy!

Yes, I'm pretty good at distinguishing between Sorrow and you.
No matter what you think of him, sometimes Mr. Sorrow has something
decent to say. Or something not so decent said in a decent way. I like his
posts when he lays off the political crap. So you are correct - I WAS directing
my response to him, not to you. I can't bat a thousand trying to ID two guys
both using the same fake name - but I do a pretty decent job with it. How
about giving me some fucking credit? Just once. For the love of God, just once.

[Thomas Joseph]

I see the :) sign designed to soften the sting of your words. On the other
hand you do like to argue a lot. You enjoy the confusion. You are not
alone. A lot of people in this group pretend to not understand what other
people are saying as an excuse to continue their argument. I understand.
But I am different. I am honest, the most honest man I ever met - so for me,
although outfitted with perhaps the sense of humor of all time - I sometimes
take offense at people not seeing or admitting to see my undying honesty
and to respect, admire, and adore it.

[Thomas Joseph]

It may appear that Duffy was responding to you but he was simply trying to clue me
in on who called me a spammer and why. He was not talking directly to you. At least
I did not get that impression. He was trying to be helpful, not argumentative.

I eat pretty much the same breakfast every day. But a switch is nice now and
then. Even going out to eat at a junky fast food place has it's benefits as I have
noticed over the years that after eating at certain fast food spots my turdal evacuation
improves greatly, also my farts. I love the big boomers. I think something new shocks
the system and gets it moving, even if that something new is considered unhealthy.

Haven't had pancakes in a long time. Ain't gonna make them at home and I rarely
go to restaurants anymore. Nothing to do with COVID. It started about 20 to 30
years ago - not being able to put up with the noise in some places - the hubbub, very
hard on the nerves, especially with a bunch of children running unsupervised up and down
the aisles screaming their guts out with that nerve shredding shriek known only to
pre schoolers.

[dsi1]

On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 11:57:57 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> I see the :) sign designed to soften the sting of your words. On the other
> hand you do like to argue a lot. You enjoy the confusion. You are not
> alone. A lot of people in this group pretend to not understand what other
> people are saying as an excuse to continue their argument. I understand.
> But I am different. I am honest, the most honest man I ever met - so for me,
> although outfitted with perhaps the sense of humor of all time - I sometimes
> take offense at people not seeing or admitting to see my undying honesty
> and to respect, admire, and adore it.

You're wrong about that. I do not like to interact with confused people. To help you gain some clarity with my posts, I'll make it real simple for you. I hope you can appreciate the hard work that people like me do for people like you. 😁👌

[André Malraux]

ONE GUY using someone else's name. Try to get your head around that,
Superman. It's not that hard.

[André Malraux]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 1:48:34 AM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rape Is Over-Rated
>
>
>
> A rollicking torrent of fist-driven thunder
> Rained down on the old wino's face
> His lips were in shreds, his eyes torn asunder
> But the madman proferred him no grace
>
> Quite some distance away at a seperate scene
> A young girl was involved in a scrape
> Her attacker was large and incredibly mean
> But she calmed him by yielding to rape
>
> Not so lucky a route could our wino friend take
> From the punchin’ and beggin’ and wheezin’
> With no pussy to sell - no deal could he make
> He was stomped for no rhyme and no reason
>
> So for women who scorn their 'subservient' role
> This proposal I offer instead
> "Are you willing to barter your rape-ravaged hole
> In exchange for that old wino's head?”


The trans supporters, for the most part, don’t give a **** about trans people.

It’s just a way to flex their intellectual and moral superiority to others. If you don’t agree with their
outlandish orthodoxy then you’re an ignorant bigot. Which means they are enlightened and tolerant.

[André Malraux]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 1:48:34 AM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rape Is Over-Rated
>
>
>
> A rollicking torrent of fist-driven thunder
> Rained down on the old wino's face
> His lips were in shreds, his eyes torn asunder
> But the madman proferred him no grace
>
> Quite some distance away at a seperate scene
> A young girl was involved in a scrape
> Her attacker was large and incredibly mean
> But she calmed him by yielding to rape
>
> Not so lucky a route could our wino friend take
> From the punchin’ and beggin’ and wheezin’
> With no pussy to sell - no deal could he make
> He was stomped for no rhyme and no reason
>
> So for women who scorn their 'subservient' role
> This proposal I offer instead
> "Are you willing to barter your rape-ravaged hole
> In exchange for that old wino's head?”

Love The Skin You're In!

Most people are very happy with what they've got, but if you're not happy with it, take control and change it.

The most common things people want are to be a bit bigger, and interestingly, to not have been circumcised.

While there's truly nothing you can do to make it bigger, non-surgical foreskin restoration works and is getting
more and more popular.

Some of you might want to check out NORM, NORM-UK and TLC Tugger and Foreskin Restoration Forums.

It's your penis and your life.

Find satisfaction!

[dsi1]

There is a general cluelessness about what's going on and who's the real spammer. Perhaps it takes an outsider to see what's happening here.

Yesterday my son had a bowl of rice, sprouts, Portuguese sausage, and cabbage broth. It's a pretty wacky bowl!

https://photos.app.goo.gl/gxZvxatTKpPq7E6t5

[Dave Smith]

Wait a tit. Bruce is complaining about someone posting under someone
else's name? That's rich. He forged me repeatedly for a few weeks at a
time on more than one occasion.

> Yesterday my son had a bowl of rice, sprouts, Portuguese sausage, and cabbage broth. It's a pretty wacky bowl!
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/gxZvxatTKpPq7E6t5

That looks pretty good.

[GM]

That is PORT - A - GESE, *not* "Portuguese" ...

And in FYOOTURE please to specify which snausage:

What are Portuguese sausages called?

Some traditional Portuguese sausages. (A) Alheira (Trás-os-Montes); (B) Chouriça de Porco Bísaro (Trás-os-Montes); (C) Chouriço de Carne (Alentejo); (D) Chouriço Mouro (Beira); (E) Morcela (Alentejo); (F) Morcela (Trás-os-Montes); (G) Linguiça (Alentejo); and (H) Farinheira (Alentejo).

Obrigada...!!!

😁

--
GM

[André Malraux]

In my signature I said it wasn't you. You always leave that little bit
out, because it doesn't fit your agenda, you sneaky old pickleballer!

[dsi1]

Sounds like you're saying that posting under someone else's name does not exist unless it's your name? I'm skeptical.

The restaurant calls this dish "Kailua eggs." My wife's late friend's son and his partner are the owners. My wife is sad that her friend never got to eat at/see the place. They also own another restaurant in just down the street in Kailua, Oahu.

https://www.easyquehi.com/

[dsi1]

On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 10:12:41 AM UTC-10, GM wrote:
> That is PORT - A - GESE, *not* "Portuguese" ...
>
> And in FYOOTURE please to specify which snausage:
>
> What are Portuguese sausages called?
>
> Some traditional Portuguese sausages. (A) Alheira (Trás-os-Montes); (B) Chouriça de Porco Bísaro (Trás-os-Montes); (C) Chouriço de Carne (Alentejo); (D) Chouriço Mouro (Beira); (E) Morcela (Alentejo); (F) Morcela (Trás-os-Montes); (G) Linguiça (Alentejo); and (H) Farinheira (Alentejo).
>
> Obrigada...!!!
>
> 😁
>
> --
> GM

You should try citing your source instead of Googling n' cutting n' pasting - that's pretty lame. In the end, you Goolgled but still don't know shit. That's a double dose of lame.
If I'm talking to a local from Hawaii, I'll say "podagee", for the haoles on the mainland, it's Portuguese. A person in the Northeastern states might say "podagee" too. It might be a derogatory term on the mainland but it isn't on this rock - well, maybe just a little.

https://www.airtohawaii.com/portuguese-sausage/

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> You're wrong about that. I do not like to interact with confused people. To help you gain some clarity with my posts, I'll make it real simple for you. I hope you can appreciate the hard work that people like me do for people like you. 😁👌

Appreciate it? I'm on my knees every day giving thanks to God in heaven that people
like you are here to guide me down life's path. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

[GM]

"dsi1" sells hearing aides, he could prolly get you a good deal if you need one...

Earlier in life, he was a sonar acoustician for the US Navy...

LOTS of subs and such lurking around Hawaii, ya know... IIRC he was also
stationed for awhiles in Kwajalein...

--
GM

[André Malraux]

On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 7:53:51 PM UTC-5, cshenk wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
>
> > On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 4:10:34 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > dsi1 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds like you've never been raped. Me neither.
> > > >
> > > I was "semi-raped' a few times. Got screwed up the ass twice for
> > > money. Not only did I agree to it, I sought it out. Well, I wasn't
> > > looking for an ass reaming, but I needed the cash and that's what
> > > the guy was looking for.
> > >
> > > He was a big jailhouse Negro. I knew right away it was a mistake.
> > > He did not rape me, but he wouldn't let me go when I wanted to. I
> > > had a rough time getting away from him. He was looking for a
> > > full-time sex slave. Later I talked to a few other poolroom guys
> > > who played the streets for money who said they ran into the same
> > > guy and did get raped. I do not doubt it. As I said, I saw the guy
> > > as a predator right from the start. But I had put myself in a
> > > position of needing money pronto, so I took the chance. And from
> > > that chance I got an evening of unsurpassed anal agony as well as a
> > > story that will live with me forever. As I have always said (for
> > > example), a good story about losing money is worth more than the
> > > money lost. So while I certainly did not enjoy that evening in my
> > > life I am aware that I am alive today and in some odd way a better
> > > man for it thanks in part to the lust-crazed jailhouse Negro.
> >
> > I'm kind of old so chances are good that I'll never have to worry
> > about getting screwed in the ass by a lust-crazed jailhouse negro.
> > OTOH, chances are good that I'll have an electric self-driving car
> > and ride in an electric airplane. How amazing is that? Really fucking
> > amazing.

> dsi1, use at least some discretion when quoting obvious spammers ok?
> Please?

Here is the gal, quoting Jesus Christ, claiming to be a Jewish immigrant from Greece and who
proclaimed on multiple occasions that Adolf Hitler was a good manager.

You cannot make this up!!!

[André Malraux]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 1:48:34 AM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rape Is Over-Rated
>
>
>
> A rollicking torrent of fist-driven thunder
> Rained down on the old wino's face
> His lips were in shreds, his eyes torn asunder
> But the madman proferred him no grace
>
> Quite some distance away at a seperate scene
> A young girl was involved in a scrape
> Her attacker was large and incredibly mean
> But she calmed him by yielding to rape
>
> Not so lucky a route could our wino friend take
> From the punchin’ and beggin’ and wheezin’
> With no pussy to sell - no deal could he make
> He was stomped for no rhyme and no reason
>
> So for women who scorn their 'subservient' role
> This proposal I offer instead
> "Are you willing to barter your rape-ravaged hole
> In exchange for that old wino's head?”

Contrary to popular myth, Ford did not pay his employees more so they could afford to buy cars.

He did it to increase his profits.

He figured out turnover costs more than paying people well.

He upped the pay and his turnover went down a lot

This allowed his factories to be more efficient and make him more profits.

[Thomas Joseph]

On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 8:11:32 AM UTC-4, André Malraux wrote:

> The trans supporters, for the most part, don’t give a **** about trans people.
>
> It’s just a way to flex their intellectual and moral superiority to others. If you don’t agree with their
> outlandish orthodoxy then you’re an ignorant bigot. Which means they are enlightened and tolerant.

GM again. Nothing to say to me, just another opportunity to spout your philosophies
which are not your own and are understood even by people who don't dwell on it
night and day. It goes way beyond the trans people, all kinds of assholes are looking
for a chance to play their ace in the hole. The Jews got the holocaust. Constant updates
on Anne Franke help keep it alive (for example). The fake enlightenment and tolerance
has been going on a long time. There are so many people openly declaring against
tyranny and injustice and oppression that one has to wonder how all that stuff got off
the ground in the first place. The answer is obvious - there are far less genuinely
tolerant people on earth than some want us to think. I'll even go as far as to say some
parents are secretly hoping their kids get killed by a drunk driver (example), so they
can start a "non profit" anti drunk driving foundation. "We're looking out for you" is
the latest industry with even news people now referring to themselves as our
"first responders." Seeing through these phonies has no value. There is nothing
anything can do to stop it. In fact, being able to see through it only makes it harder
to take. People with no card to play sometimes resort to individualistic acts of
violence to get the attention they think they deserve. You know, spree killers and
the like. They are human too. I support their right to kill until someone deals them
a better hand.

"I keep getting bad cards. And I'm the dealer!" - Gandhi, 2022

[Thomas Joseph]

André Malraux wrote:

> ONE GUY using someone else's name. Try to get your head around that,
> Superman. It's not that hard.

I know that Mr. Malraux. Did you think that switching from your real name to a
fake one would somehow discourage the 'frogging'. That's what it's called, right?
Frogging. Well, it's a form of imitation - and as I'm sure you know the saying goes,
"Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery", so you should take that into account,
especially now after using a series of fake names. I think you like the frogging
in a you yourself can't explain. It just becomes so all about you. Even when GM
posts - as you - once again it's all about YOU. What did you do to GM to get him
on you in this manner? Come on now, let's be honest - the first step on the road
to recover - be honest and admit that you love GM frogging you, your only real
regret being that there aren't more people doing it. Mr. Malraux!

[Thomas Joseph]

André Malraux wrote:

> The most common things people want are to be a bit bigger, and interestingly, to not have been circumcised.
>
> While there's truly nothing you can do to make it bigger, non-surgical foreskin restoration works and is getting more and more popular.

"Non-surgical foreskin restoration", LOL.

"Yo Doc, can ya give me the extra long look?"

"Sure can. But extra long is going to cost you."

"How much?"

"Oh I don't know, I think $30,000 skins sounds good enough."

By the way, does Medicaid cover the restoration? Just kidding, I wouldn't want
the restoration as I am an adorer of the cute skinless boner shinking with musical
definition with each individual segment of the post from the base of the balls to the
tip of the gleaming glans penis pulsing with eye catching glory.

[André Malraux]

I'd prefer to just be Bruce.

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> Yesterday my son had a bowl of rice, sprouts, Portuguese sausage, and cabbage broth. It's a pretty wacky bowl!

You are correct, and I am that outsider. Even at the cab company down here in
Winston Salem NC the dispatchers used to call me "Outsider." There was humor
to it, but some of them really did see me as an outsider, which I proudly admit is true.

As for the food, you may have read before that I cook only foods I have to. I cook
bland then spice it up after. Some of the stuff is pretty good. I'm eating pasta the
last few weeks. I boil the pasta. I blanch the broccoli. And I blanch the chicken
breasts. These are then put in the fridge and added to a new mix every day with
roma tomatoes, minced garlic, basil, parsel, whatever I want to throw in there along
with lemon and olive oil and red chile peppers sliced then. It's a cold pasta salad.
Anyway, I got into the habit of cooking a bunch of thick sliced mushrooms in the
microwave, about 1 minute, then remove and stir and do a minute more. I also do
this with brussel sprouts cut into quarters - about 2 and 1/2 minutes each time. They
are good cold in the cold pasta salad with everything spruced up with the garlic and
other herbs and spices.

[Thomas Joseph]

Dave Smith wrote:

> Wait a tit. Bruce is complaining about someone posting under someone
> else's name? That's rich. He forged me repeatedly for a few weeks at a
> time on more than one occasion.

The whole thing is quite absurd.

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> Yesterday my son had a bowl of rice, sprouts, Portuguese sausage, and cabbage broth. It's a pretty wacky bowl!
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/gxZvxatTKpPq7E6t5

Glad I clicked on it. Seems the only way I'd ever get your real name. So it is
David after all. You had an opportunity to unconfused me and didn't take it.
Why? Why didn't you tell me your name?

For the love of God - why?

[Thomas Joseph]

GM wrote:

> "dsi1" sells hearing aides, he could prolly get you a good deal if you need one...
>
> Earlier in life, he was a sonar acoustician for the US Navy...
>
> LOTS of subs and such lurking around Hawaii, ya know... IIRC he was also
> stationed for awhiles in Kwajalein...

I wouldn't use a hearing aid if I went totally deaf tomorrow. I can live without
sound. At least I think I can now that I can hear. Sometimes things have to be
taken away before we know how much we need them. Right now my hearing is
fine. But maybe I need more things to go wrong with my health - and I believe
it's starting - so that I can at long last acquire a much belated appreciation
for the many gifts God has given me in this life along with help from human
friends such as yourself and others on this group who have helped sustain me
in my quest to forge ahead into the future, not just for myself, but for all mankind!

[GM]

David Iawoka is one of them "inscrutable Orientals"...

--
GM

[Thomas Joseph]

André Malraux wrote:

> Contrary to popular myth, Ford did not pay his employees more so they could afford to buy cars.
>
> He did it to increase his profits.
>
> He figured out turnover costs more than paying people well.
>
> He upped the pay and his turnover went down a lot
>
> This allowed his factories to be more efficient and make him more profits.

Man, the written word of other people, as long as they are official sources of some
kind - it really appeals to you, doesn't it? I personally don't give two shits about
Mr. Ford. However, since you're into history and all that crap, I wonder if you knew
that Ford used to prospective hires to dinner to talk with them and get a feel for them.
But his main purpose was to see if they would salt their food before tasting it. I
don't know if it's true, I only read it. Not a bad way to judge people. But I don't know,
judging people on just one thing, that's kind of narrow, isn't it? Almost as narrow
as salting your food before tasting it.

Anyway, fuck Henry Ford and every innovator who ever came down the pike. We have
their inventions now, the results of their hard work - so who needs them? Not me.

[Thomas Joseph]

Thomas Joseph wrote:

"We're looking out for you" is the latest industry with even news people now
referring to themselves as our "first responders."

Whoops, sorry, that was a misstatement. I meant "first informers." The first time
I heard the term used was in an on air commercial for the station's news crew.
"First informers" - fucking hilarious.

[Thomas Joseph]

André Malraux wrote:

> I'd prefer to just be Bruce.

I don't doubt it. I won't argue it. It's your choice. Come on Bruce, it's time to
come out of the closet and be yourself. Can you do that? For me? Pretty please.

[dsi1]

Sarcasm? I love sarcasm! One doesn't get much chances to see that on Usenet anymore. I always appreciate a bit of sarcasm in replies to my post. Thanks for keeping the flame alive! I too shall do my best to do my part too! If you wish, we can have a "who can be the most sarcastic mook on rfc contest!" That would be awesome!
Mahalo and aloha!

[André Malraux]

…and the hits just keep on comin!

[Thomas Joseph]

GM wrote:

jazee...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Glad I clicked on it. Seems the only way I'd ever get your real name. So it is
> > David after all. You had an opportunity to unconfused me and didn't take it.
> > Why? Why didn't you tell me your name?
> >
> > For the love of God - why?


> David Iawoka is one of them "inscrutable Orientals"...

Now you've gone and done it again, using big words and
forcing me to google up the actual meaning before responding.
I have heard the word 'inscrutable' before, but only in context -
so now before launching my response I am forced to verify the
actual meaning of the word so as not to offend or confuse anyone.
Would others do same for me? I don't know.

in·scru·ta·ble
/inˈskro͞odəb(ə)l/
adjective: inscrutable
impossible to understand or interpret.
"The guy looked blankly inscrutable"

Glad I looked up the word. I was close with the actual
meaning, but not on the mark. I thought it meant 'unbending'
or 'inflexible' or 'firmly planted, something like that.

I do not see orientals as being impossible to understand or
interpret, but like most stereotypical views of other people,
they are exaggerations rooted at some point to some degree
in truth. The oriental does have a certain veneer about him,
doesn't he. Unflappable. A machine. Can't be moved. Will
not wilt under pressure.

As a pool player I played my share of orientals. I'm talking
pure oriental, not Hawaiian, although I played plenty of
Hawaiian guys too. Your image of the oriental is right on.
They do appear unflappable. But they are humans. And
once they crack they are like egg shells coming apart. You
have to get through that outer veneer to get things cracking,
But yes, it is a stereotypical view of the oriental that has some
truth to it. I believe all stereotypical views of peoples of different
ethnicities are rooted in truth.

Truth be mother fucking told

[dsi1]

On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 12:12:05 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> GM again. Nothing to say to me, just another opportunity to spout your philosophies
> which are not your own and are understood even by people who don't dwell on it
> night and day. It goes way beyond the trans people, all kinds of assholes are looking
> for a chance to play their ace in the hole. The Jews got the holocaust. Constant updates
> on Anne Franke help keep it alive (for example). The fake enlightenment and tolerance
> has been going on a long time. There are so many people openly declaring against
> tyranny and injustice and oppression that one has to wonder how all that stuff got off
> the ground in the first place. The answer is obvious - there are far less genuinely
> tolerant people on earth than some want us to think. I'll even go as far as to say some
> parents are secretly hoping their kids get killed by a drunk driver (example), so they
> can start a "non profit" anti drunk driving foundation. "We're looking out for you" is
> the latest industry with even news people now referring to themselves as our
> "first responders." Seeing through these phonies has no value. There is nothing
> anything can do to stop it. In fact, being able to see through it only makes it harder
> to take. People with no card to play sometimes resort to individualistic acts of
> violence to get the attention they think they deserve. You know, spree killers and
> the like. They are human too. I support their right to kill until someone deals them
> a better hand.
>
> "I keep getting bad cards. And I'm the dealer!" - Gandhi, 2022

GM doesn't push for any kind of unified agenda because he's mentally ill and does not act in a rational manner. He sometimes freaks out and starts spamming rfc with random/repetitious posts in order to shape/stifle/redirect the conversations. In some way, it all makes sense in GM's brainpan.

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> Sarcasm? I love sarcasm! One doesn't get much chances to see that on Usenet anymore. I always appreciate a bit of sarcasm in replies to my post. Thanks for keeping the flame alive! I too shall do my best to do my part too! If you wish, we can have a "who can be the most sarcastic mook on rfc contest!" That would be awesome!
> Mahalo and aloha!

My sarcasm is gentle. In fact I don't even see it as sarcasm or
as something directed at just one person, it's just an overall
'funny to me' outlook in life, that everyone I have ever met has
helped make me the man I am today. What kind of man is that?
One of the greatest who ever lived, that's what kind. And I have
YOU and everyone else to thank for it on some level. I am a
very humble person. Humble and modest. I could well be the
most modest human who ever lived.

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> GM doesn't push for any kind of unified agenda because he's mentally ill and does not act in a rational manner. He sometimes freaks out and starts spamming rfc with random/repetitious posts in order to shape/stifle/redirect the conversations. In some way, it all makes sense in GM's brainpan.

Not trying to change the topic but I tend to think everybody on
this board is nuts in some way. Nuts and lonely. I can handle
that combination. Add "desperate" to the mx and things could
get ugly though. Oh believe me, I see the love/hate thing with
you and your mirror image GM.

[Hank Rogers]

dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 12:43:13 AM UTC-10, André Malraux wrote:

>> On Thu, 26 May 2022 02:53:30 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Joseph

>> <jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> André Malraux wrote:

>>> Thomas Joseph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Your short response style posts are better than your political screeds which are too predictable and sermonesque for me.
>>>>
>>>> But even those can be a relief at times, kind of like a
>>> coffin confined corpse being visited by someone he didn't get
>>> along with above ground but who now suddenly is his best friend
>>> because he's the the only one visiting.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Greg Sorrow is my forger. I'm the real he, the real Bruce. Now going
>>>> through life as forging victim André Malraux.
>>>
>>>> Those posts are Greg Sorrow's.
>>>
>>>> If it works for you, enjoy!
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm pretty good at distinguishing between Sorrow and you.
>>> No matter what you think of him, sometimes Mr. Sorrow has something
>>> decent to say. Or something not so decent said in a decent way. I like his
>>> posts when he lays off the political crap. So you are correct - I WAS directing
>>> my response to him, not to you. I can't bat a thousand trying to ID two guys
>>> both using the same fake name - but I do a pretty decent job with it.

>> ONE GUY using someone else's name. Try to get your head around that,
>> Superman. It's not that hard.

>> --
>> André Malraux
>> <https://cdn.britannica.com/20/109120-050-C8214147/Andre-Malraux.jpg>
>

> There is a general cluelessness about what's going on and who's the real spammer. Perhaps it takes an outsider to see what's happening here.
>

> Yesterday my son had a bowl of rice, sprouts, Portuguese sausage, and cabbage broth. It's a pretty wacky bowl!
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/gxZvxatTKpPq7E6t5
>

I bet he blew some great loud farts. Did you record this Uncle Tojo?

[GM]

'Think FAST, Mr. Moto...!!!"

🔜

🇯🇵

🗾


--
GM

[Hank Rogers]

Are you just now realizing the druce saga?

I thought you were more astute.

[Hank Rogers]

I didn't realize that. So Uncle Tojo really does know something
about sound, acoustics, electronics, mathematics?

Damn, I thought the nip was only a slimy hearing aide salesman.

[GM]

David thinks that me and Hank Rogers are the *same * person...

--
GM

[dsi1]

On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 1:40:46 PM UTC-10, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Not trying to change the topic but I tend to think everybody on
> this board is nuts in some way. Nuts and lonely. I can handle
> that combination. Add "desperate" to the mx and things could
> get ugly though. Oh believe me, I see the love/hate thing with
> you and your mirror image GM.

You like to start your posts with "I'm not trying to..., I'm not into..., I don't talk about... and then you go right ahead and do it! That's what I love about you uncle!
I can handle nuts and lonely too. I just shy away from clinically insane. You do realize that Mr. Rogers is a figment of GM imagination, don't you? Of course you don't.

[Thomas Joseph]

Hank Rogers wrote:

> I bet he blew some great loud farts. Did you record this Uncle Tojo?

LOL. Contrary to popular belief, the loudness of farts is attributable
not so much to foods eaten but to freedom of flow within the body.
An open gut is needed for the big boomers of our youth. As we age
things tend to get more and more narrow in us. The pipes clog up.
Things slow down. A fart can be huge - the biggest of all time - but if
it can't pick up speed it's not going to break the sound barrier. For this
reason most real fart lovers already know that the key to great booming
farts is to go on a one to two day diet before eating a large amount of
fart foods. You're got to have free flow. But that's one often overlooked
aspect of farts that make them as great as they are, their ability to
appeal on more than one level. If you can't get a good sound going,
you might be able to redeem the fart with some powerhouse reek. If
you're trying to get some good reek going and you can't, you can always
cut a big non smelling boomer to make up for it. What a lovely gift from
God farts are!

[GM]

The National Geographic even gave him a grant to measure the voltage of electric eels...

--
GM

[Hank Rogers]

Some of the refugees from Netherlands do need reconstruction.

A lot of damage from plugging dikes with their johnsons.

[GM]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 1:48:34 AM UTC-5, jazee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Rape Is Over-Rated
>
>
>
> A rollicking torrent of fist-driven thunder
> Rained down on the old wino's face
> His lips were in shreds, his eyes torn asunder
> But the madman proferred him no grace
>
> Quite some distance away at a seperate scene
> A young girl was involved in a scrape
> Her attacker was large and incredibly mean
> But she calmed him by yielding to rape
>
> Not so lucky a route could our wino friend take
> From the punchin’ and beggin’ and wheezin’
> With no pussy to sell - no deal could he make
> He was stomped for no rhyme and no reason
>
> So for women who scorn their 'subservient' role
> This proposal I offer instead
> "Are you willing to barter your rape-ravaged hole
> In exchange for that old wino's head?”


A big alien telescope on a near-Earth asteroid could watch us in considerable detail during close approaches.

Small alien satellites could do the same.

And small alien robotic probes disguised as -- say -- seagulls or cats could do all the sampling and exploring of the Earth's surface with nobody the wiser.

--
GM

[GM]

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 9:55:22 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 4:41:28 PM UTC-10, André Malraux wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 May 2022 19:35:46 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Joseph
> > <jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 10:26:54 PM UTC-4, Mike Duffy wrote:
> > >> On 2022-05-24, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > chances are good that I'll have an electric self-driving
> > >> > car and ride in an electric airplane. How amazing is that?
> > >
> > >
> > >> They've been predicting that 'real soon' for about 100 years.
> > >
> > >
> > >I am viewed by many as negative but agree it's going to be some time
> > >before these fabulous new and improved versions of whatever we've
> > >already got swing into action. I expect to see a lot of unexpected
> > >malfunctions and other horrors with lots of this new shit that seems
> > >to be rather rushed at times, and am hoping to see a lot of conflict
> > >and problems with it. That's the price of progress - you gotta go through
> > >me to get there. Come on New-timer, try me. Try my fucking hand!
> > Self-driving cars only have to drive better than the average person.
> > And since they don't drink, don't use drugs, don't drop cigarettes,
> > don't use mobile phones etc etc, I can see it happen soonish. They
> > don't have to drive better than the infallible super hero Thomas
> > Joseph.

> >
> > --
> > André Malraux
> > <https://cdn.britannica.com/20/109120-050-C8214147/Andre-Malraux.jpg>

> My brother has a self-driving truck although he has to keep his eyes on the road or the system disengages. That sort of takes away from the self-driving feature but I don't have any problems with taking baby steps.


Maybe the aliens have an odd sense of humor.

They just like to screw around with us like a child playing with ants.

Everyone so often they'll send out a UFO to become visible to one of our fighter planes or abduct a human or two in order to conduct a pointless anal probe.

They're having fun is all.

--
GM

[Hank Rogers]

DAMN! Maybe we should start addressing him as Professor uncle.

Is there any way to get the damn haoles to stop shitting on poor
uncle tojo?

[Hank Rogers]

Maybe he just needs a new hearing aide.

[Leonard Blaisdell]

On 2022-05-26, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:

> Yesterday my son had a bowl of rice, sprouts, Portuguese sausage, and cabbage broth. It's a pretty wacky bowl!
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/gxZvxatTKpPq7E6t5

Ain't no "A" in Cthulhu. Lovecraft would be disappointed. :(

[André Malraux]

On 27 May 2022 02:12:56 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell

True. Also, when you see a squid with bat wings, would you ask "Is it
a cat"?

[André Malraux]

On Fri, 27 May 2022 12:15:07 +1000, André Malraux
<Mal...@nopls.invalid> wrote:

>On 27 May 2022 02:12:56 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
><leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>On 2022-05-26, dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Yesterday my son had a bowl of rice, sprouts, Portuguese sausage, and cabbage broth. It's a pretty wacky bowl!
>>>
>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/gxZvxatTKpPq7E6t5
>>
>>
>>Ain't no "A" in Cthulhu. Lovecraft would be disappointed. :(
>
>True. Also, when you see a squid with bat wings, would you ask "Is it
>a cat"?

I mean an occie.

[dsi1]

On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 4:13:02 PM UTC-10, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> Ain't no "A" in Cthulhu. Lovecraft would be disappointed. :(

That would be what's called a "joke"i.e., a play on the word Cthulhu and illustrated with a kitty-cat/monster. Lovecraft might be disappointed because the shirt pokes fun at the Cthulhu mythos. From what I've see, old HP was not a fun guy!