On 6/7/2016 7:57 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 07:03:19 -0700, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>
>> On 6/6/2016 10:27 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:23:52 -0700, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/6/2016 8:19 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:42:38 -0700, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> look here
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Costco-Anywhere-Visa-Card/td-p/4512044/page/15
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, I see the logo. But that is *not* an RFID logo. That is a NFC
>>>>> logo.
>>>>
>>>> no, that is an RFID logo.
>>>
>>> No, IT'S AN *NFC* LOGO.
>>>
>>>
http://technologyadvice.com/blog/information-technology/what-mobile-wallets-mean-for-business/
>>>
>>
>> I can find lots of web pages that say it is an RFID symbol.
>
> It has NEVER, EVER legally been used for generic RFID. It's is a
> registered trademark of EMVco and owned by the major credit card
> companies, used by excplicit license grant, and can only be used to
> indicate contactless EMV (NFC) devices.
>
>
https://www.emvco.com/best_practices.aspx?id=117
>
>> But since I
>> agree with your comment below that both RFID and NFC are contactless,
>> the symbols may be used in any fashion by various companies. I recall
>> seeing this logo for RFID long before NFC came into being.
>
> No, it cannot be used by any company for any reason. They can only be
> used by cards and devices which support EMV's contactless NFC protocol
> (an extension of ISO 14443), which is much more robust and secure than
> any conventional RFID tag that you've been screaming about.
>
>>> Nobody uses plain RFID in cards any more. It was a demented joke. I
>>> don't even think they had more than a 1% scan share even when they
>>> were being used.
>>>
>>> NFC is much more secure than RFID for many reasons. And transactions
>>> are limited to $25. Which makes it much less useful for people
>>> wanting to steal your NFC card data, especially since it can't be used
>>> on the Internet.
>>
>> and both RFID and NFC are both less secure than contact EMV.
>
> Yes, but RFID was thousands of times less secure than contactless EMV.
> IOW, you're getting your panties in a huff for practically no reason -
> basing your paranoia on old RFID technology that does not apply to new
> the card you have been issued.
>
>>> Note that a lot of people confuse NFC and RFID since scientifically
>>> they are the same thing. But when speaking of credit card and
>>> electronic technologies, they are very different protocols. And it
>>> doesn't help when Internet writers don't differentiate properly
>>> between old RFID and new NFC when they pretend to know what they're
>>> talking about. Apparently you're one of their victims.
>>
>> No, I am not.
>
> Yes, you are. NFC is not RFID. If you knew the difference you
> wouldn't have come in here screaming about RFID and arguing with
> everybody in the first place. Heck, even sf was right to argue with
> you for a change (she was just lucky, though).
>
> -sw
>
nfc is a subset of the more generic term RFID. Go back to sleep.