On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz <sqwe...@gmail.invalid>
wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
itsjoan...@webtv.net"
>> <
itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5,
Christ...@deathtochristianity.pl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
>>>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
>>>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
>>>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
>>>>
>>>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
>>>>
>>>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
>>>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
>>>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
>>>
>>>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
>>>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.
>>>
>>>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
>>>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
>
>And misplace the U.
>
>Yes, the whole idea of him NOT liking foods because he's a
>"super-taster" is the exact opposite of a super-taster.
>
>ChristKiller needs to watch the movie "Perfume" to get an idea of
>how super tasting all works.
>
>> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
>
>That beats me at dickheadedness every day. I can be pretty curt
>sometimes, but something like that never, or would, occur to me.
>THAT is 'out there'.
>
>And please know that everybody (really - EVERYBODY) here agrees with
>"this chick". You're only entertaining the little people dancing
>around in your head.
>
>-sw
a super taster is not a good thing :(