Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Queen Anne Cherries

93 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 10:36:08 PM4/26/10
to
THOSE are not Chocolate Covered Cherries!

I know,. because I make REAL Chocolate Covered Cherries at Christmas!

John Kuthe...

zxcvbob

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 10:37:19 PM4/26/10
to
Sqwertz wrote:
> Does everybody hate these or what? Half the time they're on sale 3
> boxes (of 10) for $2. Today they were $.50/box - even the packaging
> must cost $.30!
>
> OK, it's not the best chocolate, but at least it's real chocolate.
> And the gooey half-white, half-liquid centers with the maraschino
> cherry inside are the bomb.
>
> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me. I bought 10 boxes.
> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>
> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
> -sw


Try eating them frozen.

Bob

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 10:39:40 PM4/26/10
to

To kill the taste?

John Kuthe...

Kris

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 10:42:01 PM4/26/10
to
On Apr 26, 10:28 pm, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
> Does everybody hate these or what?  Half the time they're on sale 3
> boxes (of 10) for $2.  Today they were $.50/box - even the packaging
> must cost $.30!  
>
> OK, it's not the best chocolate, but at least it's real chocolate.
> And the gooey half-white, half-liquid centers with the maraschino
> cherry inside are the bomb.
>
> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me.  I bought 10 boxes.
> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>
> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
> -sw

LOL - I had a nieghbor who ALWAYS had a box of these out in her living
room (bought from KMart, of course). I liked them when I was 8,
because they were a novelty we never had our house (which I now realie
was my mother's better taste).

Now I would only eat them as a dare. Waxy and sickly sweet.

Kris

Goomba

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 10:42:22 PM4/26/10
to

<yawn>
last time you dragged this dog out it was all talk and no recipe

Message has been deleted

Omelet

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 12:46:37 AM4/27/10
to
In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$.d...@sqwertz.com>,
Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:

> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me. I bought 10 boxes.
> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>
> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
> -sw

We used to pick them in California at the "U-pick" Cherry Orchards.
They are delightfully suited for pies.
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. --Alex Levine

zxcvbob

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 1:06:07 AM4/27/10
to
Omelet wrote:
> In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$.d...@sqwertz.com>,
> Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me. I bought 10 boxes.
>> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>>
>> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>>
>> -sw
>
> We used to pick them in California at the "U-pick" Cherry Orchards.
> They are delightfully suited for pies.


I think SW is talking about really cheap chocolate-covered
maraschino cherries (with the soft but not liquid fondant centers.)

Not a yellow-with-red-blush variety of real cherries. HTH :-)

Bob

Virginia Tadrzynski

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 2:08:22 AM4/27/10
to

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:aw6jjnij2kq2$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> Does everybody hate these or what? Half the time they're on sale 3
> boxes (of 10) for $2. Today they were $.50/box - even the packaging
> must cost $.30!
>
> OK, it's not the best chocolate, but at least it's real chocolate.
> And the gooey half-white, half-liquid centers with the maraschino
> cherry inside are the bomb.
>
> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me. I bought 10 boxes.
> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>
> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
> -sw


Hubby loves them. They set my teeth on edge....wayyy too sweet for me.
-g


Leonard Blaisdell

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 2:51:58 AM4/27/10
to
In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$.d...@sqwertz.com>,
Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:

> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?

I quit looking for chocolate cherries a long time ago. I put them out of
my mind. I believe I could eat a pound at a sitting with a quart of
whole milk. Heaven! They're too good to be good for me, and I generally
don't care about what's "good for me".
I have denigrated myself to an occasional pint of 'Cherry Garcia' which
ain't bad but isn't chocolate cherries by any stretch.

leo

Ed Pawlowski

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 5:56:14 AM4/27/10
to

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:aw6jjnij2kq2$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> Does everybody hate these or what? Half the time they're on sale 3
> boxes (of 10) for $2. Today they were $.50/box - even the packaging
> must cost $.30!
>
> OK, it's not the best chocolate, but at least it's real chocolate.
> And the gooey half-white, half-liquid centers with the maraschino
> cherry inside are the bomb.
>
> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me. I bought 10 boxes.
> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>
> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
> -sw

I don't care for them. Cella's are far superior, IMO.

Message has been deleted

Food Snob®

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 7:40:38 AM4/27/10
to
On Apr 27, 12:06 am, zxcvbob <zxcv...@charter.net> wrote:
> Omelet wrote:
> > In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$....@sqwertz.com>,

Polar opposites, the former being garbage, and the latter one of the
most delicious things on Earth.
>
> Bob

--Bryan

brooklyn1

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 8:09:55 AM4/27/10
to
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:36:08 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
<john...@gmail.com> wrote:

>THOSE are not Chocolate Covered Cherries!
>
>I know,. because I make REAL Chocolate Covered Cherries at Christmas!

There is no such thing as "real" chocolate covered cherries, not
unless you are refering to using real chocolate.

"Queen Anne" is a cherry varietal, a light colored cherry that lends
itself to dying for making marachino cherries. Queen Anne cherries
are predominently grown in Oregon and Washington state. Regardless
which brand of chocolate covered cherry, in the US they are virtually
all Queen Anne cherries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maraschino_cherry

Unprocessed Queen Anne cherries are also readily available
canned/jarred at most stupidmarket, Del Monte brand is popular.

Queen Ann cherry trees are available at most plant nurseries at this
time of year.

Food Snob®

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 8:22:39 AM4/27/10
to

He ended up giving pretty detailed instructions. I guess you just
missed that part. Nearly all of us food slum in some ways. Those
chocolate covered maraschino things are one of yours. John's cherries
are spectacular. His toffee is great too. When my sweet cherries
come in, I should do something of the sort with some of them. The
trees are loaded this year.

Damn. The left shift key does not work in combination with the letter
T, nor does either shift key work with the quote markers. I hope I
can fix that soon.

--Bryan

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 10:06:55 AM4/27/10
to
On Apr 27, 7:09 am, brooklyn1 <gravesen...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:36:08 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>
> <johnku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >THOSE are not Chocolate Covered Cherries!
>
> >I know,. because I make REAL Chocolate Covered Cherries at Christmas!
>
> There is no such thing as "real" chocolate covered cherries, not
> unless you are refering to using real chocolate.

I do use "real dark chocolate" to cover my Chocolate Covered Cherries.

And I use REAL cherries, not those maraschino things that are only
called cherries because at one time, they used to be cherries! YUCK!!

John Kuthe...

Food Snob®

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 10:50:13 AM4/27/10
to

Hey John. I'm going to have sweet cherries in early June...
>
> John Kuthe...

--Bryan

Goomba

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 11:08:44 AM4/27/10
to
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message

>> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?


>>
>> -sw
>
> I don't care for them. Cella's are far superior, IMO.

oh nooooooooo.. Mon Cherie (the European ones) are the cherry "bomb"

David Harmon

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 11:10:42 AM4/27/10
to
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:06:07 -0500 in rec.food.cooking, zxcvbob
<zxc...@charter.net> wrote,

>Omelet wrote:
>> In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$.d...@sqwertz.com>,
>> Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me. I bought 10 boxes.
>>> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>>>
>>> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> We used to pick them in California at the "U-pick" Cherry Orchards.
>> They are delightfully suited for pies.
>
>
>I think SW is talking about really cheap chocolate-covered
>maraschino cherries (with the soft but not liquid fondant centers.)

That's right. They grow on trees here in California.

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 11:17:36 AM4/27/10
to

Cool! Summer is too warm to make candy though.

John Kuthe...

Food Snob®

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 11:50:25 AM4/27/10
to

They invented this thing called air conditioning. It used to only be
in movie theaters, but I have one of those amazing machines IN MY
HOUSE! It makes the air cold in the Summer!

Seriously though, other than the dipping, the rest is not temp
dependent. Even just the soaking in the Cherry Kijafa and combining
them with invert sugar fondant could make for cherry stuff that would
do nicely in a black foresty sort of a cake. We've got blackberries
and raspberries that we're going to do nice things with that involve
Chambord.
>
> John Kuthe...

--Bryan

Dan Abel

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 12:16:41 PM4/27/10
to
In article <83n9lu...@mid.individual.net>,
zxcvbob <zxc...@charter.net> wrote:

I wasn't familiar with them, so I consulted Google, and was told they
are often used to make maraschino cherries. So, it's not surprising
that a brand of chocolate covered cherries is named Queen Ann.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
da...@sonic.net

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 1:03:31 PM4/27/10
to
On Apr 27, 11:16 am, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:
> In article <83n9luFol...@mid.individual.net>,

>
>
>
>  zxcvbob <zxcv...@charter.net> wrote:
> > Omelet wrote:
> > > In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$....@sqwertz.com>,

> > >  Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>
> > >> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me.  I bought 10 boxes.
> > >> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>
> > >> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
> > >> -sw
>
> > > We used to pick them in California at the "U-pick" Cherry Orchards.
> > > They are delightfully suited for pies.
>
> > I think SW is talking about really cheap chocolate-covered
> > maraschino cherries (with the soft but not liquid fondant centers.)
>
> > Not a yellow-with-red-blush variety of real cherries.  HTH :-)
>
> I wasn't familiar with them, so I consulted Google, and was told they
> are often used to make maraschino cherries.  So, it's not surprising
> that a brand of chocolate covered cherries is named Queen Ann.

You ever see what they do to a cherry in the process of making
Maraschino Cherries? I did, either on the Food Network or an old Mr
Rogers or something on the TV. First thing they do is suck ALL the
color and flavor out, leaving this whitish translucent ball into which
they infuse FAKE color and flavor!!

YUCK!!!

John Kuthe...

ljla...@acd.net

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 3:53:17 PM4/27/10
to
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:28:32 -0500, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:

>Does everybody hate these or what? Half the time they're on sale 3
>boxes (of 10) for $2. Today they were $.50/box - even the packaging
>must cost $.30!
>
>OK, it's not the best chocolate, but at least it's real chocolate.
>And the gooey half-white, half-liquid centers with the maraschino
>cherry inside are the bomb.
>

>Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me. I bought 10 boxes.
>(that's 100pcs for $5)
>
>Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
>-sw

Nope, but after about 10 I get a funny headache and stop eatin' 'em.

(Pieces that is, not boxes)

Love them suckers, next best thing to Boyer Smoothees.


Default User

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 4:53:55 PM4/27/10
to

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:aw6jjnij2kq2$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?

I get them sometimes.

Brian


Ed Pawlowski

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 5:13:34 PM4/27/10
to

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:1gbt965wy1lt4$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:56:14 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> I don't care for them. Cella's are far superior, IMO.
>
> That's like saying dog shit is better than cat shit!
>
> I don't like Cella's because of the "all liquid centers". I like
> the traces of white fondant. Other than that, they're practically
> the exact same thing.
>
> -sw

That is what makes them better ! ! !

Food Snob®

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 5:18:58 PM4/27/10
to

You guys can have my share of both the dog shit and the cat shit.
Really though, they're not that bad. About the same quality as
Banquet frozen TV dinners.

--Bryan

merryb

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 5:44:38 PM4/27/10
to
On Apr 27, 5:09 am, brooklyn1 <gravesen...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:36:08 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>

Are you sure you're not thinking of Royal Annes? We have Rainier
cherries here also, which are very similar...

Dan Abel

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 6:26:59 PM4/27/10
to
In article
<8b88c7f0-7b60-43ce...@s13g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
merryb <msg...@juno.com> wrote:


> Are you sure you're not thinking of Royal Annes? We have Rainier
> cherries here also, which are very similar...

Here's a reference:

http://www.paghat.com/cherrytree.html

Briefly, the Queen Anne is the new name for Royal Anne. The Rainier is
related but came later.

merryb

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 6:33:11 PM4/27/10
to
On Apr 27, 3:26 pm, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:
> In article
> <8b88c7f0-7b60-43ce-a6e9-c0a5feba9...@s13g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,

Ahh, thanks for the info!

brooklyn1

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 6:59:37 PM4/27/10
to
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:44:38 -0700 (PDT), merryb <msg...@juno.com>
wrote:

The names are interchangeable... read the above wikipedia artical
carefully.

Message has been deleted

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 28, 2010, 3:01:31 PM4/28/10
to
On Apr 28, 12:30 pm, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
> > That is what makes them better ! ! !
>
> Cellas advertises "all liquid centers" like it's some sort of
> advantage.  I don't think so.  I like the fondant.
>
> -sw

A cherry is NOT LIQUID!!

John Kuthe...

Ed Pawlowski

unread,
Apr 28, 2010, 7:09:38 PM4/28/10
to

"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:1sdvjq6rpt7l9$.dlg@sqwertz.com...

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:13:34 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> That is what makes them better ! ! !
>
> Cellas advertises "all liquid centers" like it's some sort of
> advantage. I don't think so. I like the fondant.
>
> -sw

Differing tastes. The others are OK, but always seem like they are not done
yet.

Message has been deleted

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 28, 2010, 10:19:28 PM4/28/10
to
On Apr 28, 6:09 pm, "Ed Pawlowski" <e...@snetnospam.net> wrote:
> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>
> news:1sdvjq6rpt7l9$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:13:34 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> >> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> >>news:1gbt965wy1lt4$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> >>> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:56:14 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> >>>> I don't care for them. Cella's are far superior, IMO.
>
> >>> That's like saying dog shit is better than cat shit!
>
> >>> I don't like Cella's because of the "all liquid centers".  I like
> >>> the traces of white fondant.  Other than that, they're practically
> >>> the exact same thing.
>
> >> That is what makes them better ! ! !
>
> > Cellas advertises "all liquid centers" like it's some sort of
> > advantage.  I don't think so.  I like the fondant.
>
> > -sw
>
> Differing tastes.  The others are OK, but always seem like they are not done
> yet.

As I make Chocolate Covered Cherries, I've gotten to sample the
fondant at all stages of liquification, from 100% "solid" to almost
all liquid. I like mine towards the liquid side, because if the
fondant had not liquefied at all, then the cherry flavor and fondant
flavor never mixes like it does when liquification tales place. YUM!

But that's my Chocolate covered Cherries. The fondant is made of
almond flavored marshmallow cream, powdered sugar, and the cherries
are real Bing cherries soaked overnight in Cherry Kijafa and Chambord.
So there is some major flavor mixing to occur!! :-)

John Kuthe...

Ostap Bender

unread,
Apr 29, 2010, 1:33:15 AM4/29/10
to
On Apr 26, 7:28 pm, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
> Does everybody hate these or what?  Half the time they're on sale 3
> boxes (of 10) for $2.  Today they were $.50/box - even the packaging
> must cost $.30!  
>
> OK, it's not the best chocolate, but at least it's real chocolate.
> And the gooey half-white, half-liquid centers with the maraschino
> cherry inside are the bomb.
>
> Maybe it's just childhood comfort food for me.  I bought 10 boxes.
> (that's 100pcs for $5)
>
> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?

I tried them once, but after tasting one, I donated it to the local
high school's chemistry lab:

Ingredients : Sugar , Corn Syrup , Cherries , Cocoa Butter ,
Chocolate Liquor , Milk , High Fructose Corn Syrup , Partially
Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil , Soybean Oil , Cottonseed Oil , Cocoa ,
Natural and Artificial Flavors , Soya Lecithinan Emulsifier ,
Invertase , Citric Acid , Sodium BenzoatePreservative , Potassium
SorbatePreservative , FD&C Red No. 40 , Sulfur DioxidePreservative

Mike Van Pelt

unread,
Apr 30, 2010, 7:39:03 PM4/30/10
to
In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$.d...@sqwertz.com>,
Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?

I did not need to read this...

I love 'em. I can go through half a box in one
sitting if I'm not careful.

These days, I stay away from 'em, lest my pancreas explode.

--
Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

John Kuthe

unread,
Apr 30, 2010, 7:51:48 PM4/30/10
to
On Apr 29, 12:33 am, Ostap Bender <ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Invertase!! I put that and invert sugar in the fondant I wrap my
Chocolate Covered Cherries in before dipping them in REAL dark
chocolate. The majic of invert sugar and invertase is what makes my
fondant liquefy 2 or 3 days after dipping, making a deliciously
liquidy surrounding for the REAL Bing cherry inside it's dark
chocolate home.

John Kuthe...

zxcvbob

unread,
Apr 30, 2010, 7:54:28 PM4/30/10
to
Mike Van Pelt wrote:
> In article <aw6jjnij2kq2$.d...@sqwertz.com>,
> Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>> Am I the only one on the planet that eats these?
>
> I did not need to read this...
>
> I love 'em. I can go through half a box in one
> sitting if I'm not careful.
>
> These days, I stay away from 'em, lest my pancreas explode.
>


If I eat more than 2 of the milk chocolate ones, my teeth hurt
(figuratively.) The dark chocolate ones are not nearly so
sickeningly sweet -- actually they are, but the dark chocolate cuts
thru the sweetness.

Bob

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

John Kuthe

unread,
May 3, 2010, 2:24:44 PM5/3/10
to
On May 3, 12:35 pm, "l, not -l" <lal...@cujo.com> wrote:
> On  3-May-2010, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>
> > What does the pancreas have to do with it?
>
> Most likely, insulin production to deal with the high, fast-acting carbs.
> --
> Change Cujo to Juno in email address.

Ding! Ding! Ding! :-)

The pancreas secretes a number of hormones and enzymes as both a
ducted and a ductless gland. Insulin among them, from the Islet cells
of Langerhorn to enable your cells to use glucose.

John Kuthe...

Becca

unread,
May 3, 2010, 4:14:59 PM5/3/10
to
On 5/3/2010 1:24 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
> Ding! Ding! Ding! :-)
>
> The pancreas secretes a number of hormones and enzymes as both a
> ducted and a ductless gland. Insulin among them, from the Islet cells
> of Langerhorn to enable your cells to use glucose.
>
> John Kuthe...
>

Is there going to be a test on this? ;-)

Becca

ObFood

Chicken Sauce Piquant

1 (3 1/2) pound chicken, deboned, cut in 1-inch pieces
Spice mix (recipe follows)
3/4 cup vegetable oil or lard
1 cup flour
1 small onion, diced
1 small poblano pepper
1 tablespoon chopped garlic
3 stalks celery, diced
5 medium Roma tomatoes, diced
2 cups canned tomatoes
1 tablespoon dried thyme
4 bay leaves
5 cups chicken stock
4 dashes hot sauce
Hot cooked rice

Diced scallions, for garnish

Toss chicken in spice mix, making certain the chicken is evenly coated. .

In wide bottom pot or Dutch oven, heat oil until it begins to smoke
slightly. While waiting, coat the chicken with the flour in a large
mixing bowl, tossing the chicken with your hands to make sure it all
gets coated well. Shake excess flour off the chicken, reserving the
leftover flour.

Pan fry the chicken over medium heat. Don't crowd the pan with the
chicken or it will not get the right color. The pieces should be side by
side, not on top of one another. When chicken has reached the desired
color, remove it from the pan with a slotted spatula. Most likely you
will have to do this in two batches.

Add the remaining flour to the oil in the pan, and cook over medium heat
for about five minutes to make a medium brown roux. Add onions, peppers,
garlic and celery, and cook five minutes more. Add the tomatoes,
chicken, dried thyme, bay leaves, stock and hot sauce.

Simmer over low heat for 45 minutes. Serve over rice with freshly diced
scallions.

Spice Mix

1 1/2 tablespoons salt
2 teaspoons black pepper
1/2 teaspoon white pepper
2 teaspoons cayenne
2 teaspoons chili powder
1 teaspoon paprika

Combine all ingredients.


jfar...@tacsolutions.ca

unread,
Jul 3, 2015, 1:43:10 PM7/3/15
to
On Monday, April 26, 2010 at 8:36:08 PM UTC-6, John Kuthe wrote:
> THOSE are not Chocolate Covered Cherries!
>
> I know,. because I make REAL Chocolate Covered Cherries at Christmas!
>
> John Kuthe...

You're right John. Those are Queen Anne Cherries, a variant strain of cherry.

John Kuthe

unread,
Jul 3, 2015, 5:33:29 PM7/3/15
to
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:43:07 -0700 (PDT), jfar...@tacsolutions.ca
wrote:
Well, you deleted the context, so I cannot cogently comment.

John Kuthe...

Japhy Ryder

unread,
Aug 9, 2015, 8:36:53 PM8/9/15
to
On 7/4/2015 3:43 AM, jfar...@tacsolutions.ca wrote:
I have, on at least three prior occasions, written posts that delve into
the “alleged” lurid past of one of our former presidents, George Herbert
Walker Bush (GHWB), the current but ailing patriarch of the Bush Family
Dynasty – I refer to them as the Bush Family Crime Syndicate, certainly
not in terms of endearment – but rather more like the Mafia Godfather
who prepares his sons to take over the family business upon his death.
This particular post references an article by Stew Webb, a contributor
of Veterans Today.

In his life-time, George H. W. Bush (GHWB) has controlled every
clandestine (hidden from view) and secret organization/operation within
the arsenal of the United States government as either 1) Director of the
CIA, 2) Vice President to Ronald Reagan (who was an unwitting puppet to
the Bush controlled cabal – GHWB secretly gave Reagan poisons that
hastened his fall into Alzheimer’s Disease and evidence suggests he
helped plan Reagan’ attempted assassination by John Hinckley, whose
family were close friends of the Bush family – a coincidence?) and 3)
ultimately as President of the United States before Bill Clinton took
office.

Clinton’s election was a planned transition of power to allow the NWO or
New World Order advocated by Bush, Sr., to solidify and move forward
after a more suitable puppet was elected President to carry out the New
World Order Agenda (NWO) agenda – our current president, Barack Hussein
Obama. Your deduction is right, GHWB left office willingly to promote
the NWO by having Clinton elected (electronic voter fraud) and Perot
neutralized! This is the power they currently possess. They are
amazingly ruthless and efficient while amazingly arrogant and stupid at
the same time.
0 new messages