The first presentation was on the topic of improved batteries. I saw this
about 20 years ago at Argonne National Laboratory where I was a student
intern. The engineers needed a special fabric and were unable to find the
perfect material. Then, one of them saw a secretary knitting. Seeing the
knitting, they asked her some questions. After some discussion, the
researcher put the secretary on the research project, and she knit the
material for the project. (The hand knit material was used for a prototype.
If the prototype went into production, machine knitting would have been
desired.) In the research seminar, the material was called: Knit.
Interestingly, the secretary was cited as a contributor/author to the
research project -- at least during the talk I heard.
Oh-- I was particularly struck by the improved battery knitting seminar
because there were several slides on the knitting. It was a double faced
material so that both sides were "knit" and the material didn't curl. A
purl face was considered undesirable for some reason.
The second presentation was at Pacific Northwest Laboratories. It was a
discussion of heat pipes. A knit material was in the heat pipe. This was a
pre-fab knit material, specially made and designed for wicking. The
material was referred to as "knit".
No one in either research presentation called anything "construction by the
loop method."
Of course it is entirely possible that some engineers refer to knitting as
"construction by the loop method". But, the few times I've seen people show
knitting, I've heard it called knitting. When I've seen woven fabrics, I've
heard them referred to as woven fabric. Laminates are laminates and so on.
Lucia
--
Joined the knit along? Don't know what to do? Check out the instruction
page.....
http://Knitting_fiend.tripod.com/KnitALong.html
----------
> PS Rita! completekly forgot to ask you
>
>>to line airplanes, for filter beds etc.etc. but when men do it it is
>>called - wait for it - engineering a construction by the loop method.
>>Regards - Rita.
>
> In regard with this HOW WOULD THEY HAýVE CALLED PREGNANCY AND GIVING
> BIRTH had it be Done ???? by men ????? mirjam
>
Would the woven cloth itself--sans bed, sans REM recorder--still be
considered art? I'd say yes, but I wonder if the museum curators
would....
I was struck by an idea you describe some others as having. It seems they
believe that knitting can't be art because, sometimes, knitting is used to
make utilitarian items. That is, it sounds like people tell you:
No knitted item is artistic because undershirts are knit simply to be
useful.
However, the general idea is ridiculous. Think about it. If the idea is
valid generally, painting can't result in art. Why not? Because pig sty's,
barns, and outhouses are painted to protect themselves against the elements.
In these cases, painters apply paint for purely utilitarian reasons. (And it
works quite well by the way.)
Heck, I need to hire painters for my house. Let me assure you, I will not be
hiring "artists"! LOL.
By excluding processes that are sometimes used for purely utilitarian
purposes we end up with an infinite list of processes that can't result in
art. By this line of reasoning, I can come up with an incomplete short list
of other processes that can't be art:
Sculpture carved from stone: Rocks are formed and used to make retaining
walls. Therefor Michaelangelo's David is not art.
Sculpture cast from metal: Metal is cast to form tools like screwdrivers.
Therefor none of those bronze sculptures we find in museums are art.
Pottery/China/any fired item: Clay is formed and fired to make simple plates
and dishes. Therefor Wedgewood, and Ming pottery are not art.
Clearly, the fact that a process is used to make purely utilitarian items
doesn't affect whether or not it can be used to make a work of art!
Lucia
-- --
The Knitting Fiend: Custom Sweater Patterns! Web generated in your size and
gauge. Lucia's picture modeling the fitted sleeve sweater is now up!
http://Knitting_Fiend.tripod.com/order.html
She thinks textile can be used when you paint it , or clean your
Brush,
Yes As YOU UNDERSTOOD WELL people in fact Do say this , and yes Like
you i put the point of saying Ok than paint is used For painting walls
as well
As I said Lucia ! it is a matter of education , of being open minded ,
funny enough even betrween my fellow local fiberartists I get some
shaking [ in wonder heads] as to why i bother , some weavers and
mainly some [ traditional CREATIVE embroidery artists when they see my
Very different work might say ,,, ; OH you do not Know how to
embroider !!! nevervrealizing I use my knowledge in nOt doing exactly
according to rules , my art knows waht it wants to be , my finishes
are sometimnes Not straight ...... sometime i let threads Hang out ON
PURPOSE , this is confusing to some people ,,,,,,
mirjam
Gosh you sure made me THINK - that piece on artistry is soooo correct.
I'd never thought about it before. I'm known as a "craftswoman" and people
are always asking me to teach them my skills - and how I hate doing that
because it takes up so much time (and often they're not REALLY interested in
learning) - I consider myself more of an artist/designer - and who would
dream of asking a designer for their design before the catwalk??? I
certainly agree with you - the task is not the same as the design!!! That
will stick with me forever I guess. :o)))
Josephine
--
Visit our website at:
http://www.fruitcats.co.uk
Please be patient and give it time to load.
J wrote:
>
> Mirjam,
>
> Gosh you sure made me THINK - that piece on artistry is soooo correct.
> I'd never thought about it before. I'm known as a "craftswoman" and people
> are always asking me to teach them my skills - and how I hate doing that
> because it takes up so much time (and often they're not REALLY interested in
> learning) - I consider myself more of an artist/designer - and who would
> dream of asking a designer for their design before the catwalk??? I
> certainly agree with you - the task is not the same as the design!!! That
> will stick with me forever I guess. :o)))
>
> Josephine
But why do you not charge people for your time in teaching?
That's what I do. If someone seriously wants to learn
something from me, they can pay. If they don't wish to pay,
that's up to them and I'm not wasting my time.
I make exceptions for children of course.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Mirjam,
I didn't mean to imply that your work is not art -- you are definately an
artist, so why would you call yourself anything but?!! But the others,
these people you talk about who call themselves artists -- they're
craftspeople! Why is it so bad to be a craftsperson? I agree, they muddy
the waters and give serious artists a bad name. Ahhh, well, I guess we
won't change the world (well, maybe -- I'll try to infuence my kids at
least!). We're not likely to answer the "What Is Art?" question here --
that's something philosophers will still be debating generations from now as
they were generations ago!
Laurie
Off to debate whether or not musicians are really artists w/ DH (a
musician.)