Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Stash databases/MS Access

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Madeupagin

unread,
Oct 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/8/97
to

In article <19971007043...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
dbtu...@aol.com (DBTurtle) writes:

>Plus you can even incorporate pictures for each
>record.

Oh man! I've been using Access for my work for months and it just NEVER
occurred to me -- I can put "graphics" of my charts right in my database.
Although in my membership database, I did go and get the logos of each of
my members -- and it NEVER occurred to me to do the same . . .

Tere
Tere
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks for Noticing Me ~~ Eeyore

Steve and Terri

unread,
Oct 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/8/97
to

DBTurtle (dbtu...@aol.com) wrote:
: In article <19971005233...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,
: sugar...@aol.com (SugarBoben) writes:
:
: >Access 2.0 does not have the features I need (want?) since I've been
: > using 7.0 at work for the past year. <sigh> I priced 7.0 today - $399 USD
: >-
:
: ouch! I thought it was less than that.

Well, if you go someplace like Egghead, and you already have a copy of
Access 2.0 (or some other database program that would qualify you for the
competitive upgrade) it's under $100...

Terri

--
Terri Carl
ter...@neosoft.com

geo...@deltanet.com

unread,
Oct 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/9/97
to

If you are taking a class, take that student ID over to the bookstore
and get the academic price now! It is so low that you will not believe
it. In fact, if you don't have the whole of the Office suite, you can
do it for *much* less than the price you mentioned.
Vicki

On 7 Oct 1997 04:35:38 GMT, dbtu...@aol.com (DBTurtle) wrote:

>In article <19971005233...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,
>sugar...@aol.com (SugarBoben) writes:
>
>>Access 2.0 does not have the features I need (want?) since I've been
>> using 7.0 at work for the past year. <sigh> I priced 7.0 today - $399 USD
>>-
>

>ouch! I thought it was less than that. Well, I'm now forced to learn
>Access due to a class I'm taking for a grad program(don't ask, we get
>tested on a different aspect of it every week), but from what I'm learning,
>this is one sweet program! I haven't tried to keep a database on it of my
>stash, but all of it fits in 2 binders, so I'm not worried right now.
>Excel will also do a good job of keeping track of your stash, but Access
>has all those ways of displaying your data: tables, forms, queries(for you
>people who want to know questions like "what charts by Marilyn
>Leavitt-Inblum feature fairies?" without scrolling through your entire
>database) and reports. Plus you can even incorporate pictures for each
>record. So, for this class I have this textbook that focuses on the
>aspects of Access 7.0. I am not, however, a reference or tech support as I
>had not even heard of Access until this semester, but if you have any basic
>questions that don't involve error messages(such as building query to do
>just what my sample question said) I can try to help you by email.
>
>Mari
> Dain Bramaged Turtle @)}-->---http://members.aol.com/Jylythe/index.html
>"Floating beneath the sweet music of the dream garden symphony, winter
>came like a delicate diamond of death in a bitter moment." HUH?
>
>
>
>


0 new messages