Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What happened to Gunner's lawsuit(s)?
45 views
Skip to first unread message
whoyakidding's ghost
May 19, 2013, 10:05:42 AM5/19/13
to
Here are a couple of samples of Gunner's lawsuit threats. The funniest
part is that he's claiming to have a good rep! that was damaged! But
it's also funny that he's threatening to sue people he claimed he was
having killed. "Your Honor, I had a reputation for being a death
threat issuer, and Mr. TMT ruined my credibility by continuing to live
and taunt me." So, TMT, are you sued and dead yet?
"Nope..Ill let him have 33% of whatever I can get from him, now that
my good name has been tarnished and defamed.
Got any good things to say about me as well?
<VBG>
Got a buddy who is very very good at law suits of this sort. He works
for Shell Oil Co. as an outside attorney.
TMT just lost whatever he owned..which I figure isnt much..but my
buddy...I introduced him to his wife..humm...17 yrs ago..and stood as
his best man.
So we are chums. And he loves fucking over Leftwingers. Really.
Its been fairly slow for him the last couple months..so Ive passed on
the info....he knows IT guys who will find out who, what, and where
TMT
lives..and stick it right up his ass. And pull the trigger.
<VBG>
TMT is about to be really really fucked over.
Works for me.
And Ill post all his personal info, photograph, address and all the
cool
things one finds out when one sues an asshole into poverty.
Gunner"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/0e075b853915e745
"And Im very sorry you feel that way, its most unfortunate that I have
that person giving me a very bad name, simply out of spite and
internet courage. Its hard on my business and as a result, Im having
difficulty fullfilling my financial obligations.
I will have to have an lawyer attempt to restore my good name. Thank
you very much for your post and when I have the persons information,
you will be the second or 3rd person it will be forwarded to.
Sorry about the issue, and with a little bit of luck and some court
time, it will be resolved adequately in my favor, and against that
individual.
Mark "Gunner": Wieber
owner:
Coyote Engineering
326 Olive Ave
Taft, California, 93268
#####
Currently posting from my truck, after finishing a late night job in
Costa Mesa, California "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/e0457d76eb78f113
part is that he's claiming to have a good rep! that was damaged! But
it's also funny that he's threatening to sue people he claimed he was
having killed. "Your Honor, I had a reputation for being a death
threat issuer, and Mr. TMT ruined my credibility by continuing to live
and taunt me." So, TMT, are you sued and dead yet?
"Nope..Ill let him have 33% of whatever I can get from him, now that
my good name has been tarnished and defamed.
Got any good things to say about me as well?
<VBG>
Got a buddy who is very very good at law suits of this sort. He works
for Shell Oil Co. as an outside attorney.
TMT just lost whatever he owned..which I figure isnt much..but my
buddy...I introduced him to his wife..humm...17 yrs ago..and stood as
his best man.
So we are chums. And he loves fucking over Leftwingers. Really.
Its been fairly slow for him the last couple months..so Ive passed on
the info....he knows IT guys who will find out who, what, and where
TMT
lives..and stick it right up his ass. And pull the trigger.
<VBG>
TMT is about to be really really fucked over.
Works for me.
And Ill post all his personal info, photograph, address and all the
cool
things one finds out when one sues an asshole into poverty.
Gunner"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/0e075b853915e745
"And Im very sorry you feel that way, its most unfortunate that I have
that person giving me a very bad name, simply out of spite and
internet courage. Its hard on my business and as a result, Im having
difficulty fullfilling my financial obligations.
I will have to have an lawyer attempt to restore my good name. Thank
you very much for your post and when I have the persons information,
you will be the second or 3rd person it will be forwarded to.
Sorry about the issue, and with a little bit of luck and some court
time, it will be resolved adequately in my favor, and against that
individual.
Mark "Gunner": Wieber
owner:
Coyote Engineering
326 Olive Ave
Taft, California, 93268
#####
Currently posting from my truck, after finishing a late night job in
Costa Mesa, California "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/e0457d76eb78f113
Existential Angst
May 19, 2013, 3:08:06 PM5/19/13
to
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bsmhp8tg05hbpcvqb...@4ax.com...
Or, the flipside to your ongoing stalking absurdity, What happened to
KiddingHisSelf's life??
It's sorta like the Usenet equiv to the slide to homelessness..... an
asshole realizes he has absolutely nothing of value to contribute (like some
slob who can no longer pay rent), and descends into total Usenet stalking
uselessness (homelessness)..
Figgered out how yer Volt works yet? If you got absolutely nuthin to do --
and clearly you don't -- why not figger out how yer car works?
Then you might realize how gratuitously complex it is -- 300,000,000 million
other Merkins already figgered it out, so mebbe you can too.
Oh, oh, but you're SMARTER than all of Merka.... oh, that's right.....
Oh, I got 40+mpg on my trip to Eastec. But.... but.... but.... I only
paid $15K for my Fit..... hmmmmm, DAT cain't be right.....
--
EA
news:bsmhp8tg05hbpcvqb...@4ax.com...
KiddingHisSelf's life??
It's sorta like the Usenet equiv to the slide to homelessness..... an
asshole realizes he has absolutely nothing of value to contribute (like some
slob who can no longer pay rent), and descends into total Usenet stalking
uselessness (homelessness)..
Figgered out how yer Volt works yet? If you got absolutely nuthin to do --
and clearly you don't -- why not figger out how yer car works?
Then you might realize how gratuitously complex it is -- 300,000,000 million
other Merkins already figgered it out, so mebbe you can too.
Oh, oh, but you're SMARTER than all of Merka.... oh, that's right.....
Oh, I got 40+mpg on my trip to Eastec. But.... but.... but.... I only
paid $15K for my Fit..... hmmmmm, DAT cain't be right.....
--
EA
Gunner Asch
May 19, 2013, 3:23:24 PM5/19/13
to
name and address in response to repeated requests to do just
that..isnt it?
<VBG>
It would appear that he is cowardly and doesnt have the balls Crom
gave to a paramecium. What..is he afraid he is going to get sues for
slander?
<VBG>
Gunner
--
"You guess the truth hurts?
Really?
"Hurt" aint the word.
For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
Raid® to a cockroach.
Sheriff Brody to a shark
Bush to a Liberal
The truth doesn't just hurt. It's painful, like a red hot poker shoved
up their ass. Like sliding down a hundred foot razor blade using their
dick as a brake.
They HATE the truth."
Existential Angst
May 19, 2013, 4:23:27 PM5/19/13
to
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3h9ip8lmthu4lf6ha...@4ax.com...
C'mon gummer, nobody can get sued for slander on usenet....
I think people post anonymously for two reasons:
One some level, they know they are humiliating themselves, and would lose
their jobs, family, etc if the depth of their sundry pathologies were
revealed.
The other is simply not exposing yerself to fukn nutcases.
More to the point, these ngs are *filled* with bullshitting cowards -- 95%,
at least.
I think most of them are suffering from sand-kicked-in-face syndrome 50
years ago, and never recovered.
And what these assholes don't understand is, it's not a matter of whether
YOU (Gummer) are fullashit or not, it's HOW one responds to the issue.
Jb had it right: if someone has a specific beef with someone on an issue,
veracity, whatever, just address it. Going off on a stalking campaign
simply reveals the pathology of the stalker.
But the fagits here won't say shit about it. PlimbBoi, for example, just
drops to his knees, in his usual fellating repose.
Like when that fagit Harold Vordos bragged about ratting out a HD employee.
Not a single shithead here said a fukn word about it.
Yet Moi was the asshole for taking that suckup bitch to task.
Someone shoulda taken Harold and slapped him 'til he bled thru both ears.
But that's the beauty of usenet -- there are no physical consequences for
very bad behavior -- basically a coward's paradise.
--
EA
news:3h9ip8lmthu4lf6ha...@4ax.com...
I think people post anonymously for two reasons:
One some level, they know they are humiliating themselves, and would lose
their jobs, family, etc if the depth of their sundry pathologies were
revealed.
The other is simply not exposing yerself to fukn nutcases.
More to the point, these ngs are *filled* with bullshitting cowards -- 95%,
at least.
I think most of them are suffering from sand-kicked-in-face syndrome 50
years ago, and never recovered.
And what these assholes don't understand is, it's not a matter of whether
YOU (Gummer) are fullashit or not, it's HOW one responds to the issue.
Jb had it right: if someone has a specific beef with someone on an issue,
veracity, whatever, just address it. Going off on a stalking campaign
simply reveals the pathology of the stalker.
But the fagits here won't say shit about it. PlimbBoi, for example, just
drops to his knees, in his usual fellating repose.
Like when that fagit Harold Vordos bragged about ratting out a HD employee.
Not a single shithead here said a fukn word about it.
Yet Moi was the asshole for taking that suckup bitch to task.
Someone shoulda taken Harold and slapped him 'til he bled thru both ears.
But that's the beauty of usenet -- there are no physical consequences for
very bad behavior -- basically a coward's paradise.
--
EA
Gunner Asch
May 19, 2013, 8:39:52 PM5/19/13
to
On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:23:27 -0400, "Existential Angst"
Some of us here are here because we are serious about the subjects.
Shrug. I dont lie. Too easy to back check me. So I make a point in
not lying. Am I right all the time? Occasionally...rarely am I wrong
about something..but Ill admit it when its proven to me. Lots of
stuff I dont know shit about. So I keep my mouth shut..or ask
questions about the subject. I actually learn a lot of stuff here on
Usenet.
But then..I dont vote Leftwing either..and have lots of checks to
prove Im sane. Cant say the same thing about the trolls who pop in
and blow shit.
I may state something..and the goof balls go nuts about it, but if
they had the brains got gave pond scum..they could backcheck and find
out that I didnt lie. Few of them have the stones to get off their
ass and actually check. The few that do, tend to be friends of mine
and by now..they know I dont lie. Shrug
Shrug. I dont lie. Too easy to back check me. So I make a point in
not lying. Am I right all the time? Occasionally...rarely am I wrong
about something..but Ill admit it when its proven to me. Lots of
stuff I dont know shit about. So I keep my mouth shut..or ask
questions about the subject. I actually learn a lot of stuff here on
Usenet.
But then..I dont vote Leftwing either..and have lots of checks to
prove Im sane. Cant say the same thing about the trolls who pop in
and blow shit.
I may state something..and the goof balls go nuts about it, but if
they had the brains got gave pond scum..they could backcheck and find
out that I didnt lie. Few of them have the stones to get off their
ass and actually check. The few that do, tend to be friends of mine
and by now..they know I dont lie. Shrug
jon_banquer
May 19, 2013, 10:13:05 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 5:39 pm, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:23:27 -0400, "Existential Angst"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >"Gunner Asch" <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:23:27 -0400, "Existential Angst"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >news:3h9ip8lmthu4lf6ha...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 15:08:06 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> >> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>>"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 15:08:06 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> >> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
you lie and what you lie about is no longer in dispute by anyone who
is a unbiased, rational thinker and not in your clique of idiots.
You're only saving grace is that stalkers like KiddingNoOne and The
Pimple have serious issues and don't contribute very much metalworking
content. Actually, The Pimple seems to be on his best behavior lately.
I'm sure it won't last.
Make no mistake, Wieber... you're a pathetic liar and the issuer of
phony death treats. Your claims of starting lawsuits against those you
don't like is equally laughable.
Existential Angst
May 20, 2013, 4:02:57 AM5/20/13
to
"jon_banquer" <jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0143aca4-9efa-48b9...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
=================================================
When Kidding pulls his dick out of PlimpBoi's mouth, Plimpboi will start
yakking again.
Heh, and even if Kidding did have sumpn to say about metal, he's still a
cliched pandering asshole -- when he's not stalking or pop-psycho-anal-yzing
someone..
Make no mistake, Wieber... you're a pathetic liar and the issuer of
phony death treats. Your claims of starting lawsuits against those you
don't like is equally laughable.
================================================
Perhaps Gummer speaks in parable?? lol
--
EA
news:0143aca4-9efa-48b9...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
When Kidding pulls his dick out of PlimpBoi's mouth, Plimpboi will start
yakking again.
Heh, and even if Kidding did have sumpn to say about metal, he's still a
cliched pandering asshole -- when he's not stalking or pop-psycho-anal-yzing
someone..
Make no mistake, Wieber... you're a pathetic liar and the issuer of
phony death treats. Your claims of starting lawsuits against those you
don't like is equally laughable.
Perhaps Gummer speaks in parable?? lol
--
EA
Gunner Asch
May 20, 2013, 7:04:31 AM5/20/13
to
On Mon, 20 May 2013 04:02:57 -0400, "Existential Angst"
They hate my sig.
<VBG>
<VBG>
jon_banquer
May 20, 2013, 7:43:41 AM5/20/13
to
On May 20, 1:02 am, "Existential Angst" <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
> "jon_banquer" <jonbanq...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
The way I see it is that Usenet continues to die. I think the only
thing to do is post as much original content as possible and hope for
the best. Let me know if you find any well run LinkedIn groups you
like.
> "jon_banquer" <jonbanq...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
thing to do is post as much original content as possible and hope for
the best. Let me know if you find any well run LinkedIn groups you
like.
whoyakidding's ghost
May 20, 2013, 9:43:30 AM5/20/13
to
On Sun, 19 May 2013 12:23:24 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>What..is he afraid he is going to get sues for
>slander?
LOL All those legal threats yet you don't even know the difference
between slander and liable. No one has any reason to fear a lawsuit
from you. For starters your main rep is for being the Internet's most
well documented liar. Therefore it's impossible for you to show that
proof of your lies has done anything other than enhance that
reputation.
All this jibber jabber and nobody has answered the simple question I
posed: what happened to all the lawsuits you've promised? arf arf
You've hilariously warned that your army of "computer wienies" was
tracking down people to be killed. And you've claimed to be a bounty
hunter. NOW your excuse is that you can't sue the people you promised
would be dead by the end of 2012... because you don't know their
names! What a fucking clown.
wrote:
>What..is he afraid he is going to get sues for
>slander?
between slander and liable. No one has any reason to fear a lawsuit
from you. For starters your main rep is for being the Internet's most
well documented liar. Therefore it's impossible for you to show that
proof of your lies has done anything other than enhance that
reputation.
All this jibber jabber and nobody has answered the simple question I
posed: what happened to all the lawsuits you've promised? arf arf
You've hilariously warned that your army of "computer wienies" was
tracking down people to be killed. And you've claimed to be a bounty
hunter. NOW your excuse is that you can't sue the people you promised
would be dead by the end of 2012... because you don't know their
names! What a fucking clown.
Existential Angst
May 20, 2013, 12:35:51 PM5/20/13
to
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1n9kp8tfcfmcik630...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 12:23:24 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>What..is he afraid he is going to get sues for
>>slander?
>
> LOL All those legal threats yet you don't even know the difference
> between slander and liable.
Uhhh..... liable as libel?? ARF ARF ARF ARF ARF
> wrote:
>
>>What..is he afraid he is going to get sues for
>>slander?
>
> LOL All those legal threats yet you don't even know the difference
> between slander and liable.
Methinks the semi-litirit Kidding would not be the one to explain the
diff.... LOL
No one has any reason to fear a lawsuit
> from you. For starters your main rep is for being the Internet's most
> well documented liar. Therefore it's impossible for you to show that
> proof of your lies has done anything other than enhance that
> reputation.
Volt??
And the ROI thereof?
In that case, you'n'gummer oughtta be best buds, eh?
>
> All this jibber jabber and nobody has answered the simple question I
> posed: what happened to all the lawsuits you've promised? arf arf
challenge-in-a-vacuum?
You are like a hypocritical fagit preacher (or congressman) hunting down
fellow fagits. J. Edgar Hoover inyone??
>
> You've hilariously warned that your army of "computer wienies" was
> tracking down people to be killed. And you've claimed to be a bounty
> hunter. NOW your excuse is that you can't sue the people you promised
> would be dead by the end of 2012... because you don't know their
> names! What a fucking clown.
The pot calling the kettle black..... again and again and again.
Everytime you mount one of these gratuitous attacks, you show the world who
the real life-less loser is.
Hey, how come you won't talk about the the Volt inymore????
Embarrassed that you provided good Volt links that YOU clearly couldn't
grok??
300,000,000 semi-litirit Merkins figgered out a long time ago what you STILL
cain't unnerstand, re car-buying??
And inyone who tries to shed light on what COULD make the Volt more
successful is an idiot right?
And meanwhile you pursue gummer like a fagit in a bathhouse keeping tabs on
his boyfriend....
Keep'em coming, Kidding.... yer on a roll.... arf arf CLAP CLAP <gulp>
(kidding swallowing his fish)
--
EA
PrecisionmachinisT
May 20, 2013, 3:54:13 PM5/20/13
to
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bsmhp8tg05hbpcvqb...@4ax.com...
> Here are a couple of samples of Gunner's lawsuit threats. The funniest
> part is that he's claiming to have a good rep! that was damaged! But
> it's also funny that he's threatening to sue people he claimed he was
> having killed. "Your Honor, I had a reputation for being a death
> threat issuer, and Mr. TMT ruined my credibility by continuing to live
> and taunt me." So, TMT, are you sued and dead yet?
>
He's still trying to decide which attorney to 'hire'....
> part is that he's claiming to have a good rep! that was damaged! But
> it's also funny that he's threatening to sue people he claimed he was
> having killed. "Your Honor, I had a reputation for being a death
> threat issuer, and Mr. TMT ruined my credibility by continuing to live
> and taunt me." So, TMT, are you sued and dead yet?
>
--a difficult task, considering the line currently stretches from his front door nearly to Bakersfield, all of them eagerly hoping for the job...
whoyakidding's ghost
May 20, 2013, 4:35:10 PM5/20/13
to
have us believe that he's friends with the only lawyer in the world
who doesn't know about truth being a defense to a claim of libel. And
this particular lawyer also has the ability to track down Gunner's
tormentors, something that bounty hunter Gunner and all his "computer
wienies" have been unable to do for YEARS.
Existential Angst
May 20, 2013, 5:09:04 PM5/20/13
to
"PrecisionmachinisT" <123mac...@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:LKednRuThcH44gfM...@scnresearch.com...
==============================================
Please don't masturbate the sociopathic trolls.
--
EA
news:LKednRuThcH44gfM...@scnresearch.com...
Please don't masturbate the sociopathic trolls.
--
EA
jon_banquer
May 20, 2013, 6:43:48 PM5/20/13
to
On May 20, 12:54 pm, "PrecisionmachinisT" <123machin...@notmail.com>
wrote:
> "whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:bsmhp8tg05hbpcvqb...@4ax.com...
Mark Wieber's lying is obvious and laughable compared to a sociopath
like KiddingNoOne. KiddingNoOne has done a lot of lying when it comes
to Aptera and the reason I know this is I have direct knowledge/
contact with Aptera's former founders and ex employees that
KiddingNoOne doesn't.
wrote:
> "whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:bsmhp8tg05hbpcvqb...@4ax.com...
like KiddingNoOne. KiddingNoOne has done a lot of lying when it comes
to Aptera and the reason I know this is I have direct knowledge/
contact with Aptera's former founders and ex employees that
KiddingNoOne doesn't.
Gunner Asch
May 20, 2013, 9:03:59 PM5/20/13
to
personal and demented world view isnt it?
<VBG>
But then...Lefties are like that. Reagan put em out on the street and
frankly...he fucked up when he did it. Shrug
jon_banquer
May 20, 2013, 9:12:13 PM5/20/13
to
On May 19, 5:39 pm, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:23:27 -0400, "Existential Angst"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >"Gunner Asch" <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >news:3h9ip8lmthu4lf6ha...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 15:08:06 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> >> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>>"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 15:08:06 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> >> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
only listen to those who kiss your ass. You don't listen to those that
could really teach you something because they call you on your
frequent lies and bullshit.
Ed Huntress
May 20, 2013, 9:58:07 PM5/20/13
to
On Mon, 20 May 2013 18:03:59 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:09:04 -0400, "Existential Angst"
><fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>>"PrecisionmachinisT" <123mac...@notmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:LKednRuThcH44gfM...@scnresearch.com...
>>
>>"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:bsmhp8tg05hbpcvqb...@4ax.com...
>>> Here are a couple of samples of Gunner's lawsuit threats. The funniest
>>> part is that he's claiming to have a good rep! that was damaged! But
>>> it's also funny that he's threatening to sue people he claimed he was
>>> having killed. "Your Honor, I had a reputation for being a death
>>> threat issuer, and Mr. TMT ruined my credibility by continuing to live
>>> and taunt me." So, TMT, are you sued and dead yet?
>>>
>>
>>He's still trying to decide which attorney to 'hire'....
>>
>>--a difficult task, considering the line currently stretches from his front
>>door nearly to Bakersfield, all of them eagerly hoping for the job...
>>==============================================
>>
>>Please don't masturbate the sociopathic trolls.
>
>Fascinating how he makes stuff up and twists things to fit his
>personal and demented world view isnt it?
>
><VBG>
>
>But then...Lefties are like that. Reagan put em out on the street and
>frankly...he fucked up when he did it. Shrug
>
>Gunner
Gunner, give it up. He even had links to your posts and he quoted your
exact words:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/0e075b853915e745
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/e0457d76eb78f113
People are used to you being a lying jackass but when you accuse
others of lying about things you've said, when the words are still
online for everyone to see, is obnoxious and only makes you look like
a fool.
Kidding has you over a barrel. If you were smart, you'd just move on.
--
Ed Huntress
wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:09:04 -0400, "Existential Angst"
><fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>>"PrecisionmachinisT" <123mac...@notmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:LKednRuThcH44gfM...@scnresearch.com...
>>
>>"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:bsmhp8tg05hbpcvqb...@4ax.com...
>>> Here are a couple of samples of Gunner's lawsuit threats. The funniest
>>> part is that he's claiming to have a good rep! that was damaged! But
>>> it's also funny that he's threatening to sue people he claimed he was
>>> having killed. "Your Honor, I had a reputation for being a death
>>> threat issuer, and Mr. TMT ruined my credibility by continuing to live
>>> and taunt me." So, TMT, are you sued and dead yet?
>>>
>>
>>He's still trying to decide which attorney to 'hire'....
>>
>>--a difficult task, considering the line currently stretches from his front
>>door nearly to Bakersfield, all of them eagerly hoping for the job...
>>==============================================
>>
>>Please don't masturbate the sociopathic trolls.
>
>Fascinating how he makes stuff up and twists things to fit his
>personal and demented world view isnt it?
>
><VBG>
>
>But then...Lefties are like that. Reagan put em out on the street and
>frankly...he fucked up when he did it. Shrug
>
>Gunner
exact words:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/0e075b853915e745
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/e0457d76eb78f113
People are used to you being a lying jackass but when you accuse
others of lying about things you've said, when the words are still
online for everyone to see, is obnoxious and only makes you look like
a fool.
Kidding has you over a barrel. If you were smart, you'd just move on.
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 21, 2013, 12:12:42 AM5/21/13
to
On May 20, 6:58 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 18:03:59 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com>
> >>news:LKednRuThcH44gfM...@scnresearch.com...
>
> >>"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
It's KiddingNoOne who has a gullible fool like you over a barrel,
"slow Eddy". You're far too gullible and clueless to figure out that
KiddingNoOne has become little more than worthless stalker.
EA gets it. You don't.
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 18:03:59 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:09:04 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> ><fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>"PrecisionmachinisT" <123machin...@notmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:09:04 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> ><fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>news:LKednRuThcH44gfM...@scnresearch.com...
>
> >>"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
"slow Eddy". You're far too gullible and clueless to figure out that
KiddingNoOne has become little more than worthless stalker.
EA gets it. You don't.
Existential Angst
May 21, 2013, 12:31:51 AM5/21/13
to
"Ed Huntress" <hunt...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:eailp853ap07b303u...@4ax.com...
Kidding's skill as a liar and bullshitter are far more extraordinary and
subtle, which makes him more insidious, toxic.
He is a master distortionist.
Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
Gummer.
Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully misrepresented
scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
responsibility.
The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
The latter? Worthy of an execution.
See the diff??
You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb, in
fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8" on
fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
--
EA
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
>
news:eailp853ap07b303u...@4ax.com...
subtle, which makes him more insidious, toxic.
He is a master distortionist.
Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
Gummer.
Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully misrepresented
scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
responsibility.
The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
The latter? Worthy of an execution.
See the diff??
You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb, in
fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8" on
fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
--
EA
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
>
Gunner Asch
May 21, 2013, 12:45:31 AM5/21/13
to
On Tue, 21 May 2013 00:31:51 -0400, "Existential Angst"
Exact words? Odd....I dont see much simularity. Just twisting and
gnarling.
anyone.
Fact.
>Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully misrepresented
>scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
>responsibility.
>The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
>The latter? Worthy of an execution.
>See the diff??
>
>You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
>neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
>Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb, in
>fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
>link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8" on
>fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
>kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
--
gnarling.
>>
>> Kidding has you over a barrel. If you were smart, you'd just move on.
>
>Kidding's skill as a liar and bullshitter are far more extraordinary and
>subtle, which makes him more insidious, toxic.
>He is a master distortionist.
>
>Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
> Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
>Gummer.
I always pay off my debts. May take a while...but Ive never stiffed
>> Kidding has you over a barrel. If you were smart, you'd just move on.
>
>Kidding's skill as a liar and bullshitter are far more extraordinary and
>subtle, which makes him more insidious, toxic.
>He is a master distortionist.
>
>Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
> Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
>Gummer.
anyone.
Fact.
>Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully misrepresented
>scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
>responsibility.
>The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
>The latter? Worthy of an execution.
>See the diff??
>
>You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
>neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
>Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb, in
>fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
>link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8" on
>fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
>kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
--
Existential Angst
May 21, 2013, 12:52:02 AM5/21/13
to
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:urulp8hk2qov98e1c...@4ax.com...
But the point remains, Kidding is a consummate conman. That's how he made
the little money he's got.
And his new Chosen Life's Path is to be.... a STALKER!!!!!
Way to go, Kidding.... I would have suggested Yoga, or Zen, or tutoring
kids or sumpn, but I guess stalking has some perks, eh??
Like blowjobs from PlimpBoi???
--
EA
whoyakidding's ghost
May 21, 2013, 9:53:59 AM5/21/13
to
ghost and you and everyone else he's threatened, off his imaginary
death list. And he should say that he's withdrawn all his lawsuits. In
order to devote more time to his family or something. :)
Want to see something funny? If you Google pathological liar Gunner's
name, the first two pages of results are almost entirely links to
Wieber Cliff Notes. http://tinyurl.com/op5nlcz His quoted words could
cause him some trouble at an employment interview... if it weren't for
his lifelong allergy to earning a living.
Ed Huntress
May 21, 2013, 10:02:00 AM5/21/13
to
You're messing up the floor.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 21, 2013, 10:13:07 AM5/21/13
to
On Tue, 21 May 2013 00:31:51 -0400, "Existential Angst"
Now wait a damned minute. Every post he's made about Gunner is dead-on
and documented. I remember a lot of those Gunner stupidities that
Kidding has archived. Check them out. He does NOT b.s. about them.
>
>Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
> Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
>Gummer.
>Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully misrepresented
>scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
>responsibility.
>The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
>The latter? Worthy of an execution.
>See the diff??
>
>You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
>neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
>Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb, in
>fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
>link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8" on
>fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
>kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
I really don't care. I don't care about welding tables. I don't read
those threads. My metalworking interest is in machining and materials,
not in welding. I can barely stick two pieces together. <g>
I care about the truth, and Kidding has Gunner nailed to a plank,
split, and basting before an open fire.
What I see when I catch the arguments that you and JB get involved in
is a lot of smoke and fire about opinions and disagreements. I know
from experience that JB overreaches half the time -- he constantly
pontificates about things of which he has only third-hand knowledge.
Contrast that with Gunner: Gunner just makes shit up. So, he's a
congenital liar. No big deal. But it becomes a big deal when he makes
stuff up and then triumphantly uses it to put others down. That's a
white-trash thing.
So you have your arguments with Kidding, and (dangerously, and
foolishly, IMO) jump onto JB's bandwagons, but I'm not going to play
that game unless someone comes after me. Then I'll cut their legs off.
--
Ed Huntress
and documented. I remember a lot of those Gunner stupidities that
Kidding has archived. Check them out. He does NOT b.s. about them.
>
>Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
> Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
>Gummer.
>Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully misrepresented
>scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
>responsibility.
>The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
>The latter? Worthy of an execution.
>See the diff??
>
>You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
>neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
>Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb, in
>fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
>link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8" on
>fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
>kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
those threads. My metalworking interest is in machining and materials,
not in welding. I can barely stick two pieces together. <g>
I care about the truth, and Kidding has Gunner nailed to a plank,
split, and basting before an open fire.
What I see when I catch the arguments that you and JB get involved in
is a lot of smoke and fire about opinions and disagreements. I know
from experience that JB overreaches half the time -- he constantly
pontificates about things of which he has only third-hand knowledge.
Contrast that with Gunner: Gunner just makes shit up. So, he's a
congenital liar. No big deal. But it becomes a big deal when he makes
stuff up and then triumphantly uses it to put others down. That's a
white-trash thing.
So you have your arguments with Kidding, and (dangerously, and
foolishly, IMO) jump onto JB's bandwagons, but I'm not going to play
that game unless someone comes after me. Then I'll cut their legs off.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 21, 2013, 10:25:17 AM5/21/13
to
On Mon, 20 May 2013 21:45:31 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
He pulls the quotes DIRECTLY FROM YOUR POSTS, you lying phony.
whoyakidding's ghost
May 21, 2013, 10:41:53 AM5/21/13
to
On Tue, 21 May 2013 10:13:07 -0400, Ed Huntress
<hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:
>What I see when I catch the arguments that you and JB get involved in
>is a lot of smoke and fire about opinions and disagreements. I know
>from experience that JB overreaches half the time -- he constantly
>pontificates about things of which he has only third-hand knowledge.
>
>Contrast that with Gunner: Gunner just makes shit up. So, he's a
>congenital liar. No big deal. But it becomes a big deal when he makes
>stuff up and then triumphantly uses it to put others down. That's a
>white-trash thing.
Gunner and Bonkers and EA are becoming quite the tag team. I was
<hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:
>What I see when I catch the arguments that you and JB get involved in
>is a lot of smoke and fire about opinions and disagreements. I know
>from experience that JB overreaches half the time -- he constantly
>pontificates about things of which he has only third-hand knowledge.
>
>Contrast that with Gunner: Gunner just makes shit up. So, he's a
>congenital liar. No big deal. But it becomes a big deal when he makes
>stuff up and then triumphantly uses it to put others down. That's a
>white-trash thing.
thinking Three Musketeers... except for the one for all and all for
one thing. But that could be cured if only Gunner would join Bonker's
blog. :)
Jeffrey Föwler
May 21, 2013, 10:49:20 AM5/21/13
to
Ed Huntress
May 21, 2013, 10:58:58 AM5/21/13
to
dreams. Fantasy mass-murder is the best thing he has going.
>
>Want to see something funny? If you Google pathological liar Gunner's
>name, the first two pages of results are almost entirely links to
>Wieber Cliff Notes. http://tinyurl.com/op5nlcz His quoted words could
>cause him some trouble at an employment interview... if it weren't for
>his lifelong allergy to earning a living.
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 21, 2013, 11:43:24 AM5/21/13
to
jon_banquer
May 21, 2013, 11:46:15 AM5/21/13
to
On May 21, 7:41 am, whoyakidding's ghost <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.... everyone who calls KiddingNoOne out for
what he truly is part of a conspiracy.
KiddingNoOne is a liar and a worthless stalker and more people realize
it as time passes.
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 10:13:07 -0400, Ed Huntress
>
>
what he truly is part of a conspiracy.
KiddingNoOne is a liar and a worthless stalker and more people realize
it as time passes.
jon_banquer
May 21, 2013, 12:07:23 PM5/21/13
to
On May 21, 7:13 am, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 00:31:51 -0400, "Existential Angst"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >"Ed Huntress" <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 00:31:51 -0400, "Existential Angst"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >news:eailp853ap07b303u...@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 18:03:59 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:09:04 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> >>><fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>"PrecisionmachinisT" <123machin...@notmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:09:04 -0400, "Existential Angst"
> >>><fit...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>news:LKednRuThcH44gfM...@scnresearch.com...
>
> >>>>"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
who wishes to be connected to me and what I've accomplished. So do my
posts here where I've ripped your bullshit apart and shown you to be a
blowhard who often gets it wrong.
"but I'm not going to play that game unless someone comes after me.
Then I'll cut their legs off."
it came to shrinking aluminum you gave up when faced with a challenge
because you're a quitter and a loser who has spent the majority of his
life writing worthless ad copy rather than machining.
Stormin Mormon
May 21, 2013, 12:46:23 PM5/21/13
to
slan·der
[slan-der] Show IPA
noun
1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
3. Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
verb (used with object)
4. to utter slander against; defame.
verb (used without object)
5. to utter or circulate slander.
===========================
liable
li·a·ble
[lahy-uh-buhl] Show IPA
adjective
1. legally responsible: You are liable for the damage caused by your action.
2. subject or susceptible: to be liable to heart disease.
3. likely or apt: He's liable to get angry.
How about you? Do you know the difference?
Do you know the difference between libel and
liable?
.
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
.
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1n9kp8tfcfmcik630...@4ax.com...
[slan-der] Show IPA
noun
1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
3. Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
verb (used with object)
4. to utter slander against; defame.
verb (used without object)
5. to utter or circulate slander.
===========================
liable
li·a·ble
[lahy-uh-buhl] Show IPA
adjective
1. legally responsible: You are liable for the damage caused by your action.
2. subject or susceptible: to be liable to heart disease.
3. likely or apt: He's liable to get angry.
How about you? Do you know the difference?
Do you know the difference between libel and
liable?
.
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
.
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1n9kp8tfcfmcik630...@4ax.com...
whoyakidding's ghost
May 21, 2013, 1:13:52 PM5/21/13
to
On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:46:23 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
<cayoung61**NOJUNK**@hotmail.com> wrote:
>slan�der
> [slan-der] Show IPA
>noun
>1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
>2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
>3. Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
>verb (used with object)
>4. to utter slander against; defame.
>verb (used without object)
>5. to utter or circulate slander.
>===========================
>liable
>li�a�ble
> [lahy-uh-buhl] Show IPA
>adjective
>1. legally responsible: You are liable for the damage caused by your action.
>2. subject or susceptible: to be liable to heart disease.
>3. likely or apt: He's liable to get angry.
>
>How about you? Do you know the difference?
>Do you know the difference between libel and
>liable?
I know that you're the weakest type of debater.
<cayoung61**NOJUNK**@hotmail.com> wrote:
>slan�der
> [slan-der] Show IPA
>noun
>1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
>2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
>3. Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
>verb (used with object)
>4. to utter slander against; defame.
>verb (used without object)
>5. to utter or circulate slander.
>===========================
>liable
>li�a�ble
> [lahy-uh-buhl] Show IPA
>adjective
>1. legally responsible: You are liable for the damage caused by your action.
>2. subject or susceptible: to be liable to heart disease.
>3. likely or apt: He's liable to get angry.
>
>How about you? Do you know the difference?
>Do you know the difference between libel and
>liable?
http://grammar.about.com/od/rs/g/spellingflameterm.htm
"An inflammatory Internet post that corrects the spelling in another
post, usually as a way of attacking the writer rather than responding
to the writer's point.
As E. S. Raymond points out in The New Hacker's Dictionary, "It's an
amusing comment on human nature that spelling flames themselves often
contain spelling errors."
http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/S/spelling-flame.html
"spelling flame: n.
[Usenet] A posting ostentatiously correcting a previous article's
spelling as a way of casting scorn on the point the article was trying
to make, instead of actually responding to that point"
Is that where they teach the weak minded to promote their affliction
but avoid any mention of their belief in magic underwear?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Magic%20Underwear
"1. Magic Underwear
Like most of the Mormon cult's practices, magic underwear seems to be
another poorly kept, weirdo secret.
Their magic underwear are worn under their real underwear. Picture a
woman wearing a man's T-shirt and boxer briefs under her bra and
panties, and that's the look.
They even sew embroidered patches into their magic undies, adding even
more mystical, magical gibberish to the mix.
I had a boss who was a Mormon priesthood holder on the side. You could
see the outline of his magic underwear on his upper legs through his
trousers.
He professed to be some kind of moral role model but in actuality all
he worshipped was money. He treated his staff like slaves and his
upper management (all women) like sister wives.
In addition to thinking his magic drawers would bring him x-ray
vision, the ability to fly and other insane delusions, he also thinks
when he dies he'll inherit his own planet to rule.
He hides behind a conservative, family values, religious Christian
Republican facade, but in reality the man is totally batshit crazy."
Stormin Mormon
May 21, 2013, 4:34:52 PM5/21/13
to
Ah, so I'm a weak debater. I guess that establishes that you don't know the difference between liable and libel. Go ahead with the criticism. Keep working from your position of beligerant ignorance.
.
.
.
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:dganp85kcans5juuq...@4ax.com...
.
.
.
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:dganp85kcans5juuq...@4ax.com...
Existential Angst
May 21, 2013, 4:39:18 PM5/21/13
to
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dganp85kcans5juuq...@4ax.com...
of gummer.
DAT reeks of credibility, eh? LOL
And here we go again with another "one point determines a line", eh,
regarding mormons?
Quoting urbanfukndictionary, no less. Good one.
Plus, it was more than a spelling error, dood. You are basically ilitirit,
altho gifted as a distortionist.
Talk about people hiding behind shit.....
And this is actually a perfect example of your artfully distorted logic:
YOU picked on gummer for the essentially *trivial* difference between
slander and libel. YOU are a perfect example of all that bullshit you
drooled above, dat magic underwear bullshit....
So NOW, when someone calls YOU out on yer ilitirit confusion of libel and
liable, THEY are the weak debaters, right?
So true to your hypocritical form.
But, I gotta hand it to you, you ARE good at your deception.
It's hilarious how you hold people so accountable to your fantasical dotted
i's, crossed t's, yet you don't understand basic science, basic logic.
You REALLY think that because YOUR fellating-conditioned back was fine with
a 28" high welding table, EVERYONE's back will be fine????
All you proved is that more people should suck cock, for a better back.
Could make for a great infomercial, cum to think of it.
You STILL don't comprehend how GM mis-calc'd the market, to some extent the
"intent" of a green car, and can't even grok that criticizing their
"car-making strategy" has NOTHING to do with then having actually made a
good car -- albeit a science-project car.
The Q is: Good for whom?? Something you just can't fathom.
Good thing GM is fathoming it, tho..... they just better hope
toyoter/honder aren't fathoming betterer.
And bec you are so good at twisting logic and subtlely distorting the
issues, you actually have a few people here fooled -- who, btw, really
shouldn't have been fooled.by a sociopathic asshole such as yourself. Heh,
I won't name names..... LOL
You PROVE, in spades, how empty your character is, every time you post one
of those gummer witchhunts. Unfortunately, you have a deluded bunch here
cheering you on. Figgers.
--
EA
Existential Angst
May 21, 2013, 4:44:48 PM5/21/13
to
"Stormin Mormon" <cayoung61**NOJUNK**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qWQmt.202063$JM.8...@fed17.iad...
Hmmm..... Dat would be "belligerent ignerince".....
No point in giving KiddingHisSelf an unnecessary in.....
--
EA
news:qWQmt.202063$JM.8...@fed17.iad...
Ah, so I'm a weak debater. I guess that establishes that you don't know the
difference between liable and libel. Go ahead with the criticism. Keep
working from your position of beligerant ignorance.
==========================================================
difference between liable and libel. Go ahead with the criticism. Keep
working from your position of beligerant ignorance.
Hmmm..... Dat would be "belligerent ignerince".....
No point in giving KiddingHisSelf an unnecessary in.....
--
EA
whoyakidding's ghost
May 21, 2013, 4:46:02 PM5/21/13
to
On Tue, 21 May 2013 16:34:52 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
<cayoung61**NOJUNK**@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Ah, so I'm a weak debater.
No, I said that you are "the weakest type of debater." Merely weak
<cayoung61**NOJUNK**@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Ah, so I'm a weak debater.
would be dozens of steps higher.
> I guess that establishes that you don't know the difference between liable and libel.
you merely pretended to be too stupid.
> Go ahead with the criticism.
> Keep working from your position of beligerant ignorance.
the word "ignorance."
Existential Angst
May 21, 2013, 4:53:27 PM5/21/13
to
"whoyakidding's ghost" <whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5rmnp85eh5jvtbkef...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 16:34:52 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
> <cayoung61**NOJUNK**@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Ah, so I'm a weak debater.
>
> No, I said that you are "the weakest type of debater." Merely weak
> would be dozens of steps higher.
Oh, gee, I guess it's Junior High time.....
> <cayoung61**NOJUNK**@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Ah, so I'm a weak debater.
>
> No, I said that you are "the weakest type of debater." Merely weak
> would be dozens of steps higher.
>
>> I guess that establishes that you don't know the difference between
>> liable and libel.
>
> No, the context was clear. Either you are too stupid to grok that, or
> you merely pretended to be too stupid.
nitpicking, now, did it.....
Your hypocrisy is deeeee-licious!! Keep it coming!!!
>
>> Go ahead with the criticism.
>
> OK.
>
>> Keep working from your position of beligerant ignorance.
>
> People who believe in magic underwear should learn to never mention
> the word "ignorance."
about..... well, both.....
--
EA
>
>
Existential Angst
May 21, 2013, 5:57:37 PM5/21/13
to
"Ed Huntress" <hunt...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:pjvmp8homvq2ae65q...@4ax.com...
GM engineers designed the Volt, therefore it MUST be beyond reproach....
The fukn asshole don't even unnerstand his own links.
Plus, if you follow all his other bullshit.... like his latest with
Stormin, you'll see how he artfully ducks, dodges, attacks.
Look, any fukn moron can CHRONICLE -- and if you can search, copy, paste,
it's GOTTA be accurate.
So what? So he's archived Gummers stories.
How pathetic a life can one have to spend their time doing THAT????
Why is everyone so worked up about Gummer's veracity? You aren't putting
any money on it, so really, just enjoy'em!!!
39 orgasms is not THAT farfetched.... I figger mebbe he was in a motel
room, and mebbe counted a few from next door.... no big biggie.... LOL
>
>>
>>Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
>> Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
>>Gummer.
>>Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully
>>misrepresented
>>scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
>>responsibility.
>>The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
>>The latter? Worthy of an execution.
>>See the diff??
>>
>>You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
>>neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
>>Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb,
>>in
>>fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
>>link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8"
>>on
>>fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
>>kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
>
> I really don't care. I don't care about welding tables. I don't read
> those threads. My metalworking interest is in machining and materials,
> not in welding. I can barely stick two pieces together. <g>
>
> I care about the truth, and Kidding has Gunner nailed to a plank,
> split, and basting before an open fire.
copy/paste. Look at the mentality behind it.
>
> What I see when I catch the arguments that you and JB get involved in
> is a lot of smoke and fire about opinions and disagreements. I know
> from experience that JB overreaches half the time -- he constantly
> pontificates about things of which he has only third-hand knowledge.
>
> Contrast that with Gunner: Gunner just makes shit up. So, he's a
> congenital liar.
again....
No big deal. But it becomes a big deal when he makes
> stuff up and then triumphantly uses it to put others down. That's a
> white-trash thing.
more to the point the ultimate hypocrit.
>
> So you have your arguments with Kidding, and (dangerously, and
> foolishly, IMO) jump onto JB's bandwagons, but I'm not going to play
> that game unless someone comes after me. Then I'll cut their legs off.
Why is it not OK for someone to "come after you", but it's ok to go after
someone else??
Dudn't matter whether gummer is fullashit or not. This kind of witchhunting
is simply sociopathic, which Kidding displays on more and more levels.
And just cuz y'all don't like Gummer dudn't mean a witchhunt is OK. Don't
let a fagit sociopath do your dirty work for you.
jon_banquer
May 21, 2013, 6:16:47 PM5/21/13
to
On May 21, 1:46 pm, whoyakidding's ghost <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
KiddingNoOne. When I confronted you on your lies you ran away like the
chicken shit, anonymous, Usenet posting pussy that you truly are. You
are still running, KiddingNoOne but you can't hide:
My offer to try and set up a meeting with you, myself and Aptera's co-
founder Steve Fambro and his electrical engineer wife and former
Aptera employee Tricia Fambro still stands.
Should I list the reasons that you continue to run a way from my offer
to set up a face to face meeting where you will be confronted with the
lies and misinformation you have posted about Aptera?
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 16:34:52 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
>
>
> <cayoung61**NOJUN...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Ah, so I'm a weak debater.
>
> No, I said that you are "the weakest type of debater." Merely weak
> would be dozens of steps higher.
>
> > I guess that establishes that you don't know the difference between liable and libel.
>
> No, the context was clear. Either you are too stupid to grok that, or
> you merely pretended to be too stupid.
>
> > Go ahead with the criticism.
>
> OK.
>
> > Keep working from your position of beligerant ignorance.
>
> People who believe in magic underwear should learn to never mention
> the word "ignorance."
It doesn't get much weaker than the lies you have told about Aptera,
> >Ah, so I'm a weak debater.
>
> No, I said that you are "the weakest type of debater." Merely weak
> would be dozens of steps higher.
>
> > I guess that establishes that you don't know the difference between liable and libel.
>
> No, the context was clear. Either you are too stupid to grok that, or
> you merely pretended to be too stupid.
>
> > Go ahead with the criticism.
>
> OK.
>
> > Keep working from your position of beligerant ignorance.
>
> People who believe in magic underwear should learn to never mention
> the word "ignorance."
KiddingNoOne. When I confronted you on your lies you ran away like the
chicken shit, anonymous, Usenet posting pussy that you truly are. You
are still running, KiddingNoOne but you can't hide:
My offer to try and set up a meeting with you, myself and Aptera's co-
founder Steve Fambro and his electrical engineer wife and former
Aptera employee Tricia Fambro still stands.
Should I list the reasons that you continue to run a way from my offer
to set up a face to face meeting where you will be confronted with the
lies and misinformation you have posted about Aptera?
Ed Huntress
May 22, 2013, 12:13:02 AM5/22/13
to
On Tue, 21 May 2013 17:57:37 -0400, "Existential Angst"
Ok, I'm out of that one, because I wasn't following the thread at that
point and all I saw was the smoke. I'll just stand back and watch.
d8-)
>
>Plus, if you follow all his other bullshit.... like his latest with
>Stormin, you'll see how he artfully ducks, dodges, attacks.
>
>Look, any fukn moron can CHRONICLE -- and if you can search, copy, paste,
>it's GOTTA be accurate.
> So what? So he's archived Gummers stories.
>How pathetic a life can one have to spend their time doing THAT????
It beats needlepoint. I tie silly little trout flies. What's up with
that? You can hardly see 'um. But I've been doing it for over 50
years.
>
>Why is everyone so worked up about Gummer's veracity? You aren't putting
>any money on it, so really, just enjoy'em!!!
I've said this before, and I'll say it again, because he pisses me
off, too:
It's not the ridiculous stories themselves. Some of them are
childishly embarrassing, but even that isn't it.
It's the fact that they're part of his ego-salvaging put-down shtick.
He weaves them into his stories of superiority to everyone he blames
for his own personal failures. He turns them into insults and uses
them to support his insults. They're calculated to boost his own sorry
self-esteem at the expense of others.
As I said, it's a white-trash thing, and it's obnoxious.
>39 orgasms is not THAT farfetched.... I figger mebbe he was in a motel
>room, and mebbe counted a few from next door.... no big biggie.... LOL
It's just one little piece of his blowhard oeuvre. No single one of
them tells the story. But, collectively, they're the story of a
bullying buffoon who can only boost his own ego by putting others
down. That's all he has left.
>
>>
>>>
>>>Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
>>> Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
>>>Gummer.
>>>Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully
>>>misrepresented
>>>scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
>>>responsibility.
>>>The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
>>>The latter? Worthy of an execution.
>>>See the diff??
>>>
>>>You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
>>>neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
>>>Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb,
>>>in
>>>fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
>>>link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8"
>>>on
>>>fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
>>>kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
>>
>> I really don't care. I don't care about welding tables. I don't read
>> those threads. My metalworking interest is in machining and materials,
>> not in welding. I can barely stick two pieces together. <g>
>
>The point is Kidding's dogged determination to twist, squirm and wiggle.
Once again, I'll have to stand back and watch. I only got into the
conversation about the Volt pretty late, and all I saw was two
opposite ideas of what the car is trying to achieve, while I believe
the truth of it was something a little different than either one of
your positions.
>
>>
>> I care about the truth, and Kidding has Gunner nailed to a plank,
>> split, and basting before an open fire.
>
>Ed, you shouldn't be patronizing a pointless witchhunt. Any fagit can
>copy/paste. Look at the mentality behind it.
>
>>
>> What I see when I catch the arguments that you and JB get involved in
>> is a lot of smoke and fire about opinions and disagreements. I know
>> from experience that JB overreaches half the time -- he constantly
>> pontificates about things of which he has only third-hand knowledge.
>>
>> Contrast that with Gunner: Gunner just makes shit up. So, he's a
>> congenital liar.
>
>Why are you bringing up Gummer's genitals?? Or is this the 39 orgasm thing
>again....
>
>No big deal. But it becomes a big deal when he makes
>> stuff up and then triumphantly uses it to put others down. That's a
>> white-trash thing.
>
>Kidding is slightly more articulate white trash. Still semi-litirit, but
>more to the point the ultimate hypocrit.
>
>>
>> So you have your arguments with Kidding, and (dangerously, and
>> foolishly, IMO) jump onto JB's bandwagons, but I'm not going to play
>> that game unless someone comes after me. Then I'll cut their legs off.
>
>Therein lies the moral issue:
> Why is it not OK for someone to "come after you", but it's ok to go after
>someone else??
The answer is something like your approach to whoyakidding. You object
strongly to something you perceive in his posts. I object strongly to
being called foul names, as I have been for over ten years here. And
this is the only place where I've ever been exposed to that kind of
bullying. I held off for over a year until I decided it wasn't going
to happen without a couterpunch from me.
>Dudn't matter whether gummer is fullashit or not. This kind of witchhunting
>is simply sociopathic, which Kidding displays on more and more levels.
>And just cuz y'all don't like Gummer dudn't mean a witchhunt is OK. Don't
>let a fagit sociopath do your dirty work for you.
Tell you what: You fight your fights, and I'll fight mine.
--
Ed Huntress
point and all I saw was the smoke. I'll just stand back and watch.
d8-)
>
>Plus, if you follow all his other bullshit.... like his latest with
>Stormin, you'll see how he artfully ducks, dodges, attacks.
>
>Look, any fukn moron can CHRONICLE -- and if you can search, copy, paste,
>it's GOTTA be accurate.
> So what? So he's archived Gummers stories.
>How pathetic a life can one have to spend their time doing THAT????
that? You can hardly see 'um. But I've been doing it for over 50
years.
>
>Why is everyone so worked up about Gummer's veracity? You aren't putting
>any money on it, so really, just enjoy'em!!!
off, too:
It's not the ridiculous stories themselves. Some of them are
childishly embarrassing, but even that isn't it.
It's the fact that they're part of his ego-salvaging put-down shtick.
He weaves them into his stories of superiority to everyone he blames
for his own personal failures. He turns them into insults and uses
them to support his insults. They're calculated to boost his own sorry
self-esteem at the expense of others.
As I said, it's a white-trash thing, and it's obnoxious.
>39 orgasms is not THAT farfetched.... I figger mebbe he was in a motel
>room, and mebbe counted a few from next door.... no big biggie.... LOL
them tells the story. But, collectively, they're the story of a
bullying buffoon who can only boost his own ego by putting others
down. That's all he has left.
>
>>
>>>
>>>Here's the diff between Gummer and Kidding:
>>> Gummer may borrow some money from you and fail to pay it back. Bad
>>>Gummer.
>>>Kidding will convince you to invest in some hyped-up artfully
>>>misrepresented
>>>scheme, cause you to lose you life savings, and weasel out of all
>>>responsibility.
>>>The former? Worthy of an assbeating.
>>>The latter? Worthy of an execution.
>>>See the diff??
>>>
>>>You'll see it more clearly in the welding table thread, where the
>>>neverending Kidding Edict is shown to be but more authoritative bullshit.
>>>Kidding wouldn't know a good welding table if it tipped over on him. Jb,
>>>in
>>>fact, showed one of the best welding tables/systems out there. Forgot the
>>>link, but once you've seen that stuff, you either do what I did (HR 1/8"
>>>on
>>>fukn plywood/2x4s), or you buy the real deal. This 28" bullshit from
>>>kidding, ig is just too much ado about nuthin.
>>
>> I really don't care. I don't care about welding tables. I don't read
>> those threads. My metalworking interest is in machining and materials,
>> not in welding. I can barely stick two pieces together. <g>
>
>The point is Kidding's dogged determination to twist, squirm and wiggle.
conversation about the Volt pretty late, and all I saw was two
opposite ideas of what the car is trying to achieve, while I believe
the truth of it was something a little different than either one of
your positions.
>
>>
>> I care about the truth, and Kidding has Gunner nailed to a plank,
>> split, and basting before an open fire.
>
>Ed, you shouldn't be patronizing a pointless witchhunt. Any fagit can
>copy/paste. Look at the mentality behind it.
>
>>
>> What I see when I catch the arguments that you and JB get involved in
>> is a lot of smoke and fire about opinions and disagreements. I know
>> from experience that JB overreaches half the time -- he constantly
>> pontificates about things of which he has only third-hand knowledge.
>>
>> Contrast that with Gunner: Gunner just makes shit up. So, he's a
>> congenital liar.
>
>Why are you bringing up Gummer's genitals?? Or is this the 39 orgasm thing
>again....
>
>No big deal. But it becomes a big deal when he makes
>> stuff up and then triumphantly uses it to put others down. That's a
>> white-trash thing.
>
>Kidding is slightly more articulate white trash. Still semi-litirit, but
>more to the point the ultimate hypocrit.
>
>>
>> So you have your arguments with Kidding, and (dangerously, and
>> foolishly, IMO) jump onto JB's bandwagons, but I'm not going to play
>> that game unless someone comes after me. Then I'll cut their legs off.
>
>Therein lies the moral issue:
> Why is it not OK for someone to "come after you", but it's ok to go after
>someone else??
strongly to something you perceive in his posts. I object strongly to
being called foul names, as I have been for over ten years here. And
this is the only place where I've ever been exposed to that kind of
bullying. I held off for over a year until I decided it wasn't going
to happen without a couterpunch from me.
>Dudn't matter whether gummer is fullashit or not. This kind of witchhunting
>is simply sociopathic, which Kidding displays on more and more levels.
>And just cuz y'all don't like Gummer dudn't mean a witchhunt is OK. Don't
>let a fagit sociopath do your dirty work for you.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 4:38:18 PM5/23/13
to
pontificating beyond your reach. Then you accuse people, including me,
of not knowing things about subjects we neither care about nor claim
to know much about. Such as CAD/CAM.
I particularly find your posts about engines and racing amusing. What
class did you say you raced in, again?
>
> "but I'm not going to play that game unless someone comes after me.
>Then I'll cut their legs off."
>
>I hope you handle cuts better than you handle shrinking aluminum.
is only of minor interest to me. Meanwhile, you're telling me about
all of the videos I should watch and all of the things I should know
about it -- as if you're an expert.
Why don't you show us some photos of the aluminum body panels you've
made yourself, JB? Oh, you haven't actually done it? Should we be
surprised? I'm not.
> When
>it came to shrinking aluminum you gave up when faced with a challenge
>because you're a quitter and a loser who has spent the majority of his
>life writing worthless ad copy rather than machining.
know.
Let's see your examples of how you've done it. You appear to be an
armchair everything.
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 5:43:07 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 1:38 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
nothing of value.
Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
I'm everything your not. I'm a successful machinist with a 20 year
career including working in Qualcomm's prototype machine shop for 2
years. I have LinkedIn connections that you will never have, I have a
very successful CADCAM discussion group that is now approaching 650
members worldwide, I have the most successful independent blog on
Mastercam. You, on the other hand, are a blowhard who has spend the
majority of his life writing ad copy rather than machining. In
addition, your CADCAM knowledge is close to zero. When faced with
challenging machining problems you're track record shows you're a
quitter and a loser.
nothing of value.
Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
I'm everything your not. I'm a successful machinist with a 20 year
career including working in Qualcomm's prototype machine shop for 2
years. I have LinkedIn connections that you will never have, I have a
very successful CADCAM discussion group that is now approaching 650
members worldwide, I have the most successful independent blog on
Mastercam. You, on the other hand, are a blowhard who has spend the
majority of his life writing ad copy rather than machining. In
addition, your CADCAM knowledge is close to zero. When faced with
challenging machining problems you're track record shows you're a
quitter and a loser.
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 5:53:58 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:43:07 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On May 23, 1:38�pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
>nothing of value.
>
>
>Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
>
>I'm everything your not.
You can say that again, Jon. And I thank my lucky stars for it every
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On May 23, 1:38�pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
>nothing of value.
>
>
>Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
>
>I'm everything your not.
day.
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 5:55:57 PM5/23/13
to
challenges as well, "slow Eddy". Only a first class loser like you
would give up on shrinking aluminum and not want to learn from your
mistakes.
You're little more than a lazy whore who has spent the majority of his
life prostituted himself by writing worthless ad copy.
You're also a gullible moron who can't see what others easily can when
it comes to lying stalkers like KiddingNoOne or fools like Tom Gardner
who can't run a business.
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 5:56:32 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 2:53 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:43:07 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:43:07 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
> <jonbanq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On May 23, 1:38 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >nothing of value.
>
> >Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
>
> >I'm everything your not.
>
> You can say that again, Jon. And I thank my lucky stars for it every
> day.
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
You can thank your lucky stars that your wife supports a worthless
> >On May 23, 1:38 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >nothing of value.
>
> >Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
>
> >I'm everything your not.
>
> You can say that again, Jon. And I thank my lucky stars for it every
> day.
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
loser like you.
whoyakidding's ghost
May 23, 2013, 7:27:36 PM5/23/13
to
never about being employed or having any source of income? He probably
used his posts as proof positive of a mental disability. And who could
disagree? He's definitely too nutz to hold a job.
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 8:39:06 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 4:27 pm, whoyakidding's ghost <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
KiddingNoOne lies as badly as Mark Wieber does and he's also a
anonymous posting Usenet stalker and major pussy.
I've often posted that I worked at Qualcomm's prototype machine shop,
how long I worked there and the kinds of parts I made when I worked
there. I have also posted about many other shops I have worked at.
Anyone notice how many times KiddingNoOne has refused to address what
I've posted in this thread and many other threads? Specifically:
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:53:58 -0400, Ed Huntress
>
>
anonymous posting Usenet stalker and major pussy.
I've often posted that I worked at Qualcomm's prototype machine shop,
how long I worked there and the kinds of parts I made when I worked
there. I have also posted about many other shops I have worked at.
Anyone notice how many times KiddingNoOne has refused to address what
I've posted in this thread and many other threads? Specifically:
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 8:46:08 PM5/23/13
to
I have never seen an adult so utterly clueless about the impression
that results from broadcasting such braggadocio.
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 8:59:05 PM5/23/13
to
are and call you on it while also crediting you (like I do Wieber and
KiddingNoOne ) for what you do get right.
Assholes like you, Wieber and KiddingNoOne can't handle balance and
reality.
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 9:40:32 PM5/23/13
to
Just for the heck of it, not having seen your Mastercam blog, I
Googled this:
jon banquer mastercam blog
And I got this as the first item:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Flag-all-Jon-Banquers-Mastercam-3122374.S.141226648
Maybe you can explain what's going on there, so we can better
appreciate your accomplishments...
Once again, where are the photos of those body panels you've made? Or
haven't you ever actually done it?
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 9:57:32 PM5/23/13
to
a very happy 39 years together.
But then, I never beat her up like you did with yours, dirtbag:
http://tinyurl.com/brkeey8
===========================================
Ed,
The newsgroup badly needs someone who is as articulate as you are.
Keep me on my toes and correct me where ever you think it's
appropriate, as I respect what you have to say based on what you have
already posted. I will certainly take the time to think about whatever
correction, advice, etc. you post. -- Jon Banquer, post to Ed
Huntress, Jun 23, 2002
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.machines.cnc/v9HpyewLf_I/t2qa5vNd-rQJ
===========================================
<sigh>
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 9:58:46 PM5/23/13
to
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 10:35:44 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 6:40 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:55:57 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:55:57 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Maybe you can explain what's going on there, so we can better
> appreciate your accomplishments...
>
> Once again, where are the photos of those body panels you've made? Or
> haven't you ever actually done it?
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
No one with a clue about what the problems with Mastercam are could
> Maybe you can explain what's going on there, so we can better
> appreciate your accomplishments...
>
> Once again, where are the photos of those body panels you've made? Or
> haven't you ever actually done it?
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
careless about that kind of worthless gossip. It's designed by
Mastercam fanboi's to attract clueless CADCAM morons like you who are
idiots when it comes to
CADCAM. When was the last time you used Mastercam? Make sure you
answer the question rather than engage in your usual evasion, lies and
shitbaggery, "slow Eddy". It's beyond humorous reading both you and
KiddingNoOne desperately look for anything to try and discredit the
fact that my Why Mastercam Is The Wrong Choice blog is easily the most
successful and well read independent Mastercam blog on the Internet.
You're a CADCAM and machining idiot, "slow Eddy" who has spent the
majority of your worthless career writing ad copy instead of
machining. It's just another reason why no one is interested in
interviewing you and you have no serious LinkedIn connections to show.
You're fool and you have made yourself look like the fool you truly
are frequently over many years on Usenet. Does your wife, who pays the
bills, know how you waste your time or is she just glad to get you out
of her hair?
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 10:42:09 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 6:57 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:56:32 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:56:32 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ===========================================
>
> <sigh>
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
Your lies didn't work last time and they don't work now. I see total
> ===========================================
>
> <sigh>
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
desperation and frustration has set in as you grasp at straws and try
and toss as much shit as possible hoping something, anything will
stick ;>) Is this why your critics call you "slow Eddy"?
What's the reason you can't you show a conviction?
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
It's nothing but fun watching you fall to pieces as you yet again make
a total fool out of yourself. I love it!
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 10:43:04 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 6:58 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:59:05 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:59:05 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 11:40:48 PM5/23/13
to
>>
>> Maybe you can explain what's going on there, so we can better
>> appreciate your accomplishments...
>>
>> Once again, where are the photos of those body panels you've made? Or
>> haven't you ever actually done it?
>>
>> --
>> Ed Huntress
>
>No one with a clue about what the problems with Mastercam are could
>careless about that kind of worthless gossip.
Aha. But there's so *much* of it. By so many people there on LinkedIn
>> Maybe you can explain what's going on there, so we can better
>> appreciate your accomplishments...
>>
>> Once again, where are the photos of those body panels you've made? Or
>> haven't you ever actually done it?
>>
>> --
>> Ed Huntress
>
>No one with a clue about what the problems with Mastercam are could
>careless about that kind of worthless gossip.
who actually use the program. And, if you follow the links, there are
those CAD/CAM companies, such as HSMWorks and DP Technology (Esprit),
that you claimed to be working with who disavowed any connection with
you:
http://tinyurl.com/85rf4k3
As one said on the Mastercam LinkedIn group, you can't suppress the
posts there, unlike on your own group. Could that have anything to do
with the difference in the tenor of the posts? Hmm....
> It's designed by
>Mastercam fanboi's to attract clueless CADCAM morons like you who are
>idiots when it comes to
>CADCAM.
don't program machines.
> When was the last time you used Mastercam?
profess to be an expert about.
> Make sure you
>answer the question rather than engage in your usual evasion, lies and
>shitbaggery, "slow Eddy".
>It's beyond humorous reading both you and
>KiddingNoOne desperately look for anything to try and discredit the
>fact that my Why Mastercam Is The Wrong Choice blog is easily the most
>successful and well read independent Mastercam blog on the Internet.
probably the only Mastercam blog you're allowed to post to. Right?
>
>You're a CADCAM and machining idiot, "slow Eddy" who has spent the
>majority of your worthless career writing ad copy instead of
>machining.
editing books.
>It's just another reason why no one is interested in
Well, I've never been arrested, either, so you do have an edge there.
>and you have no serious LinkedIn connections to show.
>You're fool and you have made yourself look like the fool you truly
>are frequently over many years on Usenet. Does your wife, who pays the
>bills, know how you waste your time or is she just glad to get you out
>of her hair?
groups, or baiting people like Jon Banquer, the Master Baiter.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 11:44:20 PM5/23/13
to
you've left all over the Internet.
>Is this why your critics call you "slow Eddy"?
>
>What's the reason you can't you show a conviction?
>
>BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
>
>It's nothing but fun watching you fall to pieces as you yet again make
>a total fool out of yourself. I love it!
Do you have to register with the police when you move into a new town?
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 23, 2013, 11:45:03 PM5/23/13
to
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 11:49:46 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 8:44 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:42:09 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:42:09 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
normal because your life has been a dismal failure when it comes to
machining, CNC and CADCAM.
jon_banquer
May 23, 2013, 11:51:46 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 8:45 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:43:04 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:43:04 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
bone.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 12:00:53 AM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 8:44 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:42:09 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:42:09 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
what a failure you truly are, "slow Eddy". It's very similar to Mark
Wieber pretending that he doesn't lie. ;>)
I've never been convinced of a felony.
If being gullible was a felony you would be serving a life sentence.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 12:03:03 AM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 8:40 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
"She's just thankful I don't waste my time with blogs and LinkedIn
groups, or baiting people like Jon Banquer, the Master Baiter. "
She's thankful you leave her alone and spend most of your time on
"She's just thankful I don't waste my time with blogs and LinkedIn
groups, or baiting people like Jon Banquer, the Master Baiter. "
Usenet. I certainly can understand just how she feels.
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 12:09:58 AM5/24/13
to
I thought I'd slipped a disc.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 12:11:49 AM5/24/13
to
panels you've made or the racing class you used to race in.
I'm just waiting for those...still waiting...waiting............
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 12:21:10 AM5/24/13
to
of the words, but when I spoke in French Switzerland, people had to
turn their backs to hide their laughter. d8-)
>
>I've never been convinced of a felony.
effect?
>
>If being gullible was a felony you would be serving a life sentence.
Jeez, this must have been a really bad hair day for you:
http://tinyurl.com/nh5uvou
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 12:27:46 AM5/24/13
to
group, *and* at least one newsgroup.
Jeez, your fingertips must be as calloused as these guys' toes:
http://tinyurl.com/q7xrvmf
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 12:52:34 AM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 9:09 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:49:46 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:49:46 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
mirror.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 12:59:07 AM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 9:11 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:51:46 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:51:46 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Eddy"?
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 1:00:51 AM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 9:27 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
Eddy". There is a reason you would never make it as a machinist or a
CADCAM programmer.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 1:10:20 AM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 9:21 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:00:53 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:00:53 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
business owners care about felony convictions. I have no felony
convictions. You have no choice other than to deal with that fact.
Bottlebob has a felony conviction. Is there some reason you don't
bring that up other than he doesn't kick your worthless ass to the
curb like I have done for years when you start with your bullshit or
you try being smarmy? You think you do smarmy well but the reality is
that it makes you look like as weak a Wieber looks when he posts his
outrageous lies.
I've kicked you ass so hard for years you will never recover. No one
has ever handed you your ass like I have, "slow Eddy".
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 9:08:20 AM5/24/13
to
the glass. <g>
At least I don't have to look at something like this. It would really
ruin my day:
http://tinyurl.com/brkeey8
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 9:25:44 AM5/24/13
to
record?
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 9:28:58 AM5/24/13
to
impossible for humans to do, say the neuroscientists.
Of course, that applies only to humans...
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 9:34:17 AM5/24/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 22:10:20 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> >I've never been convinced of a felony.
>>
>> How many misdemeanors? Do you have any restraining orders still in
>> effect?
>>
>>
>>
>> >If being gullible was a felony you would be serving a life sentence.
>>
>> It's not even a traffic violation, Jon.
>>
>> Jeez, this must have been a really bad hair day for you:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/nh5uvou
>>
>> --
>> Ed Huntress
>
>No one cares about misdemeanors, "slow Eddy".
I guess you plea-bargained that one down, eh?
You haven't answered the question, though: Do you still have
restraining orders against you, you wife-beating dirtbag?
--
Ed Huntress
<jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> >I've never been convinced of a felony.
>>
>> How many misdemeanors? Do you have any restraining orders still in
>> effect?
>>
>>
>>
>> >If being gullible was a felony you would be serving a life sentence.
>>
>> It's not even a traffic violation, Jon.
>>
>> Jeez, this must have been a really bad hair day for you:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/nh5uvou
>>
>> --
>> Ed Huntress
>
>No one cares about misdemeanors, "slow Eddy".
You haven't answered the question, though: Do you still have
restraining orders against you, you wife-beating dirtbag?
--
Ed Huntress
whoyakidding's ghost
May 24, 2013, 10:16:57 AM5/24/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:46:08 -0400, Ed Huntress
<hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:27:36 -0700, whoyakidding's ghost
><whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:53:58 -0400, Ed Huntress
>><hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:
<hunt...@optonline.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:27:36 -0700, whoyakidding's ghost
><whoyak...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:53:58 -0400, Ed Huntress
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:43:07 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>>><jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 23, 1:38�pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
>>>>nothing of value.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
>>>>
>>>>I'm everything your not.
>>>
>>>You can say that again, Jon. And I thank my lucky stars for it every
>>>day.
>>
>>Ever notice that Bonkers can't stop bragging about having a blog, but
>>never about being employed or having any source of income? He probably
>>used his posts as proof positive of a mental disability. And who could
>>disagree? He's definitely too nutz to hold a job.
>
>Watch him for a few years. It's really something to see.
>
>I have never seen an adult so utterly clueless about the impression
>that results from broadcasting such braggadocio.
He's had plenty of chances to say that he earns a living and how, but
>>>>On May 23, 1:38�pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
>>>>nothing of value.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Time to deal with reality "slow Eddy".
>>>>
>>>>I'm everything your not.
>>>
>>>You can say that again, Jon. And I thank my lucky stars for it every
>>>day.
>>
>>Ever notice that Bonkers can't stop bragging about having a blog, but
>>never about being employed or having any source of income? He probably
>>used his posts as proof positive of a mental disability. And who could
>>disagree? He's definitely too nutz to hold a job.
>
>Watch him for a few years. It's really something to see.
>
>I have never seen an adult so utterly clueless about the impression
>that results from broadcasting such braggadocio.
all he does is keep yapping about his blog and how he USED to work. So
I figure the truth is embarrassing, probably along the lines of moved
back in with the 'rents, getting welfare or disability, devoting life
to sockpuppeteering while waiting to hit the lottery or become some
rich gay CAD guy's boy toy. :)
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 10:29:02 AM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 6:08 am, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:52:34 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:52:34 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
his life away and accomplished nothing meaningful.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 10:30:58 AM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 6:25 am, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:59:07 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:59:07 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
have no choice but to defend your lousy choices and total lack of
accomplishments?
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 10:32:51 AM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 6:28 am, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 22:00:51 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 22:00:51 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <jonbanq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On May 23, 9:27 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
> >> <jonbanq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 23, 8:40 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >> >"She's just thankful I don't waste my time with blogs and LinkedIn
> >> >groups, or baiting people like Jon Banquer, the Master Baiter. "
>
> >> >She's thankful you leave her alone and spend most of your time on
> >> >Usenet. I certainly can understand just how she feels.
>
> >> I'll bet! I'm on one newsgroup. You're on multiple blogs, an online
> >> group, *and* at least one newsgroup.
>
> >> Jeez, your fingertips must be as calloused as these guys' toes:
>
> >>http://tinyurl.com/q7xrvmf
>
> >> --
> >> Ed Huntress
>
> >The ability to multitask is just something else you suck at, "slow
> >Eddy". There is a reason you would never make it as a machinist or a
> >CADCAM programmer.
>
> You need to catch up with the research, Jon. Multitasking is
> impossible for humans to do, say the neuroscientists.
>
> Of course, that applies only to humans...
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
The ability to multitasking is required to hold almost any job in a
> >On May 23, 9:27 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:03:03 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
> >> <jonbanq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 23, 8:40 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> >> >"She's just thankful I don't waste my time with blogs and LinkedIn
> >> >groups, or baiting people like Jon Banquer, the Master Baiter. "
>
> >> >She's thankful you leave her alone and spend most of your time on
> >> >Usenet. I certainly can understand just how she feels.
>
> >> I'll bet! I'm on one newsgroup. You're on multiple blogs, an online
> >> group, *and* at least one newsgroup.
>
> >> Jeez, your fingertips must be as calloused as these guys' toes:
>
> >>http://tinyurl.com/q7xrvmf
>
> >> --
> >> Ed Huntress
>
> >The ability to multitask is just something else you suck at, "slow
> >Eddy". There is a reason you would never make it as a machinist or a
> >CADCAM programmer.
>
> You need to catch up with the research, Jon. Multitasking is
> impossible for humans to do, say the neuroscientists.
>
> Of course, that applies only to humans...
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
machining job shop... not that you would know the first thing about
that, "slow Eddy".
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 10:35:07 AM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 7:16 am, whoyakidding's ghost <whoyakidd...@hotmail.com>
tired to ignore the following but failed miserably once again:
KiddingNoOne lies as badly as Mark Wieber does and he's also a
anonymous posting Usenet stalker and major pussy.
I've often posted that I worked at Qualcomm's prototype machine shop,
how long I worked there and the kinds of parts I made when I worked
there. I have also posted about many other shops I have worked at.
Anyone notice how many times KiddingNoOne has refused to address what
I've posted in this thread and many other threads? Specifically:
It doesn't get much weaker than the lies you have told about Aptera,
KiddingNoOne. When I confronted you on your lies you ran away like the
chicken shit, anonymous, Usenet posting pussy that you truly are. You
are still running, KiddingNoOne but you can't hide:
My offer to try and set up a meeting with you, myself and Aptera's co-
founder Steve Fambro and his electrical engineer wife and former
Aptera employee Tricia Fambro still stands.
Should I list the reasons that you continue to run a way from my offer
to set up a face to face meeting where you will be confronted with the
lies and misinformation you have posted about Aptera?
tired to ignore the following but failed miserably once again:
KiddingNoOne lies as badly as Mark Wieber does and he's also a
anonymous posting Usenet stalker and major pussy.
I've often posted that I worked at Qualcomm's prototype machine shop,
how long I worked there and the kinds of parts I made when I worked
there. I have also posted about many other shops I have worked at.
Anyone notice how many times KiddingNoOne has refused to address what
I've posted in this thread and many other threads? Specifically:
It doesn't get much weaker than the lies you have told about Aptera,
KiddingNoOne. When I confronted you on your lies you ran away like the
chicken shit, anonymous, Usenet posting pussy that you truly are. You
are still running, KiddingNoOne but you can't hide:
My offer to try and set up a meeting with you, myself and Aptera's co-
founder Steve Fambro and his electrical engineer wife and former
Aptera employee Tricia Fambro still stands.
Should I list the reasons that you continue to run a way from my offer
to set up a face to face meeting where you will be confronted with the
lies and misinformation you have posted about Aptera?
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 10:44:15 AM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 6:34 am, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 22:10:20 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 22:10:20 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
desperate fool you truly are, "slow Eddy".
Speaking of taking a beating: How does it feel to get badly beaten
over and over with the facts of just why you're such a loser and how
much of a quitter you are?
You have managed to accomplish next to nothing over many years when it
comes to machining or metalworking. You're little more than a book
smart, blowhard with about zero recent modern machining experience.
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 10:57:39 AM5/24/13
to
On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:16:57 -0700, whoyakidding's ghost
Getting involved in conversation with Jon is not an ordinary thing,
even for Usenet. Before you make any assumptions about the rationality
or predictability of his behavior, check around. People who get
involved in public fistfights over CAD are not your run-of-the-mill
Usenet kooks.
Jon's a special case. Just be aware of his paper and Internet trail.
--
Ed Huntress
even for Usenet. Before you make any assumptions about the rationality
or predictability of his behavior, check around. People who get
involved in public fistfights over CAD are not your run-of-the-mill
Usenet kooks.
Jon's a special case. Just be aware of his paper and Internet trail.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 10:58:34 AM5/24/13
to
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 10:59:37 AM5/24/13
to
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 10:59:46 AM5/24/13
to
to explain an arrest record or restraining orders.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 11:01:57 AM5/24/13
to
an illusion, and that fact is well-proven.
Where did you say you're working now, BTW?
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 11:03:16 AM5/24/13
to
something he can handle. Neither are the facts of who and what I am.
"slow Eddy" has lived in fantasy land for years. Living in reality
would cause "slow Eddy" to fall apart like a cheap suit.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 11:08:46 AM5/24/13
to
Like I said:
You and Wieber have a lot in common.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 11:13:45 AM5/24/13
to
"slow Eddy". That you don't know or understand this is typical of how
out of touch you truly are with modern machining. It's very similar to
other metalworking or machining subjects you post on where you show
over and over how clueless and out of touch you are.
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 11:17:52 AM5/24/13
to
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 11:35:18 AM5/24/13
to
http://tinyurl.com/nh5uvou
>"slow Eddy" has lived in fantasy land for years. Living in reality
>would cause "slow Eddy" to fall apart like a cheap suit.
Ed,
The newsgroup badly needs someone who is as articulate as you are.
Keep me on my toes and correct me where ever you think it's
appropriate, as I respect what you have to say based on what you have
already posted. I will certainly take the time to think about whatever
correction, advice, etc. you post. -- Jon Banquer, post to Ed
Huntress, Jun 23, 2002
================================================
<sigh> There are so many reasons we should never have closed those
mental institutions, and Jon is a half-dozen of them.
--
Ed Huntress
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 11:39:08 AM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 8:17 am, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:59:37 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:59:37 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
CADCAM idiot whom I've outed for many years. That you think there is
anything there that even remotely resembles a fact is typical of how
desperate a slimeball you are, "slow Eddy". You share this desperation
with Wieber and KiddingNoOne.
You want real facts? How about what a failure you are when it comes to
metalworking and machining. There is a reason why you have been
reduced to writing ad copy for most of your life and that you mostly
live off your wife's income.
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 11:43:37 AM5/24/13
to
>
> ================================================
>
> <sigh> There are so many reasons we should never have closed those
> mental institutions, and Jon is a half-dozen of them.
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
I love how you continue to post over and over how fair and balanced I
> ================================================
>
> <sigh> There are so many reasons we should never have closed those
> mental institutions, and Jon is a half-dozen of them.
>
> --
> Ed Huntress
can be! Thank you, "slow Eddy". ;>)
How many members of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders are
there? How many have joined in the last two weeks? Who has the most
successful independent blog on Mastercam? When was it last updated?
How many worldwide connections does my LinkedIn profile show I have?
How do I know these people? ;>)
Delma T. Ivey
May 24, 2013, 11:48:49 AM5/24/13
to
jon_banquer
May 24, 2013, 11:53:12 AM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 8:48 am, "Delma T. Ivey" <somewh...@thegreatbeyond.con>
wrote:
Nope. It's just a deflection and only fools like you buy into the
obvious deflection. Now that's nailing it! ;>)
wrote:
obvious deflection. Now that's nailing it! ;>)
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 12:07:01 PM5/24/13
to
boils down to a matter of character.
My point was that you're a well-known and proven dirtbag, a
wife-beater with an arrest record, a kook who's gotten into fistfights
over the relative quality of CAD programs, a shit-stirrer who's
attended seminars under assumed names to avoid being escorted out by
police if they knew who you really were, and a phony who has a long
rap sheet of posting compliments to yourself under ever-shifting nyms.
So your opinions have to be judged in that light. And they are, as
they have been for years on blogs and forums all over the Internet.
--
Ed Huntress
whoyakidding's ghost
May 24, 2013, 12:23:49 PM5/24/13
to
unemployable. Although he probably does have to work at some kind of
Corporal Klinger act every once in a while in order to keep his checks
coming.
Ed Huntress
May 24, 2013, 12:32:10 PM5/24/13
to
jumps from one enthusiasm to another, reversing yourself at the drop
of a hat or a perceived infidelity to your childish enthusiasms. Your
several posts lauding my insights and "articulateness" gave me the
creeps at the time, because I saw therein a bizarre and extreme
attachment to things and people. You looked like a loose cannon, and
you have proven my concerns to be right.
It probably won't be long before you're calling the Aptera a cricket
with wheel pants, and claiming that anyone who thinks that ridiculous
cartoon of a vehicle ever had a chance in the market is a moron. Oh,
did I mention that Jon hands out marketing advice like peanuts at the
zoo? d8-)
>
>How many members of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders are
>there?
> How many have joined in the last two weeks?
>Who has the most
>successful independent blog on Mastercam? When was it last updated?
>How many worldwide connections does my LinkedIn profile show I have?
suspect lists.
>How do I know these people? ;>)
know *you*, or they wouldn't be there.
--
Ed Huntress
Delma T. Ivey
May 24, 2013, 12:33:26 PM5/24/13
to
On 5/24/2013 9:07 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
> <jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 8:48 am, "Delma T. Ivey" <somewh...@thegreatbeyond.con>
>> wrote:
>>> On 5/24/2013 7:59 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:
[...]
> On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
> <jonba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 8:48 am, "Delma T. Ivey" <somewh...@thegreatbeyond.con>
>> wrote:
>>> On 5/24/2013 7:59 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:
>>>> Well, I've always considered it to be a good start that I don't have
>>>> to explain an arrest record or restraining orders.
>>>
>>> <guffaw> Nailed it.
>>
>> Nope. It's just a deflection and only fools like you buy into the
>> obvious deflection. Now that's nailing it! ;>)
>
> In the end, it's a matter of how to judge your insults, Jon, and that
> boils down to a matter of character.
>
> My point was that you're a well-known and proven dirtbag, a
> wife-beater with an arrest record, a kook who's gotten into fistfights
> over the relative quality of CAD programs, a shit-stirrer who's
> attended seminars under assumed names to avoid being escorted out by
> police if they knew who you really were,
documentation of it? Not that it would surprise me, but it would be fun
to review.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages