Thanks,
Pete C.
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:03:57 -0600, "Pete C." <aux3....@snet.net>
wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."
I'm interested in that info as well.
One subtlety that I noticed:
Both the upper and lower blades are the same part number.
In a pinch, one could swap the blades and get a new edge.
http://www.harborfreight.com/manuals/5000-5999/5907.PDF
--Winston
--
Congratulations Robert Piccinini and Steven A. Burd, WalMart Publicists of the Year!
Pete, just DAGS for "HotRodding Your 30" roll/brake/shear unit".
Simple!
--
Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness.
--Thomas Paine
>Pete C. wrote:
>> I just got one of the 30" roll/brake/shear unit, still in my truck to be
>> unloaded tomorrow. I recall a few discussions of these machines here in
>> the past, is there a site somewhere covering the various tweaks, tricks
>> and upgrades for them like there are for the 4x6 H/V bandsaws?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Pete C.
>
>I'm interested in that info as well.
>
>One subtlety that I noticed:
>Both the upper and lower blades are the same part number.
>In a pinch, one could swap the blades and get a new edge.
Um, Winnie, wouldn't that be far too much like turning over the pair
of scissors and cutting with them upside down? While that may work
fine for Australians, it doesn't seem to grab in the real world.
<dg&r>
Not surprisingly, that search string returns no results either on
google, or on a real search engine (Altavista).
*Sigh*.
No, Larry.
The angled front of the upper blade slides against the square rear of
the lower blade. The square rear of the upper blade and the angled front
of the lower blade receive no wear at all. You can flip the positions of
the blades and get fresh cutting surfaces.
Glance at the side of the machine sometime and you will instantly see what
I'm talking about.
--Winston :)
It would be good to see the stand to get some ideas. I don't need wheels
on mine since I have a palette jack to move stuff around in the shop, I
just have to design a stand with suitable clearance and stable lift
points for the palette jack.
As for function, I took the top of the crate off, installed the handle,
and with the unit still bolted to the bottom of the crate gave it a test
with some 28ga galv duct material I had on hand. The shear gave a clean
cut on about a 12" wide piece, it bent fine in the brake, and rolled
fine in the roller. Seems like a good start.
I think I'll design additional table support into the stand to provide a
little extra safety.
>Larry Jaques wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:01:51 -0800, the infamous Winston
>> <Win...@bigbrother.net> scrawled the following:
>>> One subtlety that I noticed:
>>> Both the upper and lower blades are the same part number.
>>> In a pinch, one could swap the blades and get a new edge.
>>
>> Um, Winnie, wouldn't that be far too much like turning over the pair
>> of scissors and cutting with them upside down? While that may work
>> fine for Australians, it doesn't seem to grab in the real world.
>> <dg&r>
>
>*Sigh*.
>
>No, Larry.
>
>The angled front of the upper blade slides against the square rear of
>the lower blade. The square rear of the upper blade and the angled front
>of the lower blade receive no wear at all. You can flip the positions of
>the blades and get fresh cutting surfaces.
I'd say that's probably a good design. It saves tooling money for the
mfgr and lowers consumer costs.
>Glance at the side of the machine sometime and you will instantly see what
>I'm talking about.
OK, I DLed ol' Manuel. He says "Lo siento, Hal. I can't show you that
angle." <shrug>
(..)
>> Glance at the side of the machine sometime and you will instantly see what
>> I'm talking about.
>
> OK, I DLed ol' Manuel. He says "Lo siento, Hal. I can't show you that
> angle." <shrug>
I snapped a pitcher. It's 88 KB.
Want I should eMail it to you?
--Winston
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:13:22 -0800, the infamous Winston
> <Win...@bigbrother.net> scrawled the following:
>
>>Larry Jaques wrote:
>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:01:51 -0800, the infamous Winston
>>> <Win...@bigbrother.net> scrawled the following:
>>>> One subtlety that I noticed:
>>>> Both the upper and lower blades are the same part number.
>>>> In a pinch, one could swap the blades and get a new edge.
>>>
>>> Um, Winnie, wouldn't that be far too much like turning over the pair
>>> of scissors and cutting with them upside down? While that may work
>>> fine for Australians, it doesn't seem to grab in the real world.
>>> <dg&r>
>>
>>*Sigh*.
>>
>>No, Larry.
>>
>>The angled front of the upper blade slides against the square rear of
>>the lower blade. The square rear of the upper blade and the angled
>>front of the lower blade receive no wear at all. You can flip the
>>positions of the blades and get fresh cutting surfaces.
>
> I'd say that's probably a good design. It saves tooling money for the
> mfgr and lowers consumer costs.
The Di-Acro shears use rectangular bars for the blades. That way you get
4 cutting edges before you have to regrind.
Doug White
(...)
>>> The angled front of the upper blade slides against the square rear of
>>> the lower blade. The square rear of the upper blade and the angled
>>> front of the lower blade receive no wear at all. You can flip the
>>> positions of the blades and get fresh cutting surfaces.
>> I'd say that's probably a good design. It saves tooling money for the
>> mfgr and lowers consumer costs.
>
> The Di-Acro shears use rectangular bars for the blades. That way you get
> 4 cutting edges before you have to regrind.
>
> Doug White
Very cool!
--Winston
use-enco.com has the stand on sale for $110.
P/N 208-5610
http://www.use-enco.com/CGI/INLMKD?SIITEM001=208-5610&SIQTY001=1&SICOUNT=1
>Larry Jaques commented:
>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:13:22 -0800, the infamous Winston
>> <Win...@bigbrother.net> scrawled the following:
>
>(..)
>
>>> Glance at the side of the machine sometime and you will instantly see what
>>> I'm talking about.
>>
>> OK, I DLed ol' Manuel. He says "Lo siento, Hal. I can't show you that
>> angle." <shrug>
>
>I snapped a pitcher. It's 88 KB.
>Want I should eMail it to you?
Manuel says "See!"
Di-Acro engineers knew their chit.
(...)
>> I snapped a pitcher. It's 88 KB.
>> Want I should eMail it to you?
>
> Manuel says "See!"
Sent!
--El Winstono
>Larry Jaques wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:51:15 -0800, the infamous Winston
>> <Win...@bigbrother.net> scrawled the following:
>
>(...)
>
>>> I snapped a pitcher. It's 88 KB.
>>> Want I should eMail it to you?
>>
>> Manuel says "See!"
>
>Sent!
Received the supercloseup, Winnie Poo. Danke mucho, monsieur.
Soitny.
--Winston