On 30/12/2023 23:13, Richard Smith wrote:
> Peter Fairbrother <
pe...@tsto.co.uk> writes:
[...]
>> Urea nitrate is sometimes used in home made explosives, but it is not
>> used in any civil explosives I know of, or for blasting purposes -
>> that's mostly the province of ANFO and water gels, with gelignites and
>> dynamites occasionally used on smaller scales and for demolition work.
>>
>> Water gels and emulsion explosives are typically mixed on-site from
>> ammonium nitrate solutions plus fuels. They are usually not
>> cap-sensitive, though cap-sensitive ones do exist, and need a booster
>> explosive charge to detonate. The non-cap-sensitive ones are easier to
>> transport.
>>
>> ANFO is also often made on site. Ammonium nitrate prills come in two
>> types, in one the prills are carefully engineered so that they will
>> absorb exactly the right amount of fuel oil if they are to be used in
>> ANFO explosives, and in the other they are engineered so they won't
>> absorb fuel oil if the AN is to be used as fertiliser.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I don't have any practical experience in blasting tunnels. You
>> do usually need higher velocity explosives like dynamite or gelignite
>> for hard rocks though.
>>
>>
>> Peter Fairbrother
>
> Thanks for that.
> Since I posted this question I have learned a lot.
>
> The "traditional" blasting medium used in Cornwall was gelignite.
> I've had comment that cost would make you have second thoughts about
> doing that to conform with tradition.
Yes, it is more expensive. As is NG-dynamite. However they are about
twice as powerful as ANFO, so you need less.
> Brings ANFO to the fore now.
> I've read about "emulsion". Seems is "the business" when you have a
> big tanker driving around pouring into many big blasting holes.
> "per-unit" cost very favourable - but the costs of maintaining a
> storage of "ANBI", pumps to safely handle ANBI, etc. - the set-up and
> maintenance costs - might have you looking at ANFO (?)
I'm unsure whether the AN used in ANFO is itself an ANBI - if AN is
prilled for explosives purposes it might well be. Or perhaps it is
controlled under one of the many AN control orders, which I have only a
passing familiarity with.
However there is another problem or three with ANFOs, AN water gels and
emulsions - they need bigger holes than NG-dynamites or gelignites, as
they will not explode properly when the diameter of the hole is small.
In practice, combined with the fact that they are only about half as
powerful, you end up using a lot more. Which means a lot more nasty
gases to get out of your tunnel.
Second, they really need boosters. There are cap-sensitive gels and
emulsions, but then you are getting into the same legal hassles as the
higher velocity explosives - plus you need different certificates and
licenses for the boosters. Some people use detcord as a booster, but the
same requirement for an explosives certificate etc applies (in the UK).
Third, and perhaps most important, especially when used for tunnels in
hard rock, they aren't really brisant enough to cope with hard granite.
The NG-based (or NC-based) high velocity explosives produce shock waves
which will fracture granite, but the lower velocity of detonation of the
AN-based explosives give more of a hard push than a breaking shock.
> The granite I met here is so hard that a powerful rock-drill
> (percussion plus rotation) could not drill with a four-cutting-tips
> cutter - had to revert back to a carbide-tipped chisel-edge drill.
>
> Implies that need a goodly blasting medium.
Indeed. Gelignite, or a NG-dynamite, seems called for.
Also, for a a small tunnel, AN-based explosives are generally less
useful - though they do make small diameter cap-sensitive AN emulsions,
AN-based explosives are generally better for larger charges.
You didn't say how long the tunnel is, but unless it is very long
jelly/NG might even be cheaper. It will certainly be more practical and
need less drilling.
BTW, Cranfield sometimes do a short course on mining explosives.
Peter Fairbrother