A New All Time Low

Cliff

unread,

Apr 18, 2010, 6:04:27 AM4/18/10

to

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/discovery-insider-sarah-p_b_537178.html
"Discovery Channel Insider: Sarah Palin's Show Is "a New All Time Low for
Discovery" "

[
....
Last week Discovery had its annual sales conference for ad buyers for all of its
13 networks. The presentation showcases all of their new shows across the
different networks. That night the presentation was on Sarah Palin's Alaska.

Our source says "the whole thing [was] comical." Apparently the ad buyers were
not impressed. This Discovery insider said, "When the promo was over, people
(employees and buyers) were rolling their eyes, snickering, and even laughing.
People were laughing and it's not even a comedy. No one took it seriously."

This person was concerned that given the lack of interest from ad buyers that
Discovery would have to dump the show to "a crappy time slot" to cut its losses.
They added, "Bottom line everyone thought it was a new all time low for
Discovery. My guess is the show is going to tank big time."
....
The ratings for her new show on Fox News Channel were already low (she couldn't
even hold on to Greta Van Susteren's audience). Imagine how much worse she'll do
on TLC where the audience presumably wants to learn something, i.e. the exact
opposite of what Sarah Palin is known for. What's next for TLC, George Bush's
Ranch?

When are people going to finally realize that just attaching a "big name" to a
project doesn't mean it's going to work? The person hosting the show has to have
some credibility in the field. I'm not sure Sarah Palin has credibility in any
field.

Many people would argue that Palin did great ecological damage to Alaska and
would like to do more by drilling all over it. So, getting her to host a show
about the natural beauty of Alaska is a bit like getting Jeffrey Dahmer to host
a cooking show for the Food Network.
....
]

Sharx35

unread,

Apr 18, 2010, 6:30:46 AM4/18/10

to

"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
news:u1mls5t77dakag1hk...@4ax.com...

Remind us, again, why your mother didn't opt to abort your sorry, brain-dead
foetus?

> ]

Cliff

unread,

Apr 19, 2010, 8:02:21 AM4/19/10

to

We can spell too.
Show us your hands .... we want to see your crib-notes.

Find those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff

Sharx35

unread,

Apr 19, 2010, 9:27:28 AM4/19/10

to

"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message

news:dfhos51is2ktsogpn...@4ax.com...

They might be up your bored-out desphinctered faggot arse.

Cliff

unread,

Apr 20, 2010, 2:35:06 AM4/20/10

to

Find those "WMDs" yet?
Why not just lie about it?
Oops ... you already "thought" of that, right?
Just like your masters did to you .....
http://empollonintegrista.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/his_masters_voice.jpg
--
Cliff

Sharx35

unread,

Apr 20, 2010, 5:16:14 AM4/20/10

to

"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message

news:7kiqs5hksbngcm4kk...@4ax.com...

Got some SCIENTIFIC proof of global warming yet? I thought not.

.
>
> http://empollonintegrista.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/his_masters_voice.jpg
> --
> Cliff

Cliff

unread,

Apr 21, 2010, 7:53:51 AM4/21/10

to

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:16:14 GMT, "Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> Find those "WMDs" yet?
>> Why not just lie about it?
>> Oops ... you already "thought" of that, right?
>> Just like your masters did to you ....
>
>Got some SCIENTIFIC proof of global warming yet? I thought not.

Where did you look?
--
Cliff