Michelle Obama Is A Transexual? (Shocking Video and Documentation)

[Brian Hellman]

I�ve had this post in draft for MONTHS. I�ve hesitated to
publish this because of the gravity of what is being asserted,
and the uncertainty of the evidence to support the assertion.

The startling assertion is that the current First Lady of the
United States of America, known as Michelle Robinson Obama, is a
biological male posing as a woman.

That anyone would make such an assertion is a mark of how much
distrust and suspicion the Obamas have engendered, due entirely
to Barack�s secretiveness concerning his Selective Service
registration, school records (including even his kindergarten
record!), and medical records; his refusal to explain why his
Social Security number has a Connecticut prefix; and his
outright deception about his birth certificate, an image of
which he made public on April 27, 2011, but which forensic
experts have determined to be a fake.

It doesn�t help that the Hawaii official, Loretta Fuddy, who had
signed off on Obama�s purportedly birth certificate was the only
passenger who died in a small plane crash.

Startlingly, even the Obamacare sign-up website healthcare.gov
cannot verify Barack Obama�s identity! (See also �Investor�s
Business Daily editorial asks if Obama�s entire life is a
fiction.�)

So I decided to just present what I�ve found and leave the
reader to draw his/her own conclusions as to whether Mooch is a
transexual.

Barry calls his wife �Michael�

In a speech on September 30, 2011, at the transition or change-
of-office ceremony of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
at Fort Myer, Virginia, Obama referred to his wife not as
Michelle but as Michael.

As you can verify for yourself in the video below, Obama clearly
said: �Distinguished guests, men and women of the finest
military in the world, most of all, Admiral Mullen, Deborah,
Michael and I also want to acknowledge your son Jack who was
deployed today, all of you have performed extraordinary service
to our country�.�

Bafflingly, even the text of the speech on WhiteHouse.gov says
the same thing:

�Secretary Panetta, thank you for your introduction and for your
extraordinary leadership. Members of Congress, Vice President
Biden, members of the Joint Chiefs, service secretaries,
distinguished guests, and men and women of the finest military
in the world.

Most of all, Admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael and I also want to
also acknowledge your son Jack, who�s deployed today. All of you
have performed extraordinary service to our country.�

Admiral Mullen�s first name is Michael. However, throughout his
speech, Obama referred to Mullen as �Mike,� not Michael.
Michelle�s birth name was Michael

Even before Obama�s gaffe, there were bloggers who said
Michelle�s real (birth) name is Michael.

As an example, three months before Obama publicly referred to
his wife as �Michael,� blogger Matthew B. Glosser wrote on June
30, 2011 that he was contacted by �an anonymous source who
claimed to be a former White House staff member of the Obama
administration, specifically �a former member of the First
Lady�s personal staff.�

The source claimed to have sensitive information regarding a
stunning revelation about Michelle Obama and wanted to arrange a
meeting with Glosser in person to present the evidence for this
claim.

Though initially skeptical, Glosser nevertheless met with the
�anonymous source� on June 25, 2011. The source said �the major
alphabet networks � are in the tank for Obama and it is network
policy to cover up any critical stories regarding the President
and his family. The White House has officially created a State
media.� Then the source said the following about Michelle Obama:

Michelle Obama, First Lady of the United States, was born
Michael LaVaughn Robinson in Chicago, Illinois on January 17th,
1964. He was the second son born to Fraser Robinson III, a well
known cocaine dealer and union thug for Crime Lord/Mayor Richard
J. Daley, and Marian Shields Robinson, a transient street
prostitute who was diagnosed with the HIV virus in 1998.

He [Michael] was a popular high school athlete and in 1982, he
accepted a scholarship to play middle linebacker for the Oregon
State Beavers.

After finishing a respectable rookie season with 88 tackles and
7.5 sacks, he suddenly dropped out of the school. Fellow
teammates observed that Robinson could regularly be heard
lamenting over how he is a �woman trapped inside a man�s body�,
and on January 13th, 1983, he underwent sex reassignment surgery
at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

To hide the shame of his new identity, Michael left Oregon State
to attend Princeton University under his new legal name,
�Michelle Robinson�. Years later, he met Barry Obama Jr. a
Kenyan immigrant who later became aware of �Michelle�s� true
identity. They subsequently married and adopted two children.

Below is a picture, circa 1981, Glosser posted, showing the pre-
op Michael LaVaughn Robinson (top right, #44):

http://i.imgur.com/rqbnu.jpg

Pictures of Michelle�s weenie
Here are two pictures of Michelle Obama with a strange crotch-
level protuberance suggestive of a penis. I have no way to
ascertain whether the pictures are photoshopped. The sources of
the pictures are Barack Ovomit and I Hate the Media.

http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/moochs-
weewee1.jpg?w=500&h=564

Michelle was wearing this aqua blue dress when she gave a speech
at the Democratic National Convention on August 25, 2008. One
way to verify the pic�s authenticity is to find this image in a
news video of her appearance at the convention.

http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/moochs-
weewee2.jpg?w=500&h=345

The Video
The most recent claim that Michelle is a man is this fascinating
video that systematically argues that her hands, shoulders, neck
muscles, and head-to-body ratio all point to her being a
biological male, all of which would explain why there are no
pictures of a pregnant Michelle, and why there are no birth
records of �her� two daughters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVAXqKugXkg

�

[Jeff M]

On 4/19/2014 10:15 PM, Brian Hellman wrote:
> I’ve had this post in draft for MONTHS. I’ve hesitated to
> publish this because of the gravity of what is being asserted,
> and the uncertainty of the evidence to support the assertion.
>
> The startling assertion is that the current First Lady of the
> United States of America, known as Michelle Robinson Obama, is a
> biological male posing as a woman.
>
> That anyone would make such an assertion is a mark of how much
> distrust and suspicion the Obamas have engendered, due entirely
> to Barack’s secretiveness concerning his Selective Service
> registration, school records (including even his kindergarten
> record!), and medical records; his refusal to explain why his
> Social Security number has a Connecticut prefix; and his
> outright deception about his birth certificate, an image of
> which he made public on April 27, 2011, but which forensic

> experts have determined to be a fake. [snip]

All these lies are still bouncing around in the in the Regressive Echo
Chamber, but that "Michelle is a man" is a new one, AFAIK.

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/
FULL ANSWER
This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly
recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered
long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.
But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this
new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral
emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains
is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.
Nothing ‘Sealed’
The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The
word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records
that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be
released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly
“sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or
records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to
records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.
In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually
public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records
are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that
other presidential candidates haven’t released either.
So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to
raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made
public, without any evidence that those records contain anything
derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.
Claims #1, 2 and 4, college records. Obama’s college records are not
“sealed” by a court order, as this graphic would have you believe. It
would be illegal under federal law (the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act of 1974) for Occidental, Columbia or Harvard Law School to
give any former student’s records to reporters or members of the public
without that person’s specific, written permission. Obama hasn’t
released them, but neither have other presidential candidates released
their college records. George W. Bush’s grades at Yale eventually became
public, but only because somebody leaked them to the New Yorker
magazine. Bush himself refused to release them, according to a 1999
profile in the Washington Post.
Claim #3, thesis paper. Obama did write a paper on nuclear disarmament
for an honors course in American foreign policy during his senior year,
but it wasn’t the sort of “thesis” that some colleges require for
graduation and keep on file in their libraries, like those that Hillary
Clinton and Michelle Obama released. During the 2008 campaign, reporters
were told that Columbia had not retained a copy of Obama’s 1983 paper,
and that Obama didn’t have a copy, either. NBC News contacted his former
professor, Michael Baron, who said he looked for his copy but couldn’t
find it, and thought he probably tossed it out eight years earlier in a
move.
NBC quoted Baron as saying the paper likely would have disappointed
Obama’s critics. “The course was not a polemical course, it was a course
in decision making and how decisions got made,” Baron told NBC. “None of
the papers in the class were controversial.”
Claim #5, Selective Service registration. Obama’s Selective Service
registration is public. A copy has been posted publicly, and the
Selective Service confirmed that Obama registered for the draft on Sept.
4, 1980, and was given registration number 61-1125539-1.
Worth noting is that nobody in the U.S. has been drafted for military
service since 1972, the year Obama turned 11. Obama, like other young
men turning age 18 since then, was required to register on a standby
basis, in case Congress ever resumes an active military draft. Failure
to register is technically a crime, and disqualifies a man for federal
student aid or from holding certain federal jobs.
Claim #6, medical records. During the 2008 campaign, Obama released
summary medical information from his personal physician, who pronounced
him to be in “excellent health” with routine test results for such
things as cholesterol all within normal levels. (McCain, who is a cancer
survivor and was 71 at the time, let reporters see his records for three
hours to show he was cancer-free.)
Since taking office, Obama has followed the practice of earlier
presidents. He released results of his first “periodic” physical exam on
Feb. 28, 2010. Results of his second “periodic” exam were released Oct.
31, 2011. His physician described him as being “in excellent health and
‘fit for duty.’”
Claims #7 and 8, Illinois state Senate records. Obama’s voting record in
the Illinois state Senate is a matter of public record, and about as far
from being “sealed” as one can imagine. Reporters extensively went over
his votes in 2008. Transcripts of Senate debates in which Obama took
part while in office (1997 – 2004) can even be found online, at the
website of the Illinois General Assembly.
Obama’s personal appointment calendar as a state senator may still be
private — if it still exists — but we’ve seen nothing to suggest that
would add much to what is already public. As president, Obama has
released records of visitors to the White House (2.4 million so far).
There are some exceptions. Personal information about visitors, such as
Social Security numbers are not released. And there’s an exemption for
“particularly sensitive” information, which might include a visit by a
potential Supreme Court nominee, for example. But that’s still more
disclosure than any previous president has made, by far.
Claim #9, law firm clients. It’s true that Obama has not released a list
of the 30 or so clients for whom he worked personally while he was a
lawyer with the firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard in Illinois.
He did routinely disclose the law firm’s entire client list while he was
in the state Senate, however. And his campaign confirmed in 2008 several
specific clients that Obama represented personally, when reporters asked
about them. For example, he once represented the liberal group ACORN in
a 1995 lawsuit against the state of Illinois, to make voter registration
easier.
Claims #10 and 11, birth certificates. The claim that Obama’s birth
certificate is “sealed” is pure nonsense. Copies of both the so-called
“short” and “long” certificates have been released, and state officials
in Hawaii have said repeatedly that Obama was born there in 1961 and is
a “natural born American citizen.”
Claim #12, baptism record. If a paper record exists (and we’ve seen no
evidence that it does), it would most likely show only what numerous,
undisputed news accounts have stated: Obama was baptized in 1988 in Rev.
Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Obama was
often seen in attendance at Wright’s church in the 20 years that
followed. He was married there, and his two daughters were baptized there.
He remained a member even after some of Wright’s controversial sermons
were given national attention in early 2008. When Obama reluctantly
severed ties with Wright after weeks of controversy, it was a major news
event. Obama and his family now attend St. John’s Episcopal Church, near
the White House, though not on a regular basis.
Claim #13: Michelle Obama’s law license. It’s simply not true that the
first lady “can no longer practice law as an attorney.” She could resume
the practice of law any time she chooses. Both the president and his
wife have voluntarily inactivated their Illinois law licenses, thereby
avoiding a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay
hundreds of dollars in annual fees, which is common for lawyers no
longer actively practicing.
Claim #14, first ladies’ assistants. It’s true that the first lady has
more than 20 on her staff, but that’s roughly the same as other recent
first ladies. The claim that “other first ladies had only one” might
conceivably be true of Martha Washington or Dolley Madison, but it’s
certainly not true of Laura Bush or Hillary Clinton. Bush had at least
18 that we could count, and probably more with job titles that didn’t
make the link clear. The White House has said Michelle Obama’s staff is
the same size as Laura Bush’s was.
Claim #15, foreign student aid. The claim that Obama got “foreign
student aid” is untrue. That wild falsehood began as an absurd April
Fools’ Day hoax in 2009, which we quickly exposed.
Claim #16, Obama’s passport. There’s no reason to think Obama used
anything but the then-current version of his U.S. passport when he
traveled to Pakistan as a student in 1981. Some who questioned Obama’s
birthplace made baseless claims that Pakistan had banned U.S. citizens
from visiting in 1981, and speculated that he must have used an
Indonesian passport. But they were quite wrong. There was no such travel
ban. In fact, the New York Times published a travel piece that year
describing the author’s own visit to Lahore, and the U.S. consul later
wrote a letter to the Times saying he would “welcome an influx of
Americans” and giving advice on how to make the journey.
Other Claims
Besides the numbered claims, the graphic also states that Obama has been
endorsed by the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). It’s true that the
Communist Party USA supports Obama. It claims to have about 2,000
members. Obama didn’t seek the CPUSA endorsement, nor has he endorsed
that group.
The graphic also attributes three quotes to Obama, all of which are
commonly offered on conservative websites. All the quotes are accurate.
Here’s the background:
Obama appeared at the Service Employees International Union Sept. 17,
2007, to seek the union’s endorsement for the Democratic nomination, and
he said, “your agenda has been my agenda in the United States Senate.”
(The words appear at about 3 minutes and 15 seconds into this video.)
And the SEIU eventually endorsed Obama, but not until February 2008,
helping him wrap up the nomination battle against Hillary Clinton. The
union has endorsed him again for reelection.
At the 2008 National Council of La Raza annual meeting in San Diego,
Calif., on July 13, 2008, Obama concluded his remarks by saying, “And
together, we won’t just win an election – we will transform this nation.
Thank you, and God bless you.”
And speaking to the editorial board of the San Francisco Chronicle on
Jan. 17, 2008, Obama said electricity costs would “necessarily
skyrocket” as a result of capping carbon emissions. However, the
cap-and-trade legislation he endorsed provided allowances intended to
protect consumers from higher bills.
In summary, there are bits here that are true. But most is wrong or
misleading, and overall the graphic falls far short of getting our seal
of approval for accuracy. Call it “unsealed.”
– Brooks Jackson


--
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in
moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification
for selfishness.” - John Kenneth Galbraith

[Mr. B1ack]

Oooooh !!! TRANS-SEXUAL !!!!!!

Another LAME post ...............

Stick with the facts. There's plenty
there to work with.

NOT sticking to the facts ... you just
serve THEM instead.

[FPP]

In article <1d2c786989ed691a...@dizum.com>,
"Brian Hellman" <bhellman@.com> wrote:

Oe thing's for sure... she's more of a man than YOU are...

--
"Don't Believe Everything You Read on the Internet -Albert Einstein"

[Gunner Asch]

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 02:05:55 -0400, Mr. B1ack <now...@nada.net>
wrote:

So provide some facts. Perhaps some photos of her naked?


--

"
I was once told by a “gun safety” advocate back in the Nineties
that he favored total civilian firearms confiscation.
Only the military and police should have weapons he averred and what did I think about that?

I began to give him a reasoned answer and he
cut me off with an abrupt, “Give me the short answer.”

I thought for a moment and said, “If you try to take our firearms we will kill you.”"

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

[Mr. B1ack]

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:30:55 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 02:05:55 -0400, Mr. B1ack <now...@nada.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Oooooh !!! TRANS-SEXUAL !!!!!!
>>
>>Another LAME post ...............
>>
>>Stick with the facts. There's plenty
>>there to work with.
>>
>>NOT sticking to the facts ... you just
>>serve THEM instead.
>
>So provide some facts. Perhaps some photos of her naked?

Did they buy the kids in a back alley somewhere ?
There are a few things trannies CAN'T do even if
they grow big titties :-)

[Mr. B1ack]

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:30:55 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
wrote:


>
>

>I was once told by a “gun safety” advocate back in the Nineties
>that he favored total civilian firearms confiscation.
>Only the military and police should have weapons he averred and what did I think about that?
>
>I began to give him a reasoned answer and he
>cut me off with an abrupt, “Give me the short answer.”
>
>I thought for a moment and said, “If you try to take our firearms we will kill you.”"

That they want to snatch those guns SO badly
seems proof enough that they have nefarious
goals in mind should they ever gain that much
of an advantage over Joe Citizen ....

[Tom Gardner]

On 4/20/2014 8:30 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 02:05:55 -0400, Mr. B1ack <now...@nada.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Oooooh !!! TRANS-SEXUAL !!!!!!
>>
>> Another LAME post ...............
>>
>> Stick with the facts. There's plenty
>> there to work with.
>>
>> NOT sticking to the facts ... you just
>> serve THEM instead.
>
> So provide some facts. Perhaps some photos of her naked?
>
>

PLEASE NO, she's fugly! Or, I'll post pictures of me naked!

[jon_banquer]

Aren't ugly, fat, out of shape and sweaty pictures of you more than enough?

http://neme-s.org/Oshkosh_2007/Ohio_Brush/DSC02534.JPG

http://neme-s.org/Oshkosh_2007/Ohio_Brush/DSC02543.JPG

[Gunner Asch]

On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:15:50 -0400, Mr. B1ack <now...@nada.net>

wrote:

>On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:30:55 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 02:05:55 -0400, Mr. B1ack <now...@nada.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Oooooh !!! TRANS-SEXUAL !!!!!!
>>>
>>>Another LAME post ...............
>>>
>>>Stick with the facts. There's plenty
>>>there to work with.
>>>
>>>NOT sticking to the facts ... you just
>>>serve THEM instead.
>>
>>So provide some facts. Perhaps some photos of her naked?
>
> Did they buy the kids in a back alley somewhere ?
> There are a few things trannies CAN'T do even if
> they grow big titties :-)

They can indeed buy kids in a back alley. It happens regularly,
unfortunately. And the alley may be a US one..or an African one or
even a Caribbean one...but its a back alley none the less

[news13]

On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:42:18 -0400, Tom Gardner wrote:

> PLEASE NO, she's fugly! Or, I'll post pictures of me naked!

OOoooooH, a two for one offer!

[Mr. B1ack]

On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:15:01 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>

wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:15:50 -0400, Mr. B1ack <now...@nada.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:30:55 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 02:05:55 -0400, Mr. B1ack <now...@nada.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Oooooh !!! TRANS-SEXUAL !!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>Another LAME post ...............
>>>>
>>>>Stick with the facts. There's plenty
>>>>there to work with.
>>>>
>>>>NOT sticking to the facts ... you just
>>>>serve THEM instead.
>>>
>>>So provide some facts. Perhaps some photos of her naked?
>>
>> Did they buy the kids in a back alley somewhere ?
>> There are a few things trannies CAN'T do even if
>> they grow big titties :-)
>
>They can indeed buy kids in a back alley. It happens regularly,
>unfortunately. And the alley may be a US one..or an African one or
>even a Caribbean one...but its a back alley none the less

Then I guess we have to DEMAND a DNA test on the
kids don't we ... I mean if they're not natural or legally
adopted then taxpayer money intended for the executive
branch shouldn't be spent on them. We may be BEING
CHEATED !!! :-)

[Michael A. Terrell]

Tom Gardner wrote:
>
> PLEASE NO, she's fugly! Or, I'll post pictures of me naked!

Who could take them, without going insane? You can't even stand to
see yourself naked! :)


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.

[clark]

It is my understanding that not only is Michelle a woman, but a heterosexual that endured 20 years of Rev Wright's commie gay church and Barack heading off to gay bars and country clubs with Rahm.

She is a black woman, blacker than Barack. No successful heterosexual black male marries a woman blacker than himself. She is just window dressing for Barack's political ambitions. And it worked. The joke is on us.... and her. She has to live with mr B.O.

[budman...@gmail.com]

Do some research you sheep and find out just because you are a tranny doesnt mean you have to cut your dixk off

[budman...@gmail.com]

Pizzagate #pedogate obamagate these people are sick and Jeffrey Epstein didnt kill himself

[Barbara Weese]

[John B.]

On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:06:18 -0700 (PDT), Barbara Weese
<barbara...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, April 19, 2014 at 11:15:22 PM UTC-4, Brian Hellman wrote:

>> I?ve had this post in draft for MONTHS. I?ve hesitated to

>> publish this because of the gravity of what is being asserted,
>> and the uncertainty of the evidence to support the assertion.
>>
>> The startling assertion is that the current First Lady of the
>> United States of America, known as Michelle Robinson Obama, is a
>> biological male posing as a woman.
>>

And as P.T. Barnum was reported to have said, "There's one born every
minute!
--
Cheers,

John B.