Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Treasury to Print More $2 Bills:)

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Scottishmoney

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 7:17:10 AM6/12/03
to

Story on ABC News this morning that the Treasury has announced they are
going to print them again for the first time since 1996. Now I won't have
to hunt so hard for them:)

--
Dave Parrish

Scottish Banknotes and Coins:
http://www.angelfire.com/ns/scottishmoney/index.html


Malanutt 4 Life

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 7:51:37 AM6/12/03
to
Will they be a new style $2 bill by any chance? I heard that there are no plans
that the $2 bill would be redesigned, but it would be nice. I actually wrote
the Treasury Secretary urging the redesign of the $2 bill but I wonder if he
will take heed of the idea. I wish I would have mentioned a possible Louisiana
Purchase theme on the back of the $2 bill.

Scottishmoney

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 8:17:54 AM6/12/03
to
From what I understand from previous releases from the Treasury they have no
immediate plans to redesign the $1 or $2. I assume they will just be series
2003 with Snow and Marin signatures, even though she walked the plank.

--
Dave Parrish

Malanutt 4 Life <malanu...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030612075137...@mb-m18.aol.com...

Paul Anderson

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 12:01:28 PM6/12/03
to
In article <vegnn6k...@corp.supernews.com>, Scottishmoney
<scotti...@charter.net> wrote:

> Story on ABC News this morning that the Treasury has announced they
> are going to print them again for the first time since 1996. Now I
> won't have to hunt so hard for them:)

The government making more of them won't make them easier to get,
except that the publicity will make more people and banks realize it is
still a current denomination.

Paul

--
Paul Anderson
OpenVMS Engineering
Hewlett-Packard Company

PossumTrot

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 3:07:48 PM6/12/03
to
The article on CNN.com says the Treasury has $96 million in $2s in their
vaults. They are printing new ones just to assure a supply. The new ones
will be 2003 series with the same design as now. Printing more will have no
direct effect on whether they circulate more, but articles like the recent
ones will make people aware that they are still available.

I'm picking up another strap of Toms tomorrow, hopefully crisp new - at
least that what I asked the vault teller to order.


"Paul Anderson" <paul.a...@hp.com> wrote in message
news:120620031142169168%paul.a...@hp.com...

Malanutt 4 Life

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 3:00:50 PM6/12/03
to
I have heard the "no immediate plans to redesign the $1 or $2" saying also. But
does this mean, maybe eventually they will be redesigned? The saying seems to
hold that possiblity open.

jimmyfc

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 3:33:16 PM6/12/03
to
"Scottishmoney" <scotti...@charter.net> wrote in message news:<vegr928...@corp.supernews.com>...

It could also be 2003a if a replacement for Marin comes along quickly.

Fred Shecter

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 4:34:59 PM6/12/03
to
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2003-06-12-terrible-twos_x.htm

Badly written with the author's personal opinion woven into the 'story'.

-Fred Shecter


"Scottishmoney" <scotti...@charter.net> wrote in message news:<vegr928...@corp.supernews.com>...

Steve Okonski

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 6:20:16 PM6/12/03
to
Scottishmoney wrote:
>
> Story on ABC News this morning that the Treasury has announced they are
> going to print them again for the first time since 1996. Now I won't have
> to hunt so hard for them:)

They are seen so infrequently most people don't realize how rare the
1976 series "thin serial number digits" variety is. *shrug* Makes it
a bit easier for me to find them.

DFloyd

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 11:28:48 PM6/12/03
to
In article <90e15e73.03061...@posting.google.com>, fred.e....@alum.mit.edu (Fred Shecter) wrote:
>http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2003-06-12-terrible-twos_x.htm
>
>Badly written with the author's personal opinion woven into the 'story'.
>
>-Fred Shecter
>
>

Does anyone know how the Mint stocks the uncut sheets?
Whenever they make a change do they change the uncut sheet stock?

Thanks
Dan

Edward McGrath

unread,
Jun 13, 2003, 10:03:29 AM6/13/03
to
Can you order some 1976 or 1996 $2 bills from the bank? Would the bank
still have them in stock?

Coin Saver

unread,
Jun 13, 2003, 1:38:10 PM6/13/03
to
>From: Edward McGrath

>Can you order some 1976 or 1996 $2 bills from the bank? Would the bank still
have them in stock?>

You can ask for and/or order $2.oo Bills and get them, but you cannot specify
the Series, District, Block or condition. It's sort of like 'pot-luck', you
get what they got.

8-/


Coin Saver

jimmyfc

unread,
Jun 13, 2003, 3:06:12 PM6/13/03
to
They are seen so infrequently most people don't realize how rare the
> 1976 series "thin serial number digits" variety is. *shrug* Makes it
> a bit easier for me to find them.
"thin serial number digits" could you elaborate? Could this relate to
those printed by COPE vs earlier notes? I thought the BEP had
converted to COPE by the time that the first $2 FRNs were printed.

Edward McGrath

unread,
Jun 13, 2003, 5:55:30 PM6/13/03
to
I sent away for the 4-piece uncut $2 bills from the mint. My niece that
I hooked into collecting coins at age 9 suddenly fell in love with paper
money. I gave my 4-piece uncut $2 bills to her. Thanks to Coinsaver
straightening me out I now have a new respect in paper money. I still
have a hell of a lot to learn about what paper money to collect and what
to spend. I know I love $2 bills though. I think I like them because the
back of the bill has an artist beauty that other bills lack. I hope I
can learn more about paper money from all the posters in this NG.

Steve Okonski

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 4:26:18 PM6/14/03
to

(I'm unfamiliar with COPE.) I think in the mid-70s the printing
device for the serial numbers changed. All 1969 and 1974 series notes
used the old device, all 1977 series used the new. The twos in 1976
were caught during the transition.

The newer device produced thicker digits which were better aligned and
had slightly different shapes (especially for the "2" and "3"). The
difference can be seen here: http://www.insystem.com/2d2.jpg

The old (thin) digit variety is rarer than the new, and for some
districts they are a VERY small percentage of the 1976 series. All
star notes are thin digit. Other than star notes, I've not found any
thin digit variety from Richmond. Most common thin district I believe
is New York. For most, but not all districts, the thin digit variety
has a lower serial number than the thick.

I hestitate a bit to share this info because once commonly known,
it'll become that much harder for me to find the thins. ;-)

Scott Stevenson

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 7:52:21 PM6/14/03
to

Steve,

http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~dmoffitt/serials/cope.html has quite a bit
of info, including serial number ranges for COPE vs. non-COPE notes

take care,
Scott

Steve Okonski

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 8:37:06 PM6/14/03
to
Scott Stevenson wrote:

> Steve,
>
> http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~dmoffitt/serials/cope.html has quite a bit
> of info, including serial number ranges for COPE vs. non-COPE notes
>

Scott, excellent info at that site. You can tell I'm a newbie at this
since I never even knew this difference was known as COPE. I see the
serial number lists confirm what I had reasoned by obsevation
regarding relative rarity. Great stuff, thanks.

Scott Stevenson

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 9:40:01 PM6/14/03
to

Glad to help. If you drop "cope.html" from the link, it's the main
page for the BEP's monthly breakdown. It's got a ton of info. I
don't believe it's put up by the BEP, but I know that several people
in the NG use it as a resource.

take care,
Scott

0 new messages