Steve
Sounds like a "filled die" error.
Grease and other gunk from the coining press gets into the die and
causes exactly the effect you are describing.
hey Bob, thanks for the info. I have other varieties of filled dies on
other Lincolns, but none this severe. I have found a few cuds, a few
'98 & '00 TyII's, and a few other minor errors(on quarters, dimes &
nickels). It's fun looking at pocket change and finding different
things like that. Again, thanks for the info.
Steve
Finding cuds in circulation is a very good find - keep looking!
Steve,
There's one other possibility--if there was a die clash, they may
have ground down the obverse die to remove the clash marks, and ground
it to the point that some of the detail is missing (the same thing
that caused the "3-legged" Buffalo). I've got a 1973 cent that has
the same appearance you mention. While a filled die is a possibility,
I'd lean toward the "overground" die. The shallowest part of the
design is what would be missing, and that's exactly the part that's
gone on your coin.
take care,
Scott
A filled die would be far more likely than an "overground" one.
Hubby and I found a coin the size of a dime with the edges smooth
and a silver color. The impression and color is that of a Lincoln
cent, both sides.
Error or an attempt by a cheater?
Doris
I'm confused. You say in one sentence it is silver colored and in the
next it is the color of a Lincoln cent (copper).
So which is it?
The edges are silver color, the body is copper color.
Then it is a current-compostition Lincoln cent (copper plated zinc) with
then edges filed off.