The fact that he doesn't want his post archived says as much. oly
> -------------------------
> Greg Lyon
> ANA Board of Governors 2011-2013
>
Hate to break it to you but your smug attitude since you first began
trolling the chat boards looking for votes, IMHO, until you got an
uncontested election.....just proves to me that you don't have the requisite
skill sets to do an effective job.
You'll be kissing our butts for votes in two years if you can't run
uncontested again. Keep writing your smarmy comments now, Governor. What the
heck, it's not like you called for his removal before you were
appointed...whoops, I mean "elected."
So, which "master" speaks before your head turns on the current Board?
The statement says that the Board �ended� their employment relationship with
Shepherd yet seems to be concerned that Harlan Berk�s statement said
Shepherd was fired. However, a person does not have to be a rocket scientist
to know that after it was announced Shepherd was put on leave during an
investigation and then his employment was �ended� to put the two events
together to guess he was fired. In fact, my post on that day was �ANA Fires
Shepherd.�
Again, this statement does not say anything of substance. But it appears
that the Board feels they have to defend themselves. If the Board did not do
anything wrong, what are they defending? Then to have Cliff Mishler, past
president and current governor, make a statement, it makes them appear like
they are trying to hide something.
What are the ANA Board of Governors hiding?
The ANA released their statement, Harlan Berk had his say, then Shepherd
responded. Everyone vented and that should be enough. Why did the Board of
Directors have to respond? What are they hiding?
The Board�s statement concludes:
It is most unfortunate that Mr. Shepherd has resorted to a public discussion
that the ANA cannot comment upon, instead of moving forward in a dignified
manner. We are deeply saddened by his decision. Rather than dwell on past
mistakes, the ANA will move forward and fulfill its educational mission to
serve the best interests of the entire numismatic community.
If you do not want to �dwell on past mistakes,� then just SHUT UP!
"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:j6i54p$sgg$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> All this takes is a little old-fashioned investigating.
>
> Early reports noted that "more than one" ANA employee was put on leave.
>
> There were TWO people removed from the ANA employee listing (on their
> website).
>
> The other person was Nadia Moskver, a person hired by, and working
> directly under, Larry Shepherd.
>
> She was the "Special Projects Manager".
>
> Also a specialist at taking oral depositions.
oly
--------------
I have to admit this offers a lot more interesting reading than posts about
someone finding a 2011 national parks quarter or a link to an eBay auction.
Mr. Remick, you worked in a bureaucracy, I believe, although perhaps/
maybe not too recently. Anymore, nowadays, the rather standardized MO
in any office setting is (1) don't have these kind of relationships at
work; (2) when they become problems (i.e., adversely impacting other
employees in their job performance) both "offending" parties need to
be treated equally; and (3) top management just can't say too much to
the rank and file folks. IMHO, now that we MAYBE have some inkling of
what happened, it seems the Board proceeded and discharged their
responsibility in a proper manner.
BTW, I got a Glacier quarter at the liquor store last night!!!
oly
====
You knew I wouldn't give a hoot about your liquor store find, but I do
get a kick reading all the hubub here over an alleged dalliance that
shouldn't affect anyone except the few parties involved. I'd be surprised
if half of the ANA members could name anyone on the ANA board. When I
worked in the govt many years ago, messing around in the office was dealt
with firmly, not unlike in the military and in most private industry. But
seeing it turn into a national numismatic scandal when it involves a couple
folks who manage a coin collectors club is eye-rolling.
The thing that the ANA needs is a real coin nerd, or a herd of them,
in the office on Cascade Ave. The ANA has ALWAYS NEEDED this.
Coins nerds might desperately covet the opposite sex, but their social
skills usually suck, and besides, they hate to divert their funds from
the collection.
oly
So how would this affect your hobby enjoyment?
I think that Mr. Remick underestimates the ANA. Yes, you can
certainly collect coins without ever coming into contact with the ANA,
but...
In a general way, I don't know if the ANA has a net realizable "total
assets" of even $20 million. It would not take a lot in this frivolus
lawsuit-happy country to bust up the ANA (probably the ANA has some
form of liability insurance to help guard its physical and financial
assets). The question is (or would be) whether or not the ANA adds
anything to the hobby? or not? Whether the ANA is worth preserving.
Or not.
IMHO, the ANA is less than it could be or should be; but it is worth
far more than zero. The ANA does a decent job of bringing like-minded
people together (the Conventions and the Summer Seminar). To its
credit, the ANA has a good library and a good museum (but both located
in a city that is not in the first-rank of American cities, nor is it
exactly on the "beaten path" - you've gotta want to go to Colorado
Springs). The ANA has a monthly membership magazine is slick, glossy
and attractive, but whose content suffers very much from being put
together by people who aren't coin nerds and who simply don't
understand what makes coin people "tick". Thus, The Numismatist's
articles tend towards the lowest common denominator, and I believe
that a lot of good speciality articles are not accepted. This past
lack of acceptance also discourages people, over time, from sending in
the better writing today. Like most organizations of its kind, the
ANA has a "Code of Ethics" which has little or no impact on the
activities it would propose to regulate (in this case, the functioning
of the coin marketplace and particularly the behavior of some of its
most marginal denizens).
Yes, you can collect coins without ever having any contact with the
ANA. But for the small annual dues, the ANA is quite worthwhile.
Providing a venue for people to meet, very good; hobby education, so-
so; hobby regulation, dicey. But overall, you wouldn't want the ANA
destroyed.
The ANA has got to find a "dyed-in-the-wool coin person" who has a
deep intuitive gut feeling about why coins are attractive as
historical and economic artifacts, and who can manage better than what
we have had in the now er long interval since Mr. Ed Rochette
retired. Mr. Rochette was often weary and cynical, but he was a
genuine coin person and is an example of what the ANA needs today.
oly
- Thirty-three year ANA member, attendee of numerous ANA conventions
since 1979 and attendee of seven or eight Summer Seminars
Your thoughts are valuable and valid, Mr. R., and please keep them
coming. Happily, I have met and sometimes made the acquaintance of
some wonderfully brilliant successful coin collectors whom I never
ever would have met had I not gone to the annual big show or the
Summer Seminars. I've rarely made money directly out of these
expeditions, but the experiences and rubbed-off knowledge have made me
make some better coin buying choices later on.
oly
1. Laura Sperber - already declared
2. Warren Mills - Simply the best
3. Don Willis - PCGS should know how to clean up the ANA
4. Harlan Berk - He just received the ANA's second most prestigious award,
who better
5. Doug Winter - Has the trust of many
6. Kathleen Duncan - Runs an honest company
7. Mr. Commem from this board - regular poster on the PCGS board
8. Gregg Bingham - a top collector and businessman
These are just the first names to easily pop into mind. I'm sure we can come
up with enough quality to assure that the present Board is completely voted
out of office in the next election.
If Shepherd wants to let everyone "know" he was terminated, let him. If he
wants to state the facts the way he sees it, let him. The ANA also has the
right to state the facts as they see them, and let the members decide who is
telling the truth. By their continued silence and stonewalling, the ANA is
simply providing more and more evidence that there was no legitimate reason
to terminate Larry.