Fictional value, entirely.
How do you have this? It's only 2008.
mk
or did I have a very long nap today?
That's one long roll...almost 15 feet long.
No, I think it was *four* years ago.
Always Learning wrote:
> I have a roll of 2010 US Quarters. Any ideas on their value ?
No idea what they are worth now, but they will be worth $10 in just
over a year. 8-)
No! 2010 is the Year of the Tiger. There is no Year of the Coins.
--
Roger Hunt
Speaking of silly childlike responses...
> This group needs an ass beating from hell on the wiredo mind side of
> it.
You're doing a Yeoman's job of upholding the weirdo part of it.
> I have numbers I can call, people I can get in touch with and make
> things go bye bye for this newsgroups...
The phrase "off your meds" is an Internet cliché but after your
strange repetition of your question about the date on the Philippine
coin that was answered several times before you stopped asking, and
now this...
Quick - what year is it now? And most importantly...
Tell us again the year on those quarters... after you've taken your
meds and looked at a calendar.
BTW, they stopped handing out Kook of the Month and Troll of the Month
awards years ago - way too many candidates these days - so you're
wasting your time competing for those.
Heh, heh, good one. 2008 must be the Year of the Troll on his
calendar. This isn't the first time he's played the psychotic here.
btw, this is an excellent newsgroup and for me, a Brit, a treat to get a
handle on what American coins are all about.
--
Roger Hunt
And I have a sister in Ceylon.
Boy, how do you manage to get through each day avoiding the temptation of
using your tremendous powers? Imagine! All those people just waiting for
you to get in touch with them and give them "the Okay". You seem to have
been watching too many superhero cartoons. Always learning WHAT?
Troll boy reminds me of a mystery theater repeat I heard on some
streaming audio website. Some guy found a quarter in his pocket that
had a mint mark a few years later than the current year. He had it
appraised and it was worth a quarter :0)
OK, if you really do have 2010 US quarters they are fake because the current
year is 2008. Their value could be 0, however I'm willing to give you 2X
face value for them.
If you have a 40 coin roll that would be $20 plus shipping costs.
Let me know.
mk
for the black cabinet ya know
I'm curious; what is the design on the reverse?
--
Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
Can she drop a dime on the Tamil Tigers and have them take care of our
troll?
Then there was the Twilight Zone episode where a guy got a coin in
change that stopped time when you stood it on edge.
Our troll ought to be familiar with it, given that he inhabits his own
twilight zone.
The pier on Key West where U.S. Route 1 terminates in the south. It's
the first in a series of 50 quarters, running south to north, that
will commemorate various historic Rte. 1 waypoints including HoJo
restaurants and Stuckey's Pecan Log Roll stores, a roadside alligator
farm, one dinosaur exhibit, all the Dew Drop Inns, and 4 places where
George Washington slept. It will be mandated by Congress early in the
2009 session. I-95 will get its own historic series of dollar coins.
Tamil Tigers 17 Troll 0
No charge
A real historic "I-95" series would center around 301 and A1A-- a nostalgic
nightmare for those of us who made that east coastal drive before I-95. On
the good side, one could stop at most any bank and swap a $1 bill for a
silver Morgan, get a nice supper for $1.25, a motel or cabin for $6, and a
gallon of gas for 25ข.
[snip]
> A real historic "I-95" series would center around 301 and A1A-- a nostalgic
> nightmare for those of us who made that east coastal drive before I-95.
> On
> the good side, one could stop at most any bank and swap a $1 bill for a
> silver Morgan, get a nice supper for $1.25, a motel or cabin for $6, and a
> gallon of gas for 25¢.
301 ... UGH! Brings up memories of my numerous trips from
New Joisey to Florider to visit the grandfolks in WPB ...
It seemed like it took almost as long to get through Georgia
as it did to get from NJ to the GA state line ... and HOORAY
when we hit Ft. Pierce and could get back on a "zoom road" ...
Whatever happened to those shacks by the side of the road
with people who looked like extras from "Deliverance" selling
woven baskets and iron pots and pans??
--
Ken Barr Numismatics k...@kenbarr.com
P. O. Box 32541 website: http://www.kenbarr.com
San Jose, CA 95152 (souvenir cards, MPC, Hickey Bros tokens)
408-272-3247 Next show: anta Clara 11/13-16 with Mac's Coins
Some of them are still standing by the side of the same road, except that
road now is hidden a few miles off the 80mph freeway. Most of the people
from "Deliverance" are now greeters at the local WalMart.
Garbage,Trash,Junk. And they sell them on TV coin shows and large newspaer
ads for stupid money.
>
> 2010 quarters with obama on one side and a pic of the constitution
> being torn in half on the other side will be so popular amoung
> liberals they will easily sell for $5 each.
>
> Liberals love symbolism and destruction of law.
>
Cheney/Bush have methodically attempted to destroy the liberties we enjoy,
now its time to toss out the garbage. Hopefully Always Learning will join
them.
--
*
/?\
/___\
-O=O-
^
AS & His Magic Hat
A conclusion is simply the place
where you decided to stop thinking.
I just can't think of anything positive they have done. Sorry no
offense!
They managed to create the conditions that made it possible for Obama to get
elected. Time will tell if we should thank them for it or curse them for it
like everything else they have done.
They just gutted the endangered species act.
True...
That first part's right on. But endangered species-- boy, THAT's really
gonna piss voters off. Like critters of all kinds haven't been routinely
disappearing over the centuries. Heaven forbid another obscure Madagascar
marsupial should die out before Billy and his daddy can gape at it behind a
zoo railing. The stuffed mammoths are more interesting.
Always Learning,
I was thinking about you the other day when I ran across a coin book in a
used book store that has your Phillipines 5 centavos coin in it. The book
is dated 1969 and may not have the correct value but it has many very
intresting coins in it. It is " A guide bok of United States Coins" 22 ed.
1969 and (no offense) it's red. I will send you this book for free. All you
have to do is let me know your address. mjmwcs "at" htcomp "dot" net
I'll be reading it until you decide.
mk
They let coal mining companies tear the tops off of mountains and dump
the toxic waste rock into streambeds. It's not just squirrels and
birds that are affected. People living near these are getting
seriously sick.
They've created a loophole for air pollution by coal power plants. A
plant now can exceed the maximum limits for polluting national
parkland if its historic average amounts of pollution did not exceed
the limit. That's like being stopped for speeding and telling the
officer "Yes, I just exceeded the speed limit but my past average of
driving speeds has been below the posted limits so you can't write me
a ticket."
We might shake our heads at marginally questionable examples such as
saving snail darters and owls, but the Bush administration's
environmental record has been atrocious, to say the least.
> Wild animals kill and eat other wild animals, killing animals is
> normal and natural...just look at nature.
Just look at the trolls and anonymous dipsticks that post here.
IOW, just look in the mirror, pal.
Did I miss something? Why the harsh response to a factual statement?
Yes, you missed that I was responding to a jackass who has been making
a pest of himself here. His bipolar behavior swings between being a
goofball and a trenchant troll. (Or maybe you didn't miss that, since
you trimmed him from your reply here.)
I probably should take back that last sentence. You obviously don't
know the proper practices for trimming text in newsgroup posting. And
the fact that you missed to whom I was addressing my caustic comment
tells us that you don't know how to follow the attribution lines and
search through previous postings. Read the spotty posting history
here of Always Learning and you'll see how he managed to make himself
an object of contempt.
It's the "endangered" snail darters and similar local specie freaks that I
was referring to. Most people would get more excited looking at prehistoric
skeletons than at a living snail darter.
The environmental thing is a whole 'nother story.
"mazorj" <maz...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1QV0l.1431$c35...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
(Or maybe you didn't miss that, since you trimmed him from your reply
here.) You obviously don't
Anyone who can not see the value in preserving species is a real dim bulb.
Now if they have a problem with the types of people that tend to get really
fired up about environmental concerns to the point that they are irrational,
well, I can't fault anyone for that.
Preserving species to what end? To look at? And at what expense? And
which species? Obscure plants, too? Should polar bears be in danger of
becoming extinct due to gradual climate change, that's too bad. Should they
be in danger of becoming extinct due to excessive hunting, like bison and
whales, that's plain bad and indeed should be corrected. Otherwise, there
have been hundreds of animals that became extinct during the past couple
generations without public notice or adverse effect.
>
> Now if they have a problem with the types of people that tend to get
> really fired up about environmental concerns to the point that they are
> irrational, well, I can't fault anyone for that.
If you're saying you find no fault with irrational environmentalists, I
guess we'd disagree on that, too.
Now *you* are going extreme. I never advocated bankrupting the world to
save one toad.
*snip*
>
>>
>> Now if they have a problem with the types of people that tend to get
>> really fired up about environmental concerns to the point that they are
>> irrational, well, I can't fault anyone for that.
>
> If you're saying you find no fault with irrational environmentalists, I
> guess we'd disagree on that, too.
>
How on earth did you get that from my paraphraph? It may not be the best
sentence construction ever, granted. To be clear: I am not faulting anyone
who loathes envrionmental extremists.
Okay, maybe I am. I just thought you were making a blanket statement about
people who believe we often go overboard with specie preservation in
general.
>>>
>>> Now if they have a problem with the types of people that tend to get
>>> really fired up about environmental concerns to the point that they are
>>> irrational, well, I can't fault anyone for that.
>>
>> If you're saying you find no fault with irrational environmentalists, I
>> guess we'd disagree on that, too.
>>
>
> How on earth did you get that from my paraphraph? It may not be the best
> sentence construction ever, granted. To be clear: I am not faulting
> anyone who loathes envrionmental extremists.
Well your paragraph did confuse me a bit, even after trying to break it down
like we had to do in school. Maybe it was confusion over the "they" and
"anyone" antecedents. Antway, glad to see we both loathe environmental
extremists..........or, whatever.
The truth almost always lies in the middle, so, yeah there has to be a
balance. I have been reading your posts long enough to know that you are
intelligent enough to realize that if we lose too many species that will be
EXTREMELY bad for business. We will all be screwed.
What I am saying is that if someone outright dismisses the idea of species
preservation as an important issue then they are truly stupid.
Even the faction of the Republican party that has more religion than brains
need only actually read their Bible and see that we are held responsible by
God to preserve all life on earth.
>>>>
>>>> Now if they have a problem with the types of people that tend to get
>>>> really fired up about environmental concerns to the point that they are
>>>> irrational, well, I can't fault anyone for that.
>>>
>>> If you're saying you find no fault with irrational environmentalists, I
>>> guess we'd disagree on that, too.
>>>
>>
>> How on earth did you get that from my paraphraph? It may not be the best
>> sentence construction ever, granted. To be clear: I am not faulting
>> anyone who loathes envrionmental extremists.
>
> Well your paragraph did confuse me a bit, even after trying to break it
> down like we had to do in school. Maybe it was confusion over the "they"
> and "anyone" antecedents. Antway, glad to see we both loathe
> environmental extremists..........or, whatever.
>
Too many pronouns will kill you. Or get you a rap on the knuckles with a
ruler-wielding nun.
I tend to think Bush and Cheney et. al. are very cynical when it comes to
species preservation and only want to do what is best for business. As long
as it lines their pockets in the short term, who cares about the long term?
If gutting the endangered species act is not a manifestation of their
cynicism then I would be very interested for someone to explain to my why
this is a good thing.
Yes, in the end, George W. Bush proved to be a uniter after all.
--
Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
Yes they probably care about the greater good of the planet unlike the
slack jawed unemployed redneck rabble sitting on a broken down washing
machine in their front yard sucking down Budweisers. Such as
yourself.
>
> Liberals are too dangerous to laugh at them..
Typical mindless republitard word salad.
There just might be enough time left before the Sun goes nova for a new
genus of Man to emerge from the primordial soup and evolve into something
better than us. Wait, the primordial soup is gone, and so are the easy
natural resources, so maybe not.
Yes they probably care about the greater good of the planet unlike the
slack jawed unemployed redneck rabble sitting on a broken down washing
machine in their front yard sucking down Budweisers. Such as
yourself.
_________
Hey, heaping gratuitous compliments on a person ain't always gonna bring him
around to your way of thinking.
There's always hope. But I'm glad I won't have soup in my ancestral tree.
That is a contradiction surely? If HS, or anything else, are in any sort
driving seat it is not then a natural dynamic balance.
>For now, I'm glad I'm not one of those other species. The
>other species had their chance and blew it. Now we're here. S'gonna be a
>loooooooong wait.
>
The others did not possess sentience. We do (apart from game show hosts
and politicians), and this sentience is being horribly misused.
The very tip of the iceberg is greed and dishonesty, like the sale of
these fake coins from China, to name just one of ten billion examples.
--
Roger Hunt
Are you suggesting that homa sapiens are not natural creatures in the
evolution cycle? The fact that we were endowed with the brains to steer our
destiny allows us to choose our options to sway any dynamic balance in our
favor. Until the roaches and killer ants take over one day, we are indeed
in the driver's seat. Live with it.
>>For now, I'm glad I'm not one of those other species. The
>>other species had their chance and blew it. Now we're here. S'gonna be
>>a
>>loooooooong wait.
>>
> The others did not possess sentience. We do (apart from game show hosts
> and politicians), and this sentience is being horribly misused.
That they didn't posess sentience (yes, I had to look it up) is simply part
of the natural balance. Luck of the natural draw. If you're religious, you
could say God wasn't ready to hand it out yet. The interim option was a
survival instinct. According to the majority, this sentience now is being
used the way most homo sapiens want to use it, coupled with their survival
instinct. That some may disagree with the way things are going means
little.
>
> The very tip of the iceberg is greed and dishonesty, like the sale of
> these fake coins from China, to name just one of ten billion examples.
Do you believe that early creatures did not express greed and dishonesty in
their own crude way? It's not exclusive to us homo sapiens. We just
refined it a bit.
Good idea. Back to coins.
Use of such language only lowers your self to their level, Mark.
Fuck you Gary.
Do you kiss your mom with that mouth?
Here are some of sgt23's posts:
Dec 19: "I base it on shitheads like your self distorying this group,
so
take your own advice and go where your liked"
Dec 18: "RWF go away, no one cares about your fucking opinion!"
Dec 1: "When I want to hear what you have to say I will asked Mr. ASS"
Dec 1: "Its ok, I'm not the one with rwf cum stains on the back of my
pants!"
Nov 26: "This might be the kinda post that could land you in a mental
ward
or someone to mistaken you as a retard. Just my 2cents!"
Nov 20: "How do you know hes not the type who might like to have sexual
relations with food?"
Nov 6: "And like you RF always with cock in mouth!"
Nov 5: "Just a warning your going to get ass fucked really hard for
that
comment lol."
Nov 5: "Probably one them all mouth no cock and balls."
>
> The very tip of the iceberg is greed and dishonesty, like the sale of
> these fake coins from China, to name just one of ten billion examples.
> --
And eBay's fees. LOL!
>
> > The very tip of the iceberg is greed and dishonesty, like the sale of
> > these fake coins from China, to name just one of ten billion examples.
>
> Do you believe that early creatures did not express greed and dishonesty in
> their own crude way? It's not exclusive to us homo sapiens. We just
> refined it a bit.
>
> Good idea. Back to coins.- Hide quoted text -
>
As a pet owner I can assure you that dogs and cats understand
fairness, embarrasment, loyalty, duty, pride, and a whole range of
emotions most humans assume they can not possibly have. I think it is
likely that at the very least, most mammals are capable of these
emotions.
Thank goodness I've only ever been a buyer on ebay.
--
Roger Hunt
There was a recent study, reported in the news, demonstrating that dogs
had a concept of "fairness". It has long been known that primates have
"politics". And of course it was obvious from the begining that cats
consider themselves to be the lords of all creation.
--
Please reply to: | "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is
pciszek at panix dot com | indistinguishable from malice."
Autoreply is disabled |
Several years ago we had a small dog that would be in the huff for about two
weeks after we returned from holiday, him being looked after, very well, by
friends while we were away.
He as acutely aware of the unfairness of us going away on holiday without
him.
For those who have never had a dog, every dog is different in the same way
that every human is different. Billy
Are you for real? What the fuck do you think this is? Narnia? Animals
have primal emotions, which is the same as having almost no emotion at all.
Animals were put on Earth for man to torment and exploit as he pleases.
They are furs and meat just waiting to happen.
Hey, it's Dr. Doolittle!
A lot of dogs are worthless and need to be blown out of this world, or put
in a pit to tear each other to pieces.