It appears to be copper, roughly an inch in diameter (don't have it
handy for measuring), there's an outlined 5-point star on the front,
the reverse side is blank. It's not a coin, and may just have been
worn on a necklace. If it rings a bell with anyone, let me know.
Some of her coins were European WW2 era pieces collected from
returning military around that time, if that suggests any possible
origins as a type of ersatz ID tag.
http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/dd50/mazorj/Coins/StarmedalD.jpg
It may be a token from an amusement park. Something like this
http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm37/prudden_2008/token2.jpg
Thanks for the suggestion, I didn't know that the inverted pentagram
had any special significance for Mormons. There are absolutely no
other identifying marks on it so anything is possible.
Hmmm... now that you've raised the subject, what if it's a witch's
pentagram charm? I'd rub it to see what might pop up from the
netherworld, but that would violate the basic rules for handling coins
and medals. :-\
Mmmm... I'd settle for a limited "Midas touch" spell specific to one
kind of coin. Anyone for gold state quarters made entirely out of
.999999 real gold?
But then the schlockmeisters would be offering us sets of gold state
quarters "richly layered in a generous 1-mil copper/nickel plating."
It would depend on the rating system.
<G>
mk
only 5s
They're guaranteed to:
1. Be round.
2. Be made out of metal.
3. Have an obverse side.
4. Have a reverse side.
5. Have an image of someone or something somewhere on them.
Voila! A perfect "5 out of 5".
>Anyone for gold state quarters made entirely out
>>> of .999999 real gold?
>>>
>>> But then the schlockmeisters would be offering us sets of gold
>>> state quarters "richly layered in a generous 1-mil copper/nickel
>>> plating."
>>
>> It would depend on the rating system.
>> <G>
>> mk
>> only 5s
>
>They're guaranteed to:
>
>1. Be round.
>2. Be made out of metal.
>3. Have an obverse side.
>4. Have a reverse side.
>5. Have an image of someone or something somewhere on them.
>
>Voila! A perfect "5 out of 5".
>
So an edge inscription would make it 6 out of 5?
--
Roger Hunt
Nah, the inventor of the 5 out of 5 system stopped there because he's
not ambidextrous in his finger counting and he can't see his toes.
He doesn't need to see his <bleep>. He is one.