I'm trying to find a comparison review of them to determine how they
compare in warmth and pack size.
The "18 pound checklist" http://www.backpacking.net/18-pound.html
lists the MEC Northern Lite2 Pullover as standard and the Patagonia
Puffball Pullover as "Options That Add Weight". I'm assuming the
Puffball offers some additional features which justify the additional
weight?
The Northern Lite2 *Jacket* uses 3oz/sq-yd insulation whereas the
Northern Lite2 Pullover is 1.8oz/sq-yd. The Puffball is "100-g.
Thermoliter Micro". Apples and Oranges.
If the Northern Lite2 pullover were to offer similar warmth to the
Puffball, it would be a good deal as it's 5oz less weight (11 vs
16.5) ... not to mention less $$$.
Thanks
Tony
Hiya Tony.
I have the puffball, it is a nice synthetic pullover. The nice thing
I like about it it is nylon on the inside so it slides easily over
fleece or capilene etc (unlike my marmot driclime). It also works
well when sleeping in your bag at night for a little more toasty
sleep.
tmc
Cheers,
BC
ony Jones" <jones_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2be7ec4.02070...@posting.google.com...
Mike wrote:
> Even though a jacket with full zip weighs slightly more than a pullover, a
> full zip allows quick on/off. Worth the extra ounce or two.
Or, for the Nothern Lite, 4...
If you want the Puffball...It is going to undergo some changes for Fall '02. I
can look up the specs on the new one if you are inclined to wait until
September to get one. Otherwise, what a style change means is that current
Puffballs will be winging their way to the Patagonia outlets either for the
Labor Day sales, or soon thereafter. The outlet in Dillon MT does phone orders
(and I believe they'll ship to Canada, but I'm not sure), and is always a good
bet for cheaper (i.e. out of season) goods, if you don't mind off colors. Or
paying with US $.
Anne the retail goddess, NYC
jones_...@yahoo.com (Tony Jones) writes:
> The "18 pound checklist" http://www.backpacking.net/18-pound.html
> lists the MEC Northern Lite2 Pullover as standard and the Patagonia
> Puffball Pullover as "Options That Add Weight". I'm assuming the
> Puffball offers some additional features which justify the additional
> weight?
I can't tell you which is warmer, but the puffball definitely rocks.
Your list mentions the puffball jacket, not pullover. That may be the
reason it adds weight. I don't know if Patagonia still sells the
jacket version which used to have thicker insulation than the
pullover.
My puffball pullover is made about as lightly as you would want in
gear designed to be used more than once. It's a size large - big
enough to fit over size M several layers - and weighs 14.25 oz,
including accumulated dirt. Allegedly, a puffball has been stuffed
into a bandaid tin. I'd guess it would be a tossup weightwise between
the pullovers you listed in the same size.
Ken