Evinrude had a brief flirtation with the device a while back but it's
been out of production for lots of years.
There is a place in FL called Brownie's Third Lung
(They have a web site: http://www.browniedive.com/dive.htm )
that currently sells a line of similar (?) units for everything from
recreational to commercial diving. They may be able to supply some info
on the gizmo.
Else, an OMC dealer may be able to shed some light on the thing.
BTW, I'm fairly sure that you need a diver's cert. to purchase one of
these. You should certainly have completed a scuba course to use one.
Any form of compressed air diving can be dangerous (fatal) if you don't
know what you're doing.
Regards - Ted H
> Evinrude had a brief flirtation with the device a while back but it's
> been out of production for lots of years.
If memory serves, it was also called a Scu-Boy and was powered by a
Lawn-Boy engine. There are definitely no more parts available and it was
removed from th market for liability reasons (too many ppeople killing
themselves). It floated inside an inner tube and continuously supplied
air to a mask-type apparatus. I've still got some parts manuals kicking
around here somewhere and believe they stopped production circa 1972.
Can Marcus or Bill add anything here?
> BTW, I'm fairly sure that you need a diver's cert. to purchase one of
> these. You should certainly have completed a scuba course to use one.
> Any form of compressed air diving can be dangerous (fatal) if you don't
> know what you're doing.
This is why so many people killed themselves. The units were shipped
with a standard 30' garden hose to supply the air and this depth is
considered safe for any length of time (I am a certified diver). Problem
was, people started adding more garden hose and going deeper and natural
selection prevailed. :-) Of course, having the exhaust so close to the
air pump intake wasn't healty either. ;-)
I have a friend who still owns one but hasn't used it in years. Me? I
strap a proper tank on when I want to stay down for any period of time.
:-)
Regards,
Dave Brown
Brown's Marina
> If memory serves, it was also called a Scu-Boy and was powered by a
> Lawn-Boy engine.
The Evinrude version was the Aquanaut, and the Johnson version was the
Air Buoy, or maybe vice-versa, if my memory serves. Perhaps in The
Provinces they went by different names.
> It floated inside an inner tube and continuously supplied air to a
> mask-type apparatus.
I also suppose you could just set it on top of the ice up north there
:-)
> This is why so many people killed themselves. The units were shipped
> with a standard 30' garden hose to supply the air and this depth is
> considered safe for any length of time (I am a certified diver). Problem
> was, people started adding more garden hose and going deeper and natural
> selection prevailed. :-)
Providing the customer with a simple method of modifying a piece of
machinery without knowing what they're doing means they WILL do it,
many of them without knowing what they're doing.
> Of course, having the exhaust so close to the
> air pump intake wasn't healty either. ;-)
But it no doubt made the underwater scenery seem so much
more... colorful :-)
--
--
Marcus. ( be...@mail.med.upenn.edu )
I used one of those (forgot which brand) a number of time in the late
'60s, with good results. The hose was 25 ft. long, as I recall.
It seemed very safe. Since I'm not a certified diver it would presumptious
of me to say that "I knew what I was doing." But I did understand
decompression tables, knew the gas laws, the basic physiology of
partial pressure gas absorption, and also understood all too well (from
earlier experiments with long snorkels in swimming pools) what would
happen if the hose broke and the check valve malfunctioned. The proximity
of the exhaust to the air source did bother me a bit, and I don't know if
I'd want to use it in absolutely flat calm conditions.
We even used it to salvage a sailboat that was on the bottom in 15 ft. of
water. With one hose for breathing and one hose for "salvage air," it was
the perfect tool for the job.
--
fish...@netcom.com
http://www.well.com/~pk/fishmeal.html
-"Call me Fishmeal"-
>
> If memory serves, it was also called a Scu-Boy and was powered by a
> Lawn-Boy engine. There are definitely no more parts available and it was
> removed from th market for liability reasons (too many ppeople killing
> themselves). It floated inside an inner tube and continuously supplied
> air to a mask-type apparatus. I've still got some parts manuals kicking
> around here somewhere and believe they stopped production circa 1972.
> Can Marcus or Bill add anything here?
>
Yeah, Dave, you just KNEW that I was familiar with these.
Back in the '60s while working my way thru college at a dealership, one
customer had 20 of these. He hired kids to find fresh water clams to ship to
Japan for buttons. Besides spending hours in cold water, I got to service all
of these machines. They worked great and would have loved them for lobstering
in the Keys.
I don't think many got killed by these since it only had a 30' hose and when
I added more hose, the engine wasn't strong enough to pump the air needed at
greater depths.
The biggest problem was carbon blocking the tiny exhaust ports since the oils
of those days didn't have the cleaning additives and the customer used the
cheapest stuff available.
Thanks for the trip down memory lane, I guess that's one of the advantages of
being an "old fart".
Bill Grannis
Bluewater Boats
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> Yeah, Dave, you just KNEW that I was familiar with these.
Well I knew I was but a lad at this time so you'd have been what -- 35
then? <running and ducking>
> Back in the '60s while working my way thru college at a dealership, one
> customer had 20 of these.
So what's the deal with the names? I'm sure it was simply Scu-Boy up
here in the Great White North, but as Marcus has pointed out, there were
Johnson/Evinrude versions down your way. For those who might be
interested, Canadians have always known Johnson & Evinrude to be the
same motor/company because all of the related oil and accessories were
labeled OMC so this would explain the name differences. A great
challenge as a dealer is convincing Amercicans that they are one and the
same and have been for some 40 years.
> I don't think many got killed by these since it only had a 30' hose and when
> I added more hose, the engine wasn't strong enough to pump the air needed at
> greater depths.
That's why we Canucks were killing ourselves -- the cold artic air was a
higher density and the pump was actually able to feed to over 100 feet.
;-)
> Thanks for the trip down memory lane, I guess that's one of the advantages of
> being an "old fart".
I knew I could count on you for this trip. What year did they stop
making them? I believe it was around 1972.
> The Evinrude version was the Aquanaut, and the Johnson version was the
> Air Buoy, or maybe vice-versa, if my memory serves. Perhaps in The
> Provinces they went by different names.
I'm very sure we flew by the Scu-Boy name up here. I'll have a look at
the one locally and confirm it.
> I also suppose you could just set it on top of the ice up north there
> :-)
Didn't need the inner tube though, we just adapted our snowmobile
engines to do the work -- much higher volume. :-)
> Providing the customer with a simple method of modifying a piece of
> machinery without knowing what they're doing means they WILL do it,
> many of them without knowing what they're doing.
And I still see this phenomenom in the NG today. "I think I'm smarter
than the engineers who designed my motor and will to modify it to prove
it." The proof usually becomes evident in the obituary columns.
> > Of course, having the exhaust so close to the
> > air pump intake wasn't healty either. ;-)
>
> But it no doubt made the underwater scenery seem so much
> more... colorful :-)
:-)
BTW, loved your poems in .cruising -- had me laughing for some time. :-)
Hehe,
This reminds me of all the people who try and run thier propane grills on
fork truck tanks they've "borrowed" from work and cobbled to make fit.
Instant flame-o-matic!
Scott
> BTW, loved your poems in .cruising -- had me laughing for some time. :-)
Thanx for the compliment.
I had one poem to my knowledge. It "sent" itself a few times while I
composed it, and I cancelled all but the final version.
> So what's the deal with the names? I'm sure it was simply Scu-Boy up
> here in the Great White North, but as Marcus has pointed out, there were
> Johnson/Evinrude versions down your way. For those who might be
> interested, Canadians have always known Johnson & Evinrude to be the
> same motor/company because all of the related oil and accessories were
> labeled OMC so this would explain the name differences. A great
> challenge as a dealer is convincing Amercicans that they are one and the
> same and have been for some 40 years.
Well, they weren't the same company for a long time. The first
Johnson/Evinrude to be the same was the '51 25 HP Big Twin. Then came
the '52 3 HP Light Twin, then others in subsequest years. By '56 they
were all the same. J/E combined engineering forces and split up
manufacturing duties. Johnson made come parts, Evinrude made others,
and OMC's 3rd division Gale built still other parts. The parts were
assembled into complete motors on separate assembly lines in separate
Johnson and Evinrude factories. That was then, and now they're built
on the same lines.
J/E kept some separate identity even after the '50s. For instance, in
'66, Johnson boosted its 18 to 20 HP, but the Evinrude Fastwin stayed
at 18 HP till its 1974 discontinuance. Evinrude called their motors by
name, like Lark, Sportwin, Starflite, while Johnson called them simply
by Sea Horse and the HP. That hadn't always been the case, for in its
early days Johnson had named it outboards too, and they did have some
motors with names in later days--Javelin, Golden Meteor, Stinger, for
some.
My '64 Canadian Evinrude 9.5 came with its own original OMC tank,
while my '66 Johnson's tank bore the Johnson name. OMC Canada did
things their own way at their Peterborough assembly plant. In 1949,
Gale Products Division started selling outboards directly to the
public in addition to their established contracts through Eatons,
Wards, Goodyear etc. They were called Elto, a name that had been part
of the OMC family since the early days of the company, but not since
the original division had been closed in 1940. In 1950, Gale changed
its US label to Buccaneer, but OMC Canada kept the Elto moniker
through 1959.
I believe that OMC Canada's younger and more centralized operations
may have reinforced Johnson and Evinrude's similarities. The tendency
to label everything but the motors themselves as OMC no doubt was a
factor as well.
How do you know all this stuff??
TC
Marcus G Bell wrote:
>
> Dave Brown (dave....@sympatico.ca) wrote:
>
> > So what's the deal with the names? I'm sure it was simply Scu-Boy up
> > here in the Great White North, but as Marcus has pointed out, there were
> > Johnson/Evinrude versions down your way. For those who might be
> > interested, Canadians have always known Johnson & Evinrude to be the
> > same motor/company because all of the related oil and accessories were
> > labeled OMC so this would explain the name differences. A great
> > challenge as a dealer is convincing Amercicans that they are one and the
> > same and have been for some 40 years.
>
> Well, they weren't the same company for a long time. The first
> Johnson/Evinrude to be the same was the '51 25 HP Big Twin. Then came
> the '52 3 HP Light Twin, then others in subsequest years. By '56 they
> were all the same. J/E combined engineering forces and split up
> manufacturing duties.
clipped
> How do you know all this stuff??
> TC
Here's how:
Member, Antique Outboard Motor Club
Editor, Antique Outboarder Magazine
See us at http://www.aomci.org
And way before any of that, I was already an outboard fanatic. :-)
I don't recall that you needed certification to buy one. They
were extensively advertised in Popular Science at the time
(late 60s or early 70s).
It came with a fairly short air hose (like 25 or 50'?), so perhaps
decompression/nitrogen in the bloodstream wasn't ever an issue.
---
Rick Inzero uupsi!cci632!rdi
Northern Telecom, Inc. rochester!cci632!rdi
Rochester, NY r...@cci.com
"Well, right now, I'm actually water skiing behind a largemouth bass!!"
-radio ad for Keystone Beer Fishing Hotline, 1992
Marcus G Bell wrote:
Besides, he's an old fart. d;-)
Regards, Bill
--
Opinions expressed are mine not necessarily my employers.
All other standard disclaimers apply!
Remove nospam. To email reply.
>
> I don't recall that you needed certification to buy one. They
> were extensively advertised in Popular Science at the time
> (late 60s or early 70s). <snip>
>
Rick -
Until about a year and a half ago (Oct, '96), you did need a SCUBA cert
to get one. Now NAUI offers a course for those who won't be using tanks
but will only be using RHD (Recreational Hookah Diving).
Nitrogen bubbles (bends) is not the issue with shallow (<30') compressed
air diving, air embolism most certainly is. If one *really* tries, you
can get one by diving, on compressed air, to shallow (let's say 10')
depths. Just take a real deep breath at depth, hold it for all you're
worth and then surface - I'd say that you'd have a good chance of offing
yourself (or at least doing yourself a lot of hurt).
Diver training courses beat the dangers of holding your breath while
ascending into your head so that constant, normal breathing becomes a
reflex. Also the sudden loss of your air supply, for someone who hasn't
been exposed to it under controlled circumstances, could cause a fatal
panic situation.
There are lots of other concerns that compressed air diving create that
just don't exist with free or snorkel diving.
Regards - Ted H
If you want to dive deeper or longer than you can with a snorkel take a NAUI
or PADI dive class. Not only will you learn a whole lot, its fun!