Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
John H
nom=de=plume
news:l96jg51qae07g9dd7...@4ax.com...
So, because someone is an asshole that means he must be wrong?
http://ty.rannosaur.us/5-geniuses-who-were-massive-assholes/
--
Nom=de=Plume
Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent
and supress free and open scientific discovery.
Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann.
This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else
in modern history.
He should be put in jail to rot forever.
H the K
Uh-huh...and with your non-existent reputation in peer-reviewed science,
you should be placed in hack with your BFF Shortshit Ingersoll.
--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.
John H
Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it.
Another f*ing joke!
--
John H
I am Tosk
salmo...@gmail.dotcom says...
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch...
I am Tosk
remov...@rejectswsportsdot.org says...
How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...
H the K
*You* are commenting on science? You? Doubtful you completed high school.
BAR
justwaitaf...@gmail.com says...
"University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more
than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how
many of the stolen items were authentic."
This is priceless!
If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now.
BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog.
Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
><remov...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H <salmo...@gmail.dotcom>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>>
>>And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent
>>and supress free and open scientific discovery.
>>
>>Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann.
>>
>>This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else
>>in modern history.
>>
>>He should be put in jail to rot forever.
>
>Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it.
>
>Another f*ing joke!
You want to see how it all unfolded?
John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024995.php
I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while
he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a
smile on his face today.
Real science might actually win the day.
H the K
Sheesh. Yet another right-wing bullshit site. No wonder SW Tom-Tom likes
it.
Tom Francis - SWSports
I honestly don't know why it happened. I think it's an unfortunate
confluence of science and politics - policy rather than procedure.
From what I know about Dr. Mann, he has always been a bit of a
eco-warrior and got carried away. He attracted the attention of Al
Gore who sensed an opportunity and like the snake oil salesman he's
always been, took advantage of it. And it snowballed from there -
grants were given, studies to be made, reputations to be protected,
taxes/revenue to be raised and applied, social engineering to be
accomplished for the protection of the masses.
I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't
need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on
non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but
they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is
turning out, is a bogus crisis.
Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows
over.
Tom Francis - SWSports
Welcome to the club. :>)
Then again, I wouldn't be a member of any club who would have me as a
member.
TopBassDog
> On 11/22/09 9:32 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
>
>
>
> > wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
>
> >>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H<salmonb...@gmail.dotcom>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>
> >>> And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent
> >>> and supress free and open scientific discovery.
>
> >>> Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann.
>
> >>> This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else
> >>> in modern history.
>
> >>> He should be put in jail to rot forever.
>
> >> Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it.
>
> >> Another f*ing joke!
>
> > You want to see how it all unfolded?
>
> > John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files.
>
> >http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024995.php
>
> > I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while
> > he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a
> > smile on his face today.
>
> > Real science might actually win the day.
>
> Sheesh. Yet another right-wing bullshit site. No wonder SW Tom-Tom likes
> it.
>
Herr Krause. No wonder you can't stand it. It bothers you too much.
TopBassDog
> In article <l96jg51qae07g9dd7v2o4lf7nd5m9pp...@4ax.com>,
> salmonb...@gmail.dotcom says...
>
>
>
> >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>
> They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch...
This is established as being the time-honoured method used by Krauss
and company.
Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
Talk about shameless...
Tim
<removeem...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR <sc...@you.com> wrote:
> >justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com says...
>
> >> In article <l96jg51qae07g9dd7v2o4lf7nd5m9pp...@4ax.com>,
> >> salmonb...@gmail.dotcom says...
>
> >> >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>
> >> They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch...
>
> >"University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more
> >than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how
> >many of the stolen items were authentic."
>
> >This is priceless!
>
> >If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now.
>
> >BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog.
>
> Welcome to the club. :>)
>
> Then again, I wouldn't be a member of any club who would have me as a
> member.
Tom, I've been kicked out of some clubs I started... so, don't feel
alone.
?;^ )
Tim
<removeem...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H <salmonb...@gmail.dotcom>
> wrote:
>
> >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>
> Talk about shameless...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ
That was gross!
i agree witht he commenter that said "It reminds me of the people
jumping to their deaths on 9/11. What is wrong with the people who
think this stuff up?"
Tom Francis - SWSports
Frogwatch
<removeem...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:27:14 -0800 (PST), Tim <tschna...@gmail.com>
Mann and Jones behavior in all of this has been really sleazy. Just
about any real scientist (even us commercial scientists) welcome
criticism of our work because then we can make it better. We try to
keep away from personal attacks and realize that sometimes our critics
are simply correct. Yeah, we all have egos but if you try to cover up
questionable stuff, it just spirals out of control and you really end
up looking foolish. Yes, I sometimes think my professional critics
are being jerks but you have to keep up the pretense of civility,
otherwise you end up looking stupid.
You NEVER, NEVER, NEVER put things into e-mail that you would be
ashamed to be published. You do not say such things on the phone
either. Save it for times when you can be absolutely sure you are
alone with someone else and even then be professional about it,
otherwise it'll come back to bite you. Sometimes I hear my employees
say nasty things about some company that has done us wrong and I tell
em to watch what they say.
There are people who have really done me wrong but whenever I see them
at conferences, I always greet them in a friendly manner (but watch
what I say to them) because this impresses people. When I hear
something bad has happed to them, I make sure I make it known they
have my best wishes although in reality I may wish for em to die. It
is just good PR.
I am almost astonished at the foolishness of these guys in the e-
mails. It is either a case of arrogantly thinking they are immune to
blowback or simple foolishness to such an extent that I would doubt
their judgement on anything.
Scott Dickson
Heres the shithead responsible for this drivel.......
http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/ff357/FattyLumpkin11/n1278732218_8642.jpg
thunder
> I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't
> need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on
> non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but
> they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is
> turning out, is a bogus crisis.
How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you
know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"?
> Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows
> over.
Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than
is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science
*is* doing it's job.
For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of
smoking gun, you may want to consider:
"More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/communist/
vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the
hackers also being in on the plot though."
From:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/
thunder
> How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
> it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
> little Harrys...
"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)
thunder
> "University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more
> than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how
> many of the stolen items were authentic."
“Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm
that all of this material is genuine.”
There was 160 MB of data stolen. Obviously, it would take some time to
confirm if it was authentic. Obviously, someone who was willing to break
the law (hacking), and post private information publicly, *might* not be
above changing the data, if they have an agenda.
You don't think they have an agenda, do you?
> This is priceless!
>
> If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now.
Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are
easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen
anything in those emails that debunks the science.
Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
>You don't think they have an agenda, do you?
You know, for a really smart guy, you have some amazing blind spots.
OF COURSE THEY HAD AN AGENDA!!!
Jesus - read through the material.
Damn man...
Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
>Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are
>easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen
>anything in those emails that debunks the science.
Read the exchange between Keiller and Briffa at the bottom of this
analysis.
Neither one was answered.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024995.php
In fact, read the whole thing.
H the K
Pimping that right-wing blog again, eh?
Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
>
>
>> I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't
>> need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on
>> non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but
>> they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is
>> turning out, is a bogus crisis.
>
>How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you
>know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"?
>
>> Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows
>> over.
>
>Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than
>is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science
>*is* doing it's job.
It's not if data sets are hidden and results are not properly analyzed
and/or included to advance a public policy agenda.
>For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of
>smoking gun, you may want to consider:
>
>"More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
>evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
>nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to �get rid of the
>MWP�, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
>falsifying of data, and no �marching orders� from our socialist/communist/
>vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the
>hackers also being in on the plot though."
>
>From:
>
>http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/
Oh please - here's the "directorship" of RealClimate.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/category/extras/contributor-bios/
Notice a prominent name there? And Schmidt isn't exaclty an objective
observer - he's participated in this data fraud and is a prominent
eco-warrior.
I don't know a lot about Dr. Ammann but I noticed a couple of
interesting things in his CV - most notably this: IPCC AR4 Reviewer
Synthesis Report, Chapter 9 and contributing author.
Think they might have something to protect here?
I am Tosk
remov...@rejectswsportsdot.org says...
Pretty damning stuff... These folks are full of shit and they know it...
BAR
thunder...@gti.net says...
>
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR wrote:
>
>
> > "University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more
> > than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how
> > many of the stolen items were authentic."
>
> that all of this material is genuine.?
> There was 160 MB of data stolen. Obviously, it would take some time to
> confirm if it was authentic. Obviously, someone who was willing to break
> the law (hacking), and post private information publicly, *might* not be
> above changing the data, if they have an agenda.
Do you realize how simple it is to compare 160 MB worth of data? That is
not even two hours of work. The "University" could verify it but they
won't.
> You don't think they have an agenda, do you?
Everybody has an agenda. The sooner you understand this the sooner you
will cast a suspicious eye at both sides of an issue.
> > This is priceless!
> >
> > If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now.
>
> Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are
> easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen
> anything in those emails that debunks the science.
Debunks the science? How about the Antic Hole. How about the evidence to
the contrary. How about debating your detractors in public. If you are
so damn cocksure of your data and your "science" then it should stand up
the the scrutiny of the sunshine. Put the data into the public domain,
put the "models" into the public domain.
Surely the scene supporting global warming will stand on its own. Unless
the legs upon which it has to stand are balsa wood tooth picks.
I am Tosk
thunder...@gti.net says...
What real science? ;) ;) I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...
H the K
> In article<ANadnXq0YasI2JfW...@posted.gtinet>,
> thunder...@gti.net says...
>>
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
>>
>>
>>> How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
>>> it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
>>> little Harrys...
>>
>> "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
>> science? ;-)
>
> What real science? ;) ;)
Why are you commenting on *science*? Unlikely you completed high school.
BAR
thunder...@gti.net says...
>
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
>
>
> > I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't
> > need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on
> > non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but
> > they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is
> > turning out, is a bogus crisis.
>
> How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you
> know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"?
>
> > Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows
> > over.
>
> Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than
> is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science
> *is* doing it's job.
>
> For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of
> smoking gun, you may want to consider:
>
> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
> evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
> MWP?, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
> falsifying of data, and no ?marching orders? from our socialist/communist/
> vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the
> hackers also being in on the plot though."
>
> From:
>
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/
Your attempt to minimalize the information brought into the public
domain by stating that it can't be a world-wide conspiracy because
George Soros isn't involved is a nice try at deflection.
What we have is a collection of "scientists" from around the world who
saw global warming as a way to fatten their research budgets, bring them
national and international prominence and pad their CV's. The part that
is really nefarious is that they are trying with every "trick" they know
to beat their critics into submission by calling the global warming
deniers at the least and idiots at the most.
Keep pushing the it can't be a conspiracy because George Soros isn't
behind it line of crap if you want.
H the K
Crikey...BAR is another "scientist" who barely completed high school.
RLM
Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.
H the K
You gotta love it when Toskie comments on that which is beyond his
capability of understanding, and that would would science, math,
history, politics, sociology, childrearing and building of boats capable
of being launched into Long Island Sound.
The "over-priced orange towels..."commercial...
Yes, that's something worth pondering and analyzing.
I am Tosk
says...
Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects
started with scale models. Problem?
RLM
The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way
over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard
boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat.
I also suspect you have tried it more than once.
Don White
"H the K" <naled...@mypacks.net> wrote in message
news:7mvmimF...@mid.individual.net...
I could see Snotty trying to pitch 'ShamWow' cloths....pony tail & all.
He'd make that Vince guy look like a movie star.
I am Tosk
And I suppose you find yourself much more qualified? <ploink>
H the K
> He'd make that Vince guy look like a movie star.
>
>
A new nick - Scotty Sham-Wow!
H the K
> In article<hee987$nud$1...@news.eternal-september.org>, R...@127.0.0.1
Everyone is more qualified, Scotty Sham-wow.
RLM
<ploink>
Thank you!
H the K
If only Snotty Scotty would "ploink" himself...and mean it, this time.
RLM
<ploink>
Thank you!
RLM
> On 11/23/09 10:37 AM, RLM wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:26:23 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
>>
>> <ploink>
>> Thank you!
>>
>
> If only Snotty Scotty would "ploink" himself...and mean it, this time.
He believes himself to be a great leader on Usenet and can't help himself.
Let him relish in his corner of fame.
John H
wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
How do you know what was or wasn't said? According to your site,
"Update: The official UEA statement is as follows:
�We are aware that information from a server used for research
information
in one area of the university has been made available on public
websites,�
the spokesman stated.
�Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently
confirm
that all of this material is genuine.�"
Hell, even the UEA cannot confirm what is or is not in the material.
Perhaps the folks you quoted don't know what they're talking about?
Perhaps you're a little quick to quote?
--
John H
jps
<groun...@snerkville.com> wrote:
>On 11/22/09 5:49 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H<salmo...@gmail.dotcom>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>>
>> And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent
>> and supress free and open scientific discovery.
>>
>> Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann.
>>
>> This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else
>> in modern history.
>>
>> He should be put in jail to rot forever.
>
>
>Uh-huh...and with your non-existent reputation in peer-reviewed science,
>you should be placed in hack with your BFF Shortshit Ingersoll.
Thirty days in the hole with an insurance salesman.
John H
And what do you call yourself?
You attempted to steer the conversation away from the facts, that much
of the 'science' is made up bullshit.
Good try.
--
John H
John H
<remov...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H <salmo...@gmail.dotcom>
>wrote:
>
>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>
>Talk about shameless...
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ
Wonder how much money Gore contributed to that pile of shit.
--
John H
John H
<remov...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John H <salmo...@gmail.dotcom>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
>><remov...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H <salmo...@gmail.dotcom>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>>>
>>>And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent
>>>and supress free and open scientific discovery.
>>>
>>>Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann.
>>>
>>>This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else
>>>in modern history.
>>>
>>>He should be put in jail to rot forever.
>>
>>Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it.
>>
>>Another f*ing joke!
>
>You want to see how it all unfolded?
>
>John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files.
>
>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024995.php
>
>I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while
>he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a
>smile on his face today.
>
>Real science might actually win the day.
That was a great article. The part about the tree rings was
fascinating. My brother, the atheist liberal, is a 'tree scientist'
recently retired from Weyerhauser. He, of course, is a firm believer
that man has caused every bit of global warming.
We aren't talking now, or I'd get his reaction to the blog. Actually,
he'd just be pissed and shoot the messenger.
--
John H
JustWaitAFrekinMinute!
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:22:21 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
>
> >On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H <salmonb...@gmail.dotcom>
> >wrote:
>
> >>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>
> >Talk about shameless...
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ
>
> Wonder how much money Gore contributed to that pile of shit.
> --
>
> John H
I am sure he considered it more of an investment, than a
contribution...
John H
wrote:
>On Nov 22, 9:22�pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
><removeem...@rejectswsportsdot.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H <salmonb...@gmail.dotcom>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>>
>> Talk about shameless...
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ
>
>That was gross!
>
>i agree witht he commenter that said "It reminds me of the people
>jumping to their deaths on 9/11. What is wrong? with the people who
>think this stuff up?"
They think Al Gore is cool.
--
John H
Rob
> He'd make that Vince guy look like a movie star.
>
>
You could "see" that, dummy? You are really a fucked up mess. Go paint
something.
Rob
I am Tosk
Loogypicker
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:32:06 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John H <salmonb...@gmail.dotcom>
> >wrote:
>
> >>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
>
> >>>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H <salmonb...@gmail.dotcom>
> >>>wrote:
>
> >>>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#printMode
>
> >>>And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent
> >>>and supress free and open scientific discovery.
>
> >>>Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann.
>
> >>>This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else
> >>>in modern history.
>
> >>>He should be put in jail to rot forever.
>
> >>Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it.
>
> >>Another f*ing joke!
>
> >You want to see how it all unfolded?
>
> >John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files.
>
> >http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024995.php
>
> >I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while
> >he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a
> >smile on his face today.
>
> >Real science might actually win the day.
>
> That was a great article. The part about the tree rings was
> fascinating. My brother, the atheist liberal, is a 'tree scientist'
> recently retired from Weyerhauser. He, of course, is a firm believer
> that man has caused every bit of global warming.
>
> We aren't talking now, or I'd get his reaction to the blog. Actually,
> he'd just be pissed and shoot the messenger.
> --
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah, those scientists, what in hell do they know? It's not like they
know as much about science as conservative politicians, Rush and
Hannity et al.
I am Tosk
@e7g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>, loogy...@gmail.com says...
Well, the scientists who found the problems with the research know that
they have been threatened with violence. How come you only acknowledge
the scientists who agree with you, since there are so many who don't?
Listen, when is enough of the "science" being fudged going to convince
you that there is something wrong there?
John H
You should read a little, Loog. It's all about *those scientists*.
--
John H
RLM
There are never any facts. Only opinion or mindless links as if no one
knows what a search engine is. Provided most of the time as OT BS from
Tommy and the band of losers that include you. It is repetitious on a
daily basis and boring much the same as you.
It must be for points to be the most prolific posters of the group
that no longer has a subject to discuss. It has become the losers support
group of the last election chat room.
Wayne B. will come by to stroke any bruised egos.
Great place if you have a stick to poke and prod. Watch the losers squirm.
Get over it!
RLM
Then he was a lot smarter than you and had a real job that contributed to
society. Didn't spend thirty years and still hanging on the government's
tit as it were.
I read somewhere that athiest is the fastest growing belief
now. Imagin that, no recruters or nothing to preach and still
growing. Maybe a phase shift in the galaxy. Sounds as good as global
climate chamge pro and con thread.
H the K
Facts get in the way.
H the K
RLM
Spelling is the least of my concerns today. Thank you, I can make it worse
to get it phonic only. It will fit in better in this group.
H the K
Not my post...one of the idiots is spoofing my id here. Might be loogy.
RLM
This group is getting to be a bunch of ding-a-lings that have less value
than a glass of water. I refuse to be put out by anyone here. I may
sharpen my stick if I please. Some need the fear of a god in their lives.
It will lead them down the path of Easter Island but I won't live that
long.
RLM
Achmed
H the K
I block both of them, even if they are the same idiot :>) .
Loogypicker
> On 11/24/09 10:29 AM, RLM wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:24:09 -0500, H the K wrote:
>
> >> RLM wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:28:27 -0500, John H wrote:
>
> >>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:32:06 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
>
> >>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John H<salmonb...@gmail.dotcom>
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H
You'd be wrong you idiot.
John H
That would be a shame. We'd hate to lose you.
--
John H