Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"You guys really go after someone for spilling 2 ounces, I asked?"

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Tim

unread,
Feb 1, 2012, 11:13:53 PM2/1/12
to
Wow, these guys are really getting serious.. or is it 'nit-picky?

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2017387034_danny01.html

Happy John

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 8:01:21 AM2/2/12
to
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:13:53 -0800 (PST), Tim <tsch...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Wow, these guys are really getting serious.. or is it 'nit-picky?
>
>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2017387034_danny01.html

Probably a serious response and then nit-picky when the guy started acting 'assholish'. Perhaps a
wee bit 'apologetic' may have been a more appropriate response?

*e#c

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 2:45:05 PM2/2/12
to
On Feb 1, 11:13 pm, Tim <tschna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, these guys are really getting serious.. or is it 'nit-picky?
>
> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2017387034_danny0...

A Shot Glass is TWO ounces? No wonder I geet so hammered !!!

Tim

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 7:46:43 PM2/2/12
to
On Feb 2, 7:01 am, Happy John <salmonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:13:53 -0800 (PST), Tim <tschna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Wow, these guys are really getting serious.. or is it 'nit-picky?
>
> >http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2017387034_danny0...
>
> Probably a serious response and then nit-picky when the guy started acting 'assholish'. Perhaps a
> wee bit 'apologetic' may have been a more appropriate response?

I was gonna say....
0 new messages