Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Difference between the 3.0L & 3.0 LX Mercs?

1,308 views
Skip to first unread message

da...@cris.com

unread,
May 19, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/19/96
to

I know this is getting sort of specific but does anyone know what the
difference is between these 2 models? They've been around for a while
so I thought maybe somebody's heard or been into them. Manual doesn't
say. Mine's in a 17' Searay.

Danny
d...@cris.com


Bill Walker

unread,
May 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/23/96
to

In article <4novj5$1...@tribune.concentric.net>, da...@cris.com wrote:

>I know this is getting sort of specific but does anyone know what the
>difference is between these 2 models?

[...]
The LX has more horsepower. If I recall correctly, the numbers used to
160 vs. 185, but I think the current LX makes more than that. I don't
recall how they got the extra power, but I'd guess it might be a different
manifold, maybe a different cam, and perhaps a 4-barrel carb.
----------------------------------------------
Bill Walker, QUALCOMM, Inc., San Diego, CA USA
WWa...@qualcomm.com

Dave & Carole

unread,
May 24, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/24/96
to

According to Trailer Boats magazine the 3.0LX has a different head,
intake manifold and camshaft. This means better breathing for enhanced
top end.

Don Mahony

unread,
May 25, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/25/96
to

This is only a guess, but I understand on the 4.3L V6 the LX means a
four barrel carb is used instead of a standard two barrel unit.

Don

da...@cris.com wrote:

>I know this is getting sort of specific but does anyone know what the

da...@cris.com

unread,
May 27, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/27/96
to

>According to Trailer Boats magazine the 3.0LX has a different head,
>intake manifold and camshaft. This means better breathing for enhanced
>top end.

Thanks. I guess theres goes my hop up plans. Mucho $.

Danny
d...@cris.com


Dave & Carole

unread,
May 27, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/27/96
to

Hello, it's dlo again. Thanks for responding to my reply. This follow
up post might make you feel a little better. I didn't mention in my
earlier post that all the changes in the LX only amount to 7 or 8 hp
increase (according to the same Trailer Boats magazine article).
I think that you could get the same performance boost in other (cheaper)
ways.
Some suggestions:
1) Lighten load. Take out every unneeded item in your boat.
2) Resurface and wax bottom. It should be perfectly straight.
3) Tune up motor
4) Install a stainless steel prop

R.W. Odell

unread,
May 28, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/28/96
to

da...@cris.com wrote:
>
> >According to Trailer Boats magazine the 3.0LX has a different head,
> >intake manifold and camshaft. This means better breathing for enhanced
> >top end.
>
> Thanks. I guess theres goes my hop up plans. Mucho $.
>
> Danny
> d...@cris.com

I once upgraded a 5.0L to a 5.0 LX with these items. I had the shop do
the work and it cost $988, in 1991 $'s. It was more than worth it, as
fuel consumption overall was down, poweband width was much greater, and
top speed improved as well.

The total parts cost was about $500, as I recall.

acss...@acs.eku.edu

unread,
May 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/30/96
to

In article <31A9DF...@inreach.com>, Dave & Carole <d...@inreach.com> writes:
> Hello, it's dlo again. Thanks for responding to my reply. This follow
> up post might make you feel a little better. I didn't mention in my
> earlier post that all the changes in the LX only amount to 7 or 8 hp
> increase (according to the same Trailer Boats magazine article).
> I think that you could get the same performance boost in other (cheaper)
> ways.
> Some suggestions:
> 1) Lighten load. Take out every unneeded item in your boat.
> 2) Resurface and wax bottom. It should be perfectly straight.
> 3) Tune up motor
> 4) Install a stainless steel prop


I don't think these changes are going to get more than a couple mph
unless

1) he is seriously overloaded
2) has a very bad bottom (if it's that bad, send it back)
3) has a very poorly tuned engine

I missed the original post, so I don't know the original poster's goal.
But, if he is looking for top end, a swap to a faster boat is probably the
best option in the long run. If he is looking for modest gains in
acceleration and skiability, a prop change might accomplish that.
Try some 4, 5, or 6 bladed props, or one of the variable pitched props.

The little 4 cyl engines are good dependable, economical engines, but
there is only so much performance you can squeeze out of them...

Good luck,
Dudley Cornman
Systems Programmer
Academic Computing Services - EKU
ACSS...@ACS.EKU.EDU

********************************************************************
*** When it comes to boats... ***
*** I'd rather have a new boat than a used boat... ***
*** I'd rather have a Baja than a Bayliner... ***
*** I'd rather have a used Bayliner than no boat at all... ***
********************************************************************


Graham Lea

unread,
Jun 15, 1996, 3:00:00 AM6/15/96
to

"R.W. Odell" <rod...@atl.com> wrote:
>I once upgraded a 5.0L to a 5.0 LX with these items. I had the shop do
>the work and it cost $988, in 1991 $'s. It was more than worth it, as
>fuel consumption overall was down, poweband width was much greater, and
>top speed improved as well.
>The total parts cost was about $500, as I recall.
Does anyone know if there is a Mercury site on the web where the
differences are explained?
Their brochures give *little* information on the differences...


da...@cris.com

unread,
Jun 20, 1996, 3:00:00 AM6/20/96
to

No. But on the L vs. the LX, some people have responded to me(I'm the
original poster) that the heads, intake and exh. manifold are all
different.

Danny
d...@cris.com


0 new messages