Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Boating and Sailing Instruction Web Ring

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Jack Dale

unread,
Jun 10, 2001, 11:13:04 PM6/10/01
to
Do you maintain a web site associated with boating and sailing instruction?
If so you might consider joining a Web Ring devoted to that topic. Check it
out at:

http://nav.webring.yahoo.com/hub?ring=boatingandsaili3&id=1&hub

Jack

--
__________________________________________________
Jack Dale Sailing
ISPA and CYA Instruction
http://members.attcanada.ca/~jds/
Phone: (403)239-1429 Cell: (403)861-5296
Ringmaster Boating and Sailing Instruction on the Internet
http://nav.webring.yahoo.com/hub?ring=boatingandsaili3
As I sail I praise God, and care not. (Luke Foxe)
__________________________________________________

alex2000

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 2:44:33 AM6/12/01
to
I am involoved withn company specilising in producing deck shoes.

If anyone has any thoughts on what is good/bad about them or how they could
be improved I would like to hear your comments.

Many Thanks

Peter


Mine

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 6:16:09 AM6/12/01
to
Offer replacement shoe laces that match the color of your deck shoes. I am
tired of buying leather shoes laces and having to dye them to match my
shoes.

d parker

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 7:35:53 AM6/12/01
to
I work and live in them. I have had good and bad. To date Sperry win all the
prizes. If I get 6 months out of a pair I am doing well. The current pair of
Sperrys I have are currently 9 months old. Beat that and you'll win me. Send
me a pair I will let you know. No joke there either.

DP
alex2000 wrote in message ...

d parker

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 7:41:20 AM6/12/01
to
Oh yeah, put mpx or similar in them. It wont stop "splash" water getting in
at the ankles, but it will keep the toes dry after standing in a shallow
pool of water.

DP
d parker wrote in message
<3b25fe41$0$25472$7f31...@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>...

Russell Eberhardt

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 8:05:08 AM6/12/01
to
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:44:33 +0100, "alex2000"
<alex...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:

Put sufficient carbon in the rubber soles so that they are
electrically conductive and I don't get a shock everytime I get out of
the car!

Russell.
TO REPLY BY EMAIL:
Change nospam in reply address to iee

Christine Sheffield

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 8:43:40 AM6/12/01
to
Everybody's sailing shoes are cut too shallow - ie they dont come up the
heel far enough. Also the lacing doesn't come up the top of the foot far
enough towards the leg, so they are too easy to step right out of. I have
to use very long leather laces and put them round behind my ankles and tie
the ends at the front of my ankles to get them to stay on.

I have moccasin-type shoes with very fine wavy cuts in the soles. Apart
from my comments above, these shoes are very comfortable and they grip like
nobody's business!

I do not like soles which are stiff or have a raised pattern - the flatter
the sole the better the grip - especially on wet GRP.

If you can improve on the depth of the shoes and the lacing arrangement. If
you can make ladies shoes which are not too narrow or too pointed or
"girly". If you can make the soles as "grippy" and long-lasting (8 yrs) as
the ones on my current shoes. If you can sell me a pair for under £25
through my local chandler - I am interested!

Christine Sheffield
S/V "Rusalka"
christine...@btinternet.com

"alex2000" <alex...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:VRiV6.12069$jd1.7...@monolith.news.easynet.net...

Al Phillips

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 10:26:22 AM6/12/01
to alex2000

1. Make sure the sole is thick enough to absorb shock. I WILL NOT BUY
DECK SHOES WITH SKINNY SOLES.

2. They should stay on your feet when wading in knee deep water.

3. The sides should not come up so high as to rub the ankles. (Not a
problem with most designs.)

Glenn Ashmore

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 11:04:07 AM6/12/01
to
Agreed! I cannot stand the two hole boat shoes with leather laces. They are
easy to get on but you can slide out of them on any kind of heel and they
constantly require retying.

Most of the shoe manufacturers are offering at least one model built more like an
athletic shoe with fancy molded sole patterns. They stay on your feet but they
don't seem to have the grip of the razor cut soles on fiberglass decks.

I have to confess though that my favorite boating foot wear is the Teva Spinnaker
sandle. Fully adjustable and reasonably good grip. Teva has come a long way
from the cursed deck bkackeners of old.

Al Phillips wrote:

--
Glenn Ashmore

I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there
of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com

Rosalie B.

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 11:30:21 AM6/12/01
to
"alex2000" <alex...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:

I personally love the LLBean boat shoes. I have to get men's shoes because
most women's shoes aren't wide enough. They are leather moccasins with
white soles (small flat close together slashed pattern on the bottom), and
I never have trouble with slipping. I don't like to have to lace shoes up.
They do fine even when I wade around in the water. Sometimes they come un
stitched over the big toe joint, and they have to be broken in. When you
first get them they are too tight and pinch, but if you break them in
carefully (without getting blisters), they can be worn without socks.

I like to be able to get them on and off easily. I'd really rather be
barefoot, but my husband won't let me. He has very tender feet.

grandma Rosalie

bad_sneakers

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 12:32:34 PM6/12/01
to
Another point about deck shoes.... they go on easily so they can come
off easily. If you get dumped in the drink you want to be able to
kick them off easily without having to reach down.


"alex2000" <alex...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:<VRiV6.12069$jd1.7...@monolith.news.easynet.net>...

Mayday

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 2:55:09 PM6/12/01
to
Christine,

Sperry made years ago what I think you are looking for. My wife and I each
bought a couple pair at a close out sale. They had the standard sperry non-skid
sole (flat, no raised pattern). Cut more like an oxford than a moccasin, with a
higher heel and side, with 3 (maybe 4) lace holes bringing it further up the
arch. They were an unfinished leather rather than smooth. The only downside is
they continually when soaked turned your socks orange.

Jim

Christine Sheffield wrote:

--
Jim "Mayday" Mady
http://www.floatplan.com
http://members.aol.com/myescobedo


Capt.Mooron

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 4:23:23 PM6/12/01
to
Oz... with that statement you have identified yourself as a pussy, sunday
sailing, prissy deck, anal, white pants after May 1st, navy blue jacket and
Capt's hat wearing, got a boat-must be a sailor, pansy!

This whole thread on "Deck Shoes" is a farce! Deck Shoes are an overpriced
unneeded item better regulated to people that spend more time entertaining
on their boats than sailing them.

I imagine your boat at the dock with a set of carpets and a foot bath.

--
Capt. Mooron ©
S.V.Overproof
"Treat your Crew with Disdain.... and other Vessels with Distaste"
"Oz1" <ozsa...@hotmail.com> wrote in message


> ><alex...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >Put sufficient carbon in the rubber soles so that they are
> >electrically conductive and I don't get a shock everytime I get out of
> >the car!
> >
> >Russell.
> >TO REPLY BY EMAIL:
> >Change nospam in reply address to iee
>

> You wear them in the car, walk thru the carpark them climb onboard?
>
> I, personally, would throw both you and you shoes overboard.
>
> Oz


Message has been deleted

Hugh Davison

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 7:20:30 PM6/12/01
to
And will make your feet stink too.
(from experience with the Goretex lining in my Dubarrys).
Hugh

"d parker" <davep...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:3b25ff87$0$25513$7f31...@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...

Buck Frobisher

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 7:25:20 PM6/12/01
to
I'm with Christine! Make them like the old Sperry "Topsiders", we'll all be
happy!

--
"Stay calm. Be brave. Wait for the signs."

regards,

Frank Johansen
Aurora, Ontario


Buck Frobisher

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 7:27:29 PM6/12/01
to
here, here. I wear a 12 narrow (C, standard men's width is D). of course,
it's too much to expect deck shoes in widths!

--
"Stay calm. Be brave. Wait for the signs."

regards,

Frank Johansen
Aurora, Ontario

"Simon Earle" <simon...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9g5v2g$3ut$1...@neptunium.btinternet.com...
> They should come in size 13...
>
>


Buck Frobisher

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 7:31:30 PM6/12/01
to
btw, Peter (or ALEX2000), you should run the spell checker on your NG
software.

--
"Stay calm. Be brave. Wait for the signs."

regards,

Frank Johansen
Aurora, Ontario

"alex2000" <alex...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:VRiV6.12069$jd1.7...@monolith.news.easynet.net...

Buck Frobisher

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 7:33:57 PM6/12/01
to
Bingo! the "Topsider". Coolest runners when I was in high school (too many
years ago).

--
"Stay calm. Be brave. Wait for the signs."

regards,

Frank Johansen
Aurora, Ontario

"Mayday" <may...@floatplan.com> wrote in message
news:3B26657B...@floatplan.com...


> Christine,
>
> Sperry made years ago what I think you are looking for. My wife and I
each
> bought a couple pair at a close out sale. They had the standard sperry
non-skid
> sole (flat, no raised pattern). Cut more like an oxford than a moccasin,
with a
> higher heel and side, with 3 (maybe 4) lace holes bringing it further up
the
> arch. They were an unfinished leather rather than smooth. The only
downside is
> they continually when soaked turned your socks orange.
>
> Jim

<snip>


edgar cove

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 6:32:29 PM6/12/01
to
In article <94dcits82povs4uj2...@4ax.com>, Rosalie B.
<gmbe...@mindspring.com> writes

> I'd really rather be
>barefoot, but my husband won't let me. He has very tender feet.
>
>grandma Rosalie
What is the connection between his 'tender' feet and your own needs,
Rosalie?
--
edgar (remove nospam from return address for e-mail reply)

Rosalie B.

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 9:14:41 PM6/12/01
to
edgar cove <ed...@nospam.coves.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In article <94dcits82povs4uj2...@4ax.com>, Rosalie B.
><gmbe...@mindspring.com> writes
>> I'd really rather be
>>barefoot, but my husband won't let me. He has very tender feet.
>>
>>grandma Rosalie
>What is the connection between his 'tender' feet and your own needs,
>Rosalie?

Just that he doesn't understand bare feet because he never goes barefoot.
I learned to walk on gravel barefoot when I was a kid. I go barefoot in
the snow (I do draw the line at thorns etc).

I wear shoes on deck because I see the sense of it, but I wear shoes that I
can get off quickly if I have the choice.

grandma Rosalie

Jack Dale

unread,
Jun 12, 2001, 10:59:34 PM6/12/01
to
I have not noticed the following considerations:

-Removable insoles to speed up drying.
-Drain holes to get water out after a dunking.
-Gum rubber soles.

I am a fan of Harkens. Before they (Saucony) started making much of the shoe
offshore, they were a reasonable price. Now they no longer fit under the
Free Trade Agreement and the duty is brutal.

I recommend that my students use old indoor court shoes (tennis, squash,
volleyball). They work just fine. I know some other instructors who also
use court shoes. I will give old pair of my squash shoes a trail this
summer.

Jack

--
__________________________________________________
Jack Dale Sailing
ISPA and CYA Instruction
http://members.attcanada.ca/~jds/
Phone: (403)239-1429 Cell: (403)861-5296
Ringmaster Boating and Sailing Instruction on the Internet
http://nav.webring.yahoo.com/hub?ring=boatingandsaili3
As I sail I praise God, and care not. (Luke Foxe)
__________________________________________________

"alex2000" <alex...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:VRiV6.12069$jd1.7...@monolith.news.easynet.net...

d parker

unread,
Jun 13, 2001, 2:57:54 AM6/13/01
to
Youre right. I can smell them from here :-0

dp
"Hugh Davison" <hdav...@iol.ie> wrote in message
news:2txV6.6148$IQ2....@news.iol.ie...

Glenn Ashmore

unread,
Jun 13, 2001, 7:37:17 AM6/13/01
to
I have searched in vain for a pair of razor cut gum soled squash court shoes.
Found a pair in London several years ago but Impossible to find here in the US.
They don't last long but have a grab that would make a tree frog jealous.

Jack Dale wrote:

--

hkr...@capuantispam.net

unread,
Jun 13, 2001, 7:54:08 AM6/13/01
to
Glenn Ashmore wrote:
>
> I have searched in vain for a pair of razor cut gum soled squash court shoes.
> Found a pair in London several years ago but Impossible to find here in the US.
> They don't last long but have a grab that would make a tree frog jealous.
>

Glenn:

You're one of the few guys who might appreciate this:

When I was a lad, my father, who was a boat dealer and sometime boat builder,
offered a line of highly finished molded ply soft chine runabouts in 14-21'
size ranges. He only built a few a year, usually over the winter when he and
his shop crews had the time and he wanted to keep everyone employed. They were
similar to a manufactured line called "Wolverine," which he also sold.

The front decks on these boats were traditional, with strips of mahogany and
caulking stripes between. The decks had a slight bow...high in the center and
a drop down to the gunnels. Dad had a fellow who was an absolute "master of
varnish" and who would finish the boats in a spray booth and with a brush. The
boats looked as if they were coated in liquid glass. They were more like
furniture than boats.

Most of the boats were sold with fitted canvas mooring covers. Some of the
buyers kept their boats in the water, on buoys or in a slip. The front decks
were so slick and slippery (they weren't meant to walk on...just to cover a
space forward and to look pretty) that no matter how you tried to snap on the
canvas cover, once all your body weight was on the deck, on top of the cover,
it would slip and slide and you and the cover would end up in the
water--unless you had started fastening the cover from the stern. And no one
ever seemed to do that.

I kept my 15-footer on a mooring. If I covered the boat out there, I'd almost
always slide off into Long Island Sound. It was a rite of passage, I suppose.

Nothing is prettier than a wood boat.


--
Harry Krause
------------

"But I also made it clear to [Vladimir Putin] that it's important to think
beyond the old days of when we had the concept that if we blew each other up,
the world would be safe."Bush 邑ashington, D.C., May 1, 2001

Russell Eberhardt

unread,
Jun 13, 2001, 9:07:40 AM6/13/01
to
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:07:08 GMT, Oz1 <ozsa...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>You wear them in the car, walk thru the carpark them climb onboard?

Yes.

>I, personally, would throw both you and you shoes overboard.

I'd like to see you try. See
http://www.reberhardt.freeserve.co.uk/aikido/russell.htm :0)

Still, I don't suppose I would want to board your boat anyway.

Regards,

ted...@socrates.berkeley.edu

unread,
Jun 13, 2001, 5:27:00 PM6/13/01
to
My first advice would be to use the proper sole material.

I had been racing a small keelboat in Gill Neoprene dingy boots. They were
of wetsuit material with a zipper up the side and a plain rippled sole of
white latex. These were great, even though I tended to tear the neoprene
near the sole by snagging it on cleats, etc.

My next boots were Ronstan neoprene boots of similar construction, but
with fancier soles that wrapped up the sides a bit to protect the
neoprene.

I almost died! The soles on the Ronstans were not latex, but fancy 3-color
elastomer plastic. There was not enough traction on a wet foredeck to be
safe. The "aggressive" tread patern did nothing to help the situation.

If the material is wrong, no tread pattern can make the shoes work on a
wet deck. This may be something that does not go down well in a business
dominated by fashion. My next boots will be boring, old-fashioned Gills.

-tc

In article <VRiV6.12069$jd1.7...@monolith.news.easynet.net>,

rda...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jun 13, 2001, 7:41:00 PM6/13/01
to
Make it easier to replace the soles.

My shoe of choice are Timberlands. They're far more durable (both uppers and
soles) than others I've used.

Jonski

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 4:10:28 AM6/14/01
to
[certain NGs removed]

alex2000 wrote:

>I am involoved withn company specilising in producing deck shoes.
>If anyone has any thoughts on what is good/bad about them or how they could
>be improved I would like to hear your comments.

Just a few simple things:

Support- you're often standing on them for hours at a time, at angles
up to 45 degrees

Grip- aforementioned 45 degrees, and on wet, smooth, pitching surfaces
you need all the grip you can get.

Toe protection- kicking a cleat or bollard is no fun.

Quick drying. Salt resistance. Low odour. Non-marking. Easy removal
when you're the MOB, non-easy removal when you're wading in knee-high
water pulling the dinghy ashore. Durability- they should last more
than a season. Laces that stay tied. Non-chafing when loaded with
dried salt. Quick draining, non-squelching. Cool. Light. Flexible.
Cheap. Oh, and they should look good too.

(BTW, deck shoes *will* get wet. If I want dry feet, I'll wear sea
boots!)

Finally, when you invent the perfect deck shoe, export them to NZ.
I'll evaluate them against all the other perfect shoes in the
marketplace, and if they stand out, I'll buy them.

Cheers
Jon (not being very fussy at all!)


=========================
Young 88 "Dynamo" K3883
=========================

Jonski

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 4:10:29 AM6/14/01
to
Glenn Ashmore wrote:

>I have to confess though that my favorite boating foot wear is the Teva Spinnaker
>sandle. Fully adjustable and reasonably good grip. Teva has come a long way
>from the cursed deck bkackeners of old.

Ditto. Unfortunately, Tiva no longer exports this model to NZ.
Fortunately, I found an end-of-line outlet selling them at 50% of
retail.

Cheers
Jon

Jonski

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 4:10:30 AM6/14/01
to
hkr...@capuantispam.net wrote:

>Nothing is prettier than a wood boat.

Agreed, with a few exceptions.

However, (with all due respect) the ones your father built sound
rather impractible with paintjobs like that.

The need for beauty shouldn't override the need for safety /
practicality, especially as to a trained eye, form follows function.

David Maslen

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 9:21:58 AM6/14/01
to
alex2000 wrote:
>I am involoved withn company specilising in producing deck shoes. If
>anyone has any thoughts on what is good/bad about them or how they
>could be improved I would like to hear your comments.

At the risk of sounding vain. I judge a boat shoe on looks in addition
to function. I agree with the comments about 45 degree angles, and
grip is pretty critical, but I wear my boat shoes in the yacht club
and at home too. They are really quite comfortable, and an extension
of the boating lifestyle which I enjoy.

My choice of shoe, is the Logan boat-shoe. A NZ company. I believe they
are made in China, and they definitely aren't the cheapest shoe by the
time they reach Australia, but I haven't regret the purchase.

As somebody else said, I put on my sea-boots when I want my feat to
stay dry. So often my deck shoes will be worn only until I'm on board!


Meir Riba

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 1:30:07 PM6/14/01
to
1. Quick-drying material, (venting holes are a help, also for breathing)
2. Non skid sole.
3. Non-skid area wraps up the boot to enable non skidding in various foot
position.
4. Sturdy plastic zipper in ankle high boots, Velcro (as opposed to laces)
for sneakers.
5. Not too expensive.
6. Light colour, non-marking sole.
7. Machine washable.
8. Immune to high power cleaning substances in the unpleasant event of
getting soiled.


--
Meir Riba
meir...@inter.net.il
<ted...@socrates.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message
news:9g8lr4$18o2$1...@agate.berkeley.edu...

Ian Wright

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 3:13:23 PM6/14/01
to
People will buy and use whatever they chose, naturally, but deck shoes
costing over £100 are a fashion item in the same way as other
"sports"footwear is.
For inexpensive boat shoes go for cheap, under £10, Squash shoes. Buy
two or three pairs to stand a chance of finding a dry pair to wear.
Better still, go barefoot. Feet are waterproof and as non-slip as
anything glued to the sole of an over priced moccasin.
For comfort in the cabin get carpet slippers.
I'm very well aware that no one will take this advice but it is
nevertheless good advice and I publish it again as a public duty. You
never know, one day folk might get tired of being conned out of their
cash and wise up a little,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but I doubt it.

Ian Wright, Patience, Vertue 203

Doug Dotson

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 4:34:56 PM6/14/01
to
Several years ago a friend I used to race with read an article
in Sailing World (is that right? the one that is racing oriented by USSA).
The artical related the fact that the Gill dingy boots were
death traps. It was the ones that laced, not zipped. Short,
ankle high, gray, I think they were Gill. Several racers had
drowned because they would fill with water and drag you
down before you could get them unlaced. Maybe the zippered
version was the solution.

Incidently, my SO and I just bought the new Gill boots which
are breathable GoreTex. A bit pricey but they are THE most
comfortable boat boots I have ever had. Nancy has orthopedic
insoles in hers.

GoreTex: If Al Gore and Bush Lite had been running mates?

Doug
S/V Callista

Doug Dotson

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 4:35:02 PM6/14/01
to
Ever stand on a wood deck in bare feet? How does that song go?
"The Deck Is HOT, HOT, HOT". When I got into sailing my
father taught me three things: "no glass on deck", "no barefeet", and
"sailbot racers are assholes". (Sorry racers but that's what he told
me).
I eventually learned that 1) broken glass is sharp, 2) deck hardware
is hard, and 3) only some sailboat racers are assholes.

Shoes good -- burn't cut feet bad!

Doug

steve thomas

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 7:34:41 PM6/14/01
to
Other than "style" why would anyone want leather laces?

Glenn Ashmore <gash...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3B262F66...@mindspring.com...
> Agreed! I cannot stand the two hole boat shoes with leather laces. They
are
> easy to get on but you can slide out of them on any kind of heel and they
> constantly require retying.
>
> Most of the shoe manufacturers are offering at least one model built more
like an
> athletic shoe with fancy molded sole patterns. They stay on your feet
but they
> don't seem to have the grip of the razor cut soles on fiberglass decks.


>
> I have to confess though that my favorite boating foot wear is the Teva
Spinnaker
> sandle. Fully adjustable and reasonably good grip. Teva has come a long
way
> from the cursed deck bkackeners of old.
>

> Al Phillips wrote:


>
> > alex2000 wrote:
> > >
> > > I am involoved withn company specilising in producing deck shoes.
> > >
> > > If anyone has any thoughts on what is good/bad about them or how they
could
> > > be improved I would like to hear your comments.
> >

> > 1. Make sure the sole is thick enough to absorb shock. I WILL NOT BUY
> > DECK SHOES WITH SKINNY SOLES.
> >
> > 2. They should stay on your feet when wading in knee deep water.
> >
> > 3. The sides should not come up so high as to rub the ankles. (Not a
> > problem with most designs.)

Glenn Ashmore

unread,
Jun 14, 2001, 7:39:55 PM6/14/01
to

steve thomas wrote:

> Other than "style" why would anyone want leather laces?

I didn't say anybody would WANT them but every pair of Sperry topsiders or
Seabago mocs I ever saw had raw hide leather laces. The ones that run around
the heel and are almost impossible to replace.

MB

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 4:04:43 AM6/15/01
to
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:34:56 -0400, Doug Dotson <ddo...@digidata.com>
wrote:

>Several years ago a friend I used to race with read an article
>in Sailing World (is that right? the one that is racing oriented by USSA).
>The artical related the fact that the Gill dingy boots were
>death traps. It was the ones that laced, not zipped. Short,
>ankle high, gray, I think they were Gill. Several racers had
>drowned because they would fill with water and drag you
>down before you could get them unlaced. Maybe the zippered
>version was the solution.

That's a myth- how can water filled boots drag you under? Water in
boots weighs the same as water outside the boots- net effect no
apparent weight.

I've fallen in the sea several times wearing normal sea boots and can
swim quite happily with them, the only problem which arises is when
you pull yourself out of the water as water filled boots in air are
heavy, but not enough to cause massive problems.

Mine

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 4:30:35 AM6/15/01
to
Forget the deck shoes and do like the commercial fisherman do. Get yourself
a pair of cajun reeboks and they work fine on wet slippery surfaces. White
shrimp boots.


rjh...@ucs.ed.ac.uk

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 6:35:50 AM6/15/01
to
Ian Wright <i...@vertue.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
> Better still, go barefoot. Feet are waterproof and as non-slip as
> anything glued to the sole of an over priced moccasin.

Hooray!

> For comfort in the cabin get carpet slippers.

I have sailed with two folks who used carpet slippers 0 one of them also
had an embroidered silk dressing own as well for below-decks...

RH

MB

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 7:42:43 AM6/15/01
to
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:30:35 -0500, "Mine" <sar...@gs.verio.net>
wrote:

>Forget the deck shoes and do like the commercial fisherman do. Get yourself
>a pair of cajun reeboks and they work fine on wet slippery surfaces. White
>shrimp boots.


I thought shrimps wore pink boots,,,
>

Al Levesque

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 8:20:40 AM6/15/01
to
Doug Dotson wrote:

> .... Several racers had drowned because they would fill with water and drag you


> down before you could get them unlaced. Maybe the zippered
> version was the solution.

Try the float test. Be sure to do both at the same time. Nothing
more useless that the mate to a boot that didn't float. ;)

Al

Rosalie B.

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 11:13:18 AM6/15/01
to
rjh...@ucs.ed.ac.uk wrote:

>Ian Wright <i...@vertue.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
>> Better still, go barefoot. Feet are waterproof and as non-slip as
>> anything glued to the sole of an over priced moccasin.
>

Actually they are not. My feet slip more on the cabin top than my boat
shoes do, especially if it is a little wet. I was told that the reason
there were so many peg leg sailors was because of foot injuries that became
gangrenous and had to be amputated. It is also virtually impossible (for
me anyway) to keep from hitting hard angular stuff with my foot when the
boat is pitching around.


>
>> For comfort in the cabin get carpet slippers.
>
>I have sailed with two folks who used carpet slippers 0 one of them also
>had an embroidered silk dressing own as well for below-decks...

For comfort in the cabin I go barefoot. If it is really cold I wear
thermal socks. On shore, if the dock is wood I wear shoes because of
splinters (most wood docks seem to be splintery).

grandma Rosalie

ted...@socrates.berkeley.edu

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 2:08:04 PM6/15/01
to
I tested my Gill zip-up neoprene boots and I found that the air in the
neoprene gives then significant floatation. And because they fit rather
closely, there will not be much extra water to lift back on board.

-tc


In article <3B29FD98...@cove.com>,

Message has been deleted

Ian Wright

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 4:36:55 PM6/15/01
to
On 15 Jun 2001 10:35:50 GMT, rjh...@ucs.ed.ac.uk wrote:


>I have sailed with two folks who used carpet slippers 0 one of them also
>had an embroidered silk dressing own as well for below-decks...
>
>RH

And why not,,,,,,,,?
It ain't hard to be comfortable on a boat and only a damn fool would
put up with discomfort when he needn't.
There are still people sleeping under hairy blankets or in restrictive
sleeping bags when a cotton under sheet and a duvet are SO much more
comfy. Beats me why they do it

Ian Wright, Patience, Vertue 203.

edgar cove

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 4:00:29 PM6/15/01
to
In article <s4tjit86fkk2hvpki...@4ax.com>, MB
<m...@smb.ac.uk> writes
Only after they have been boiled

Capt.Mooron

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 7:11:47 PM6/15/01
to
Okay... let me get this right.... a pair of rubber boots that weigh maybe 4
lbs ( 3lbs in water) fill with water and "drag you down" ?????
Ha-Ha-Ha! I guess that the 35lb lift in the Life Jacket couldn't compensate
for the ballast eh? what utter complete nonsense! To prove another of those
Yacht Club Sailors wrong... I swam the 100 meters to shore wearing my jeans,
and steel toed work boots with no difficulty.
Can't Swim?.... stay the Hell off the water!

--
Capt. Mooron Š
S.V.Overproof
"Treat your Crew with Disdain.... and other Vessels with Distaste"
"Doug Dotson" <ddo...@digidata.com> wrote in message
news:3B291FF0...@digidata.com...

Don White

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 8:39:28 PM6/15/01
to
Don't you mean 'stay out of the water'?
Lots of commercial fisherman up here don't swim and do just fine.....


Capt.Mooron wrote:
>

> Can't Swim?.... stay the Hell off the water!
>
> --

> Capt. Mooron ©

Ian Wright

unread,
Jun 16, 2001, 8:59:44 AM6/16/01
to
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:13:18 -0400, Rosalie B.
>
>>Ian Wright <i...@vertue.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
>>> Better still, go barefoot. Feet are waterproof and as non-slip as
>>> anything glued to the sole of an over priced moccasin.
>>
>Actually they are not. My feet slip more on the cabin top than my boat
>shoes do, especially if it is a little wet.


Well, OK. Different folk and different ships,,,,,,,
Barefoot on deck works for me, as long as it's not too cold, I have
teak decks and good non-slip deck paint on the cabin top. In addition
to which the working area round the mast is well provided with 1/2
inch X 1/4 inch teak strips which help a lot. I don't stub my toes
'cos I know where everything is,,,,, and use the otherwise stubbable
objects as places to brace against, so I get by fine.
However, in years past I had a pair of Dubarry deck boots, a Xmas
gift, and they were wonderful. As comfortable as any deck shoe,
genuinely waterproof until the water crept over the top, and good
non-slip soles. I didn't replace them when they wore out 'cos I didn't
want to spend £150.
Deck shoes at any price are imo a waste of time here in the UK, they
just ensure that wet feet stay wet at great expense.


,,,,,,, but I still stand by carpet slippers down below, sheer
bliss,,,,,,,!

Keith Wood

unread,
Jun 16, 2001, 9:16:09 AM6/16/01
to

Ian Wright wrote:

> Deck shoes at any price are imo a waste of time here in the UK, they
> just ensure that wet feet stay wet at great expense.

You can say the same thing about the bonnet on any Brit roadster.

;)

Ian Wright

unread,
Jun 16, 2001, 11:46:28 AM6/16/01
to
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:16:09 +0000, Keith Wood <k...@bctv.com> wrote:

> wet feet stay wet at great expense.
>
>You can say the same thing about the bonnet on any Brit roadster.
>
>;)

You could,,,,,,,,, if bonnet meant soft top and not hood,,,,,,, and
by roadster I assume you mean open sports car,,,,,?

IanW.

Keith Wood

unread,
Jun 16, 2001, 12:26:37 PM6/16/01
to

Ian Wright wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:16:09 +0000, Keith Wood <k...@bctv.com> wrote:
>
> > wet feet stay wet at great expense.
> >
> >You can say the same thing about the bonnet on any Brit roadster.
> >
> >;)
> You could,,,,,,,,, if bonnet meant soft top and not hood,,,,,,, and
> by roadster I assume you mean open sports car,,,,,?

I mean what we Americans call the "hood," that thing that goes over the
engine, and guides every drop of water that hits it to the one place
where that drop will leak through the firewall to drip on the driver's
feet (and on the passenger, but only when it is someone the driver is
trying to impress).

Ian Wright

unread,
Jun 16, 2001, 2:21:47 PM6/16/01
to
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 16:26:37 +0000, Keith Wood <k...@bctv.com> wrote:

>
>
>I mean what we Americans call the "hood," that thing that goes over the
>engine, and guides every drop of water that hits it to the one place
>where that drop will leak through the firewall to drip on the driver's
>feet (and on the passenger, but only when it is someone the driver is
>trying to impress).


Oh I see,,,,,,, seems to be that if you went a little faster the rain
would blow past your elbow without the time to creep into the
bodywork,,,,,
More speed Keith, more fastness, or as a Yorkshire motorcyclist might
say "Give it some Thrutch!

Doug Dotson

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 10:43:25 AM6/15/01
to
Didn't Farley Mowatt write a book "The Boot The Wouldn't Float"?
I sometimes here may Canadian friends talk about going "Oat ina Boot".

Doug :)

Doug Dotson

unread,
Jun 15, 2001, 10:40:37 AM6/15/01
to
Dunno, I didn't write the article. But I agree with your point.

Doug

Keith Wood

unread,
Jun 17, 2001, 2:03:03 AM6/17/01
to

Ah, but the designers have prepared for that -- speed up, and the water
flows in between the windshield frame and the soft top.

Capt. Neal®

unread,
Jun 17, 2001, 5:51:54 PM6/17/01
to

Wrong, Keith! We Americans call the place where negroes live
the 'hood'. They even call it that themselves.


"Keith Wood" <k...@bctv.com> wrote in message
news:3B2B88BD...@bctv.com...

rjh...@ucs.ed.ac.uk

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 11:00:47 AM6/18/01
to
Rosalie B. <gmbe...@mindspring.com> writes:
> rjh...@ucs.ed.ac.uk wrote:
>
> >Ian Wright <i...@vertue.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
> >> Better still, go barefoot. Feet are waterproof and as non-slip as
> >> anything glued to the sole of an over priced moccasin.
> >
> Actually they are not. My feet slip more on the cabin top than my boat
> shoes do, especially if it is a little wet.

Depends on deck surface? I usually sail wooden boats these days not
plastic, and baries grip as well as anything on wood.

> I was told that the reason
> there were so many peg leg sailors was because of foot injuries that became
> gangrenous and had to be amputated.

Does your informant also happen to know why so many old sea-dogs have
parrots perched on their shoulders (I just read Treasure Island *again*
and couldn't resist asking...)?

> It is also virtually impossible (for
> me anyway) to keep from hitting hard angular stuff with my foot when the
> boat is pitching around.

Unless you have steel toecaps that'll hurt whether you've got shoes on
or not. In any case, on any sensibly run boat, if it's pitching about a
bit, you'll be down below having tea and a fairy cake with the vicar
won't you?

RH

Ian Wright

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 2:27:20 PM6/18/01
to
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 06:03:03 +0000, Keith Wood <k...@bctv.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>Ah, but the designers have prepared for that -- speed up, and the water
>flows in between the windshield frame and the soft top.

Good Lord man, have you no idea of how things are done,,,,?
You wear a Barbour waxed cotton coat, keep the soft top folded up
neatly in the garage in case you ever sell the car, fold the
windscreen flat for extra speed and keep flies out of your teeth and
hair with leather flying helmet and goggles.
All the above work very well indeed driving a 1936 Morgan three
wheeler. your milage may vary,,,,,,,,,,,

RGrew176

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 9:41:33 PM6/18/01
to
I like my Rockports for use on the boat. Not deck shoes per-se but very
functional for that purpose.

David S Spear

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 5:50:29 PM6/22/01
to
I have lived in boat shoes for extended periods. I like Sperry topsiders for
longevity, but by far the best I have had so far are a pair of Sebago boat
mocs... they are the only mocassin I have tried with any insole support... I
had no problem standing in flat-soled shoes until I hit about age 30; then my
years of bodily abuse started catching up with me.

dave

RGrew176

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 6:06:41 PM6/22/01
to
Although they are not deck shoes I happen to like Rockport Pro Walkers. I have
been using them for several years now and they work very well on the boat.

Capt.Mooron

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 10:03:48 PM6/22/01
to
Excess weight flattening the old soles eh?
Lived in Boat shoes?
Real Mocaains have no "insole support" you pussy!
The only "footwear" should be Barefeet! You can't buy that kind of traction
/ feel / comfort at any price.

Just ask Scotty!,,,, he goes barefoot all the time!

--
Capt. Mooron ©
S.V.Overproof
"Treat your Crew with Disdain.... and other Vessels with Distaste"

"David S Spear" <david....@alcatel.com> wrote in message
news:3B33BDA5...@alcatel.com...

Scøtt Vernøn®

unread,
Jun 23, 2001, 10:55:29 AM6/23/01
to
Nothin feels better than squishin thru a cow pasture in Spring. ;)


Capt.Mooron wrote in message <8OSY6.75$o52....@sapphire.mtt.net>...

MadCow57

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 5:14:29 PM6/24/01
to
> I have sailed with two folks who used carpet slippers 0 one of them also
had an embroidered silk dressing own as well for below-decks...<

>>Just because one is afloat it is no excuse for allowing standards to
drop...<< -- Simon Earle

Aha, that explains why a 44-ft boat I visited recently had a bidet in the
master stateroom head.

Al Rodway

unread,
Jun 25, 2001, 11:34:32 AM6/25/01
to
Was that on the way to the shore for cleaning up your hull for an early launch?

Geoff Harwood

unread,
Jul 22, 2001, 2:02:30 PM7/22/01
to
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 02:03:48 GMT, "Capt.Mooron"
<aer...@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:

>Excess weight flattening the old soles eh?
>Lived in Boat shoes?
>Real Mocaains have no "insole support" you pussy!
>The only "footwear" should be Barefeet! You can't buy that kind of traction
>/ feel / comfort at any price.
>
>Just ask Scotty!,,,, he goes barefoot all the time!

Trouble with barefoot is when there's ice on the deck!

Geoff at 50N 0W!

David Perry

unread,
Jul 22, 2001, 2:35:47 PM7/22/01
to
> >The only "footwear" should be Barefeet! You can't buy that kind of
traction
> >/ feel / comfort at any price.


Thats right. Nor split / shattered toenails that bang you up for a day or
two.

Humans...masters of the universe, belittled by a busted toenail!

David. Martian. No feet that ain't flat.


Rosalie B.

unread,
Jul 22, 2001, 3:18:00 PM7/22/01
to
geoff....@nospamfreenet.co.uk (Geoff Harwood) wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 02:03:48 GMT, "Capt.Mooron"
><aer...@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>Excess weight flattening the old soles eh?
>>Lived in Boat shoes?
>>Real Mocaains have no "insole support" you pussy!
>>The only "footwear" should be Barefeet! You can't buy that kind of traction
>>/ feel / comfort at any price.
>>
>>Just ask Scotty!,,,, he goes barefoot all the time!
>
>Trouble with barefoot is when there's ice on the deck!

My husband has tender feet, but I go barefoot in the snow. For some
reason he doesn't it when I get into bed afterwards<g>. In any case, my
feet are slipperier than my boat shoes.

>>"Treat your Crew with Disdain.... and other Vessels with Distaste"
>>"David S Spear" <david....@alcatel.com> wrote in message
>>news:3B33BDA5...@alcatel.com...
>>> I have lived in boat shoes for extended periods. I like Sperry topsiders
>>for
>>> longevity, but by far the best I have had so far are a pair of Sebago boat
>>> mocs... they are the only mocassin I have tried with any insole support...
>>I
>>> had no problem standing in flat-soled shoes until I hit about age 30; then
>>my
>>> years of bodily abuse started catching up with me.
>>>
>>> dave
>>>
>>> alex2000 wrote:
>>>
>>> > I am involoved withn company specilising in producing deck shoes.
>>> >
>>> > If anyone has any thoughts on what is good/bad about them or how they
>>could
>>> > be improved I would like to hear your comments.
>>> >
>>> > Many Thanks
>>> >
>>> > Peter
>>>
>>
>>

grandma Rosalie

Glenn Ashmore

unread,
Jul 22, 2001, 3:42:38 PM7/22/01
to
And deck cleats and pad eyes and stantion bases and a dozen other things that
have an affinity for toes.

Geoff Harwood wrote:

--
Glenn Ashmore

I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there
of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com

Buck Frobisher

unread,
Jul 22, 2001, 5:34:41 PM7/22/01
to
you forgot bugs!

--
"Stay calm. Be brave. Wait for the signs."

regards,

Frank Johansen
Aurora, Ontario


Glenn Ashmore

unread,
Jul 22, 2001, 7:25:10 PM7/22/01
to
Nah, I sail off shore most of the time. Then again, stepping on a dead
flying fish early in the morning before the coffee can get the day off
to a bad start and pelican poop between the twinkies is not pleasant
either.

Buck Frobisher wrote:

--

Nick Evans

unread,
Jul 23, 2001, 9:07:34 PM7/23/01
to
and a friend of mine got a sewing machine between the toes on his way to the
head one night - quite a spread...


"Glenn Ashmore" <gash...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3B5B60D6...@mindspring.com...

Buck Frobisher

unread,
Jul 23, 2001, 9:09:57 PM7/23/01
to
well I maintain, he forgot the bugs...

"Nick Evans" <nick....@home.com> wrote in message
news:qT377.171318$q51.1...@news1.gvcl1.bc.home.com...

The_navigator©

unread,
Jul 23, 2001, 9:34:49 PM7/23/01
to
But I guess it stitched him up...
Was he in stitches?

Cheers MC

JC

unread,
Jul 23, 2001, 11:00:36 PM7/23/01
to

"Geoff Harwood" <geoff....@nospamfreenet.co.uk> wrote in message

> Trouble with barefoot is when there's ice on the deck!

Or when one impales the ball of his foot on a sharp-profile deck cleat, as I
did. Left parts of me and lots of blood behind on the way to have it
stitched up. I'm a huge believer in not going barefoot on deck now.

Jeff


David Perry

unread,
Jul 25, 2001, 2:06:58 PM7/25/01
to
getting head when I thought I was only in for a pee would certainly have me
in stitches!!!


David
"The_navigator©" <farr...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:3B5CD0B...@excite.com...

Joe Kovacs

unread,
Aug 1, 2001, 11:05:15 PM8/1/01
to
>>> alex2000 wrote:
>>>
>>> > I am involoved withn company specilising in producing deck shoes.
>>> >
>>> > If anyone has any thoughts on what is good/bad about them or how they
>>> > could be improved I would like to hear your comments.
>>> >
>>> > Many Thanks
>>> > Peter

Yah. Speak of the devil. I just went to a Sperry dealer to
get a pair of basic white lace-up Topsiders. They couldn't
get my size, 10 1/2 EEE, ostensibly from the manufacturer.
Either they or the 3,427,621 of us who wear 10 1/2 EEE are
right out of it.


--
Joe Kovacs
Port Colborne Ontario Canada


The_navigator©

unread,
Aug 1, 2001, 11:06:00 PM8/1/01
to
What's a 10 1/2 EEE? Is it a water ski?

;-)

Cheers MC

Joe Kovacs

unread,
Aug 1, 2001, 11:48:28 PM8/1/01
to

That's a 13 1/2 EEE. A 10 1/2 EEE is within the realm of
reasonableness.

BJW

unread,
Aug 2, 2001, 7:52:23 AM8/2/01
to
Hey Peter,
I'm stompin' around on 14 EEE's, should I just ask for a couple of canoes?
Of course they were helpful when I was a lifeguard and could outswim
everyone with my natural 'flippers' LOL
Bern


"Joe Kovacs" <jako...@sentex.net> wrote in message
news:3b68...@news.sentex.net...

Douglas King

unread,
Aug 2, 2001, 9:01:21 AM8/2/01
to
The navigator© wrote:

> What's a 10 1/2 EEE? Is it a water ski?

It's a new one design


Doug Dotson

unread,
Aug 2, 2001, 11:27:35 AM8/2/01
to
Can you do your Jesus Lizard immitation for us? :)

dug

BJW

unread,
Aug 2, 2001, 11:30:19 AM8/2/01
to
hehe, you gotta see me ski!
Bern


"Doug Dotson" <ddo...@digidata.com> wrote in message
news:3B697167...@digidata.com...

William Brown

unread,
Aug 2, 2001, 7:05:15 PM8/2/01
to
Is that a Canadian 10 1/2 EEE?

Joe Kovacs wrote:
>
>>
> Yah. Speak of the devil. I just went to a Sperry dealer to
> get a pair of basic white lace-up Topsiders. They couldn't
> get my size, 10 1/2 EEE, ostensibly from the manufacturer.
> Either they or the 3,427,621 of us who wear 10 1/2 EEE are
> right out of it.
>
> --
> Joe Kovacs
> Port Colborne Ontario Canada

--
SPAMBLOCK NOTICE! To reply to me, delete the h from apkh.net, if it is
there.

rh...@darkstar.ca

unread,
Aug 2, 2001, 11:35:37 PM8/2/01
to
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 11:52:23 GMT, "BJW" <bjohn...@spam.hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Hey Peter,
>I'm stompin' around on 14 EEE's, should I just ask for a couple of canoes?
>Of course they were helpful when I was a lifeguard and could outswim
>everyone with my natural 'flippers' LOL
>Bern

I hear you, brother. Got 13 EEEs myself. Women seem to like 'em for
some reason.

R.

Doug Dotson

unread,
Aug 3, 2001, 8:55:41 AM8/3/01
to
A Canadian 10 1/2 would be a baby shoe wouldn't it?

dug

BJW

unread,
Aug 3, 2001, 9:13:42 AM8/3/01
to
hehe, I know my wife does,
maybe 'cause she can pack her shoes inside mine!

<rh...@darkstar.ca> wrote in message
news:3b6a1bdc....@news1.on.sympatico.ca...

Pat Drummond

unread,
Aug 13, 2001, 5:16:29 PM8/13/01
to
Is that centimeters or inches?

Doug Dotson wrote:
>
> A Canadian 10 1/2 would be a baby shoe wouldn't it?
>
> dug
>
> William Brown wrote:
>
> > Is that a Canadian 10 1/2 EEE?
> >

--
Pat Drummond
Boating in Canada http://www.ncf.ca/boating

Glenn A. Heslop

unread,
Oct 4, 2001, 10:04:18 AM10/4/01
to
Well...if you would be so kind as to send me a sample of your find shoes I
would be very happy to write an in depth report on my assessment of quality
and any possible improvement opportunities.

--
________________________________
Glenn A. Heslop


"Joe Kovacs" <jako...@sentex.net> wrote in message
news:3b68...@news.sentex.net...

0 new messages