OT: You've got to like the second paragraph...
John H
Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
What a f'ing joke.
Harryk
Why, again, were *you* involved in the killing of more than a million
innocent Asians?
--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?
HarryK
> On 6/21/11 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
>> ...in http://tinyurl.com/6djzz2l
>>
>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>
>> What a f'ing joke.
>
>
> Why, again, were *you* involved in the killing of more than a million
> innocent Asians?
>
>
>
Group. It is an active group of real life boaters.
Jay
> On 6/21/11 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
>> ...in http://tinyurl.com/6djzz2l
>>
>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>
>> What a f'ing joke.
>
>
> Why, again, were *you* involved in the killing of more than a million
> innocent Asians?
>
>
>
orders of his commander in chief. Just as Obama is directly involved in
the killing of innocent civilians.
Jay
> On 6/21/11 10:34 AM, Harryk wrote:
>> On 6/21/11 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
>>> ...in http://tinyurl.com/6djzz2l
>>>
>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>
>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>
>>
>> Why, again, were *you* involved in the killing of more than a million
>> innocent Asians?
>>
>>
>>
> PS - If you are tired of off topic political bullshit visit my Google
> Group. It is an active group of real life boaters.
>
Apparently you are trying to drive posters to a group sans your bullshit.
HarryK
I am doing my best to destroy rec.boats, but I have not been very
successful recruiting anyone to my new group. I really can't figure out
why.
Colonel Kurtz
On 21-Jun-2011, John H <salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>
> What a f'ing joke.
Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
jps
Oh, if it were Bush you simps would be crowing about how we need to go
kill that bad man.
Harryk
Herring played soldier-boy in Vietnam; he's obviously not adverse to
killing non-combatant civilians.
Colonel Kurtz
On 21-Jun-2011, jps <tr...@thedump.com> wrote:
> >Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a
> >blind
> >guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> >new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>
> Oh, if it were Bush you simps would be crowing about how we need to go
> kill that bad man.
What remains of the US has no authority or right to interfere with any
sovereign country - attacking Iraq was stupid on two counts - it was immoral
and unjustified, and, Iraq NEEDED Hussein (the former US doesn't need a
Hussein) - Bush was just one more blind fool trap shooting at night.
Neither of these clowns are or were the problem; the voters are. That's you
and millions of others, and that can't be fixed..
Colonel Kurtz
On 21-Jun-2011, Harryk <payer...@mypacks.net> wrote:
> > Oh, if it were Bush you simps would be crowing about how we need to go
> > kill that bad man.
>
>
> Herring played soldier-boy in Vietnam; he's obviously not adverse to
> killing non-combatant civilians.
Killing non-combatant civilians is no big deal in the US - tens of thousands
of criminals and infants are offed every year.
John H
Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
Some liberals tend to forget that.
Harryk
@mypacks.net says...
>
> On 6/21/11 1:14 PM, jps wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
> > <Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
> >>>
> >>> What a f'ing joke.
> >>
> >> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
> >> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> >> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
> >
> > Oh, if it were Bush you simps would be crowing about how we need to go
> > kill that bad man.
>
>
> Herring played soldier-boy in Vietnam; he's obviously not adverse to
> killing non-combatant civilians.
Spoofer alert! Everyone that has access to my new group knows full well
that I don't like insulting.
jps
Campaign finance reform. The only way.
Colonel Kurtz
That would reform campaign finance; it would not cure the stupidity,sloth
and 3rd world attitudes of your voters. It would be far more worthwhile to
learn to adapt to the cultural and economic standards of Somalia.
Harryk
The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
than a million non-combatant Asians.
iBoat
@mypacks.net says...
>
> On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"<Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
> >>>
> >>> What a f'ing joke.
> >>
> >> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
> >> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> >> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
> >
> > Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
> >
> > Some liberals tend to forget that.
>
>
> The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
> point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
> than a million non-combatant Asians.
The point is, you are a fucking coward.
jps
I prefer to field arguments that apply to this planet.
jps
wrote:
>On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"<Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>>
>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>>
>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>>
>> Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
>>
>> Some liberals tend to forget that.
>
>
>The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
>point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
>than a million non-combatant Asians.
Would Harry use "adverse" in place of averse?
Billy Joe
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:23 -0400, Harryk <payer33...@mypacks.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
>
> >>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>
> >>>> What a f'ing joke.
>
> >>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
> >>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> >>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>
> >> Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
>
> >> Some liberals tend to forget that.
>
> >The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
> >point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
> >than a million non-combatant Asians.
>
> Would Harry use "adverse" in place of averse?
The big question is why the Democrat presidents would order the
killing of all those civilians, just as the Democrat president is
doing today.
How do you spell 'hypocritical'?
Harryk
Interesting. We have a "Billy Joe" using at least a portion of Herring's
email address: salmo...@gmail.com
I'll reserve further comment. :>)
HarryK
Those assholes definitely would be jumping up and down crowing about the
need to kill the bad man. Those pompous assholes change their mind
depending upon who is in office.
Wait, didn't we say that Bush should definitely not invade another
country to try to force democracy onto another country? Isn't Obama
doing the same thing Bush did? Damn, now that I think about it, didn't
Obama tell us he would have us out of Iraq and Afghanistan in less than
a year? Why aren't we yelling about Obama doing the same thing Bush
did? Damn simps.
HarryK
Hell NO, that is one of those ID spoofers. Fuck them all.
John H
> On 6/21/11 4:03 PM, Billy Joe wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 21, 3:37 pm, jps<tr...@thedump.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:23 -0400, Harryk<payer33...@mypacks.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"<Colon...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>
> >>>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>
> >>>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
> >>>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> >>>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>
> >>>> Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
>
> >>>> Some liberals tend to forget that.
>
> >>> The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
> >>> point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
> >>> than a million non-combatant Asians.
>
> >> Would Harry use "adverse" in place of averse?
>
> > The big question is why the Democrat presidents would order the
> > killing of all those civilians, just as the Democrat president is
> > doing today.
>
> > How do you spell 'hypocritical'?
>
> Interesting. We have a "Billy Joe" using at least a portion of Herring's
>
> I'll reserve further comment. :>)
>
> --
> Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
> personal insults are not allowed?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing
Question too difficult for you?
Harryk
What question is that, "Billy Joe"?
John H
> On 6/21/11 4:03 PM, Billy Joe wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 21, 3:37 pm, jps<tr...@thedump.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:23 -0400, Harryk<payer33...@mypacks.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"<Colon...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>
> >>>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>
> >>>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
> >>>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> >>>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>
> >>>> Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
>
> >>>> Some liberals tend to forget that.
>
> >>> The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
> >>> point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
> >>> than a million non-combatant Asians.
>
> >> Would Harry use "adverse" in place of averse?
>
> > The big question is why the Democrat presidents would order the
> > killing of all those civilians, just as the Democrat president is
> > doing today.
>
> > How do you spell 'hypocritical'?
>
> Interesting. We have a "Billy Joe" using at least a portion of Herring's
>
> I'll reserve further comment. :>)
>
> --
> Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
> personal insults are not allowed?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing
Seems like the question was too difficult to answer?
HarryK
Piss up a rope. If you were a man you would have refuse to obey your
Commander in Chief. Lead by example asshole.
John H
Reading too difficult for you?
emde...@hush.com
Seems like you're just a low-life spoofer. I guess "you" never heard
of GWB.
Harryk
Herring, apparently, wants to be "Billy Joe."
jps
wrote:
>On 6/21/11 1:14 PM, jps wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
>> <Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>>
>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>>
>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>>
>> Oh, if it were Bush you simps would be crowing about how we need to go
>> kill that bad man.
>
>Those assholes definitely would be jumping up and down crowing about the
>need to kill the bad man. Those pompous assholes change their mind
>depending upon who is in office.
>
>Wait, didn't we say that Bush should definitely not invade another
>country to try to force democracy onto another country? Isn't Obama
>doing the same thing Bush did? Damn, now that I think about it, didn't
>Obama tell us he would have us out of Iraq and Afghanistan in less than
>a year? Why aren't we yelling about Obama doing the same thing Bush
>did? Damn simps.
Have we moved half our military to Libya? Shock and awe? Pallets of
100 dollar bills? 5000 dead?
Let me know when any of that happens.
Harryk
The really big question is why did the last Republican president lie us
into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Billy Joe?
Harryk
Why did John Herring become "Billy Joe"?
TopBassDog
You prefer to argue, regardless of what planet and which talking
subject. That is why you are so well admired by your only two
friends, Herr Krause, and Hack D'Plume.
They can debate on your level.
TopBassDog
Can you answer his question, D'Plume, or are you simply tap dancing in
the bathroom stall like Krause?
Jimmy
> On 6/21/11 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
>> ...in http://tinyurl.com/6djzz2l
>>
>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>
>> What a f'ing joke.
>
>
> innocent Asians?
Remember when Krause called for the carpet bombing of Afghanistan after
9-11? I guess the killing of innocent Afghans doesn't equate with the
killing of innocent Asians.
Krause is one of those people you just shake your head at and move on.
Canuck57
> ...in http://tinyurl.com/6djzz2l
>
> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>
> What a f'ing joke.
Because he can and Congress isn't stopping him.
Obama will support al Queda affiliated armed rebels using kids as
shields on tanks, and Obama will send in missiles to unarmed kids in
their homes.... sounds like a political and personal vendetta.
But that is OK as the US-Euro regime marches on for cheap oil, 144 tons
of gold to destroy one of the few countries in the world that has no net
DEBT. It also prevents Gbadbo and Gaddafi from forming a African Union
of States for fair labour and trade laws that colonial and corporate
interests would not like.
UN, the NWO of unelected world domination.
IMF, US-Euro banking control, if UN does not like you IMF will extort
you with debt. That is why USA gets away with debt fraud that Icelnad,
Greece, Spain, Portugal and others can't.
If IMF does not work, then UN will fund and supply weapons to rebels to
over throw you. Worked in Rwanda, Ivory Coast and elsewhere. But in
Libya it didn't so the next step...
NATO strong arm brownshrts will bomb you if UN, IMF and subversion don't
work.
The Fourth Reich. US-Euro-Saudi Regime. World control.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
Canuck57
> On 6/21/11 10:34 AM, Harryk wrote:
>> On 6/21/11 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
>>> ...in http://tinyurl.com/6djzz2l
>>>
>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>
>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>
>>
>> innocent Asians?
>>
>>
>>
> Group. It is an active group of real life boaters.
You sound pathetically desperate.
Canuck57
> On 6/21/2011 10:34 AM, Harryk wrote:
>> On 6/21/11 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
>>> ...in http://tinyurl.com/6djzz2l
>>>
>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>
>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>
>>
>> Why, again, were *you* involved in the killing of more than a million
>> innocent Asians?
>>
>>
>>
> orders of his commander in chief. Just as Obama is directly involved in
> the killing of innocent civilians.
At least Bush recognized democracy and went to congress for the funding
and permission. In fact, congress more or less told Bush to go get
them. Heir Obama didn't do either, just more debt spend. Haven't got
money to pay the bills but we can create war!!
Morally corrupt actually. Going to end in misery for the American
people one way or another. Obama needs to be impeached.
Canuck57
> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>
>> What a f'ing joke.
>
> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
Lets hope for 16 months and he is a limp duck.
Canuck57
> On 6/21/11 1:14 PM, jps wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
>>
>>>
>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>>
>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>>
>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a
>>> blind
>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap
>>> shooting.........nothing
>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>>
>> kill that bad man.
>
>
> killing non-combatant civilians.
But you were too dishonorably cowardly to serve your country. The wars
are not the soldiers fault, they are the politicians fault.
Canuck57
> On 21-Jun-2011, Harryk<payer...@mypacks.net> wrote:
>
>>> Oh, if it were Bush you simps would be crowing about how we need to go
>>> kill that bad man.
>>
>>
>> Herring played soldier-boy in Vietnam; he's obviously not adverse to
>> killing non-combatant civilians.
>
> of criminals and infants are offed every year.
But you know Anderson Pooper would put it on the news to support Obama's
agenda in a heart beat if a rebels kid siting on a tank as a human
shield bought it.
But ignores it when USA sends in bombs into homes with unarmed
non-participating kids.
US-Euro Regime. We BOMB you. No wonder the middle east hates the USA.
Canuck57
> In article<CNmdnWqf2Z52TJ3T...@earthlink.com>, payer33859
> @mypacks.net says...
>>
>> On 6/21/11 1:14 PM, jps wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
>>> <Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>>>
>>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>>>
>>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
>>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
>>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>>>
>>> kill that bad man.
>>
>>
>> Herring played soldier-boy in Vietnam; he's obviously not adverse to
>> killing non-combatant civilians.
>
> that I don't like insulting.
No one there to insult but yourself.
Canuck57
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:19:00 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
> <Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21-Jun-2011, jps<tr...@thedump.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> What remains of the US has no authority or right to interfere with any
>>>> sovereign country - attacking Iraq was stupid on two counts - it was
>>>> immoral
>>>> and unjustified, and, Iraq NEEDED Hussein (the former US doesn't need a
>>>> Hussein) - Bush was just one more blind fool trap shooting at night.
>>>> Neither of these clowns are or were the problem; the voters are. That's
>>>> you
>>>> and millions of others, and that can't be fixed..
>>>
>>> Campaign finance reform. The only way.
>>
>> That would reform campaign finance; it would not cure the stupidity,sloth
>> and 3rd world attitudes of your voters. It would be far more worthwhile to
>> learn to adapt to the cultural and economic standards of Somalia.
>
> I prefer to field arguments that apply to this planet.
He is right. It comes down to naive, gullible, greedy, herd mentality
voters.
Canuck57
> On 6/21/11 1:14 PM, jps wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
>> <Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>>
>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>>
>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a
>>> blind
>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap
>>> shooting.........nothing
>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>>
>> Oh, if it were Bush you simps would be crowing about how we need to go
>> kill that bad man.
>
> Those assholes definitely would be jumping up and down crowing about the
> need to kill the bad man. Those pompous assholes change their mind
> depending upon who is in office.
>
> Wait, didn't we say that Bush should definitely not invade another
> country to try to force democracy onto another country? Isn't Obama
> doing the same thing Bush did? Damn, now that I think about it, didn't
> Obama tell us he would have us out of Iraq and Afghanistan in less than
> a year? Why aren't we yelling about Obama doing the same thing Bush did?
> Damn simps.
Nope. Obama didn't go to congress, he acted alone. Not much unlike
Adolph Hitler went for Austria.
Canuck57
To give you an idea how screwed up this Libya is. Canada is going to
rack up more debt and provide finacial aid to Libya. A no debt country,
one of the best balance sheets in the world before USA bombed it. Has
oil and 144 tons of gold because they don't trust USD.
Yep, NA is deliberately being saddled with billions of debt for war,
bailing out corrupt, incompetence and UN NWO regime.
We are the ones that should be protesting but we are too fat and lazy.
Canuck57
> On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel
>> Kurtz"<Colo...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>>
>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>>
>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a
>>> blind
>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap
>>> shooting.........nothing
>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>>
>> bunch of other soldiers.
>>
>> Some liberals tend to forget that.
>
>
> The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
> than a million non-combatant Asians.
Harry the coward, you really should stay out of this.
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
Well, that's about your speed, isn't it. You're a racist little sh*t
of an excuse for a human being.
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
>On 21/06/2011 9:29 AM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>
>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>
>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>
>Lets hope for 16 months and I've got a limp dick.
You've got a limp dick. And, your point?
jps
It's a perfect match to his brain.
emde...@hush.com
Please don't insult his limpness. He can barely think even with that
appendage.
Colonel Kurtz
On 22-Jun-2011, Canuck57 <Canu...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> What a f'ing joke.
> >
> > Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a
> > blind
> > guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap
> > shooting.........nothing
> > new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>
> Lets hope for 16 months and he is a limp duck.
I lost a $500.00 bet when "Americans" didn't elect Ozone Al. That was 10+
years ago. They're much dumber now - Obama's got it in the bag as long as
the population is as deficient as it is now. The good news is the U.S. will
have to be a protectorate of some other country by 2016, or it will look
like "Escape From New York" with no Adrienne Barbeau.
emde...@hush.com
I don't have to bet anything that you're dumber than a post.
Canuck57
People are voting with mindless greed. Anyone promising a lot will get
the vote, even if they could never really deliver. And with the debt,
looks like USD is starting a small run on currency. The USA economy, if
left on the same "In Debt We Trust!" track will be decimated by 2016.
By 2016, the Chinese economy might even eclipse the US economy. USD
just lost more today against the Yuan and people are exiting the US
currency. Not sure how long the Chinese can prop up teh value of the
USD but I suspect not much longer.
So what happens with rapid currency depreciation? Over night inflation.
Roman Empire thought it was too big to fail too.
Harryk
What possible connection is there between the fall of the Roman Empires
and the possibilities of the future U.S. history? You obviously know no
more about the Fall of Rome than you do about economics or, frankly,
anything else. You are, in all ways that matter, the intellectual
equivalent of Scott Ingersoll, the ranking fool here.
Canuck57
Lots. Read up on the fall of the Roman Empire, paying particular
attention to the economics and taxation. It doesn't happen over night.
Did you know the Chinese ordered 93 metric tons of gold last quarter as
they didn't want more US cash? And that it is expected shortly to be
over 100 metric tons?
Yep, you biggest creditor no longer values USD.
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
He uses lead for his water containers, so I guess that's the
connection.
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
Good grief... China is the largest gold producer. I don't think 100
tons is going to make much difference.
Harryk
Actually, I've read quite a bit of Roman history over the course of my
lifetime. You haven't. The Roman Empires collapsed for many reasons, but
civil wars were among the main reasons.
Jay
Is that out of the "want to be a lawyer" snappy retort manual?
Canuck57
And they import it leaving he USDs. Think about it.
Canuck57
Didn't read that well then I guess. One of the major reasons was
economics. Moving off of the gold/silver to common metals,
hyper-inflation, excessive taxation, and a local power guy eventually
said cheaper to fight than pay these insane taxes. Then over time, the
empire crumbled under the sheer bureaucracy, plutocracy and dead weight.
Everyone wanted to be an academic or statesmen, not a soldier or farmer.
Read it again, USA as in Roman Empire thinks is too big to fail even
though the evidence is clearly there. Denial, just like the Roman
leaders....
Funny how history repeats.
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
Huh? You're frothing at the mouth again. Take your pill.
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
Funny how you think that something that went on over 300 years is
going to happen in the US tomorrow. You're a congenital moron.
Canuck57
I didn't say in a day dummy. We are only 3-4 years into it. More of
the same to come, as no one ever got wealthy on the borrowing side of
debt. That includes countries and states.
I know, I am self made in the top 0.2% of the worlds population. Or so
CBC says.
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
Feel free to get back to us in 100 years.
Nobody gets wealthy on the borrowing side of debt unless you work on
Wall Street.
Greece, for example... They talked to Goldman Sachs, who structured
currency default swaps, which were sold to Euro banks. Then, Goldman
structured those into credit default swaps, making money the whole
time. Nobody actually knows who purchased those credit default swaps,
because there is NO regulation of such instruments.
John H
>On 6/21/11 4:59 PM, John H wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:38:22 -0400, Harryk<payer...@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/21/11 4:29 PM, John H wrote:
>>>> On Jun 21, 4:08 pm, Harryk<payer33...@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/21/11 4:03 PM, Billy Joe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jun 21, 3:37 pm, jps<tr...@thedump.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:23 -0400, Harryk<payer33...@mypacks.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"<Colon...@youcantthink.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What a f'ing joke.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Give him a break, he's just trying to look presidential. It's like a blind
>>>>>>>>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
>>>>>>>>>> new there. Only about 5-1/2 years of him to go...take that to the bank.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some liberals tend to forget that.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
>>>>>>>> point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
>>>>>>>> than a million non-combatant Asians.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would Harry use "adverse" in place of averse?
>>>>>
>>>>>> The big question is why the Democrat presidents would order the
>>>>>> killing of all those civilians, just as the Democrat president is
>>>>>> doing today.
>>>>>
>>>>> > How do you spell 'hypocritical'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting. We have a "Billy Joe" using at least a portion of Herring's
>>>>> email address: salmonb...@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll reserve further comment. :>)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
>>>>> personal insults are not allowed?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing
>>>>
>>>> Question too difficult for you?
>>>
>>>
>>> What question is that, "Billy Joe"?
>>
>>
>> Reading too difficult for you?
>>
>> "The big question is why the Democrat presidents would order the
>> killing of all those civilians, just as the Democrat president is
>> doing today."
>
>
>The really big question is why did the last Republican president lie us
>into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Billy Joe?
Still can't answer the question.
Life must be a bitch for hypocritical liberals.
(BTW, although not your business, you can add this to your data base. I've a brother named William
Joseph. Guess what his nickname was.)
WAFL!
Harryk
You pretend to be your brother? You righties are...weird.
emde...@hush.com
Canuck57
Yep, and has Obama arrested any of them yet or is Obama feeding them
billions to cover the rich cats?
Harryk
Someone using the "billy joe" handle with herring's email address appled
for access at my little boating/fishing group. I figured it was an ID
spoofer so I disapproved access.
Yesterday, I also dumped someone with access I determined to be one of
the assholes from here, using a "different" handle. I don't spend much
time "policing" the group, so I am sure we still have a "ringer" or two
in there. They seem so obsessed by a harmless little boating/fishing
discussion group, as if it wasn't enough that they destroyed this one.
Weird boys.
HarryK
When I only have a few posts a week in my little harmless
boating/fishing discussion group, it really doesn't take a lot of time
to police the group. The problem I have with the little asshole is he
was highlighting the fact that there really were very few posts in my
group, and even less boating or fishing related posts. While there has
not be any negative or insulting posts in my group, I will continue to
dump users to make sure those assholes don't know how useless my little
boating and fishing group really is.
Harryk
Awwww...the ID spoofer is upset because he was dumped. Awwww.
North Star
> On 6/23/11 10:43 PM, emdepl...@hush.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:05:05 -0400, Harryk<payer33...@mypacks.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >> On 6/23/11 8:16 PM, John H wrote:
>
> >>>> On 6/21/11 4:59 PM, John H wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
It really is odd.... they're so fixated on you that they'll travel
anywhere just to sniff your butt.
Sad and pathetic!
HarryK
Yup, it is truly sad and pathetic. Almost as sad and as pathetic as us
using MY group so we can insult others. While that was my original
objective when I set up the group, I thought someone would occasionally
make a boating or fishing post. Your cut and paste concerning Canadian
Money was a new low, even for you. We have to keep those assholes out
of MY group or they will find out how little you use your boat, and how
you want to sell your boat and buy a motorcycle. Now you have to admit,
that was a weird post for a boating and fishing newsgroup.
Well, I will do my best and stay fixated on keep those assholes out of
MY group. We don't want anyone to know how useless MY boating and
fishing group is. The last thing we need is for them to be able to read
the group and find out that for every cut and paste post you make in MY
group you will post about 100 insults in rec.boats. Talk about pathetic.
Harryk
That and the fact that there are some of us who actually like to discuss
fishing/boating and feel no need to insult other posters in the process.
HarryK
If you notice you will see how we never insult others ... and most
importantly how many boating and fishing post we make in my group.
Harryk
> Someone using the "billy joe" handle with herring's email address appled
> for access at my little boating/fishing group. I figured it was an ID
> spoofer so I disapproved access.
>
> Yesterday, I also dumped someone with access I determined to be one of
> the assholes from here, using a "different" handle. I don't spend much
> time "policing" the group, so I am sure we still have a "ringer" or two
> in there. They seem so obsessed by a harmless little boating/fishing
> discussion group, as if it wasn't enough that they destroyed this one.
>
> Weird boys.
Yawn.
HarryK
Yawn right back at you. You assholes are so upset that you can't read
the dribble that we post in MY group that you don't know what to do. I
will continue to weed out the "ringers" so they won't know how little
boating and fishing posts we make in MY group.
If it wasn't for Don's cut and paste non boating posts, there wouldn't
be any posts at all.
iBoat
@x12g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, prince...@gmail.com says...
>
> On Jun 24, 8:07ï¿œam, Harryk <payer33...@mypacks.net> wrote:
> > On 6/23/11 10:43 PM, emdepl...@hush.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:05:05 -0400, Harryk<payer33...@mypacks.net>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >> On 6/23/11 8:16 PM, John H wrote:
> >
> > >>>> On 6/21/11 4:59 PM, John H wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>> On 6/21/11 4:29 PM, John H wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On 6/21/11 4:03 PM, Billy Joe wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:23 -0400, Harryk<payer33...@mypacks.net>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/11 1:35 PM, John H wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21-Jun-2011, John H<salmonb...@gmail.com> ￜ ￜ ￜ ￜ wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why again is Obama killing Libyans? To protect 'innocent rebels'?
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What a f'ing joke.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> guy at 3:00 AM outside wearing sunglass and trap shooting.........nothing
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Besides, I was sent there by a Democrat president, as were a whole bunch of other soldiers.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Some liberals tend to forget that.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The point is not that you were sent there by a Democratic president. The
> > >>>>>>>>>>> point is you were not adverse to participating in the slaughter of more
> > >>>>>>>>>>> than a million non-combatant Asians.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>> Would Harry use "adverse" in place of averse?
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> The big question is why the Democrat presidents would order the
> > >>>>>>>>> killing of all those civilians, just as the Democrat president is
> > >>>>>>>>> doing today.
> >
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Interesting. We have a "Billy Joe" using at least a portion of Herring's
> >
> > >>>>>>>> I'll reserve further comment. ￜ:>)
Gee, you and Harry sure are posting here a lot. For a couple who
constantly whines about rec.boats, then have their own google group, one
has to wonder why you two don't just go there?
iBoat
says...
Why are you and Don constantly here then?
Harryk
How many different IDs are you posting with here these days, little
loogylicker? Three at least (you forget to change your faked email address).
As I have stated several times, I post here because:
there are still a few -very few- posters here with whom I like to stay
in contact.
I'm a student of deviant sociology and, thanks to you and your trash
buddies here, rec.boats is a hotbed of deviants. There's no place in my
real life where I regularly encounter the sort of dimwits, racists,
obsessives, and hate-mongers that now take up most of the bandwidth in
rec.boats. Small doses of you morons give me a giggle. I'm hoping Tosk
becomes more active again. He and Canuck are pretty funny.
Now, you have the answer to the question you ask here 20 times a day, so
you don't have to ask again.
John H
>On 6/24/11 8:09 AM, Harryk wrote:
>> On 6/24/2011 7:07 AM, Harryk wrote:
>>
>>> Someone using the "billy joe" handle with herring's email address appled
>>> for access at my little boating/fishing group. I figured it was an ID
>>> spoofer so I disapproved access.
>>>
>>> Yesterday, I also dumped someone with access I determined to be one of
>>> the assholes from here, using a "different" handle. I don't spend much
>>> time "policing" the group, so I am sure we still have a "ringer" or two
>>> in there. They seem so obsessed by a harmless little boating/fishing
>>> discussion group, as if it wasn't enough that they destroyed this one.
>>>
>>> Weird boys.
>>
>> Yawn.
>>
>
>Yawn right back at you. You assholes are so upset that you can't read
>the dribble that we post in MY group that you don't know what to do. I
>will continue to weed out the "ringers" so they won't know how little
>boating and fishing posts we make in MY group.
>
>If it wasn't for Don's cut and paste non boating posts, there wouldn't
>be any posts at all.
You two should quit fighting with each other. I checked, and I found out there's plenty of room for
both of you on the net.
Harryk
It's billy joe...
iBoat
And that's all bullshit. You post here because your group is dead. No
one likes you. You also post here because you're a narcisstic asshole.
Harryk
> In article<96jg6l...@mid.individual.net>, naled...@mypacks.net
Whatever floats your non-existent boat, little loogylicker. And since
you think you have the answer to the question you keep asking, I guess
you don't have to ask it again.
"No one likes" me. What are you, in the third grade?
emde...@hush.com
wrote:
So, when there are no laws or regulations governing something, it is
therefore Obama's duty to arrest someone? Keep telling us you're a
genius.
Harryk
Wait, wait...if you prompt him, Canuck will give you his version of why
the Roman Empires fell.
iBoat
@mypacks.net says...
Bullshit and lies, that's all you have.
Harryk
> In article<v5CdnRhSxKGSDpnT...@earthlink.com>, naled24511
> @mypacks.net says...
>>
>
>>> And that's all bullshit. You post here because your group is dead. No
>>> one likes you. You also post here because you're a narcisstic asshole.
>>
>>
>> Whatever floats your non-existent boat, little loogylicker. And since
>> you think you have the answer to the question you keep asking, I guess
>> you don't have to ask it again.
>>
>> "No one likes" me. What are you, in the third grade?
>
> Bullshit and lies, that's all you have.
Whatever floats your mindless little boat, loogylicker.
HarryK
> In article<96jg6l...@mid.individual.net>, naled...@mypacks.net
Asshole, I post here because I enjoy making personal insults. It is the
only reason I post to any newsgroups, and is the reason I am banned from
so many newsgroups.
I was surprised when my good buddy Chuck Gould banned me from his
newsgroup. He must have become a damn right wing deviant. Too bad.
iBoat
says...
>
> On 6/24/11 9:45 AM, iBoat wrote:
> > In article<v5CdnRhSxKGSDpnT...@earthlink.com>, naled24511
> > @mypacks.net says...
> >>
> >
> >>> And that's all bullshit. You post here because your group is dead. No
> >>> one likes you. You also post here because you're a narcisstic asshole.
> >>
> >>
> >> Whatever floats your non-existent boat, little loogylicker. And since
> >> you think you have the answer to the question you keep asking, I guess
> >> you don't have to ask it again.
> >>
> >> "No one likes" me. What are you, in the third grade?
> >
> > Bullshit and lies, that's all you have.
>
> Whatever floats your mindless little boat, loogylicker.
What ever happened to you having me killfiled, asshat?
HarryK
> In article<96jjc8...@mid.individual.net>, naled...@mypacks.net
I forgot I had you killedfiled into my septic tank. Damn it all, they
say the mind is the 2nd thing to go.
Harryk
> In article<96jjc8...@mid.individual.net>, naled...@mypacks.net
I'm running backups on my desktop computer right now and I'm using my
laptop, little boatless, mindless loogylicker. No filters. Isn't it
about time for you to ID spoof me, little turd?
HarryK
> On 6/24/11 10:21 AM, iBoat wrote:
>> In article<96jjc8...@mid.individual.net>, naled...@mypacks.net
>> says...
>>>
>>> On 6/24/11 9:45 AM, iBoat wrote:
>>>> In article<v5CdnRhSxKGSDpnT...@earthlink.com>, naled24511
>>>> @mypacks.net says...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> And that's all bullshit. You post here because your group is dead. No
>>>>>> one likes you. You also post here because you're a narcisstic
>>>>>> asshole.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever floats your non-existent boat, little loogylicker. And since
>>>>> you think you have the answer to the question you keep asking, I guess
>>>>> you don't have to ask it again.
>>>>>
>>>>> "No one likes" me. What are you, in the third grade?
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit and lies, that's all you have.
>>>
>>> Whatever floats your mindless little boat, loogylicker.
>>
>> What ever happened to you having me killfiled, asshat?
>
> I'm running backups on my desktop computer right now and I'm using my
> laptop, little boatless, mindless loogylicker. No filters. Isn't it
> about time for you to ID spoof me, little turd?
Sometimes it takes weeks for me to complete my backups, so don't ask me
about this again. I also don't want to hear any questions about why I
haven't included my filters in my laptop. That is way too complicated
for me to figure out. That would mean making a backup of my desktop and
I don't know how to do that.
Wait, did I just say I was making a backup of my desktop? Damn, it is
so hard to keep up with my lies. Damn it all.
Wait, I have the answer. If I had made a backup of my desktop settings
and then included them in my laptop settings then I wouldn't be able to
insult you whenever I wanted. Yeah, that is my answer, and I am
sticking to it.
PS - I know many people make backups of their system during the night
when they are not using their computer, but I prefer to do it during the
day so then I have to use my laptop. This makes it very difficult to
actually have a backup since I have now have many different original
hard-drives and no real backup, but that is what makes life interesting.
iBoat
@mypacks.net says...
>
> On 6/24/11 10:21 AM, iBoat wrote:
> > In article<96jjc8...@mid.individual.net>, naled...@mypacks.net
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 6/24/11 9:45 AM, iBoat wrote:
> >>> In article<v5CdnRhSxKGSDpnT...@earthlink.com>, naled24511
> >>> @mypacks.net says...
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>>> And that's all bullshit. You post here because your group is dead. No
> >>>>> one likes you. You also post here because you're a narcisstic asshole.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Whatever floats your non-existent boat, little loogylicker. And since
> >>>> you think you have the answer to the question you keep asking, I guess
> >>>> you don't have to ask it again.
> >>>>
> >>>> "No one likes" me. What are you, in the third grade?
> >>>
> >>> Bullshit and lies, that's all you have.
> >>
> >> Whatever floats your mindless little boat, loogylicker.
> >
> > What ever happened to you having me killfiled, asshat?
>
> I'm running backups on my desktop computer right now and I'm using my
> laptop, little boatless, mindless loogylicker. No filters. Isn't it
> about time for you to ID spoof me, little turd?
Take that insulting and name calling back to your own group, you low
life asshat. Just what is a "loogylicker"??
Harryk
> In article<RIOdndT_TLb3ApnT...@earthlink.com>, naled24511
The poor little loogylicker thinks he is going to somehow "influence" me
to do what he says he wants.
Time for you to ID spoof, little loogylicker.
HarryK
> In article<RIOdndT_TLb3ApnT...@earthlink.com>, naled24511
You are so stupid, that you missed the folly of my statement concerning
my "backup". If you had an IQ of at least 70 you would have realized
that my Mac uses "Time Machine" and there is no reason for a separate
backup or to stop using my desktop when making a backup. I was just
testing you to see if you knew your ass from a hole in the wall.
Harryk
>>>
>>> I'm running backups on my desktop computer right now and I'm using my
>>> laptop, little boatless, mindless loogylicker. No filters. Isn't it
>>> about time for you to ID spoof me, little turd?
>>
>> Take that insulting and name calling back to your own group, you low
>> life asshat. Just what is a "loogylicker"??
>
> You are so stupid, that you missed the folly of my statement concerning
> my "backup". If you had an IQ of at least 70 you would have realized
> that my Mac uses "Time Machine" and there is no reason for a separate
> backup or to stop using my desktop when making a backup. I was just
> testing you to see if you knew your ass from a hole in the wall.
>
Sorry, ID spoofer, but my primary backup is *not* Time Machine. Now,
switch over to one of your other annoying IDs.
iBoat
YOU are too stupid to know that *I* didn't say a fucking word about your
backup.