I may be wrong (so what else is new), but I think that Vanha made the _AQ_,
not the AQII, which is what Dagger calls the boat they make to the same
design. In other words, if it has an "AQII" printed on it, it's an AQII; if
it's old, well-worn, and has a Noah emblem, it's an AQ.
Please feel free to set me straight.
Steve
The scoops on the front of the AQ II are more pronounced and the front
is a little pointier.
john mc
>When Vladimir Vanha was making the AQII he didn't print the big "AQII" on it
>like Dagger does. Does anybody know how to distinguish and AQII from it's
>predecessor the Aeorquatic?
hehe the plastic in the Aeroquatic had poor uv protection properties or
whatever. There arn't very many surviving so you don't really need to tell!! :)
Three friends of mine had 'AQI' 's and all three had bad cracking and
splitting about 2 years ago. Only one is still beiing used and that bloke uses
a LOT of canoe tape :)
Pat Thoyts
John Arthur
Stanford, CA
This is only partially true. The last few years that AQ's were made they
were roto-molded, which prevents cracking and the sort. These boats are
MUCH stronger than the original AQ's. I have paddled these boats for the
last 4 years on all kind of water and find them a great all-around boat.
I haven't gotten the chance to paddle an AQII yet but I have seen them and
there are some design differences. First of all, on the bottom of the
boat Dagger cut deeper and broader lines (gouges, I don't know what to
call them, I guess they help in tracking) whereas the original only had 2
which ran straight along the bottom. Secondly, the cockpit is much more
keyhole and the AQII has a standard Dagger seat with better knee bracers.
You can't go wrong with a II but if you can find an original roto-molded
AQ I'm sure it would be a better deal $ wise.
brian
>
>