Was the chain dipped originally? Might you talk to some chain
producers? They may know how it's done, or by whom. JG
Can anyone advise me on how to re-galvanize 200 feet of chain?
Thanks in advance.
--
Donald Jardine, Kingston Ont. Canada
Donald Jardine <jard...@qucis.queensu.ca> wrote in message
news:8c33ll$9k6$1...@knot.queensu.ca...
> Does anyone know of a company on the east coast of USA that will hot-dip
> galvanize a 200-foot anchor chain? The problem seems to be that hot dip
> galvanizing companies have zinc kettles of maximun 25 to 40 feet, and
cannot
> accomodate a long chain.
There is a company in Richmond, VA that will do chain galvanizing. However,
the cost is about $1/lb. + an additional charge if there is significant rust
or paint that needs to be removed. Since I got a good deal on new chain
(look under "Chain" in the yellow pages) I opted for that route.
--
Evan Gatehouse
s/v Ceilydh
--
Gordon W5RED
G. C. Couger gco...@couger.com Stillwater, OK
www.couger.com/gcouger
"You miss 100 percent of the shots you never take." - Wayne Gretzky
Gary
Donald Jardine <jard...@qucis.queensu.ca> wrote in message
news:8c33ll$9k6$1...@knot.queensu.ca...
> Does anyone know of a company on the east coast of USA that will hot-dip
> galvanize a 200-foot anchor chain? The problem seems to be that hot dip
> galvanizing companies have zinc kettles of maximun 25 to 40 feet, and
cannot
> accomodate a long chain.
>
Everett, Massachusetts.
>> Does anyone know of a company on the east coast of USA that will hot-dip
>> galvanize a 200-foot anchor chain? The problem seems to be that hot dip
>> galvanizing companies have zinc kettles of maximun 25 to 40 feet, and
>cannot
>> accomodate a long chain.
I had 200 feet of 5/16" BBB regalvanized in Seattle and was not happy with
the results. Even with tumbling, small amounts of material accumulate on
the chain. Each of these gobules has to be knocked off or the chain will
not go through the gypsy cleanly. Considering the cost and the bad result,
it seems clear to me that purchasing new chain is the better way to go.
YMMV
Also have a look at my LITTLE boat I made last fall and see if see is
as pretty as her name sake, Vanna White
http://homepages.together.net/~jaxxon/photospage/vanna.jpg
I also helped build a planked wooden 36 ft ketch and every bolt and fastener
in her was galvanized. That was 40 years ago and I hear she is still doing
fine.
Steve
s/v Good Intentions
If the less-than "gold-plater" look doesn't bother you, go for it!
Regards,
Ev
Near the Ballard Bridge in Seattle. It cost a little over $1.00 per pound.
>Why couldn't the co. tumble it to knock the lumps off?
They did tumble it, but not long enough.
>What happened to it? Did you use it?
For the next 80-100 times anchoring, the chain would get stuck in the gypsy.
Sometimes I would lift the chain over the rough spot, sometimes I used a
hammer and pounded the globs off...one by one. Finally, the chain is
starting to go through the gypsy moderatly well - but still not half as well
as new chain does.
All the testimonials about galvanized fittings lasting many, many years may
be true. But chain, that is dragged in he sand and rocks, gradually has the
galvanized (yes - it was hot dipped) material worn off. Far different than a
cleat that spends it time on a dock or deck.
There is hot dip galvanising and there is zinc plating which looks
somewhat similar but is nowhere near as good. The zinc is a sacrificial
coating which protects the nearby steel or iron but if you do not have
stray electrical currents to foul up the issue 20 years is well on the
cards. I think wrought iron fittings are better than welded steel. 50
years ago one made a sketch of the required fitting, then had it made by
the local blacksmith and then had it hot dip galvanised. Such fittings
lasted a very long time.
Many people seem to get away with bronze shafts and props in steel boats
but great care must be taken with selection and positioning of anodes to
protect the hull. A steel shaft and a ductile iron propeller would be a
better solution.
--
edgar (remove nospam from return address for e-mail reply)
The process:
The chain is first soaked (soaked at a temperature of 2000 Fahrenheit)
to clean the surface and then an acid dip rinse. Two clear water
rinses to remove acid residue.
First plating is a solution of Potassium Chloride, Hydrochloric
acid, Boric acid, Zinc brightener & Zinc carrier.
Then 2 more rinses and a bath of nitric acid. Then it is either a blue
bright plating or the yellow dichromate (the latter was done on mine).
3 more rinses.
The yellow colour that is on my chain is used by the Transport
Industry for tie down chain and is subject to salt on the roads.
It is used because it does resist salt.
I don't know how it would stand up to salt water. Would it be a
meaningful test for me to put a couple of links in a 30% salt
solution for a few months to see that happen? Or is there something
else in seawater that would make this test meaningless. I am willing
to try, and report the results.
<snip excellent post, all except for:)
> The chain is first soaked (soaked at a temperature of 2000 Fahrenheit)
I rather doubt that. I don't know of any liquid (maybe mercury?) that
could withstand 2000 degrees at anywhere near atmospheric pressure.
Maybe you meant 200 degrees? 8^)
--
DAVe
(what's a zero or two between friends?)
My wife is the expert in this field. I mistook her use of the word
"soak" to mean that the chain is heat-soaked in the furnace for
annealing/tempering purposes. In actual fact the real story is:
"The "Soak2000" is the name of the chemical combination used to soak off
any debris on the chain. It is patented, and provided by the company
that supplies the plating chemicals"
Thanks for catching that.
H
No, I don't think so. If I remember correctly at 2000 Fahrenheit steel
glows dull red, good for annealing, but not hot enough to distort the
object's shape from melting. I think steel melts somewhere around 2400F.
> * (what's a zero or two between friends?)
Details, details, always details. Maybe _you_ were thinking 20,000. 8^)
--
DAVe