by Drs Wegman and North, respectively the chairmen of their eponymous committees, the North Committee specifically constituted by the NAS to defend Mann from the US Senate! Under

of the Wegman and North Committees, both of whom fatally undermined the Hockey Stick and Michael Mann's credibility, and thus the foundation of Global Warming forever, so badly

counter the Wegman Panel, > > > which had been commissioned by the US Senate to investigate Michael > > > Mann's statistical credibility, and had found it to

> Jesse Wegman: Is the inside of the helmet warm? > >> > >> My team then had me take the helmet off and then tried to make my hair > >> look good. So that's

Dr Edward Wegman, speaking under oath to the American Congress about the statistical methods of the IPCC and its happy-slappy band of global warmies. Dr Wegman is a past chair of the

On Sunday, October 18, 2015 at 6:28:12 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote: > > Amazing! An individual who describes himself as: > "I am a professor

counter the Wegman Panel, which had been commissioned by the US Senate to investigate Michael Mann's statistical credibility, and had found it to be zero as related in "(

soiled every time you address me. Andre Jute "Bad Method + Right Answer = Bad Science" Dr Wegman of the National Institute for Science on oath before the United States Senate

> the Wegman and North panels. I'd be delighted to republish their > > testimony, if you're interested. > > > You wanna be calm, "zencycle",

Mann's "Hockey Stick" NOT supported by NAS Panel ********* In the accompanying thread

This has been the worst year for cycling since I took up cycling in 1992. Today is 22 March and all

Learn about the the fastest growing religion in the World http://www.ig.org/

, and Wegman and North confirmed > under oath before the US Senate in 2005. It's not exactly news that > that this paleoclimatological scum lied; even some of the insiders

On Dec 8, 2:32 pm, Ben C <spams...@spam.eggs> wrote: > On 2009-12-08, Qui si parla

respectively Drs Wegman and North. Wegman's damning report is here: http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/WegmanReport.pdf North's Panel was constituted by

> > Wegman > > > and now exposed by Climategate as a conspiracy against the public > > > interest. Then Weiner can tell us which of these actions is *not* >

in the Wegman Report > > to the Senate years ago already. > > That isn't strictly speaking the only manmade warming, or even the only > Mann-made warming. > >

You think the Man from Abilene had a premonition about the global warming scam pulled by those

identified by Wegman, to destroy no further records... But as science, global warming is finished, regardless of who "believes" in it; the political death throes might

On Dec 2, 10:03 pm, Lord Valve <detri...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: ******* > Think 'Climate-

appoint Edward Wegman, the most distinguished statistician in the US, > > probably in the world, to form a panel to advise it on Mann's > > credility and work. Wegman

whom Edward Wegman condemned before the US Senate as a clique corrupting global warming studies. Hadley CRU capo di capo tuti, Professor Jones, is a co-author of Wang... The upshot

North and Wegman and several other members of their panels, right here on RBT. (It is one of the reasons the local global warmies, who get their "facts" from television, no

Keitht <KeithT> wrote: > Andre Jute wrote: > > > The Earth has a lot of practice

Karl Marx wrote spectacularly badly and had a spectacular talent for misusing statistics. Those are

academicians, Wegman and North, both condemning Mann lock-stock-and-barrel and finding each of his conclusions individually unproven. That's a more serious case than even

Do politicized "scientists" practicing scientism deserve respect? a question by Andre Jute

A FEW INNOCENT QUESTIONS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING FROM THE COMMON MAN Q: Is there global warming? A: No.

counter the Wegman Panel, which had been commissioned by the US Senate to investigate Michael Mann's statistical credibility, and had found it to be zero as related in "(

This is just to toss some fuel into the fire and see how my namesake and others respond. Notice an