On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:19:15 -0700 (PDT), Frank Krygowski
<
frkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 6:39:25?PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 12:36:17 -0400, Catrike Rider
>> <sol...@drafting.not> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:30:03 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>> ><
frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 6/8/2023 3:08 AM, Catrike Rider wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Reality is a subjective evaluation.
>> >>
>> >>Wow.
>> >
>> ><LOL> If it's an evaluation, it's subjective. Even a logic-impaired
>> >fool like you should be able to see that, Krygowski.
>> >
>> >For instance, your reality is that you're qualified to instruct other
>> >people on how, where, and for what reasons to ride a bicycle. My
>> >reality is that you totally lack those qualifications.
>> Come now! My neighbor's 7 year old daughter has the training wheel off
>> her bicycle now. Can riding a bike be 'that' complex a task?
>
>Of course, the Florida troll rides only a tricycle. That's evidence that yes,
>riding a bike is too complex a task for him. But what he's still chafing about is
>that I mentioned the value of sometimes riding near lane center in
>a narrow lane.
Actually, no, you can't make me chafe. I do, however, have a guilty
pleasure of making you chafe by rubbing your nose in your pathetic
attempts to garner respect and admiration. (see below)
>Yes, I know that some here are very fearful of ever slightly inconveniencing
>any motorist; and that some are fearful of ever riding on roads at all. But
>state laws in many, perhaps most states permit that tactic, often very specifically.
<chuckle> If the fact that something is legal means that everyone must
do it, you'd have to carry a gun, and you're afraid of guns.
>And the value and use of the technique is taught in the national Cycling Savvy education
>courses, and in the courses taught by the League of American Bicyclists, the
>similar courses in Canada and Great Britain, and probably elsewhere.
A bunch of do-gooders who get an ego boost by telling other people
what to do. Not the kind of people I'd want to be around.
>It's not the only technique taught, of course. Those courses also cover things like
>destination positioning, communicating and negotiating with motorists,
>hazard avoidance, dealing with unusual intersections and much more.
Some folks don't know anything unless someone else tells them... What
the f**K is "destination positioning?"
>Is it complex? For some! There are many cyclists who don't know those things.
>You can often spot them by their behavior on the road (skulking in gutters, weaving in
>and out of spaces between parked cars, riding in door zones, etc.) or by their
>postings ("I would _never_ ride there!" of "Anyone who delays a motorist
>has a death wish"
"death wish" = straw man alert...
>or "I ride only on bike trails" etc.)
Nobody I know has said that, either.
As for me, I ride on roads and streets when I need to, but I don't
when I don't need to. I did just a few days ago to check out my new
Garmin Bike computer. I did about 2 and a half miles. Sat in the left
turn lane at three different stop light intersections.
Totally banal ride. I don't know why anyone would choose to ride like
that.
>Am I qualified to talk about such things?
Nope... You're a blowhard who strokes your ego by telling others what
to do, and who, by the way, is afraid to hook your feet onto your
pedals.
>Yes, by virtue of attending multiple
>classes at various levels for each of the programs described above.
Sorry, I can't muster up any respect for anyone who'd attend a class
on how to ride a bicycle. But like I said, "some folks don't know
anything unless someone else tells them."
>I've also acted
>as an editorial consultant on two well known books dealing with those matters.
>I've written many articles on those and related topics, and had some of them
>reprinted by publications in other states and one other country. I no longer maintain
>the teaching certification, but I've taught many cycling classes, I've written scripts for
>and appeared in televised instructional spots, I've been interviewed for newspapers and
>TV on such matters, and I've spoken (by request) at city, regional and statewide gatherings.
<EYEROLL> "look at me, look at me."
>Some would apparently say that's just _my_ reality;
Indeed...
>that nobody needs to know
>those skills (which may be true, if one is timid enough to never ride anywhere
>practical or interesting);
Practical and interesting are subjective evaluations.
>or that none of that is true in _their_ reality (which may be
>true if one lives in a place with different laws and different traffic principles).
>
>But then, in the reality of our four-year-old neighbor boy, he's Batman.
<LOL> You're such a blowhard, Krygowski, but I do get a kick out of
seeing your bluster.
>- Frank Krygowski