ATV runs light, hits cyclist; video

[AMuzi]

Naturally, bystanders lambaste and insult NYC cops.

https://nypost.com/2022/09/21/atv-runs-red-light-slams-into-cyclist-in-the-bronx/

--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

[Tom Kunich]

You can find anything in New York. It is correct that the people own the streets but without regulations it becomes a free-for-all as you can see.

[Catrike Rider]

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:11:24 -0500, AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

>Naturally, bystanders lambaste and insult NYC cops.
>
>https://nypost.com/2022/09/21/atv-runs-red-light-slams-into-cyclist-in-the-bronx/

Blue lives matter.

[Tom Kunich]

Very much of this comes from the loss of confidence in the justice system and it isn't the justice system that is bad but an entire generation of leftist millennials who were brought up through an education system that taught them that the free enterprise system was unfair because you had to work to succeed. Most of these spoiled little brats don't want to work even when a rather large percentage of them could succeed. My step-son now has his PhD and is a manager at a major aerospace firm in San Diego fighting to stay in business because they cannot find people that are willing to work. ALL of the step-kids have become successful simply because they are willing to work for what they want.

Fully a third of the millennials want communism here in the US because teachers and professors never once explained the absolute failures of communism and how millions of people were murdered by the communists for little more than the fun of it. These millennials are vastly outnumbered here in the US and who do you suppose is going to come out with the shitty side of the stick when they start their efforts to install communism here?

This is largely driven though by George Soros who makes his money destroying countries. This is a mental problem but no one calls him out on it and he finances the election of extreme left city officials across the nation. The stupid six are delighted to see the failing of America until it effects them personally. At that time it is bad. This is why you see them calling the movement of illegals into their own neighborhoods as bad while the open borders is good.

Flunky tellls us he rides bikes. If so why doesn't he ever have anything to say about bikes? The same with our queer contributor, Russell Seaton. We know that Krygowski's idea of a bicycle ride is the 5 or 6 mile evening ride and Liebermann and Slocum do not ride bikes at all. Since they're both dying I suppose we can forgive them not riding but why do they feel the need to put their two cents (which are worthless under Biden's inflation) in on everything? People who used to ride are only of worth if they have something to add and not one of these do. They are the embodiment of civil unrest and they are the ones that will suffer from it. Unlike Soros they don't have heavily armed guards protecting them around the clock. They bring death to themselves by their own hands

[AMuzi]

That started out pretty well and the sailed off
to...somewhere else entirely although I have no idea where.

Which is a trending thing this week:

https://nypost.com/2022/09/21/biden-started-strong-at-un-then-bumbled-his-way-into-woke-irrelevance/

Do you have any plans for autumn of 2024?

[Frank Krygowski]

Tom's posts just drip misery. What a sad, angry old man!

- Frank Krygowski

[Tom Kunich]

You're right, I keep trying to ignore the stupid six but they continue to intrude on most of the conversations. A kill file doesn't appear to be enough since I have to check my Google mail account often enough that the mail doesn't build up. And then there those idiots are. I can only keep trying.

[AMuzi]

Try working in 'domestic terrorist' and 'semi-fascist'[1].

I'm told those are popular terms nowadays and very effective
for letting people know just who you are and how you think.


[1]whatever the hell that means. A 1938 Mercedes heavy truck?

[John B.]

Well, there is still hope. The Demo's introduced a bill that aimed to
combat “dark money” in United States elections by making it mandatory
for political organizations to disclose big donors.
And the Repubs skillfully blocked it.

But unfortunately the Courts ruled that if Trump wants to claim that
FBI might have planted documents during search of Mar-a-Lago last
month., he's got to prove it.
--
Cheers,

John B.

[John B.]

Well, I know that Tommy, for one, disdains using "google" but I just
googled "semi-fascist" and got 6.3 million "hits". There must be one
in there, somewhere, that suits your fancy (:-)
--
Cheers,

John B.

[John B.]

"the stupid six"??
Yes, I rather like that title, and yes I do agree.

How stupid it is to believe that anyone can ever convince Tommy to
tell the truth.

--
Cheers,

John B.

[AMuzi]

Disclosure of political donors is a free speech issue for
PACs. Not gonna happen.

How exactly does one prove a negative? Regarding planted
documents, I invoke the Captain Bryan Suits rule, "Why
wouldn't they?"

[AMuzi]

In re disclosing names of donors to nonprofit groups:

https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/889

Review the arguments and I think you'll agree that case was
rightly decided. Neither the Constitution nor the principles
have changed.

[John B.]

Interesting. I thought that the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
placed a limit on individual and corporate donations of election
funding.

Has that been changed?

>How exactly does one prove a negative? Regarding planted
>documents, I invoke the Captain Bryan Suits rule, "Why
>wouldn't they?"

Err... that seems a bit vague. The Trump-ets claim that the FBI might

have planted documents during search of Mar-a-Lago last month.

In other words a statement or allegation of an act. In more simple
terms you accuse someone of stealing a bicycle., it's up to you to
prove that (1) you actually had a bicycle, and (2) That was the guy
that took it.

Would you go to the Police and claim... "well I might have had a
bicycle and I thing that guy might have stolen it"?
And if you did what do you suppose the Cops would say?
--
Cheers,

John B.

[John B.]

Ah But... You live in the U.S. and the courts seem to be quite capable
in changing laws that have been in previously agreed upon as
legitimate to now be illegitimate.
The recent turnabout in the Federal Court decision on the Abortion
laws as one example (:-)

--
Cheers,

John B.

[Frank Krygowski]

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 9:16:47 PM UTC-4, AMuzi wrote:
> Regarding planted
> documents, I invoke the Captain Bryan Suits rule, "Why
> wouldn't they?"

If you're talking about the ex-president: Because they wouldn't need to.

They've already got what amounts to confessions.

- Frank Krygowski

[Jeff Liebermann]

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:16:41 -0500, AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

>Disclosure of political donors is a free speech issue for
>PACs. Not gonna happen.

Trump:
<https://www.opensecrets.org/trump>
<https://www.opensecrets.org/trump/inauguration-donors>

Biden:
<https://www.opensecrets.org/biden>
<https://www.opensecrets.org/biden/bundlers>

George Soros:
<https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=george+soros&order=desc&sort=A>

--
Jeff Liebermann je...@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

[Catrike Rider]

What a shame that people quit riding, or only manage 5 or 6 miles. It
takes me 5 or 6 miles just to get my heart rate up to 75 BPM. Perhaps
these slackers should consider a trailer park trike. 5 or 6 miles
would be a walk in the park on one of these.. maybe even 8 or 9 miles.

https://tinyurl.com/2hyqqf9g

[AMuzi]

You were not born yesterday:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/baltimore-police-sergeant-planted-drugs-suspects-car-federal/story?id=51492675

[AMuzi]

Not the only instance. Roe was wrongly decided even as many
preferred the policy result. Even Ms Ginsburg wrote and
lectured on that point and even as she advocated some other
arguments for her preferred result. But at the end of the
day it was an error and was reversed. Read the Dobbs
arguments and I doubt you'll disagree. You may prefer the
policy result but The Supremes are not charged with
political or policy responsibility, only with application of
the Constitution and statutes as written.

In re The Court, it's high time they took up some of the
many /coram nobis/ petitions regarding Yasui, Korematsu and
Hirabayashi and finally reverse all three.

https://iexaminer.org/announcement-hirabayashi-yasui-korematsu-families-file-brief-in-supreme-court-in-opposition-to-travel-ban/

[AMuzi]

On 9/23/2022 1:24 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:16:41 -0500, AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>
>> Disclosure of political donors is a free speech issue for
>> PACs. Not gonna happen.
>
> Trump:
> <https://www.opensecrets.org/trump>
> <https://www.opensecrets.org/trump/inauguration-donors>
>
> Biden:
> <https://www.opensecrets.org/biden>
> <https://www.opensecrets.org/biden/bundlers>
>
> George Soros:
> <https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=george+soros&order=desc&sort=A>
>

Direct candidate or campaign contributions are reported and
regulated by FEC. Contributions to PACS which are
'educational and advocacy' charitable organizations are not.
And for good reason:

https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/889

[funkma...@hotmail.com]

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 3:54:00 PM UTC-4, cycl...@gmail.com wrote:
>

> Flunky tellls us he rides bikes. If so why doesn't he ever have anything to say about bikes?

You're a fucking moron beyond all comparison.

[funkma...@hotmail.com]

You aren't surprised by that, are you?

[funkma...@hotmail.com]

You are - without fail - the first person in any discussion to throw out a personal insult or turn to politics.

> A kill file doesn't appear to be enough since I have to check my Google mail account often enough that the mail doesn't build up. And then there those idiots are. I can only keep trying.

A) you don't have a kill file. You're too stupid to figure out how to use one. If you did have one, you wouldn't have been the first person to respond to my helmet conversation.

B) If you had a clue on how to use a gmail account you'd know 2 things:
B1) You don't have to open a message from anyone you don't want to read.
B2) you could block the email address from anyone you don't want to read.

Shut the fuck up tommy.

[Jeff Liebermann]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:19:51 -0700 (PDT), "funkma...@hotmail.com"
<funkma...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 5:03:34 PM UTC-4, cycl...@gmail.com wrote:

>> You're right, I keep trying to ignore the stupid six but they continue to intrude on most of the conversations.

>You are - without fail - the first person in any discussion to throw out a personal insult or turn to politics.

Maybe Tom doesn't know the difference between a personal insult and
his politics?

>> A kill file doesn't appear to be enough since I have to check my Google mail account often enough that the mail doesn't build up. And then there those idiots are. I can only keep trying.
>
>A) you don't have a kill file. You're too stupid to figure out how to use one. If you did have one, you wouldn't have been the first person to respond to my helmet conversation.

I couldn't find any way to create a kill file for Google Groups. There
are no kill files for Google Groups. Tom lies.

>B) If you had a clue on how to use a gmail account you'd know 2 things:
> B1) You don't have to open a message from anyone you don't want to read.
> B2) you could block the email address from anyone you don't want to read.

Oops. I just realized where Tom's Gmail deluge from RBT is coming
from. He did it to himself by misconfiguring his Google Groups
settings.

Hey Tom. Go to your Google "My Groups" page at:
<https://groups.google.com/my-groups>
You'll see a column titled "Subscription". Change the entry for RBT
from "each email" to "no email" and the RBT deluge in your Gmail inbox
should stop. If you are subscribed to other groups, also change those
to whatever is appropriate.

I should have recognized the problem much earlier. I did the same
thing to myself when I was first learning to configure Google Groups
and mailing lists.

"Manage your subscriptions & global settings"
<https://support.google.com/groups/answer/9792489>

[John B.]

But had the Japanese brought their claim to the court during the
period of imprisonment (I'm guessing here) their claim might even been
refused to be heard.

In fact, reading newspaper accounts, of the time, had someone said
"Shoot 'em" it looks like the news, at least, would have applauded the
idea.

"What's right" seems to vary greatly depending upon when it occurs.

--
Cheers,

John B.

[AMuzi]

I knew Mr Yasui, an American born law school graduate
recently admitted to the Oregon bar in 1941.

On reading of the discriminatory curfew for people of
Japanese heritage, including American natural born citizens,
he promptly set out to get himself arrested in order to file
a test case, believing in his heart that the orders were
unconstitutional and trusting the courts to affirm that.

After being brushed off all night by several Portland
officers, many of whom knew him, he was finally arrested
early the next day and spent the early years of the war in
Multnomah County solitary confinement while defending
himself until his case wended its way to The Supremes.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/320/115/

It's as indefensible as Dred Scott or Plessy. And yet the
decision stands.

[John B.]

But as I said, at the time it was legal. In fact on December 18, 1944,
the Supreme Court handed down two decisions on the legality of the
incarceration under Executive Order 9066. Korematsu v. United States,
a 6–3 decision upholding a Nisei's conviction for violating the
military exclusion order, stated that, in general, the removal of
Japanese Americans from the West Coast was constitutional.

"Nisei", a designation for second generation Japanese born in the
U.S., A U.S. citizen who's parent(s) were native Japanese.

--
Cheers,

John B.

[AMuzi]

Same argument as Plessy.
And equally wrong, Constitutionally.

We're either 'equal before the law', all of us, or we are not.

[John B.]

Sure sounds good but in real life it just ain't true.
And, probably never has been so.
--
Cheers,

John B.

[Tom Kunich]

You couldn't possibly believe that the Democrats think of even WANT everyone to be equal? I think that Martha's Vinyard put paid to the idea that Democrats have the slightest belief in equality.