On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:17:05 -0800, sms <
scharf...@geemail.com>
wrote:
>On 1/9/2024 12:01 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 11:35:54 -0800, sms <
scharf...@geemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/9/2024 11:06 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> I've been mentioning that Tom has been using Google Groups to post his
>>>> comments for at least 2 years in reference to Tom's non-existent kill
>>>> file, a service which Google Groups does NOT provide.
>>>
>>> That is correct. Unfortunately there is no filtering by user name or
>>> subject in Google Groups, formerly Deja, formerly Dejanews.
>>
>> Yes, there is filtering in the search feature. Go to RBT:
>> <
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech>
>> Click on the down arrow to the right of "Search conversations within
>> rec.bicycles.tech" box at the top of the page. The first field is
>> "Posted by". Inscribe Tom's full name or email address and it should
>> produce a list of threads that include Tom's comments.
>
>Yes of course in searching for posts you can filter, but you can't just
>filter out posts in a group like you can in other news readers.
True. I'm not sure what plans (if any) Google had for the Google
Groups reader. The big problem for me is that threads are not
threaded (form a tree structure) so that I follow the comments back to
the original perpetrator. It's a problem with all online web or app
based news readers. Since the program is running on the news server
and not on your own PC or smartphone, you can only do those things
that the program author or company designates as necessary. The
opposite is also a problems. If they become excessively creative, you
could end up with the user interface from hell and features that
nobody wants. Or, they might throw in every possible feature they
think might be useful. That's one problem I have with Forte Agent.
Also, simple filtering a thread by author doesn't work very well. It
makes the original posting by the offending author disappear, but all
the replies continue to be visible. Filtering by branches of a tree
structure works well, but Google Groups isn't tree structured.
Most often, the worst offenders are also the longest and strongest
survivors. Over the years, I've seen newsgroups lose almost all their
readers because obnoxious readers who have never bothered to read
about netiquette. There are many versions. This one seems adequate.
<
https://coursedesign.colostate.edu/obj/corerulesnet.html>
I usually add one rule of my own:
"Don't post anything that you wouldn't consider worth reading".
No picnic is complete without its attendant cloud of flies. No Usenet
newsgroup is complete without its characters. I thought it might be
fun to apply labels and define them:
<
http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/Genesis%20-%20Usenet.pdf>
Sometimes, it does seem like I'm swatting at flies.