http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080717140421.htm
is that your research? no. so you're still a fucking retard timmy.
Tim,
Thanks for the link. Here's another link on that site that talks about
corrosion in Stainless:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/02/020214080414.htm
Dear Tim,
Thanks for the link--interesting site.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
Bourbon wasn't properly fermented this morning?
no, it's timmy desperately trying to be relevant after getting a good
roasting for posting utter bullshit about "crumple zone" forks.
and when the blind squirrel does stumble across a buried acorn, what
does he dig up? not the actual acorn, but an empty husk - something
with only marginal relevance to bikes. bizarre when that same site
carries /much/ more relevant [and topical when you consider the above]
stories with content like the wider application of cfrp:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/0211-cars_of_the_future_plastic_makes_perfect.htm
the trouble with timmy is that not only is he retarded, he's /so/
retarded, he doesn't even know it.
Bourbon appears to make the beamster dyspeptic.
At any rate, the location of the images of the cracks in the cross
section of the stainless steel wire was quite interesting.
location??? what other location would you have expected??? retard.
I didn't have any expectations. That's why it's interesting. Some
have claimed that spoke fractures originate from the outside of the
spoke, some have proposed that the fractures start inside the spoke
(e.g., damage to the spoke versus internal stresses). This research
would appear to have the potential to shed some light on that
discussion. But since you're an ex-metallurgist, you already knew
that and were just finger masturbating on your keyboard again.
That's also interesting. I had not discovered the Science Daily site
back then so I hadn't seen that one. I wonder if it is an issue in
spoke service life.
oh timmy, you're so retarded you don't have a freakin' clue.
1. that story is about the new technique called "diffraction contrast
tomography" and what it can observe - the cracking part, the bit you
latched on to, is ancient history and merely a dumbed down example of
that this kind x-ray diffraction can be used for.
2. the cracking system used in this example is stress corrosion, not
fatigue.
3. spokes are observed to be experiencing metal fatigue, not stress
corrosion.
so to summarize, you can't read, you're bullshitting about a subject on
which you have not the first clue, and in the process you're showing
yourself to be truly retarded.
which leads to the next point: how much longer are you going to subject
your neuron to this kind of abuse timmy? or rather, if you can't resist
abusing it, can't you just abuse it in private rather than in public
like this? it's getting pathetic.
still desperately trying to be relevant then timmy? so what is the
spoke sulfur content then? and what is the reagent to which the
sulfured zones is typically reacting?
retard.
I believe that you need professional help.
I put him on ignore LONG ago. I suggest you do the same Frank.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"People who had no mercy will find none." - Anon.
> "jim beam" <spamv...@bad.example.net> wrote
>> is that your research? no. so you're still a fucking retard timmy.
Frank Drackman wrote:
> I believe that you need professional help.
Tim _is_ a professional.
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **