Many years ago I had the pleasure of owning a Gios Torino, which was
clearly an absolutely spectacular bike until it was crashed beyond
repair. I am wondering if their modern steel frames (e.g., their
"Compact Pro" models) are, relative to what one can get today, as good.
You don't often see people riding them, although I believe they are
still quite available in the U.S.
"Good" is tough to nail down because everyone's definition is
different. IMO, Italian bikes are "bad" because they're relatively
expensive and the paint is not durable. Why shell out $1K+ for an
Italian frame when you can get well made, custom frame with great paint
from any number of US builders?
Just my opinion.
Gios is the biggest brand of racing bikes in Japan. I thought that was a
joke until i did the Suzuka RR and witnessed this for myself. They are
everywhere.
Hey for what it's worth when i first got into racing about ten years ago my
dream bike was a Gios pro with full campy super record.
edgar
I have a twenty year old Blue Gios Torino Super Record in pristine
condition. It has all Campy Super Record Equipment and I would not trade it
for the world. As far as the new models, I can't help you there.
Mark
spi...@earthlink.net wrote in message <34AD5A...@earthlink.net>...
I think the shimmy could in fact be related to what's been talked about
here. Gios frames, while stunningly beautiful (I have never seen a
handsomer blue) and by all accounts absolutely rocket-like on climbs,
have top tubes that are even shorter than some of the other Italian
frames. I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a road bike with a
shorter wheelbase for a given frame size. Accordingly, many Gios people
that I've seen use a long 12-14 cm stem. Which is fine in and of itself,
but by the time you add the forward reach of some of the newer anatomic
bars and those long-bodied STI/ergo levers, your weight is really out
there, well in front of the front axle. This puts an awful lot of
pressure on the front wheel which, in my experience, can lead directly
to shimmy, esp. if the bike is even very slightly mis-aligned (please
correct me if I am wrong).
Accordingly, for steep descents on those fabulous, fabulous bikes, some
find it helpful to remember to sit back a little and take some of that
weight off the front wheel.
I have one of the new ones..the Gios Lite. This one does not have
the "compact" dropouts. Instead it has normal horizontal dropouts. This
bike has turned more heads in one year than any other bike I've owned
before.It is just plain gorgeous. It is nice and stiff in the BB.
Geometry is more suited to crits than RR's IMOH. I like the ride very
much as, even thought the geometry is more crit oriented, the frameset
will not beat you up in a long road ride. It does a good job smoothing
up the road.I'm selling my frameset because it does not fit me as well
as my previous bike. (If anyone is looking for a cheap 1 year old 56cm
Gios frameset, drop me
a line at nar...@cae.cig.mot.com).
All in all, they're excellent frames, with gorgeous paint and the price
is right.
--
Ricardo Colon
Q14...@email.mot.com
I considered a Gios frame when building my new road bike, although
I gave up the thought when I realized I couldn't straddle one with a
long enough top tube.
They're _real_ short up top, meaning those of us with an above
average torso to leg length ratio won't fit period. People with
more normal proportions will fit, but may be happier (losing
3cm of seat tube made me feel a _lot_ more in control of the
bike on track stands and when I'm out of the saddle) with the
shorter seat tube possible with a different manufacturer's frame
geometry.
Nice paint job though...
--
"Come to the edge, Life said. They said: We are afraid. Come to the edge,
Life said. They came. Life pushed them...and they flew." -Guillaume Apollinaire
Work: dr...@Qualcomm.COM Play: dr...@PoohSticks.ORG
Home Page: <a href="http://www.poohsticks.org/drew/">Home Page</a>
Sonja
Aluminum: Cannondale and Klein.
Carbon: Trek 5000 series and Kestrels.
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
Tom Kunich wrote in message <884379546...@dejanews.com>...
>In article <34B64549...@lhsystems.com>,
> Sonja Schellenberg <Schell...@lhsystems.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking for a road bike with a short top tube. It should be
>> preferably made of aluminium or carbon. Any suggestions?
>Aluminum: Cannondale and Klein.
Cannondales are short, Kleins are long.
Matt O.
>In article <34B64549...@lhsystems.com>,
> Sonja Schellenberg <Schell...@lhsystems.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking for a road bike with a short top tube. It should be
>> preferably made of aluminium or carbon. Any suggestions?
>Carbon: Trek 5000 series and Kestrels.
Both the Trek and Kestrel don't have particularly short top tubes.
In fact, I don't know of any non-custom carbon frames with short top
tubes. Calfee Designs (aka CarbonFrames) are available in custom sizes,
but are big $$$.
I'd start by looking at the Cannondales.
Also do a DejaNews search. There was a similar thread entitled something
likes "bikes for short women" only a couple of months ago. You'll
probably find some good info there.
Good luck in your search,
Chris Neary
dia...@aimnet.com
"It doesn't get any easier - you just go faster" - Greg Lemond
And the Vitus 992 is even shorter if memory serves me correctly, and a really
nice bike besides.
--
jeve...@wwa.DEFEAT.UCE.BOTS.com (John Everett) http://www.wwa.com/~jeverett
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Things have gotten so bad I feel the need to disguise my email address.
And I don't like this explanation because I just hate long signatures.
On Fri, 09 Jan 1998 15:02:38 -0600, tku...@diabloresearch.com (Tom
Kunich) wrote:
>In article <34B64549...@lhsystems.com>,
> Sonja Schellenberg <Schell...@lhsystems.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking for a road bike with a short top tube. It should be
>> preferably made of aluminium or carbon. Any suggestions?
>
>Aluminum: Cannondale and Klein.
>
>Carbon: Trek 5000 series and Kestrels.
>
>-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
Rick Denney
Take what you want and leave the rest.
>My Trek 5500 is built about square. I consider that a long top tube.
Depends.... A square 50cm bike is VERY short, while a square
64cm bike is VERY long... while a square 56cm bike is "just right".
Mark Hickey
Habanero Cycles
http://www.cynetfl.com/habanero/
Chris Neary wrote:
> tku...@diabloresearch.com (Tom Kunich) wrote:
>
> >In article <34B64549...@lhsystems.com>,
> > Sonja Schellenberg <Schell...@lhsystems.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm looking for a road bike with a short top tube. It should be
> >> preferably made of aluminium or carbon. Any suggestions?
>
> >Carbon: Trek 5000 series and Kestrels.
>
> Both the Trek and Kestrel don't have particularly short top tubes.
Kestrels are longer than Treks on similarly sized bikes. Treks have
lengthened their top tubes over the past couple years, but originally the
OCLV's were shorter and the frames were undersquare. The Treks are also
measured kinda strange as well. Consider the fact the frames are the same
for the Lemond and Trek, but the "frame sizes" are different. Although the
frame sizes are different, the top tube legnths are the same for the 59 cm
Trek and 57cm Lemond. It all depends on how the frames are measured for
seat tube legnth. The only way you can tell is to have someone fit you for
your bike! Hell, fit is the most important thing, not what its made of.
Any poorly fitting bike, whether it is aluminum, carbon or bamboo is a waste
of money.
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998 06:34:32 GMT, mhi...@cynetfl.com (Mark Hickey)
wrote:
Rick Denney wrote:
> Mine's a 58. In reviewing a buying guide a year ago or so, I noted
> that it was at the long end of the spectrum in top tube length. My
> Eddy Merckx is about a half centimeter shorter, and it's longer than
> most famous Italian bikes.
Most famous Italian bikes have short top tubes, especially when you get
into larger sizes.
Joe Lucchio wrote in message <34BBD552...@castles.com>...
>Most famous Italian bikes have short top tubes, especially when you get
>into larger sizes.
That seems to be the case. However, it's interesting that most Italian cars
have the steering wheel placed high and far away, while the pedals are
close. Car magazines used to joke that Italians must all be built like
apes, with long arms and torsos, and short legs. However, their bikes are
built just the opposite. Maybe all the long legged Italians become
cyclists, while the short legged ones become race car drivers. Who knows!
Matt O.
>
> Both the Trek and Kestrel don't have particularly short top tubes.
>
<delete>
> I'd start by looking at the Cannondales.
>
Why does Cannondale get a reputation for having short top tubes? When
I measure my three year old R500, the figures come out as 53 cm for the
top tube, from centre of headset to centre of seat tube, and about 50
to 50.5 cm for the seat tube, centre of top tube to centre of bottom
bracket. Am I measuring in some non-standard way?
R. Dal Farra
-- Fred
I've wondered about this too. I have a '96 2.8 and an '82 Peugeot Super
Comp. The Peugeot's tt is a centimeter shorter for a frame with them
same stand-over height as the Cannondale's. I've read, too, about
"classic euro geometry" in magazines which suggest longer tt's, but
after recently sizing a Pinarello SLX, I found the exact same
measurements as my old Peugeot -- shorter tt than my Cannondale.
David
>
> Why does Cannondale get a reputation for having short top tubes? When
>I measure my three year old R500, the figures come out as 53 cm for the
>top tube, from centre of headset to centre of seat tube, and about 50
>to 50.5 cm for the seat tube, centre of top tube to centre of bottom
>bracket. Am I measuring in some non-standard way?
My wife's six year old R600 is the only 48 cm bike she can ride, due to
the unusually short top tube.
Unfortunately newer C-dales have longer tubes than this.
> Tom Kunich wrote:
> >
> > Uh, Colnagos have medium to long top tubes.
> >
> Tom, I disagree. A 57cm(c-t) Colnago has a 55.3cm top tube. I call this
> short. -Dbear-
Couldn't it be the case that the different frames that are
available from Colnago have different geometries?
In a German bicycle magazine there was recently a review
of a few Italian road race bikes that are made from other
material than the traditional steel.
Their opinion was that they are not really bad, but that
there are better ones for the same price.
The Italians seem to have not yet gained enough experience
with the material.
So I'm having a closer look at American or northern Europe manufacturers.
I just have trouble finding geometry figures somewhere.
From the looks, data, reviews etc. I'm especially interested in
Principia, Muesing, Storck, Trek, Look, Kestrel.
I have the strange feeling, that the ones I like all have longer top
tubes.
Never ridden any of them.
Are the Kestrels still around? Haven't seen one for a while.
Thanks for all your informative answers!
Sonja
I have a hunch that the geometries that Tom and Dbear cite are from
Colnagos of different vintages. If I remember correctly, the late-70's
and early-80's frames had top tubes that were much longer than the ones
of more recent vintage.
-Ray
tab...@speakeasy.org
http://www.speakeasy.org/~tabula
Kestrel is still around. You can find their web site (which includes
frame dimenstions) and others, at:
Seems to me that you're looking at carbon fiber frames. You could also
consider Aegis and Calfee Design. Both have good reputations, have web
sites, and offer custom sizing. How you'd get one of these frames in
Germany could be a problem, though. Perhaps this is a good excuse for a
vacation in the States ;)
Marc
>Are the Kestrels still around? Haven't seen one for a while.
Try http://www.kestrel-usa.com/
or link there from my home page.
Damon Rinard
Damon Rinard's Home Page:
http://members.aol.com/rinards/