On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 10:26:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<
cycl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 12:23:47 AM UTC-7, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:59:01 -0700 (PDT),
cycl...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >Listening to people here who actually believe in Darwin, spouting religion is ridiculous.
>>
>> Did you know that Usenet has its own collection of characters,
>> apparently modeled after various biblical characters? I wrote this
>> about 25 years ago. It still applies:
>> <
http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/genesis.txt>
>While that is clever it isn't accurate.
I'll take that as a half-compliment. Thanks/2
>The internet chat groups used to have quite intellectual discussions
>because it was mostly limited to technical people.
I ran a small Usenet node using Bnews 2.11 in about the late 1980's,
when there were only 16 newsgroups. I was one of the early users of
the AT&T ihnp4, seismo, and later UUNET passing traffic with Telebit
modems over dialup using UUCP. Please don't lecture me on the manner
of the early discussions and operations. The reason everyone was
exceptionally polite was due to the fragile nature of the network,
which was heavily dependent on the good graces of the large companies
that operated the major network nodes for free. Everyone was afraid
of losing access to these nodes. It would be a big stretch to suggest
that (for example) seismo, which was the Center for Seismological
Studies somewhere in Virginia was somehow sponsoring a USENET node for
the purpose of "research".
>That ended with the more general public who most often ranted
>anonymously.
The problem was that all the major commercial network providers had a
clause in their contracts that prevent their customers from reselling
bandwidth. If a company contracted with (for example) BARRNET, they
could not setup a BBS to redistribute bandwidth or content to their
customers. This changed literally overnight when Sprint, possibly by
accident, removed this clause from their contracts, and opened the
flood gates to individuals reselling or just giving away bandwidth.
Even so, the GUM (great unwashed masses) took a long time to learn how
to use USENET. It wasn't until the World Wide Web and web browsers
arrived, that the GUM was able to actually use the web for rants (such
as this). My guess(tm) about 1994. Certainly, USENET has its Green
Card Lawyer spammers, and there were attempts to subvert the system
for commercial gain, but as I recall, these were the exceptions rather
than the rule.
Incidentally, there was a very good for anonymity. A major USENET
restriction was that there should not be any commercial traffic
through publicly funded nodes, such as universities. Since the
traffic was not segregated between commercial and non-commercial, it
was expedient to have all traffic be non-commercial. Also, to avoid
getting fired for making disparaging remarks about one's employer or
irritating various politicians, it was necessary to hide one's
identity. So, "munging" email addresses and names became common
practice.
>People like Frank who attempts to take out all of his own life's
>failures on the rest of the universe. I rather feel sorry for
>these people but that doesn't mean I won't return their insults
>with insults.
That's fine. Please continue to run your life in any manner you see
fit, but forgive me if I don't join you in your attempted insults.