On 1/14/2020 6:54 PM, jbeattie wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 3:58:27 PM UTC-8, Mark J. wrote:
>> On 1/14/2020 10:34 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>> On 1/14/2020 11:51 AM, jbeattie wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 9:10:48 AM UTC-8, Mark J. wrote:
>>>>> So I learned (?) something new (?) today reading Lennard Zinn's column
>>>>> at Velonews:
>>>>>
https://www.velonews.com/2020/01/technical-faq/technical-faq-specialized-turbo-2bliss-tire-blowoff_503717
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What I learned was the term "crochet-type rim".
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking it up, some sources say this is just another name for hook-bead,
>>>>> BUT:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_5775#Rims   says:
>>>>>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Both crochet (C) and hooked-bead (HB) rims have inner profiles
>>>>> Â Â Â Â that curve inwards near the outside diameter of the rim to
>>>>> Â Â Â Â provide a hook that helps retain the tire bead under high
>>>>> Â Â Â Â pressure. On modern bikes crochet rims are most common and
>>>>> Â Â Â Â hooked bead rims are rare. The distinction is primarily that
>>>>> Â Â Â Â hooked-bead rims lack the defined bead seat of straight side and
>>>>> Â Â Â Â hooked bead rims. The tire is held in position radially by the
>>>>> Â Â Â Â hook without a bead seat playing a role. Without a bead seat,
>>>>> Â Â Â Â the primary designation of the diameter in terms of the bead
>>>>> Â Â Â Â seat is not applicable, and the governing diameter is the OD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sentence #3 pretty clearly has a typo, but I can't figure out the
>>>>> correction, and I cannot find any images on google that directly compare
>>>>> hooked-bead and crocheted (also sometimes mis-named "crotched").
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect the "HB" in the quoted passage above is really referring to an
>>>>> obsolete design, and that the quoted writer would even call the 70's
>>>>> Mavic Mod E "crocheted" rather than "hooked-bead," even though we all
>>>>> called them hooked-bead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anyone clear this up with an authoritative source?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark J.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure there must be an ISO drawing somewhere.
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_5775Â My sense is that we've been
>>>> calling ISO "crochet" rims "hook bead" rims but that a true "hook
>>>> bead" looks like an open hook ala the old steel rim design.
>>>>
http://www.asia.ru/images/target/photo/51559581/Steel_Rim.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, that's correct.
>>> Rims with a lip and also a bead seat, such as items #571 and #A125 here:
>>>
http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/WEINRIMS.JPG
>>>
>>> are the modern standard design.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, Jay & Andrew. SO I gather that in the quotation above the
>> author intended to say:
>>
>> >>> The distinction is primarily that
>> >>> hooked-bead rims lack the defined bead seat of straight side and
>> >>> /crochet/ rims.
>>
>> Somehow, I think I'm just gonna keep calling them "hooked-bead." It's
>> worked for me for forty years.
>>
>> Mark J.
>
> Until today, I had never heard the term crochet rim. I always called them hook bead rims as distinguished from straight sided rims -- like the Wolber concaves Andrew linked. I built a set of those 4X 27" (I think). Anyway, they were 310mm spokes, and I still have a bunch of them. Totally useless unless I get a $zillion Phil spoke cutter-threader. I don't even remember what I did with the wheels. They weighed a ton, and I hated them. I think I replaced the rims with Mod 58s -- my standard crochet bead touring rim.
>
> -- Jay Beattie.
>
Yeah Weinmann A124/A129 were real pigs.
But we sold tons of them, used to buy them in case-of-50
700C, 27", 36 and 48 drill. For people who eat rims, those
were nearly indigestible.