http://www.jitensha.com/eng/cospeacrnk_e.html
However, Beyond Bikes sells a Sugino Alpina 2 crankset for $113:
http://www.beyondbikes.com/bb/ItemMatrix.asp?GroupCode=BGSO2071&MatrixType=1
Obviously, the rings are different and the logo on the Alpina 2 is the
newer updated version. Anything else? Thanks!
The XD600 / Alpina2 (or XD500, it seems to be one of those two models)
seems to be a mid-quality replacement, heavier with thicker rings.
The Alpina Cospea isn't on the sugino website any more, it has morphed
into a Dura-Ace type of crankset with integrated bottom bracket.
- Don Gillies
San Diego, CA, USA
>Does anybody know what, if any, are the difference between the Sugino
>Alpina and Alpina 2 crankarms?
1. Alpina Cospea has much thinner (lighter, more machined) chainrings
than Alpina2 cranks, which has the XD700 / XD600 chainrings.
2. Alpina 2 looks like it might be 110 bcd only. No inner 74 mm
spider. You might want to call BeyondBikes to check on this
fact. All the japanese websites offer Alpina2 as a double only.
> 2. Alpina 2 looks like it might be 110 bcd only. No inner 74 mm
> spider. You might want to call BeyondBikes to check on this
> fact. All the japanese websites offer Alpina2 as a double only.
>
> http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.cycle-...
>
110bcd double works as that's all I need. At this point, the alpina 2
looks like a good deal as I can always "upgrade" the rings later.
Thanks!
Thanks Don. The problem with that crank is it is only fits an Octalink
bb. I'm an old-school square taper guy and prefer to use a Phil bb.
The only other square taper cranks out there that I was considering
was the Campy Centaur at Nashbar:
At $60, its a bargain! I wonder if it fits a JIS bb? Brewster
It's spec'ed for an ISO BB. Some swear it will work OK, others say
that the earth will swallow you up if you mix them. IIRC (all hail)
Sheldon once said you could mix them, but don't use that crank on an
ISO spindle afterwards. Also, it will treat spindle length differently
(I think the JIS seats deeper, but don't quote me on that) so a
standard ISO 111 will have the same chainline as a JIS 113 or 108, I
forget which. Phil's shoulderless design will easily allow you to
accommodate that and get the proper chainline.
FWIW, I bought one of those Centaur CT cranks back when they were $80
and they were a good deal then. Mine replaced a Centaur 135/53-39, and
I use a Phil 110.5 ISO spindle (It's on my PX-10, so a Phil is the
only way to get ISO and French threading).
Based on what Sheldon says it sounds like it might stick out, but
would in practice work.