On 12/23/2023 5:13 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 08:10:49 -0800 (PST), "
funkma...@hotmail.com"
> <
funkma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, December 22, 2023 at 10:58:35?PM UTC-5, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 09:15:25 +0700, John B. <
sloc...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>> Goodness! I thought that 17 or 18 years was a long time and now I
>>>> learn it was a lot longer.
>>> Add another 5 years. I arbitrarily selected a quote from 1997.
>>> 2023 - 1997 = 26 years
>>> However, the time span for the articles I found were from 1992 to
>>> 1997. Therefore, the earliest article was posted:
>>> 2023 - 1992 = 31 years ago.
>>> In about 2 weeks, it will be 2024, so you can also add 1 additional
>>> year for:
>>> 2024 - 1992 = 32 years ago.
>>> In that year, Tom would have been 32 years old.
>>
>> 32? since he's allegedly in his late 70's I'm thinking he would have been closer to 50 back then
>
> Oops. My mistake. Tom was born in 1944. In 1992, he would have
> been: 1992 - 1944 = 48 years old. Hopefully, when my eyesight is
> fixed, my math will improve.
>
> I thought it might be interesting to see from what company Tom was
> posting his Usenet news from in 1992. In 1992, we were just getting
> connected to the internet in Santa Cruz CA and almost everything was
> going through two local universities. That was well before 1996, when
> Sprint was first to resell bandwidth to individual users. In 1992,
> one had to be either associated with a large company or university in
> order to obtain internet access. Tom's online resume:
> <
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-kunich-22012/details/experience/>
> shows Tom working for "Various Companies" which isn't much help.
> Perhaps one of these companies had internet access?
>
> This is Tom's earliest posting that I could find (Aug 25, 1992):
> <
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/8sQFgxIS71c/m/jc1rpspUjVIJ>
> Unfortunately, the article does not show Tom's email domain or
> signature, which would have given me a clue. About half the other RBT
> postings are from sites, companies and universities. That
> information, and much more was previously available on Google Groups,
> but was removed over the years by Google. Oh well.
Helpful hint: Clicking the reply button on a specific message in google
groups often reveals domain information. In the case of the above link
from 1992 that you provided, tom's email is listed as:
to...@netcom.com
According to a quick websearch Netcom.com was apparent;y the largest ISP
in the SF bay area at the time.
According to his resume he was "Consulting Electronics Engineer" at
"Various Companies" during that period. Interestingly, the little
snippet of the header shows the message was posted to usenet Tue, 25 Aug
92 18:11:08 GMT, translating to 10:11 AM local time.
So either tommy wasn't working, or he logged into the email account at work.
>
--
Add xx to reply