On Apr 15, 7:03 pm, Sir Ridesalot <
i_am_cycle_pat...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 8:53 pm, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>
>
>
> <
nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Don't ask me about the morality of it. It's all about survival. I must
> > ride on sidewalk like everybody else in the middle of this bike
> > sharing program. I don't know if it's that way in Paris or London, but
> > that's reality here. I figure that on average I have five near misses
> > with pedestrians and two with cars every single outing.
That's alarming. Unless by "near misses" you mean "passed in close
proximity" (which is not necessarily a problem if everybody involved
is situationally aware, in control, and exercising due care),
something really wrong there.
> > Today I almost
> > hit a child that must have been daydreaming.
People daydream - kids especially. Anticipate it.
> > Elderly people really
> > worry me since they can hardly afford to have a broken bone.
You really shouldn't even be thinking of the relative fragility on
impact of your potential victims. However, ederly people can warrant
some extra care since there are considerations such as alertness,
response time, agility, etc. - not to mention general respect for your
elders.
> > Couples
> > blocking my way patiently step aside.
It is nice to see mutual cooperation and sharing the path, but it
blows me away how many people are loath to go single file for
anything.
> > Some give me a dirty look. I
> > wished they understood I don't want to be there.
Deference and pleasant courtesy go a long way, but some people are
going to scowl at you no matter what.
> > Cars, on the other
> > hand, just ignore me when they go in/out of driveways as if they lived
> > in a bubble.
I think that's probably illegal, but as you say, the law of the jungle
prevails (or, as I say, the laws of physics trump), and ultimately you
have to watch out for yourself.
> > We are all taking gambles, and the odds are against the
> > weak. Is everybody willing participant?
Is there an option not to?
>
> > Is there a solution or are people zombies? Do we have the living dead
> > walking among us? That's a scary thought. But that's only my humble
> > opinion.
>
It's all out there.
> >
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Zombies_Nightofthe...
>
>
> Most pedestrains do *NOT* expect to encounter a bicycle that is moving
> at any rate of speed on a sidewalk. Therefore those pedestrains are
> not on the lookout for such a vehicle. As far as i am concerned a
> bicycle being ridden at speed on a sidewalk with pedestrians also
> using that sidewalk is even worse than the discrepency between law
> abiding bicyclists sharing the same road with motor vehicles.
I agree. Sidewalks belong to pedestrians, but here in the legal
jurisdiction where I live and ride, bikes are allowed on sidewalks,
except where specifically prohibited, which is usually downtown areas
where pedestrian traffic is greatest. In most other areas there is
almost never any pedestrian traffic, and sidewalks can be a good
option for the bicyclist.
> That is
> because at leaast on the road there are rules and laws governing the
> behaviour of the vehicles sharing it...
There are rules and laws governing bikes and their interaction with
pedestrians on sidewalks here.
> ... such as which traffic shall
> travel in which direction and when whereas on the sidewalk there is no
> rule such as having one side of the walkway for westbound traffic and
> the curbside for eastbound traffic or however the sidewalk is oriented
> direction wise.
Thank you. I was quite flabbergasted to find myself trying to
convince people of this fact here before.
> On the sidewalk you have such a mix of people of
> varying degrees of mobility and awareness.
Situational awareness, perceptive consideration, due care, deference
and courtesy.
> If a bicyclist does elect
> to ride on the sidewalk I think that bicyclist should ride as close
> to the curb as is practcable so that they do not strike a pedestrian
> who steps out of a doorway.
Oh, absolutely. Actually, bicyclists should probably be walking their
bike anywhere there are doorways opening onto the sidewalk. That
nearer the curb thing is good courtesy, too - unless the other person
obviously wants that line. Nearer the street means you can bail off
the sidewalk, and it's where the gentleman is supposed to be to catch
any flak from the street.
> There have been deaths of pedestrians who
> were killed when struck by a bicyclist moving at speed on a sidewalk.
> The very young and the elderly and the handicapped are most at risk.
>
That is so sad - and so unnecessary.
(I understand from Frank's "data" that there have been deaths of
people falling out of bed, too.)