On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:58:27 +0700, John B. Slocomb
<
sloc...@invalid.com> wrote:
>A much cheaper method is to repeat the mantra "I don't loan tools"
>from time to time.
I've tried that and found that it doesn't work for me. I try to be
generous, helpful, and tolerant, which includes loaning tools.
Overall, it seems to work well, except when I forget to whom I loaned
a tool, or when I can't find it, if they returned the tool. However,
I have to draw the line somewhere. I won't loan my automobile, guns,
or chain saws.
>B&D are not really common over here.
Consider yourself fortunate. A friend lives within walking distance
of a Harbor Freight retail store. He describes it like living next to
a drug dealer or liquor store. It's very difficult to resist
temptation.
Black & Decker certainly has changed over the years. I have some old
B&D drills from the 1960's that continue to work well. It's the
current offerings that I consider junk. I was going to mumble
something about DeWalt marginal quality, when I noticed that they have
been owned by Stanley Black & Decker since 1960. Enough said:
<
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeWalt>
<
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_%26_Decker>
<
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Black_%26_Decker>
>Borsch, made in Malaysia, and the
>Japanese brands are what you usually see. The Borsch appear to be the
>home owner sort of thing but I bought a 1/4" hand drill probably 15 or
>so years ago expecting it to die at a young age and it is still going
>strong.
Good to know. I don't have any experience with Borsch tools. If I
want something to last, it's Milwaukee, Makita, Rigid, Hitachi, and
maybe DeWalt.
>I bought a battery operated electric drill after struggling with 40
>feet of extension up a mast and rather liked it although it wasn't a
>"high voltage" drill and would barely, if you were careful, usually
>manage a 1/4" hole in sheet aluminum. I kept it for work aloft, and it
>worked well, but eventually the batteries died and I sold the boat so
>gave it to someone.
Try one of the LiIon battery powered drills next time. Lots of power
available. The brushless motors also have quite a bit of low end
torque. I'm too old to do tower work any more, so it's not an issue
for me. When I did, it was usually Sawzall cutting at 60 to 80 ft. I
used a rather heavy 100ft 10/3 extension with twist-lock connections.
After about 15 minutes, the extension cable was noticeably warm. If
there was any grease on the power plugs, the connection would get VERY
hot. Hauling up the cable by one end was futile. It had to be
winched up to the top in a coil, and then one end dropped.
>Repairing tools is certainly something that sounds like a good idea
>but it is really only practical to do yourself if the alternate is
>watching TV. If you are billing 25 - 30 dollars an hour for your time
>it takes you X hours to repair your tool it may well be cheaper to
>just throw it away.
Agreed. As I mentioned, I'm a compulsive repairman, which means that
I do uneconomical and absurdly expensive repairs. I should know
better. I also have a collection of rationalizations to justify my
actions. It also extends to my current business, computah repair,
which often involves unprofitable repairs. The worst part is that I
consider it fun to fix things, which takes the profit motive
completely out of the equation.
>I gave the Japanese engineers a
>lot of credit for some pretty slick work.
It was intentional. I've heard stories, possibly true, about how a
product is re-evaluated after a few years to see which parts lasted
past the expected lifetime. Then, those parts are "cost reduced" to
last not quite so long. After a few such design cycles, everything
tends to fail simultaneously, which is the primary design goal.
Incidentally, it's fairly easy to do with electrolytic capacitors in
electronic devices. Their lifetime is easily predicted if the
operating parameters (mostly ripple current) and temperature are
known.
<
http://www.illinoiscapacitor.com/tech-center/life-calculators.aspx>
Same with semiconductors and power/temp stress cycles.
>I don't know about the whole bicycle but I did read mention of some
>wheels for the bike used on climbs that were intended for a one time
>use, and another mention in a different place of one of the top
>Italian riders changing bikes for the down hill portion in the Giro (I
>think). Perhaps it is done, although the downhill bike is probably
>heavy :-)
That's a start, but not quite what I was thinking. Drillium might be
a good way to create intentional stress risers, which would fail in a
predictable manner. For example, aluminum is susceptible to
repetitive fatigue failure, which is conveniently predictable. Here's
a good start by SRAM:
<
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/bicycles/slides/080_srax13_0.html>
>>Oh yeah, the stuck seat post. I haven't tried using an oscillating
>>multifunction power tool and tape measure yet, but plan to try it the
>>next time I run into a stuck seat post.
>
>My experience is that if the seat post is really stuck a tape measure
>isn't going to do much good.
Agreed, but with some vibratory power behind the tape measure,
<
http://www.harborfreight.com/power-tools/oscillating-tools.html>
it just might be able to slither in between the seat post and seat
tube. As I understand it, the problem is that the rust from the seat
tube has imbedded itself into the aluminum seat post. If the tape
measure can break up the rust, it should release the seat post. If
not, I might try a pneumatic welding descaler. Anyway, it seems
easier than caustics and explosives.