On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:24:16 -0800 (PST), "
russell...@yahoo.com"
My mistake. I had thought it was $100
>
>But the USA licenses and regulates explosives too. Everyone buying, selling, using explosives has to have federal license. Why do we do that? Shouldn't everyone have the right to use explosives whenever they want? Isn't it a constitutional right? Explosives are inert objects too. Why should they be regulated and controlled? I don't recall anytime in history where the bad guys were blowing everyone and everything up with dynamite. FREEDOM to BLOW things UP!!!!!!!!!!!
>
https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/fact-sheet/fact-sheet-explosives-united-states
While your reference is certainly true in part is it true in dealing
with gun powder? Does one require a license to poses or use gun power
either Black or smokeless?
As an aside, as a kid I and a buddy used to make nitroglycerine,
generally unsuccessfully. We used to put the "nitroglycerine" in empty
rifle cases and throw them down into an abandoned mine... and every
once in a while one of them would go "bang". Note: "bang" not "!BANG!"
>Or did some freedom hating government bureaucrat decide to take that freedom away from Americans? He thought blowing things up was not a good thing for the average Joe on the street to do. Even though explosives are an inert object. And do lots of good things in activities like mining. Kind of like M-16 and AR-15 are appropriate for the military to have and use because they are good at killing people. Which the military does. But do bums walking on the street need to be able to kill people so easily? Or blow people and things up easily with explosives?
Well, the M-16's being capable of full-automatic firing are banned or
at least you need a $200 license to own one and the AK's not being
anything but a "semi-automatic" require no license. But why should
they. After all, semi automatic firearms, to my knowledge, have been
available for more then 100 years - the Remington Model 8 was first
sold in 1905.
And "big Magazines" Oh Horrors!
But of course the Luger pistol had a 30 round magazine way back in WW
I days and several current pistols, the Glock 18 comes standard with a
20 round capacity and 31 round magazines are available and the Glock
17 can also be fitted with a 30 round magazine, and the Kel-Tec PMR 30
has a standard capacity of 30 rounds.
So, apparently semi automatic rifles aren't inherent scary and 30
round magazines aren't scary so why when you combing a small bore semi
automatic rifle with a 30 round magazine does it become such a
fearsome weapon.
I might comment that a full length magazines for a 12 gauge shotguns
are available. In fact the "Century Arms Catamount Fury II" is a 12
gauge shotgun that comes standard with a 30 round magazine, and I'm
pretty sure that 30 rounds of 12 gauge buckshot is are more lethal
then 30 rounds of .22 bullets.
My own supposition is that those who rush about waving their hands in
the air and screaming "Oh! My God! an AR! are people who, in fact,
know very, very, little or nothing at all, about firearms.
As Andrew mentions, there are something like 20 million AR type rifles
in the U.S. If they were inherent dangerous then we should have a
substantial number of rifle homicides each year and in fact the FBI
tells us that we have about 300. Which is, I might add, some .0015% of
the AR's or about 1 out of every 66,666 AR's . Or maybe another way of
putting it might be that in 2018 there were 305 murders committed with
all types of rifles and 854 died on bicycles.
Danger! Danger!
--
Cheers,
John B.