On Jan 7, 4:40 pm, Lou Holtman <
l...@planet.nl> wrote:
> Frank Krygowski schreef:
>
> > Lou Holtman wrote:
>
> > > No way Chalo or Frank can talk me out of brifters.
>
> > If I say why I don't want brifters, it's not because I'm trying to talk
> > you out of them!
>
> It was a joke Frank. Can you tell me why you don't want brifters
> Frank? As far as I know because you think they are too complicated and
> therefor unreliable, right?
Well, let's see - since you ask:
First, I have never felt their advantage (shifting without moving my
hands 8") has been very valuable for me. My riding just doesn't
require that.
Second, I'm a bit bothered when any component gets too picky, so to
speak - in this case, when one shifter needs (almost) exactly the
proper derailleur, proper type of brake, proper cog spacing, proper
chain. This is why I still have friction shifting on the bikes I ride
most. And with my index barcons or thumb shifters, I always have the
friction option if needed, unlike STI.
Third is probably the complication you mention. Philosophically, I
think a bike should be simple. Practically, I sometimes take off and
ride very long distances on my bike. And on such rides, I've had to
fix occasional mechanical problems. I prefer that everything on my
bike that might reasonably fail could be fixed using tools I'd
reasonably carry. STI fails that criterion.
Fourth is the reliability you mention. Brifters do seem to fail more
often than most things on bikes. Understand, I'm not claiming they
break even once per year; just more often than other mechanisms, and
FAR more often than other shifters. (But FWIW, when my daughter, wife
and I rode coast to coast, my daughter had STI on her bike. I never
said "I'm making you change shifters." )
Fifth, I've got direct pull cantilevers on one bike. I don't want to
have to use a kludge like Travel Agents to get the brakes to work with
brifters.
Sixth, I prefer less expensive solutions. Given their lack of
advantage for my riding, I don't see a reason to spend that money.
> Have you ever used them yourself for a longer period of time?
Nope, for the reasons listed above.
> My opinion is based on my own experience using
> brifters for more then 20 years without any major problems. I showed
> how simple Ergo's are and how easy they are to maintain. Your opinion
> is only based on two incidents of two of your famous friends...,
Not really. I still remember the day one of my riding friends (a
master bike mechanic) showed up on a ride with the first STI we'd ever
seen. I tried them out, and immediately thought "I don't need these"
and "Man, they must be complicated." He told me they were
unrepairable, and that pretty much killed the deal for me. This was
long before the repair incidents. (And BTW, I have at least one
friend who killed her STI shifter in a crash.)
>... which were easily soved btw.
Regarding the ease of fixing my friends' STI, I'll just note that it
was difficult enough that the owners phoned me after they and their
spouse (in one case) or other friend (in the other case) failed to fix
theirs. That moved the repair out of the "easy" column, in their
minds. And one took quite a while of fussing with solvent; it was a
long way from "Squirt some WD-40 and it'll be fine."
I understand they work great for many people, and that Ergo (vs. STI)
may work even better. Still, just as I won't try to get you to give
up brifters, please don't try to make me use them. ;-)
- Frank Krygowski