Santa's got his own problems:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_vPZXbttdk&feature=player_embedded#
Bill "it's all about the carbon (credits), baby" S.
> Sadly, Jute still doesn't understand the difference between local
> weather and global climate change. How typical of his ilk.
Right back at ya, climate fraud artist apologist criminal...
--
All the perplexities, confusion, and distress in America arise,
not from defects in their Constitution or confederation, not
from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance
of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation,
John Adams
Such gracious goodwill to all men!
Andre Jute
Brandy for breakfast
He knows not what he does. I forgive him for not having a sense of
humour. It is too much to expect my hedgehog to forgive.
Tis the season of goodwill to all men with a 95% confidence rating.
According to first pie chart one comes to on that page, in the climate
sciences that's none. Ouch!
Andre Jute
The IPCC -- longest hand job in the history of mass hysteria -- has
now lasted almost twice as long as the Third Reich
Maybe its dead?
Like your proofreader?
Those things taste almost was good as Bald Eagle and Spotted Owl.
[...]
For shame you sniping anonymous sniper you! Ronald Reagan was so great
they named an Airport after him! There is no higher honor, with the
possible exception of receiving a Presidential pardon after being
bagged for lying to Congress. That's a *real* feather in one's Cap
Weinberger!
> On Dec 25, 5:50�pm, sam booka <Y...@email.com> wrote:
>> * Still Just Me * <noEmailto...@stillnodomainey.com> tapped the mic
>> and amongst other things, said, "Is this
>> on?"news:n2s9j5lfd9mhh2krno9s5ovb874
> f67...@4ax.com:
>>
>> > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:56:34 -0800 (PST), Andre Jute
>> > <fiult...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>Looked into the hole of our pet hedgehog, who hasn't been eating
>> >>his food since there's been ice on the ground. Poor animal has gone
>> >>into hibernation in its hole by the stables for the second year in
>> >>a row. Looks like even the little porcupines don't believe in the
>> >>global warming porkie any more. I hope it survives the winter. It
>> >>ain't young any more. -- Andre Jute
>>
>> > Sadly, Jute still doesn't understand the difference between local
>> > weather and global climate change. How typical of his ilk.
>>
>> Right back at ya, climate fraud artist apologist criminal...
>
> He knows not what he does. I forgive him for not having a sense of
> humour. It is too much to expect my hedgehog to forgive.
>
>> www.surfacestations.org
>
> Tis the season of goodwill to all men with a 95% confidence rating.
> According to first pie chart one comes to on that page, in the climate
> sciences that's none. Ouch!
>
> Andre Jute
> The IPCC -- longest hand job in the history of mass hysteria -- has
> now lasted almost twice as long as the Third Reich
>
Here's a pie chart we can all agree on:
http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=4239
Sorry, denialist lie site.
Laughed aloud at this from that entertaining site:
"In a scientific survey of Democrats, Democrat-leaning independents,
and nominal Republicans who vote Democratic, 71% of the respondents
were in favor of perpetual motion, 15% said it was the work of Satan,
and 14% said "what the hell does 'perpetual' mean?" When asked if they
thought perpetual motion would help or hurt the economy, 75% said
"help," 10% said "hurt," and 5% said "stop bothering me you a**hole."
These results were consistent across all ages, races and demographic
groups."
If global warming as practiced by the University of East Anglia CRU
and Michael Mann is "science", that sort of survey must surely also be
science! If you load the dice, of course the results will be exactly
what you loaded the dice for...
Andre Jute
Lies, damned lies -- and global warming
>
> [....] since EA CRU doesn't divulge how
> they 'massage' data and neither does NOAA. GISS makes 'some' UHI
> adjustment but don't explain it and are just as likely to adjust up as
> down. For the record, the UHI [urban heat island] effect *increases* temperature readings
> and there is no known mechanism by which it would 'cool' them so
> adjusting 'both ways' presents a conundrum.
>
> Hansen himself states "it is difficult to have confidence in the use
> of urban records for estimating climate change…some urban stations
> show little or no warming, even a slight cooling relative to rural
> neighbors."
>
> Damn problem, that "no warming." Obviously 'something wrong' with
> those.
>
> [......] Not that it would matter to EA CRU seeing how they simply
> threw out 40% of the Russian data, mostly rural because those damn
> things usually show cooler than nice warm cities, and 'value add',
> undocumented, whatever the hell they like anyway, and then throw the
> data away.
[.....]
> The quaint notion we have a 'real' global temperature record to the
> accuracy and certitude claimed is, thanks to the machinations of EA
> CRU, NOAA, and GISS, every bit as much a myth as 'flat earth'.
It will be a very big problem reconstructing that data after so many
years of cooking and the job can certainly not be given to Jones,
Mann, Briffa, Hansen or anyone associated with them or any institution
they were connected with. We should not forget that a study of climate
trends is probably a useful if minor science, and that it has every
right to be conducted if honestly done and reported. We should not
throw the baby out with the scummy bathwater. In fact, I can see a
bright future for many young climatologists, though the profession is
generally so tainted that it will probably be necessary for a decade
or two to keep on men like Lindzen and Christy and Gray long, long
after normal retirement age to provide a base of experience and not
least the respectability of their example of standing up to the tide
of dishonest hysteria that was global warming.
More generally, any paper that cites any climate "researcher" ever
associated with the IPCC is automatically suspect, though it should
not be too difficult to find the few good ones as any are suspect
which show the hockey stick in any context whatsoever: flip through
it, see the hockey stick, bin it. And the "scientists" who were dumb
enough to go along with the mass hysteria of global warming should be
punished according to the severity of their crimes, with dismissal
from all university posts for those who subverted the peer review
process, tried to suppress opposing papers, took part in the
persecutions of skeptics, or personally cooked data, all scientific
crimes of the most despicable soviet-fascist class, with lesser
punishments and abrogation of future promotion for those who were
merely gullible or stupid. "Scientists" who misused official
positions, especially if on the public dollar, to make false forecasts
to generate panic should be criminally prosecuted for fraud and
disturbances of the public order. "Scientists" who raised huge sums
of public monies on the basis of cooked data also committed fraud
against the taxpapayer and should be criminally prosecuted. It is
encouraging to see that Mann is under investigation, and one expects
many other similar investigations in the States, with charges
following. Unfortunately, in Britain the affair will be swept under
the carpet, with Jones and Briffa and others quietly taking early
retirement, unless someone at the Freedom of Information enforcers
gets balls and leans on the Crown Prosecution Service to bring them
before a judge for their crimes. Business executives who committed the
insider trading, dishonest advertising practices, failures of
disclosure, destruction of accounts, contortions of truth,
conspiracies against competitors, monopoly practices and so on (a list
that if complete would take several pages to render), would long, long
since have been in jail with the key thrown away.
Andre Jute
Reformed petrol head
Car-free since 1992
Greener than thou!
Posted last week on another thread, and completely ignored by the local warmie acolytes:
___________________________________________________
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=119745
And here's a C&P from that URL - plenty more of this
article is there...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Solomon revealed that Connolley, one man in the
nine-member team who is a U.K. scientist, a
software engineer and Green Party activist,
took control of Wikipedia's entries to see that
any trace of the true climate history would be erased.
Beginning in February 2003, Connolley rewrote
Wikipedia entries on global warming, the greenhouse
effect, the instrumental temperature record, the urban
heat island, on climate models and on global cooling,
according to the report. In February, he began editing
the Little Ice Age. By August, he began to rewrite
history without the Medieval Warm Period. In October,
he turned to the hockey-stick chart.
"He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming
and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band,"
Solomon explains. "Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two
of the world's most distinguished climate scientists,
were among his early targets, followed by others that
the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and
Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period."
Through his role as a Wikipedia administrator, Connolley
is said to have created or rewritten 5,428 unique
Wikipedia entries.
"When Connolley didn't like the subject of a certain
article, he removed it - more than 500 articles of
various descriptions disappeared at his hand," Solomon
wrote. "When he disapproved of the arguments that others
were making, he often had them barred - over 2,000
Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found
themselves blocked from making further contributions."
Meanwhile, followers who adhered to Connolley's climate
views "were rewarded with Wikipedia's blessings," Solomon
contends.
Through his control of the Wikipedia pages, Connolley is
said to have "turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing
of the global warming movement."
Facts about the Medieval Warm Period and criticism of
global warming doctrine were purportedly scrubbed from
Wikipedia's pages.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For fuck's sake, these people are *massively* crooked.
Shades of the old USSR, where people, events et al
were routinely chopped out of textbooks, magazines,
newspapers, movies, etc. to support that shenanegins
of the state. These fucktards should go to goddamn *jail*,
where they'll be safe when the whole civilized world
figures out what a monumental conjob this bogus climate
scam is. If they're not incarcerated, they're likely to
end up like Mussolini.
___________________________________________________
Of course, Wikipedia is the reference of choice for the AGA
practitioners of Global Warmism. I guess they're fairly sure
it's rigged in their favor, so why not, eh?
Lord Valve
Globally Cool
(Actually, freezin' me bloody arse off in Denver...I could
sure use some of that global warming right about now.)
Yes, I saw that. I was waiting for the global warmie faithful to
commit themselves before I said anything and was amazed that they just
shut up.
On RBT the same clowns who scoff at Wiki as useless for physics and
general engineering information think nothing of citing it as an
"approved" source for global warming informaton. Their hypocrisy is
striking.
The reason the usual global warmie impressionists didn't take up your
question is that they're shellshocked. They know Climategate is real.
They know Copenhagen was the beginning of the end for their political
hoax and scientific lie of global warming.
> Lord Valve
> Globally Cool
> (Actually, freezin' me bloody arse off in Denver...I could
> sure use some of that global warming right about now.)
Here in Ireland too. One degrees Celcius. I'm wondering what happened
to my fur coat.
Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/
"wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio
constructor"
John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare
"an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of
wisdom"
Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review
ROTFL See why I plonked Still Just Clueless? Hypocrisy and dishonesty are
his /better/ qualities. He's literally mentally ill (benefit of the doubt
given).
Bill "and don't get him started on the Jews" S.
> The really scary thing is people just like him are running the country
> now.
>
Gotta be careful on 'em too. They just had a shrink on Fox analyzing the
gaunch bomber. He was an antisocial loser type that buddied up with
idiots on the internet after being bztch slapped by every kid and his
dog. He/she/it may be only a few idiotic "Blame Bush" posts away from
snapping and donning locked and loaded "Fruit-O'-The-Lo0ns" in Amsterdam.
Bettter put him on a "Gaunch Spud" watch. :p
Plonk is supposed to mean ignore.
Which part of your behavior comports with "ignoring" him?
Hmm.
Poor Bill. May (or may not) have dropped the bottle, but ... just
never addressed the (innumerable) underlying issues, huh?
Happy New Year, regardless!
Signed: One of the Jews
The Sornson "plonk":
Today's scandalous revelation (one of many):
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177.ece
Gee...bullshitting scientists. Who'd'a thunk it?
The global warming assholes are poised to take their
final swirl down the shitter of history...and none of 'em
will admit it. After all...who wants to give up shindigs
like Copenhagen, or the opportunity to squeeze the
ordinary folks with carbon taxes?
Fuck 'em, they're goin' down.
Lord Valve
Globally Cool in Denver
> So much for 'peer review', so much for 'due diligence', so much for
> 'settled science', so much credibility and so much assigning 90%
> 'likelihood' to a freaking ad hoc speculation that they got wrong to
> begin with.
>
> The Three Stooges, hi we're morons. were more competent than the IPCC.
How dare you compare the Stooges to the IPCC?
The Stooges are fuckin' *rocket scientists* compared to
those bullshit artists...jeez...
I especially loved the bit where Professor Lal, the fellow in charge
of the IPCC 2007 chapter on glaciers, admits that he doesn't know much
about glaciers. So much for the IPCC's self-vaunted 'expertise'.
Presumably Lal was appointed because the IPCC knew he would not
scruple to take an unfounded speculation from a 'grey source' (i.e.
NOT peer reviewed) and expand it from a single glacier to a whole
mountain range melting.
> The Three Stooges, hi we're morons. were more competent than the IPCC.
To compare the Three Stooges, hugely competent and entertaining
comedians, to those self-righteous, pompous, offensive, ineffective,
counterproductive bumblers in the IPCC is gratuitously offensive to
the Three Stooges.
> I contacted Moe through a medium and he said it was OK.
Well - at least that's got more science behind it than AGW.
LV
where's he live ? We have a gallon of used gasoline.
My understanding is that Santa lives at the north pole and that he
uses reindeer, so he would have little use for 'a gallon of used
gasoline'.
>> where's he live ? We have a gallon of used gasoline.
> My understanding is that Santa lives at the north pole and that he
> uses reindeer, so he would have little use for 'a gallon of used
> gasoline'.
Is there ANY use for ANY quantity of "used" gasoline?
Bill "other than fumes" S.
If you only used it to clean a chain, it might still run your Subaru.
FIRE IN THE HOLE!
--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007