The notable part of that link is Dr Dezsak, quoted in 2015,
warning of a 'clear and present danger' regarding Gain of
Function[1] in this group of viruses.
I've linked other science press[2] articles on the subject
here over the past 18 months or so. This from February 2017
for example:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21487
Starting in 2013 these projects hit the science press. In
2014 some warnings or misgivings were published, as above.
Also in 2014, many countries including USA & France banned
this sort of work both on practical[3] and legal[4] grounds.
Shortly thereafter the French built the Wuhan lab for the
CCP/PLA and were involved in research/production and,
imoprtantly, the results and data so derived. Dr Fauci
approved CDC funding[5] for the CCP Wuhan Virus Plant
through an entity controlled by Dezsak, who was also
involved in the research and also obtained data and results.
In this way, both governments were legally[6] not doing
prohibited bioweapons production and research when in fact
they were exactly doing bioweapons production and research.
We've discussed all this here, with web links, for a year
and a half. I hope that was clear enough. If not, do a web
search for wuhan virus lab and any year from 2013 through
2019. A great many publications are still not deleted.
But do write some naive comment again about the little
angels at the CCP PLA. Extra points for including 'orange
man bad' in any post.
[1] euphemism for 'design/manipulate a virus to enhance
contagion'.
[2] Regular science publications, not Screwy Louie Farrakhan
or Alex Jones. Many are be4hind paywalls.
[3]By error or intent, one might kill millions relatively
easily & quickly. This is not news, see 2014 article.
[4]Government departments viewed this area as a probable
violation of bioweapons treaties. China doesn't sign
treaties generally and roundly ignores where convenient or
interesting.
[5]Originally denied that fact, then admitted funding
something like $150K but it's actually some large number,
reportedly $3,400,000, a subject of FOIA disclosure suits.
[6]'plausible deniability' = the phrase that pays.